Microsoft Corporation Chairman Bill Gates announced the software giant has sold nearly 40 million Windows Vista licenses in the first 100 days since commercial availability on January 30, making Microsoft’s latest release the fastest-selling operating system in history. Gates noted that Home Premium editions accounted for 78% of Vista sales. Gates also confirmed rumours that Microsoft’s next-generation Windows Server software (codename Longhorn Server) would be named Windows Server 2008. Microsoft, which controlled an estimated two-thirds of the global server software maker in 2006, has said the product is on track for a debut in the second half of 2007. The company also said three new hardware manufacturers (Gateway Incorporated, Lacie and Medion) plan to build products for Windows Home Server.
News source: InformationWeek
















Have it, it rocks.
It's been more anti-Vista than usual in light of this new flamefest of words and legal action between Microsoft and the Linux community.
Just wondering how many legal and illegal users of Vista there are altogether really in a 1-on-1 comparison
*cough*PARADOX*cough*
It is? Actually its rather trivial to circumvent the Vista activation methods. Most pirates are sticking with XP because the common consensus is that Vista sucks and isn't even worth stealing.
back in the topic; that's good news, I think Vista will become mainstream faster than XP.
Truth be told, I agree. Vista will become mainstream faster than XP. Part of that has to due that XP at the time was a very MINOR upgrade over Windows 2000 (NT 5.0 to NT 5.1). Vista is a monumental upgrade that IMO is not quite ready for mainstream just yet, but in about 5-6 months, I believe it'll be on nearly as many home computers as XP.
MS will eventually lose their market position and something else will take over, say 15 years from now. Or more. Until then, they serve businesses just fine.
As for the lifetime span of Microsoft,it will take much more than 15 years to dissapear,i think ull be dead when that happens
Stick with linux,let the happy people stick with windows.
Wonder how many of those Vista licenses are really in use?
Very true, and at customer request, no less. When is the last time you heard of Dell customers getting so fired up over the fact they couldn't get a 5+ year old OS installed instead of the new one MS put out. Was Windows ME even met with such hostility? And since Vista will be replaced in two years, much like ME was...whats the rush to get this turd right now?
Yep
I think Microsoft will never do a public beta with another OS though, because it's got such bad press with users getting Vista Beta's and RC's confused with RTM. The RC's always crashed on me, the RTM runs flawlessly.
I think Microsoft will never do a public beta with another OS though, because it's got such bad press with users getting Vista Beta's and RC's confused with RTM. The RC's always crashed on me, the RTM runs flawlessly.
MS needs to set new standards on specifically who can apply for their future OS testing programs. Vista's beta testing, while seen as unprecedented in how open MS made it for people to offer feedback, bugs, and suggestions, was overly littered with random people jumping in through invites they cried for in forums, plus signing in with Live IDs that have false birthdates set on their profiles. I am not implying that teenagers be barred from testing (despite that I am technically no longer under that age group), as there are certain teens that are honest and resourceful, as you can see from some Neowinians that post in the forums. However, there's a sheer number of them that drop all responsibilities in their position as beta testers by acting all egoistic and cool, they use the beta OS for one day and immediately uninstall it, and they go back onto forums and trash talk about MS.
They should scrap the point-and-click questionnaires and instead make people write a 500 word essay on why they should be accepted. Because honestly, this is supposed to be deciding on who to elect into a beta program, not collect more statistics for their own benefit.
They should scrap the point-and-click questionnaires and instead make people write a 500 word essay on why they should be accepted. Because honestly, this is supposed to be deciding on who to elect into a beta program, not collect more statistics for their own benefit.
Wow, write an essay! I haven't written an essay for more than 7 years I believe
Scirwode
I disagree... MS doesn't just do an open beta forum, they have much smaller groups of beta teams which performs complete actual tests on the OS. The open beta forum is used for multiple reasons. For example, it helps Microsoft gain an idea of how well the OS is going to fair with the average user. It also started alot of talk about the OS, good and bad, but the name is out there.
http://www.itfacts.biz/index.php?id=P8376
[edit] I'm also assuming that every Windows Vista license came with a new PC. I know this isn't the case, which makes Microsoft's numbers even worse.
