main

Storing data in molecules: shifting atoms and flipping bits

Slimy   on 03 September 2007 - 03:47 · 16 comments & 7126 views

Advertisement (Why?)
As electronics continue to shrink, they're constantly pushing up against the limits of our ability to craft increasingly tiny features. Processors rely on features etched with extremely high-energy light, and disk drives store information in ever-smaller clusters of atoms. As these features shrink, electrical, magnetic, and even quantum interference begin to dominate, and it becomes ever more difficult to maintain and detect signals such as the state of a memory bit. To avoid these issues entirely, scientists have started to explore the possibility of storing information in the chemical structure of single molecules. A team of European researchers reported a new approach to single-molecule storage that may bring these devices closer to stepping out of the lab.

Molecular memory will require chemicals that can switch back and forth between two stable states, much the way clusters of atoms switch magnetic states on the surface of disk drives. It's relatively easy to find molecules that can behave the same way. So far, however, most of these molecular switches involve structural changes: large parts of the molecule move relative to each other when changing states. This can work well in lab settings, but it isn't ideal in the real world, where it may not be compatible with a stable and reliable material that's easy to manufacture. The approach described in the new research relies on a molecule that's physically flat and changes states by shifting the location of hydrogen atoms without undergoing any structural changes. Even better, the memory states can be changed and read through the same technique used in electronics today: changes in electrical conduction.

View: Full Story
News source: Ars Technica

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 16 additional comments
(2 replies) #1 Croquant on 03 Sep 2007 - 05:45
Sounds promising, but then so did Cold Fusion. We'll see.
#1.1 PureLegend on 03 Sep 2007 - 11:32
Adobe ColdFusion?
#2 +Berserk87 on 03 Sep 2007 - 05:55
i want a terabyte hard drive the size of my watch!
#3 +RuudJacobs.NET on 03 Sep 2007 - 06:51
I'd like 500 TB in the size of a VISA-card
#4 kickenchicken360 on 03 Sep 2007 - 07:30
id like 500GB in a DAP
#5 billyea on 03 Sep 2007 - 08:03
I'd like 800 TB in a penny please.
(2 replies) #6 Gamerhomie on 03 Sep 2007 - 08:16
I want 1000 TB inside of me please.
#6.1 Samboini on 03 Sep 2007 - 13:52
Wow, I have no idea how your are going to shove 1000 hard-drives up your ass, but film it when you do!
#6.2 billyea on 03 Sep 2007 - 17:12
With this new technology, you could probably swallow 1000 TB as part of your pills before you sleep.
It'd be a nice way to add memory to your brain. (j/k, the body doesn't work like that)
(2 replies) #7 Logie on 03 Sep 2007 - 08:21
As I great man once said: "That's some quantum **** right there"
#7.1 theyarecomingforyou on 03 Sep 2007 - 11:14
Chuck Norris?
#7.2 SilentMage on 03 Sep 2007 - 13:45
Doc Brown, I believe.
#8 traci lords army on 04 Sep 2007 - 03:40
I want to know why a processor has to process 32 or 64 bits at a time? Why can't the bits be divided across multiple processors?
You don't build a house with one person at a time, so why one processor?
#9 +The Cub on 04 Sep 2007 - 13:33
Quote -
I want to know why a processor has to process 32 or 64 bits at a time? Why can't the bits be divided across multiple processors?
You don't build a house with one person at a time, so why one processor?

Probably talking crap here, but the way things are now, isn't it like 32 or 64 builders working for one firm? And with multi core CPU's and multi threaded app's the bits are being divided across multiple processors.
#10 Dakkaroth on 04 Sep 2007 - 16:54
Didn't I read this already on Neowin?

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)