main
Report a problem

Microsoft to delay Office for Mac 2008

Tom Warren   on 02 August 2007 - 09:40 · 39 comments & 22142 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Mac users must wait until next year for fresh versions of Word, Excel and PowerPoint, as Microsoft moves its intended launch of Office for Mac 2008 to January from the second half of this year.

"We had hoped to hit the Christmas selling season, but now we hope to target Macworld (in January)," said Craig Eisler, who became general manager of the Mac business unit at Microsoft six weeks ago. "We as a group were not satisfied with product quality."

Details about any software development snags, as well as final pricing, were unavailable. Office for Mac 2004 is sold in three flavors at between $150 and $500.

The company demonstrated early previews of Office for Mac 2008 at the Macworld 2007 convention in January. Microsoft will not open beta testing to the public as it did for more than six months while building Office 2007 for Windows.

The 2008 release will be the first built for Intel-based Macs. The features and visual style of Office for Mac software differ from their Windows counterparts. Microsoft is introducing XML-based file formats, which require a converter to be opened in older Office software. A time-management, task-launching widget joins Office for Mac 2008 in addition to Word, Excel, PowerPoint and the Entourage e-mail application.

View: news.com

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 39 additional comments
(7 replies) #1 K3vlar on 02 Aug 2007 - 10:24
Noo! Now I must continue to run their trashy Power PC-based office suite to open files from my windows-based coworkers.

And this, just when they were doing SO well with a beta of Remote Desktop Connection.
#1.1 Croquant on 02 Aug 2007 - 12:29
What's the problem? I thought you all mac-fans count the Mac's ability to run Windows as part of it's Holy Doctrine Of Superiority (all praise and honor to Steve Jobs, for he invented the computer and his iProducts are teh c001) Got boot-camp?

#1.2 meamog on 02 Aug 2007 - 13:18
Even if he has Boot Camp set up, he'd still need another copy of Windows and Office.

And really, who wants to buy software twice, once for each platform?
#1.3 +Hell-In-A-Handbasket on 02 Aug 2007 - 14:05
Or you could ust use the Universal NeoOffice Suite,, its fully compatible with with Office 07


Quote - (K3vlar said @ #1)
Noo! Now I must continue to run their trashy Power PC-based office suite to open files from my windows-based coworkers.

And this, just when they were doing SO well with a beta of Remote Desktop Connection.
#1.4 Cryingcure on 02 Aug 2007 - 15:11
Quote - (Croquant said @ #1.1)
What's the problem? I thought you all mac-fans count the Mac's ability to run Windows as part of it's Holy Doctrine Of Superiority (all praise and honor to Steve Jobs, for he invented the computer and his iProducts are teh c001) Got boot-camp?



Your comments get more annoying everytime I see them. You're nowhere near as funny as you think you are. I'm not even a huge Mac fan and your comment still annoyed me. Got any maturity?
#1.5 vetneufuse on 02 Aug 2007 - 17:00
Quote - (Cryingcure said @ #1.4)
Quote - (Croquant said @ #1.1)
What's the problem? I thought you all mac-fans count the Mac's ability to run Windows as part of it's Holy Doctrine Of Superiority (all praise and honor to Steve Jobs, for he invented the computer and his iProducts are teh c001) Got boot-camp?



Your comments get more annoying everytime I see them. You're nowhere near as funny as you think you are. I'm not even a huge Mac fan and your comment still annoyed me. Got any maturity?


Please try not to insult other users. You may not like or agree with them, but please watch what you say to someone else on here. This is on the boarder line...
#1.6 Croquant on 02 Aug 2007 - 18:13
Quote - (Cryingcure said @ #1.4)
Quote - (Croquant said @ #1.1)
What's the problem? I thought you all mac-fans count the Mac's ability to run Windows as part of it's Holy Doctrine Of Superiority (all praise and honor to Steve Jobs, for he invented the computer and his iProducts are teh c001) Got boot-camp?



Your comments get more annoying everytime I see them. You're nowhere near as funny as you think you are. I'm not even a huge Mac fan and your comment still annoyed me. Got any maturity?

