Michael Howard here. A core tenet of the SDL is to take and incorporate lessons learned when we issue a security update, and there is a great deal to learn from the recent animated cursor bug, MS07-017, so I want to spend a few minutes to go over some of the things we have learned from this bug.
First of all, this code is pretty old; is in Windows 2000, and predates the SDL. The SDL has parts (i.e., design review, threat modeling, testing, and security push) that focus on the product as a whole, and parts (i.e., code review and use of tools) that are focused on code. In the Windows Vista process, we banned certain APIs, like strcpy and strncpy, and changed well over 140,000 calls to use safer calls. memcpy wasn’t on that list. We also built in a lot of defense-in-depth measures because we know that the SDL can’t catch everything. Let’s start by looking at some of the defense-in-depth measures we have in place that didn’t stop the threat
View: The full story
News source: MSDN Blog
First of all, this code is pretty old; is in Windows 2000, and predates the SDL. The SDL has parts (i.e., design review, threat modeling, testing, and security push) that focus on the product as a whole, and parts (i.e., code review and use of tools) that are focused on code. In the Windows Vista process, we banned certain APIs, like strcpy and strncpy, and changed well over 140,000 calls to use safer calls. memcpy wasn’t on that list. We also built in a lot of defense-in-depth measures because we know that the SDL can’t catch everything. Let’s start by looking at some of the defense-in-depth measures we have in place that didn’t stop the threat
View: The full story News source: MSDN Blog
strncpy does not automatically append a NULL-terminator to the destination in all cases.
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.