main

Intel Fights Back Workstation Market from AMD

Daniel Fleshbourne   on 14 June 2007 - 10:18 · 13 comments & 4145 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Advanced Micro Devices’ positions in the market of workstations have never been really strong primarily due to the fact that not a lot of system builders used AMD’s chips in business-oriented personal computers. While along with popularization of AMD Opteron processors the company’s market share began to increase slowly, the introduction of new dual-core and quad-core Intel Xeon processors have managed to fight nearly everything back.

Back in Q2 2006 the market share of uni-processor (UP) and dual-processor (DP) AMD Opteron workstations was 3.6% and 13.3%, respectively, which was not even close to Intel’s 96.4% and 86.7%, but still was historically highest. But then Intel introduced its Core 2 micro-architecture along with dual-core as well as quad-core processors and started to fight back the lost share, which lead to logical results: Intel Xeon chips commanded 98% of UP and 92% of DP workstations in Q1 2007, whereas AMD Opteron central processing units could be found only in 2% of single-processor and 8% of dual-processor workstation systems, a report from Jon Peddie Research estimates.

View: The full story
News source: Xbit Labs

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 13 additional comments
#1 yudi_lks on 14 Jun 2007 - 11:13
Poor AMD
#2 yudi_lks on 14 Jun 2007 - 11:13
Double post
#3 [bear] on 14 Jun 2007 - 11:50
thats rough.. 98% ouch
(2 replies) #4 antsy on 14 Jun 2007 - 12:57
The reason Intel do so well is cos everybody has herd of them because of TV ads, why don't AMD do a TV ad?
#4.1 diso25 on 14 Jun 2007 - 14:38
Quote - (antsy said @ #4)
The reason Intel do so well is cos everybody has herd of them because of TV ads, why don't AMD do a TV ad?
No the reason Intel is doing so well is that AMD has nothing to compete with Intel CORE 2 Duo. I mean INTEL is destroying AMD. AMD better hurry up and come up with something....
#4.2 antsy on 14 Jun 2007 - 22:36
Quote - (diso25 said @ #4.1)
Quote - (antsy said @ #4)
The reason Intel do so well is cos everybody has herd of them because of TV ads, why don't AMD do a TV ad?
No the reason Intel is doing so well is that AMD has nothing to compete with Intel CORE 2 Duo. I mean INTEL is destroying AMD. AMD better hurry up and come up with something....


I was talking historically, not just at the current, I thought that was obvious
(3 replies) #5 Croquant on 14 Jun 2007 - 13:52
No, the reason that Intel is doing so well is that their Xeons simply kick ass.
#5.1 diso25 on 14 Jun 2007 - 14:35
No the reason Intel is doing so well is that AMD has nothing to compete with Intel CORE 2 Duo. I mean INTEL is destroying AMD. AMD better hurry up and come up with something....
#5.2 Andre on 14 Jun 2007 - 15:25
Quote - (diso25 said @ #5.1)
No the reason Intel is doing so well is that AMD has nothing to compete with Intel CORE 2 Duo. I mean INTEL is destroying AMD. AMD better hurry up and come up with something....

They will. Pre-Athlon era was far worse than it is right now. Everybody should chill and wait.
#5.3 [bear] on 14 Jun 2007 - 21:12
Quote - (diso25 said @ #5.1)
No the reason Intel is doing so well is that AMD has nothing to compete with Intel CORE 2 Duo. I mean INTEL is destroying AMD. AMD better hurry up and come up with something....


diso25 did you even read this article? It's about the Xeon processors. Troll.
#6 LTD on 14 Jun 2007 - 15:57
I remember the mighty Athlon (32-bit) . . . I miss those days. The T-bird, T-bred, Palomino, etc. Oh well . . .
#7 majortom1981 on 14 Jun 2007 - 19:50
AMD has to come up with something fast. especially with intel starting to put the memory controller in the cpu like amd ( i think starting with the next ver of the extreme edition) .
#8 ishtar on 14 Jun 2007 - 20:06
Oh my this is the end of AMD oh no The sky is falling.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)