main
Report a problem

Bill to restrict internet wrong approach: experts

Slimy   on 22 April 2007 - 19:59 · 29 comments & 6613 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Joy Smith, a Conservative MP representing Kildonan-St. Paul, introduced her proposed clean internet act, or Bill C-427, which would allow the government new powers while imposing restrictions and penalties on internet users and operators. The bill's full name is: "An act to prevent the use of the internet to distribute child pornography, material that advocates, promotes or incites racial hatred, and material that portrays or promotes violence against women." The bill's provisions would grant the industry minister special powers to search data as well as the ability to order an internet service provider to block access to content deemed inappropriate. It would force ISPs to exclude service to convicted offenders, and leave company officials facing jail time for failing to comply with some provisions.

While the goals are largely admirable, the approach is wrong-headed, some experts say. "This is not well thought out. I don't think anything is going to happen with this bill given how it's inconsistent with the government's approach," said Ottawa University law professor Michael Geist. The bill even includes an ISP licensing system "that is so broad, it would include even a local store with a Wi-Fi connection." Sam Punnett, a consultant who has advised governments on formulating internet policies, echoed Geist's concerns. "The sentiment's right, but the practicality is out to lunch," said Punnett, president of Toronto-based FAD Research Incorporated.

News source: CBC News

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 29 additional comments
(7 replies) #1 Baptist on 22 Apr 2007 - 20:02
Did anybody think this was about bill gates? when you saw the title?
#1.1 SimFreaker3243 on 22 Apr 2007 - 20:08
Yeah I did as well.
#1.2 Phil1208 on 22 Apr 2007 - 20:08
Quote - (Baptist said @ #1)
Did anybody think this was about bill gates? when you saw the title?


yep
#1.3 gohankid77 on 22 Apr 2007 - 20:23
Quote - (Baptist said @ #1)
Did anybody think this was about bill gates? when you saw the title?

Ja, especially since a previous article recently posted dealt with Bill Gates.
#1.4 Night.Hawk on 22 Apr 2007 - 21:28
Yep. This article's title is worded oddly.
#1.5 Windam on 23 Apr 2007 - 00:05
Quote - (Night.Hawk said @ #1.4)
Yep. This article's title is worded oddly.


lol I did too
#1.6 SacrificialSoldier on 23 Apr 2007 - 00:28
Also did.
#1.7 EchoNoise on 23 Apr 2007 - 03:14
Ditto
(2 replies) #2 +Hell-In-A-Handbasket on 22 Apr 2007 - 20:13
this bill would also give the government the ability to limit access/arrest anybody going to websites that conflict with its interests.


AKA like China Does already
#2.1 Co_Co on 22 Apr 2007 - 20:37
where does it say that? by inappropriate they mean specified illegal acts under the Criminal Code of Canada.
The bill won't be passed as there are already many laws regarding soliciting violence, hate, racism and their meaning have been extended to include internet means of distribution and this bill is too vague and overreaching.

I'm not worried at all if this gets passed either, there are prudent and stringent measures when rights are going to be infringed upon by the government.
#2.2 +Hell-In-A-Handbasket on 22 Apr 2007 - 20:57
Quote -
The bill's provisions would grant the industry minister special powers to search data as well as the ability to order an internet service provider to block access to content deemed inappropriate.


Who decides whats " Inappropriate ", and the government can deem whatever it wants inappropriate to itself. aka what it doesnt want us looking at, it will deem it inappropriate, and block it.

and the ISP licensing can shut down the ISP's that dont comply with what the government wants blocked, coupled with the jail time for the ISP provisions.



Quote - (Co_Co said @ #2.1)
where does it say that? by inappropriate they mean specified illegal acts under the Criminal Code of Canada.
The bill won't be passed as there are already many laws regarding soliciting violence, hate, racism and their meaning have been extended to include internet means of distribution and this bill is too vague and overreaching.

I'm not worried at all if this gets passed either, there are prudent and stringent measures when rights are going to be infringed upon by the government.
(2 replies) #3 The Tjalian on 22 Apr 2007 - 20:26
Looks like 50,000 Porn Websites just got screwed.
#3.1 Co_Co on 22 Apr 2007 - 20:38
I would be very worried if there were 50 000 child porn websites floating around available to Canadian citizens.
#3.2 thenay on 23 Apr 2007 - 01:49
Quote - (Co_Co said @ #3.1)
I would be very worried if there were 50 000 child porn websites floating around available to Canadian citizens.


I would be worried in general if anyone would have access to them, not just canadians.
And I also thought this related to Bill Gates... lol.. title threw me off.
(5 replies) #4 Primexx on 22 Apr 2007 - 20:42
So many idiot lawmakers making even more idiotic laws in the US. EVERY.****ING.DAY!
#4.1 +chconline on 22 Apr 2007 - 22:08
... Except if you actually read the article, it's about Canada. Since when was Canada USA?
#4.2 Croquant on 22 Apr 2007 - 22:22
Quote - (chconline said @ #4.1)
... Except if you actually read the article, it's about Canada. Since when was Canada USA?

Since Mulrooney sold us to the Americans with his "Free Trade" sell-out.
#4.3 The_Decryptor on 22 Apr 2007 - 23:52
Funny, we are supposed to be getting a copy of the DMCA here, due to the Free Trade agreement we got with the US.

Why do they seem to favor the US?
#4.4 Primexx on 23 Apr 2007 - 02:40
Quote - (chconline said @ #4.1)
... Except if you actually read the article, it's about Canada. Since when was Canada USA?


Hm...didnt pick that up, in any case it's still stupid. I'm going to see what I could do about it.
#4.5 MrCobra on 23 Apr 2007 - 09:45
Quote - (Primexx said @ #4)
So many idiot lawmakers making even more idiotic laws in the US. EVERY.****ING.DAY!

Grow up already.
#5 LTD on 22 Apr 2007 - 22:28
Unconstitutional.
#6 drygnfyre on 23 Apr 2007 - 00:37
I hope this fails miserably.
#7 GEIST on 23 Apr 2007 - 00:59
But portraying and promoting violence against males is all good as usual. Word.
Gender biased persons can stay the **** out of Internet power business.
#8 Mystnight on 23 Apr 2007 - 01:11
That preacher guy who blamed microsoft for it, will now change his opinion, and now blame eBay
#9 zivan56 on 23 Apr 2007 - 02:32
Another conservative redneck trying to police the world. Please call an election already...
#10 +Kirkburn on 23 Apr 2007 - 02:48
CANADA. Since some people haven't noticed yet.

Please, when you post stories like this, SAY THE COUNTRY IT APPLIES TO. Argh.

Meanwhile "material that portrays or promotes violence against women". Lovely, nice to see sexism still going strong.
#11 EchoNoise on 23 Apr 2007 - 03:15
Ohhh Canada...
#12 Orange on 23 Apr 2007 - 06:34
Same here i thought it was on billl gates
#13 invalidbuffalo on 24 Apr 2007 - 01:59
Yeah I thought it was Bill Gates...

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)