hardware
Report a problem

AMD K10 Family Chips Support DDR3 Memory – Documents

Slimy   on 14 September 2007 - 19:29 · 8 comments & 4599 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Not only do Advanced Micro Devices’ new tenth-generation microprocessors promise to increase performance because of micro-architectural improvements and the increased amount of processing engines, they apparently feature DDR3 memory controller as well. Technical documents that cover AMD’s latest microprocessors, such as quad-core AMD Opteron or AMD Phenom and their derivatives, reveal that the new built-in memory controllers can support both DDR2 and DDR3 memory types, provided that processors are installed into mainboards with DDR3 memory slots and appropriate BIOS.

According to roadmaps that AMD shows to its partners, DDR3 memory support will only be available in microprocessors made using 45nm process technology and on AM3 platforms due out in the second half of 2008. However, given that AMD’s documents for BIOS developers already note both AM3 and DDR3, it is highly likely that even current versions of AMD’s tenth-generation microprocessors can support DDR3 memory in certain conditions.

News source: Xbit Laboratories

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 8 additional comments
#1 Naughty Dog on 14 Sep 2007 - 19:32
At last AMD is making slow adjustments to take market control back from Intel. I WILL be buying a Phenom CPU from this socket 754 K8 I have now. However DDR3 is still expensive for most peoples' tastes for now.
(4 replies) #2 RAID 0 on 14 Sep 2007 - 19:32
AMD.... come on! You can't play catch up forever! Second half of 08? Intel already has chipsets and CPUs that support DDR3. Ahhhhh!
#2.1 Marty2003 on 14 Sep 2007 - 19:50
Perhaps you should read the part of the article where it says current versions may support DDR3.
#2.2 RAID 0 on 14 Sep 2007 - 22:23
Quote - (Marty2003 said @ #2.1)
Perhaps you should read the part of the article where it says current versions may support DDR3.


MAY! MAY* MAY* MAY*







MAY
#2.3 dhitb on 15 Sep 2007 - 00:54
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #2.2)
Quote - (Marty2003 said @ #2.1)
Perhaps you should read the part of the article where it says current versions may support DDR3.


MAY! MAY* MAY* MAY*







MAY

DDR3 support coming in May 08?




#2.4 RAID 0 on 15 Sep 2007 - 01:30
Quote - (dhitb said @ #2.3)
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #2.2)
Quote - (Marty2003 said @ #2.1)
Perhaps you should read the part of the article where it says current versions may support DDR3.


MAY! MAY* MAY* MAY*







MAY

DDR3 support coming in May 08?






HAHA! You smart-ass! May as in "might", or "possibly"
(1 reply) #3 CoolerUK on 15 Sep 2007 - 01:27
I'm past caring about what AMD are doing, Intel are leading the way. I'll be waiting for Penryn to come out and will snap one of those up.
#3.1 IceBreakerG on 15 Sep 2007 - 13:48
Quote - (CoolerUK said @ #3)
I'm past caring about what AMD are doing, Intel are leading the way. I'll be waiting for Penryn to come out and will snap one of those up.


Me too, even though I'm really trying my best to wait for Nehalem. With the rumors of an 8-core CPU coming out, that has me excited. For those of you asking do I really need 8 cores, the answer is this: I don't need 8 cores for "1 application" but I do need 8 cores for 8 applications.

I notice alot of people look at multi-core CPU and immediately think "no one needs this," but they never think outside the box. They look at their favorite "game" and say, no games take advantage of this. There's more to computers than just games. Yeah, most games don't take advantage of more than 1 CPU, but there's something that I do that does, which is video encoding. Video encoding scales VERY well with multiple cores, so to me that's a benefit. On top of that, sometimes I may want to run more than 1 program, so a multi-core CPU will benefit that.

Yes, that was completely off topic, but still needed to be said lol. I guess the other thing is that DDR3 support really isn't that important right now because the gains are minuscule at best. Add to the that, the cost of DDR3 memory is ridiculous too, so it's definitely not worth it.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)