It's called having a sense of humor. You might want to look into getting one.
#1.7 vetneufuse on 03 Aug 2007 - 00:40
Quote - (Croquant said @ #1.6)
Quote - (Cryingcure said @ #1.4)
Quote - (Croquant said @ #1.1)
What's the problem? I thought you all mac-fans count the Mac's ability to run Windows as part of it's Holy Doctrine Of Superiority (all praise and honor to Steve Jobs, for he invented the computer and his iProducts are teh c001) Got boot-camp?



Your comments get more annoying everytime I see them. You're nowhere near as funny as you think you are. I'm not even a huge Mac fan and your comment still annoyed me. Got any maturity?

It's called having a sense of humor. You might want to look into getting one.


Saying what someone says is annoying isn't "funny" so what does a sense of humor have to do with anything?
(3 replies) #2 .Neo on 02 Aug 2007 - 10:40
Unbelievable. Adobe was able to get their Universal Creative Suite 3 out the door months ago, which is by far a much larger suite than Microsoft Office for Mac is.
#2.1 vetneufuse on 02 Aug 2007 - 11:09
Yes, but they didn't redesign parts of it completely... MS is redesigning parts of office 2008 to look more like Office 2007 on windows
#2.2 balupton on 02 Aug 2007 - 11:29
Well for the macromedia products, all adobe did was made them stable... But then again, each new version of a macromedia product is more like a x.x release.
#2.3 .Neo on 02 Aug 2007 - 17:05
Quote - (neufuse said @ #2.1)
Yes, but they didn't redesign parts of it completely... MS is redesigning parts of office 2008 to look more like Office 2007 on windows

Adobe had to port over their entire suite to Xcode just as well. Which must have been a lot harder if only looking at the quantity of applications it contains, let alone the addition of new features.

As far as I'm concerned the only reason why it's taking Microsoft this long to push Office 2008 out the door is because the project is heavily understaffed. Not because they decided to revamp the interface of a word processing, spreadsheet, keynote and email/calender application.
#3 Sam Granger on 02 Aug 2007 - 13:19
Argg! Microsoft thanks!
(1 reply) #4 Pippin666 on 02 Aug 2007 - 14:16
Where the guy who always says "It's better to wait a little longer and get a polish and bug free software than a unsatisfiable piece of code trashed in a cd" ... I bet it's because we're talking about Microsoft.

Pip'
#4.1 C_Guy on 02 Aug 2007 - 14:45
I'm not sure where that guys is!! Look for the thread about Apple delaying OS X "Leopard" 'til October, I'm sure he or she is in there.
(2 replies) #5 Galley on 02 Aug 2007 - 14:22
You know what they say: "Once you go iWork..."
#5.1 fivehorizons on 02 Aug 2007 - 14:42
"...you stop making spreadsheets?"
#5.2 C_Guy on 02 Aug 2007 - 14:52
...you have a new-found appreciation for Office, even if they delay '08 to make it a better release?
(2 replies) #6 PsykX on 02 Aug 2007 - 14:25
What the hell....... I was waiting for this one. Office 2004 sucks with all the buttons on the side.. I want Ribbon ASAP.....
#6.1 vetneufuse on 02 Aug 2007 - 15:10
Quote - (PsykX said @ #6)
What the hell....... I was waiting for this one. Office 2004 sucks with all the buttons on the side.. I want Ribbon ASAP.....


This really doesn't have the ribbon like Office 2007 did... it will be a subset of it to match the Mac look...
#6.2 .Neo on 02 Aug 2007 - 17:13
The last screenshots showed us an iWork-like interface layout. There is however a Ribbon located directly beneath the toolbar, but it's function is different from the one you see in Office 2007.
(3 replies) #7 LTD on 02 Aug 2007 - 14:53
Big deal.

There's NeoOffice.

There's the current version of Office for Mac.

There's the Windows version to run in under BootCap.

Or you could just wait.

There are so many other options.

Apple users (like me) who take shots at MS for developing poorly-designed software and who cheer when a Mac vs. PC commercial comes on have absolutely no justification for complaining when they're late with software for our platform.
#7.1 fivehorizons on 02 Aug 2007 - 15:48
NeoOffice? Decent for simple stuff, but not much else.

Office:Mac is pretty much a slow, bloated POS. Hooray for crashes!

