main
Report a problem

IEEE group settles on faster Ethernet plans

Daniel Fleshbourne   on 24 July 2007 - 13:02 · 9 comments & 3704 views

Advertisement (Why?)
A technical group working on the next generation of Ethernet has agreed to disagree and will now work on a single standard that covers both 40Gbps and 100Gbps speeds. The Higher Speed Study Group (HSSG), part of the IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), made the decision last week at its meeting in San Francisco after months of debate between backers of the two speeds. If the IEEE approves the move late this year as expected, a standard may be completed by mid-2010, said John D'Ambrosia, chair of the HSSG.

Ethernet has sped up by a multiple of 10 several times, from 10Mbps to 100Mbps and ultimately from 1Gbps to 10Gbps, the current fastest version. Some HSSG members backed a similar boost this time and that 100Gbps plan appeared to have won out late last year. But others pushed for a 40Gbps standard. Different applications were at the heart of the disagreement, according to D'Ambrosia. The need for speed is growing everywhere, but at different rates. While the data output of servers doubles roughly every 24 months, the amount of traffic on carrier networks is doubling every 18 months, according to D'Ambrosia. Members more interested in faster server-to-switch applications pushed for a 40Gbps goal, while those aiming at network aggregation and backbones favored 100Gbps. The higher speed means more expensive and power-hungry equipment.

View: The full story
News source: InfoWorld

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 9 additional comments
(1 reply) #1 vetSHoTTa35 on 24 Jul 2007 - 13:37
OMG, 100Gbps LAN? Yikes I thought my 1Gbps port on my Thinkpad was fast enough to pee my pants but i think i know what will happen next when i get a 100Gbps port on any machine
#1.1 MioTheGreat on 24 Jul 2007 - 23:57
Realistically, hard drives can't hit that speed yet. I mean, even with the expected drop in performance from "real world" use....
(3 replies) #2 roadwarrior on 24 Jul 2007 - 14:07
Hard drive speeds are going to have to increase quite a bit before this really makes much difference. Even 10Gbps would exceed the transfer rates of most drives on the market today.
#2.1 ichi on 24 Jul 2007 - 14:24
In the meanwhile it would at least allow for more simultaneous high speed transfers.
#2.2 ProChefChad on 25 Jul 2007 - 02:15
Quote - (ichi said @ #2.1)
In the meanwhile it would at least allow for more simultaneous high speed transfers.


Yes, I hope --> maybe sites like RapidShare will move into the 21st century and allow more than 1 simultaneous download.
#2.3 roadwarrior on 25 Jul 2007 - 12:03
Quote - (ProChefChad said @ #2.2)
Yes, I hope --> maybe sites like RapidShare will move into the 21st century and allow more than 1 simultaneous download.


Rapidshare does allow more than 1 simultaneous download if you have a premium account.
#3 cooljerk_dv on 24 Jul 2007 - 20:07
Does this mean i'm going to have to rerun my whole house with Cat6 or Fiber . . rather than the cheap Cat5e I have now.


oh well progress is good . . more speed is always better.
#4 Croquant on 24 Jul 2007 - 23:31
When they start putting 10 Gbps RJ-45 ports on motherboards as standard equipment, then I'll care.
#5 tao muon on 25 Jul 2007 - 00:44
So maybe independant-head, multi-platter, multi-spindle, multiple channel hard drives with 32MB parallel caching are going to have to be built... striped-raid in a 3.5" box so to speak, is next?

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)