main

AMD accelerates 3D graphics performance

Daniel Fleshbourne   on 20 August 2007 - 14:18 · 14 comments & 7428 views

Advertisement (Why?)
AMD is promising workstation graphics professionals a 300 per cent improvement in performance compared with previous 3D products following the introduction of five graphics accelerators.

The graphics processing units (GPUs) are targeted at CAD, DCC and medical imaging professionals and come with a new unified shader architecture featuring up to 320 individual stream processing units. The boards that are based on the new GPUs are the ATI FireGL V8650, V8600, V7600, V5600 and V3600. They are being touted as the first to sport 2GB of onboard memory.

ATI has claimed that when running DirectX 10 and OpenGL 2.1-based professional applications, the cards are 300 per cent faster than the previous professional ATI products.

View: The full story
News source: vnunet

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 14 additional comments
(3 replies) #1 jimbo11883 on 20 Aug 2007 - 14:21
I wonder how these would perform in games, though?
#1.1 Pippin666 on 20 Aug 2007 - 14:33
Quote - (jimbo11883 said @ #1)
I wonder how these would perform in games, though?
3D rendering is 3D rendering either it's in games or 3D software application. I guess tho it will all depend on driver optimisation.

Pip'
#1.2 Dorza on 20 Aug 2007 - 15:08
Quote - (Pippin666 said @ #1.1)
Quote - (jimbo11883 said @ #1)
I wonder how these would perform in games, though?
3D rendering is 3D rendering either it's in games or 3D software application. I guess tho it will all depend on driver optimisation.

Pip'


Final rendering in the majority of 3D Software apps is done exclusively on the CPU. The GPU plays no part in the final rendering of a scene or sequence of scenes (video). The GPU just handles the non rendered geometry in the application window; the scene you are working on. Where as with games the graphics card does the majority of the rendering. In short workstation cards aren't design to render on the fly, so they tend to be crap in games despite them being almost identical to their consumer grade counterparts.

Last edited by Dorza on 20 Aug 2007 - 15:16
#1.3 toadeater on 20 Aug 2007 - 22:14
Quote - (Dorza said @ #1.2)
Final rendering in the majority of 3D Software apps is done exclusively on the CPU. The GPU plays no part in the final rendering of a scene or sequence of scenes (video). The GPU just handles the non rendered geometry in the application window; the scene you are working on. Where as with games the graphics card does the majority of the rendering. In short workstation cards aren't design to render on the fly, so they tend to be crap in games despite them being almost identical to their consumer grade counterparts.


Aren't these based off their gaming 2x000 cards though? The same way Nvidia does it with the Quadros?
(1 reply) #2 BrainDedd on 20 Aug 2007 - 14:35
Um ... call me dumb but how can they make DX10 300% faster if the previous generation didn't support DX10?
#2.1 AfroTrance on 21 Aug 2007 - 05:42
They are saying that their new cards will be 300% faster than their previous cards, if you use DX10, irrespective of what version of DX the previous card is using.
#3 DKAngel on 20 Aug 2007 - 14:42
previous gen was the HD line of cards also thier shaders could be program specific making them a hell of alot faster than the last cards
(1 reply) #4 ahhell on 20 Aug 2007 - 14:47
Promises..promises.

How about delivering some actually product AMD/ATI.

300% faster? Yeah, I'm sure.
#4.1 Eis on 20 Aug 2007 - 19:05
I'm a pretty hardcore ATI fan myself, and even I have to agree with you there.

Show us the products or shut up AMD. =/
#5 Flint2 on 20 Aug 2007 - 14:49
#6 IntelliMoo on 20 Aug 2007 - 17:59
And I wonder if their drivers will be 300% more stable.
#7 eilegz on 20 Aug 2007 - 19:04
what about power consumption??

#8 ensiform on 21 Aug 2007 - 00:18
I do believe percent (%) is one word not "per cent" as in per USD 1 cent.
#9 Stup0t on 21 Aug 2007 - 08:14
A friend of mine had a old old fireGL card and it was pants at running games, but put in in 3dsmax and it would out do any of the 3d cards around at that time. Voodoo, TNT etc. So I would stick with the gaming cards for gaming. But if you fancy some Maya or 3dsmax stuff or any other kind of CAD system, then these are the cards you should buy.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)