If anything, there should be a hoop MORE copies of Vista being "sold"...
And XP = awesome.
Last edited by Chad on 16 May 2007 - 15:48
Last edited by Chad on 16 May 2007 - 15:49
All things considered, Vista is having a much worse launch than XP did.
No, you're slanting the data. I'm sure there were XP promotions when it came out too that they counted in those sales and such like that. They are comparing launches that had nearly the same conditions and Vista's lauch has come out better than the rest. You're trying to make something of nothing.
The easiest way to put it is like this:
Copies that were sold in pre-launch promotions: happened in Vista, not sure but probably happened with XP
Copies bundles with PCs, happened with both Vista and XP
Copies sent to MS and other misc employees and such: happened with Vista and XP
etc, etc.
The comparison for sales for the launches are identical and vista come out on top no matter which way you try and slant gates' data.
-Spenser
Last edited by Chad on 16 May 2007 - 15:52
All things considered, Vista is having a much worse launch than XP did.
No, you're slanting the data. I'm sure there were XP promotions when it came out too that they counted in those sales and such like that. They are comparing launches that had nearly the same conditions and Vista's lauch has come out better than the rest. You're trying to make something of nothing.
The easiest way to put it is like this:
Copies that were sold in pre-launch promotions: happened in Vista, not sure but probably happened with XP
Copies bundles with PCs, happened with both Vista and XP
Copies sent to MS and other misc employees and such: happened with Vista and XP
etc, etc.
The comparison for sales for the launches are identical and vista come out on top no matter which way you try and slant gates' data.
-Spenser
I'm pretty sure your also counting the number of ppl who wiped off vista from their brand new desktop/laptop and installed their old copy of WinXP ... right? ofcourse you are ... in case youre missing my point... did all these 40 million buyers actually "wanted" to buy Vista or "had" to buy vista
Last edited by Chad on 16 May 2007 - 15:54
PS: I'm pretty sure your also counting the number of ppl who wiped off vista from their brand new desktop/laptop and installed their old copy of WinXP ... right? ofcourse you are ... in case youre missing my point... did all these 40 million buyers actually "wanted" to buy Vista or "had" to buy vista (yes I know later on some ppl got refunds ... and you'll probably call them "idiots" because of that).
If you honestly think that most people who ended up with Vista have deleted it, you're bogus, but in such a case, C++'s comment comes into play in that Microsoft still got the money for it so it makes no difference anyhow.
-Spenser
If you honestly think that most people who ended up with Vista have deleted it, you're bogus, but in such a case, C++'s comment comes into play in that Microsoft still got the money for it so it makes no difference anyhow.
-Spenser
<snip>
Last edited by Chad on 16 May 2007 - 15:56
<snip>
Last edited by Chad on 16 May 2007 - 15:59
Last edited by Chad on 16 May 2007 - 15:57
Last edited by Chad on 16 May 2007 - 15:58
it would be more impressive if 40 million actually went out and bought it for themselves rather than getting it on a new machine, that says more.
-Spenser
Anti-MS Linux users? no way not possible lol
Doubt that.
Is this numbers for real? I couldn't imagine. I had Windows server once and after several days someone hacked and formated it...
And thats the underlining nobody seems to get. Windows as an OS is very, very stable. It isn't until you install additional third-party (and sometimes even Microsoft software) that the OS becomes unstable; This is especially true for drivers... however Vista should help with that too.
//sarcasm
Yeah there are probably over 300 copies now sold in china
//sarcasm
Last edited by CoolBits on 16 May 2007 - 05:53
__________________________________
http://www.vdownload.org/
Windows _____?
Fast
Less Resource
More compatible
Cheap
Ugly.
Security depend in users.
Windows _____?
Slow
Resource hog
Least compatible.
Expensive
Nice eyecandies.
Security depend in users but windows ask for every "dangerous" task.
______?
Can be fast or average.
Can be from less resource to average.
Not compatible nativelly.
Free.
Ugly can be "patched" for a less ugly (but slow) interface.
Security depend in a correct configuration.
______?
Average.
resource hog.
Not compatible.
Expensive.
Pretty.
Security depend much in the factory default also in a correct configuration.
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.