I'd rather not have to close down all my apps and reboot just to work on office documents. If I wanted to run Windows on my Mac, I'd just get a PC.

Oh, sure, just waiting sounds great. I'll tell my boss that none of my projects will be completed until Jan 08!

So I'd say complaining is justified.
#7.2 bluarash on 02 Aug 2007 - 17:37
I know dual booting can be tough on those fingers and being exposed to Windows applications can cause cancer. You are special and you are much too good to be using Windows. You are an elite follower of the iGod and he has bigger plans for you (enlightenment, holy grail) and purchasing an iPhone (and putting away money for a replacement battery).

Why does your boss not just fire you and look for someone who is willing to use whatever software is available to get the job done (whether it is Linux, Unix, Mac or Windows)? I think the more creative people are those that work through road blocks rather than waiting for everyone to solve them for him or her.
#7.3 fivehorizons on 02 Aug 2007 - 21:53
In all honesty, this delay is no skin off my nose, but I was trying to point out why some people are up in arms about it. That's all.

I'm not sure why my post inspired such an angry rant from you... It was supporting MS Office
#8 vetRitsuke on 02 Aug 2007 - 14:54
Of course it's delayed. They need to push Vista machines for Back to School...
#9 nemo on 02 Aug 2007 - 15:38
Surprising.........

Microsoft is up the shitter with you boys for this move....

But Apple is all in the clear, and in THEIR RIGHTS as a company to pull the iPhone battery crap... SEE the article above this one.
#10 Ambroos on 02 Aug 2007 - 16:57
I say:

VMWare Fusion + Unity
(2 replies) #11 bluarash on 02 Aug 2007 - 17:25
I am really confused as to why people are so upset about not having a native x86 Office suite from Microsoft for their Intel Macs. Microsoft is under no obligation to produce another Mac version of Microsoft Office. I think most Mac users fail to realize that Microsoft is not required to make a version of Office for the Mac. Worse, they fail to realize past versions of Office have always been awful compared to their Windows counterparts (at least in features).

Why not look for native ports of applications that are supported like (Neo, O.O., Nisus) and support those with your time and money?
#11.1 whistlerxp on 03 Aug 2007 - 00:47
I'm reasonably sure Microsoft renewed their five year deal with Apple to make office. It's big business, especially since sales of office:mac have gone up 72% in the last year or so.
#11.2 .Neo on 04 Aug 2007 - 09:40
There isn't one 3rd party company "under the obligation" to release software for operating system X or Y unless they want to. But once a company does people will expect them to continue improving their software.
(1 reply) #12 Axon on 02 Aug 2007 - 18:27
There's some nice screen shots over at TUAW:
http://www.tuaw.com/photos/office-2008-for...ac-screenshots/

The MacBU should be teaching the rest of their MS Office peers how to utilize what MS's design team is capable of.
#12.1 bluarash on 02 Aug 2007 - 19:42
Hardly, the design and layout of Office 2007 is more polished, flexible and, therefore, more powerful. It may be a beta but the layout shows that they lack the necessary refinements for academics, scientists and legal professionals. It looks more like a desktop publishing application than a word processor.
(1 reply) #13 toadeater on 02 Aug 2007 - 20:09
#13.1 billyea on 03 Aug 2007 - 00:45
Mac: "or I will be when the guy next to me finishes with it."
#14 C++ on 02 Aug 2007 - 22:01
Why exactly are the Apple zealots complaining? If you hate Microsoft so much, this should be great news for you. Now you get at least 6 extra months of not giving that devil of a corporation any more money and not contaminating your holier than thou systems with any more of their worse than Hell software.
#15 Binary on 02 Aug 2007 - 22:14
It'd be nice if they at least gave us a public beta version to tide us over like they did for Office 2007 on Windows. I mean, it has been almost 4 years since their last Office offering, not to mention it being a Universal Binary running at full speed on an intel Mac..
(1 reply) #16 buletov on 03 Aug 2007 - 06:06
Why don't you iFans just use the 2004 version? Or switch to OpenOffice 2.2; why do you complain so much?
#16.1 Binary on 03 Aug 2007 - 09:53
Because they are both slow on the newest intel macs perhaps?

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)