main
Report a problem

Researchers Break Internet Speed Records

Slimy   on 24 April 2007 - 22:29 · 18 comments & 7761 views

Advertisement (Why?)
At the Internet2 consortium's spring meeting in Arlington, Virginia, it was publically announced that a group of researchers led by the University of Tokyo had broken Internet speed records – twice in two days. On December 30, researchers sent data at 7.67 gigabits per second, using standard communications protocols. The next day, using modified protocols, the team broke the record again by sending data over the same 20,000-mile path at 9.08 Gbps. Researchers used the IPv6 Internet addressing system to break the records in December. Data started in Tokyo and went to Chicago, Amsterdam and Seattle before returning to Tokyo.

The previous high of 6.96 Gbps was set in November 2005. Speed records under the older addressing system, IPv4, are in a separate category and stand at 8.8 Gbps, set in February 2006. Rules require a 10% improvement for recognition, a percentage that would bring the next record right at the Internet2's current theoretical limit of 10 Gbps. Not willing to give up, the Internet2 consortium is planning to build a new network with a capacity of 100 Gbps. The Internet2 is run by a consortium of more than 200 U.S. universities. It is currently working to merge with another ultrahigh-speed, next-generation network, called National LambdaRail.

News source: Physorg

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 18 additional comments
#1 MR_Candyman on 24 Apr 2007 - 22:39
bring this kind of technology to a mass-market, cheap, home use, please
#2 eAi on 25 Apr 2007 - 00:12
Think what happens to the movie/music industry if this ever gets into consumer hands. Whole movies downloaded in a second or so, your whole music library in a couple...

Of course, lots of legal and illegal potential!
(2 replies) #3 Croquant on 25 Apr 2007 - 00:43
Meanwhile, many people still have to put up with 30kbps download speeds.
#3.1 darthyoda6 on 25 Apr 2007 - 04:09
Gee, compared to my 4kbps, that's so shameful .
#3.2 backslash on 25 Apr 2007 - 21:41
4kbps < 30kbps. I take it you meant 4Mbps. Common mistake, but it sure makes you look stupid.
#4 vetmarkjensen on 25 Apr 2007 - 01:02
The previous internet speed record: The time it took from creation of a thread with a Vista problem to the first troll that said "Vista sux".

It is hard to be faster than the trolls.
(2 replies) #5 Ravensworth on 25 Apr 2007 - 01:33
Quote -
7.67 gigabits per second


Can you even imagine? Then again I can remember when the thought of having dial-up internet in my home was a dream, rather than staying late at school to use it. Then DSL came along and that was a crazy fantasy, having a fast 24 hour connection that didn't tie up the phone. Now I take it for granted. Still, being able to download nearly 8 GB in a second blows my mind.
#5.1 PCyr on 25 Apr 2007 - 04:47
FYI: b=bit, B=byte... 1B=8b. So it's 8gigabits, not 8gigabytes. A 5MB MP3 would take 8 seconds to download at 5Mb/s.

Funny though, I work for a company that does the promotional sales for most of the major ISPs in the US, and almost everyone says x megabytes per second, not realizing that they are saying a speed 8 times faster than what the customer is actually getting. lol if the consumers knew though, that would be one big lawsuit.
#5.2 Ravensworth on 25 Apr 2007 - 16:16
Yeah, I wasn't paying attention I guess.
(2 replies) #6 Windam on 25 Apr 2007 - 02:15
What's preventing broadband companies from increasing the bandwidth? Are they just trying to squeeze every dime and nickle at the consumer? I mean UK and Japan have far superior speeds compared to ours.. that's pretty shameful
#6.1 RAID 0 on 25 Apr 2007 - 02:22
From what I've heard, the cost is higher than here in the US. I would love to have a connection faster than my 1 meg a sec. Where I live, it's my only option other than satellite. Then again.. just 4 miles down the road, you can get 20 meg/sec for less than I pay now. Frontier sucks!
#6.2 Max™ on 25 Apr 2007 - 14:07
The problem with the UK being that a large portion of people are on ADSL, which uses the 40 year old phone network down a copper wire to communicate. That copper wire can only do a maximum of 8mb - so about a 700/800Kbps download speed. It cannot be increased.
#7 Stetson on 25 Apr 2007 - 02:48
Quote - (Ravensworth said @ #5)
Can you even imagine? Then again I can remember when the thought of having dial-up internet in my home was a dream, rather than staying late at school to use it. Then DSL came along and that was a crazy fantasy, having a fast 24 hour connection that didn't tie up the phone. Now I take it for granted. Still, being able to download nearly 8 GB in a second blows my mind.


That's 8 gigabits, not 8 gigabytes.

#8 Sp3ctranova on 25 Apr 2007 - 03:55
Quote -
National LambdaRail.


Maybe they can use the Lambda reactor complex to power it

λ
#9 Praeses on 25 Apr 2007 - 06:25
*strokes his 384Kb "broadband" which costs $80 per month with a 3GB cap and cries*
#10 10010 on 25 Apr 2007 - 20:26
#11 backslash on 25 Apr 2007 - 21:31
Does anyone actually have a disk system that can take advantage of such speed? No. This sort of technology will be limited to backbones and server farms. Although it would be nice to have the weak link be something else besides your internet connection. In this case your Dual 10k RPM Raptors in RAID 0 would be your "weak link". It actually sounds quite pathetic.
#12 Davo on 26 Apr 2007 - 00:17
That's pretty awesome. Right now I have 5 Mbps. I used to have 15 Mbps but that was just ridiculous but for only $50 I might go back sometime.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)