main

BlackBerry passes 10m subscriber mark

Slimy   on 06 October 2007 - 01:59 · 13 comments & 7330 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Research in Motion has announced strong second-quarter results for its BlackBerry brand, adding around 1.45 million subscribers to break the 10 million mark. Revenue for the second quarter of fiscal 2008 reached $1.37bn, up 27% from $1.08bn in the previous quarter. Co-chief executive Jim Balsillie noted that strong demand for the BlackBerry Curve and BlackBerry Pearl handsets was behind the numbers and that the BlackBerry service is now available from around 325 operators worldwide. RIM continued its push into the retail market during the quarter, with non-corporate subscriber account additions in the US exceeding 50% for the first time. Device sales made up the vast majority of RIM's revenue at approximately 78%, followed by services at 15%, software at 4% and 'other sources' at 3%.

"RIM's second-quarter results were exceptionally strong on all metrics including revenue, subscriber account additions and net income. With over 10 million BlackBerry subscriber accounts, and over 20 million handsets shipped, we are pleased with our position in the market today. We expect recent product and market initiatives to extend our business momentum through the remainder of the fiscal year," said Balsillie.

News source: vnunet

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 13 additional comments
#1 cha0s on 06 Oct 2007 - 05:07
They sell a great product. I finally got one for myself. Will never go back to a regular phone or windows mobile.
Keep it up!
(1 reply) #2 PseudoKiller on 06 Oct 2007 - 12:10
I have had my BB Curve for over a month now and to put it simply... it just works and works well. There are some great 3rd party apps and tons of support if needed. Sorry Apple the iPhone is a toy when compared to a Black Berry. At the very least I wont have to worry about my smart phone becoming a brick because I run an application not sanctioned by RIM.
#2.1 Neomac v6 on 06 Oct 2007 - 13:50
If by "toy" you mean it's child's play to use, then you're right. The iPhone interface is still far superior, but if third-party apps are more important to you, that's your call.
(6 replies) #3 LTD on 06 Oct 2007 - 15:10
Glad you like the Blackberry - it's a useful device, but we've just been shown that the Blackberry's interface and physical design are positively ancient compared to the iPhone's.

The iPhone is by nature a game-changer. Same as the iPod. Wait a bit until it reaches widespread exposure, especially for the software to mature and diversify, and it'll only be a matter of time before it renders these also-rans obsolete. Apple is usually several steps ahead of the game, witness the iPod Touch and the new Nano. Is it because of more money Apple pumps into R&D? Is it because they buy the tech from smaller outfits? Is it because they take older ideas that were discarded and seek to re-develop them? is it because they place such a premium on the user experience? I don't know. Could be any one or several of those factors.

As for hacking/third-party apps:

In response to countless lame stories about Apple's "evil" intentions, there is no electronic device in the history of the universe that did not carry a warning stating that unauthorized modifications and/or use of the device will void the warranty.

Furthermore, Apple's iPhone development team would quickly go stark raving mad if they even attempted to factor in all the unauthorized hacks as they update the iPhone over time. People are asking for the moon here and aiming totally unjustified accusations at Apple instead of acknowledging their own stupidity.

98% of iPhone buyers have no intention of ever hacking the device in any way whatsoever. We all know that.

As a platform to develop on/for, the iPhone is by far superior to anything out there. The third party app issue remains a sticking-point for certain users or users-to-be, let's face facts. But the future is bright for this device, and it has already made serious waves in the industry.

#3.1 Rob on 06 Oct 2007 - 17:40
Can you elaborate a little on your point where you said "As a platform to develop on/for, the iPhone is by far superior to anything out there"? I thought the third party app issue kinda negates the development opportunities.
#3.2 Dakkaroth on 06 Oct 2007 - 18:31
They don't want anyone else making something useful for the iPhone. It would take the "Apple is so awesome for making this" feel away.
#3.3 excalpius on 06 Oct 2007 - 21:09
Please ignore LTD. He only posts really obsequious pro-Apple posts everywhere he can, even here in an article on the Blackberry, ahem.

He also tends to state his gross over-reaching opinions as statistical facts ( "98% of iPhone buyers have no intention of ever hacking the device in any way whatsoever. We all know that." ) rendering his bias clear to even Apple supporters.

But he's only getting started. For example, his note where he ignores that Apple has locked the iPhone from any significant third-party development just defies all credulity.

Which is a shame, because the iPhone does have a revolutionary interface. Unfortunately, it is hamstrung by a sole-source vendor (AT&T) which is precisely the OPPOSITE of how the iPod attained market ubiquity.

This is why sales of the iPhone have been so weak. It was a TERRIBLE mistake to bundle the iPhone to one vendor just to have a non-killer feature like "visual voicemail".

They've lowered the price to try and rebound this blowback, but unfortunately, I wouldn't sign up with AT&T if they gave the iPhone for FREE...and neither would most business customers I suspect.
#3.4 +DrunkenMaster on 06 Oct 2007 - 21:55
The history of the universe, huh? Are you an intergalactic spokes person? LOL. Try narrowing your history next time.
#3.5 PureLegend on 07 Oct 2007 - 10:56
Quote - (excalpius said @ #3.3)
It was a TERRIBLE mistake to bundle the iPhone to one vendor just to have a non-killer feature like "visual voicemail".


It was for more money. By controlling the network they can earn a profit on the price plan as well as on the phone, even further maximising their profits.
#3.6 excalpius on 07 Oct 2007 - 22:43
Quote - (PureLegend said @ #3.5)
It was for more money. By controlling the network they can earn a profit on the price plan as well as on the phone, even further maximising their profits.


Except that it was my understanding that any phone company would have done that...and do with other vendors, yes?
#4 PseudoKiller on 07 Oct 2007 - 03:32
ancient interface... when something works then whats wrong with that. I dont have to stare at the my keys cause I can feel them and i can just type.
Dont get me wrong the BB has a couple of places to improve, like html email but there are a couple of apps that can fix that problem. Its nice to have a couple of different browsers to use and i can use prolly the best IM client ever Jive Talk. Sorry I just dont feel the need to flick this or flick that. Seen and know several business ppl using the iPhone and all though its got the kewl factor and eye candy the function is less than desirable.

(1 reply) #5 sweetsam on 07 Oct 2007 - 17:41
Apple made a big mistake by making iphone exclusive to AT&T. If they had allowed use with any network there would have been a lot of sales. They found out how many people dislike AT&T service the hard way. ouch !
#5.1 excalpius on 07 Oct 2007 - 22:44
Precisely. The iPod became ubiquitous because EVERYONE could make money selling them...and, more importantly, the accessories.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)