main

AMD to launch new high-end desktop processor

Daniel Fleshbourne   on 24 July 2007 - 12:55 · 11 comments & 4876 views

Advertisement (Why?)
AMD is preparing to launch a new high-end desktop processor, the Athlon 64 X2 6400+, which will be the last processor in the Athlon 64 X2 family, according to sources at motherboard makers. Currently, AMD's highest-end desktop processor is the Athlon 64 X2 6000+, however with its performance unable to match Intel's upcoming Core 2 Duo E6850, AMD plans to launch the new 6400+ to cover up the gap in the market, noted the sources.

The 6400+ will have a core frequency of 3.2GHz and 2MB L2 cache, noted the sources. Pricing will range between US$220-248, they added. AMD has already sent processor samples to motherboard makers in order to allow them to update their BIOSes. The processor is predicted to ship shortly, added the sources.

View: The full story
News source: DigiTimes

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 11 additional comments
#1 Shof on 24 Jul 2007 - 13:03
Whoa, finally a dual core 3.2ghz with a big l2 cache
(1 reply) #2 Croquant on 24 Jul 2007 - 13:05
We'll just see if it outperforms the E6850. Show me the benchmarks!
#2.1 nekrosoft13 on 25 Jul 2007 - 02:08
HAHA!!

2.4ghz C2D beats a 3.0ghz AMD, 6400+ has no chance against E6850
#3 Chicane-UK on 24 Jul 2007 - 15:43
Nice. Prices aren't too heavy either!

How does the X2 6000+ compare with Intels offerings? I know that, generally the Core2Duo has the X2 pegged clock for clock but just interested to know peoples experiences. I just upgraded to a 3800+ X2 and liking it so far but with the 6000+ being so cheap, i'd be tempted to spring for one of those sooner rather than later!
#4 lnxpro on 24 Jul 2007 - 19:06
I am not familiar with Intel performance as i've been building desktop PCs with AMD processors for over 8 years now. But i have the 6000+ processor with 4 GB DDR2 dual channel ram and dual SLI 7800 GT video cards and this machine flies. Picked up the 6000+ a few months ago at fry's electronics as an awesome deal with a crappy montherboard which i threw away, but got it for $159. and at that time the CPU itself was $249. so $100 cheaper.

the 6400+ doesn;t seem too expensive and has a hefty L2 cache. Can;t wait to get that.
(2 replies) #5 phiberoptik on 24 Jul 2007 - 20:22
Charts to compare the 6000+ to the Core2 6850 as requested Chicane-UK

Prey - http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu_2007.htm...2&chart=425

WinRAR- http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu_2007.htm...2&chart=434

HDTV Playback - http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu_2007.htm...2&chart=441

Cinema 4D - http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu_2007.htm...2&chart=436

3d Studio - http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu_2007.htm...2&chart=435

Just picked 5 random tests, and they all show the Intel chip beats the AMD by 20-30 seconds or 20-30 FPS, which ever is applicable to the test.
#5.1 Chicane-UK on 24 Jul 2007 - 20:36
I think the 6400+ will be a fairer comparison given the price difference, and significant L2 cache advantage the 6850 has over the 6000+

I guess Intel chips are faster performers looking at figures like that.. but then they do come in quite significantly more expensive than the AMD chips.
#5.2 Croquant on 24 Jul 2007 - 22:52
All the new C2Ds have 4MB L2 on them, not the 2MB that the X2s have.
#6 usman767 on 25 Jul 2007 - 09:47
There is no competition for C2Duos at the moment. AMD's old architecture can't cope with the intel's at the moment. Hope Phenom will be good or i see AMD going down the drain. Too bad, competition is wat keeps us customers happy...
#7 randomnut on 25 Jul 2007 - 11:27
Nice one, I was planning on upgrading from the 5000 to the 6000 but I think i'll wait for this.
#8 Glen on 26 Jul 2007 - 00:50
This sounds like it will be a nice boost in performance over the 4200+ X2 I currently have. Unfortunately, I'd probably have to replace the PSU in my off-the-shelf HP system to sufficiently power this puppy and the additional heat might be an issue as well.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)