main

'Italian job' attacks spread worldwide

Daniel Fleshbourne   on 19 June 2007 - 13:19 · 11 comments & 3743 views

Advertisement (Why?)
A coordinated series of web-based attacks that began last week in Italy is quickly expanding and has now infected 10,000 websites around the world. When security researchers first noticed the threat, it has affected 1,000 English language websites with the Italian '.it' domain. By Monday, however, the attack had gone worldwide and had drawn the attention of the FBI. The attackers are using known exploits in web server applications to post attack code on third-party websites. The actual attack is carried out when a user visits a compromised site.

The site redirects the user to another server that runs MPack, a web-based attack tool that delivers an exploit specially designed to target flaws in each user's web browser. The exploit installs spyware and a key-logger. Traffic is bounced from the compromised sites to a server in the San Francisco area which then redirects to the attack server which is currently located in Chicago, according to Paul Ferguson, a network architect at security vendor Trend Micro. Ferguson noted that the San Francisco server uses an IP address registered to a Hong Kong entity, and is hosted by a company that is notoriously slow in responding to complaints about illegal activities on its network.

View: The full story
News source: Vnunet

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 11 additional comments
(2 replies) #1 SHADOW-XIII on 19 Jun 2007 - 14:50
but still, not all web browser will be easly attacked with the exploit, right ?
ie ok, ff maybe, opera unlikely ... other ?
#1.1 [deXter] on 19 Jun 2007 - 15:16
Yes, unlikely that it would affect Opera.

Opera currently has 0 holes : http://secunia.com/product/10615/

Oh and btw, it's Fx, not ff.
#1.2 vetmarkjensen on 19 Jun 2007 - 22:08
Quote - [deXter
said,#1.1]Yes, unlikely that it would affect Opera.

Opera currently has 0 holes : http://secunia.com/product/10615/

Oh and btw, it's Fx, not ff.
No need to get worked up over an abbreviation that was pretty obvious what it was intended to designate.

Oh, and your link seems to be 404.
(1 reply) #2 OblivionStalker on 19 Jun 2007 - 15:42
Use Firefox and you will be safe.
#2.1 [deXter] on 19 Jun 2007 - 16:04
Secunia.com lists Firefox as still having 5 unpatched vulnerabilities: http://secunia.com/product/12434/
(3 replies) #3 LaXu on 19 Jun 2007 - 16:10
Considering how much info there is of the attack you'd think they could send the cops to bust the hosting company if they don't comply with taking down the attack server. Especially in a case that has an effect on so many websites and users.

PS. "Fx" generally stands for "effects" so no matter how much Mozilla tries to change this, "FF" has become the standard abbreviation for Firefox.
#3.1 [deXter] on 19 Jun 2007 - 16:41
Effects = FX not Fx

It doesn't make sense calling FF as firefox. If Firefox were called FireFox or Fire Fox, FF would make sense. Although FF might seem more natural, it's grammatically inappropriate.
#3.2 vetmarkjensen on 19 Jun 2007 - 22:12
Quote - [deXter
said,#3.1]Effects = FX not Fx

It doesn't make sense calling FF as firefox. If Firefox were called FireFox or Fire Fox, FF would make sense. Although FF might seem more natural, it's grammatically inappropriate.
Another "fx" vs "ff" post? And this one arguing that using the first and last letters makes more sense than using the normal first-letter abbreviations from a compound word.

So, abbreviating "download" makes more sense as "dd", not "dl"?
And "Microsoft" also makes more sense as "MT", as opposed to "MS"?

Suuuure.
#3.3 whocares78 on 21 Jun 2007 - 01:21
are yo people on drugs, who really givesa crap what anyone abbreviates it to, geta life
#4 hvy on 19 Jun 2007 - 16:46
Thanks for keeping these IPs a secret Symantec and Trend Micro. That way no one will be able to block them with firewall and they will further propogate.
#5 mitt on 19 Jun 2007 - 18:26
Quote -
... and is hosted by a company that is notoriously slow in responding to complaints about illegal activities on its network.

Well then get those critters offline! If this is turning into a global problem, there is no reason for the authorities to have patience with those people.. 10 000 websites is already too much
Also I don't know about how secure is FF about this by looking at this article, it shows FF as a vector too:
http://blogs.pandasoftware.com/blogs/panda...ered_2100_.aspx

Is there a way to disable IFRAME support in FF ?

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)