main

Microsoft sued over WGA spyware allegations in China

Haddaway   on 17 September 2007 - 09:10 · 10 comments & 4809 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Microsoft's Windows Genuine Advantage woes aren't likely to end any time soon. Soon after a global WGA failure caused by human error comes word that a privacy suit has been brought against the company in China over alleged WGA behavior. This joins similar suits in the US that have described WGA as "spyware."

Lu Feng, a student at Beijing University, is asking for compensation and a reversal of practices from the Redmond giant, saying that WGA's analytical methods are akin to snooping technologies. According to scattered reports, some of which are contradictory, Lu Feng first installed WGA on his Windows XP computer before realizing what it was. Feng believes that Microsoft failed to provide him with proper notice of WGA's capabilities or how it would affect his use of his computer.

Feng's complaint asserts that WGA monitors his computer usage closely enough to constitute a privacy violation. Microsoft has long insisted that WGA does not invade privacy and only monitors what is necessary to prevent unauthorized modifications to anti-piracy tools in Windows.

View: Full story
News source: Ars Technica

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 10 additional comments
(1 reply) #1 .hasan on 17 Sep 2007 - 11:08
does Lu Feng have a legit copy of xp
#1.1 RAID 0 on 17 Sep 2007 - 18:53
As I was reading TFA, that same thought jumped into my head. I got 20 bucks that says he has a pirated copy.
(2 replies) #2 ozgeek on 17 Sep 2007 - 11:34
I guess they will throw this suit out because it's in the EULA. If you don't like MS "snooping" on you, then you should not use their products. It's an obvious matter.
#2.1 roadwarrior on 17 Sep 2007 - 12:59
Part of the legal problem with EULAs (especially ones from Microsoft) is that they can be changed by the originating party at any time without notice. That has been shown in some court cases to not constitute a legally binding contract, and is thus invalid.
#2.2 +James7 on 17 Sep 2007 - 14:16
Quote - (roadwarrior said @ #2.1)
Part of the legal problem with EULAs (especially ones from Microsoft) is that they can be changed by the originating party at any time without notice. That has been shown in some court cases to not constitute a legally binding contract, and is thus invalid.


You're right. This is an important point that most people don't seem to know. And frankly who knows what status it has in China? It would be ironic if the legal system of one of the more oppressive/intrusive countries in the world brought back a verdict against Microsoft's invasion of people's privacy.
#3 Pippin666 on 17 Sep 2007 - 13:34
WGA is only there to validate the legitimity of the Windows installed in a computer.

How can that be a privacy violation?

Is a police officer looking for in a car for it's serial number to check the ligitimity of the owner a privacy violator?

This is bullcrap. Long live Microsoft!

Pip'
#4 thornz0 on 17 Sep 2007 - 13:51
I'm sorry, Microsoft has done a lot of questionable things, but its hard to find them at fault for anything dealing with anti-piracy and protecting their product in that country. When they shape up (the country as a whole), and stop the mass levels of piracy and theft of intellectual property, I'll feel sorry for them.
#5 npe on 17 Sep 2007 - 14:20
I think they have other more serious privacy violations to concern about in China than WGA.
(1 reply) #6 C_Guy on 17 Sep 2007 - 18:17
China obviously forgot to look up the definition of "spyware"...

...or are they looking to make piracy even easier?
#6.1 GoatOfMendez on 18 Sep 2007 - 11:33
No they are just looking to do what everyone else thinks but hasn't got the balls to do - get rid of the abomination that is WGA.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)