AMD is preparing to launch a new high-end desktop processor, the Athlon 64 X2 6400+, which will be the last processor in the Athlon 64 X2 family, according to sources at motherboard makers. Currently, AMD's highest-end desktop processor is the Athlon 64 X2 6000+, however with its performance unable to match Intel's upcoming Core 2 Duo E6850, AMD plans to launch the new 6400+ to cover up the gap in the market, noted the sources.
The 6400+ will have a core frequency of 3.2GHz and 2MB L2 cache, noted the sources. Pricing will range between US$220-248, they added. AMD has already sent processor samples to motherboard makers in order to allow them to update their BIOSes. The processor is predicted to ship shortly, added the sources.
View: The full story
News source: DigiTimes
The 6400+ will have a core frequency of 3.2GHz and 2MB L2 cache, noted the sources. Pricing will range between US$220-248, they added. AMD has already sent processor samples to motherboard makers in order to allow them to update their BIOSes. The processor is predicted to ship shortly, added the sources.

2.4ghz C2D beats a 3.0ghz AMD, 6400+ has no chance against E6850
How does the X2 6000+ compare with Intels offerings? I know that, generally the Core2Duo has the X2 pegged clock for clock but just interested to know peoples experiences. I just upgraded to a 3800+ X2 and liking it so far but with the 6000+ being so cheap, i'd be tempted to spring for one of those sooner rather than later!
the 6400+ doesn;t seem too expensive and has a hefty L2 cache. Can;t wait to get that.
Prey - http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu_2007.htm...2&chart=425
WinRAR- http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu_2007.htm...2&chart=434
HDTV Playback - http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu_2007.htm...2&chart=441
Cinema 4D - http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu_2007.htm...2&chart=436
3d Studio - http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu_2007.htm...2&chart=435
Just picked 5 random tests, and they all show the Intel chip beats the AMD by 20-30 seconds or 20-30 FPS, which ever is applicable to the test.
I guess Intel chips are faster performers looking at figures like that.. but then they do come in quite significantly more expensive than the AMD chips.
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.