I have yet to meet a teacher or professor who does not despise students who research using Wikipedia. That said, I want to meet University of Washington-Bothell professor Martha Groom, as she seems to have a completely different perspective on the online encyclopaedia. Instead of asking students in her environmental history course to turn in one big paper at the end of the semester, she requires them either to write an original Wikipedia article or to do a major edit on an existing one.
For her students, the Wikipedia experiment was "transformative," and students' writing online proved better than the average undergrad research paper. Knowing their work was headed for the Web, not just one harried professor's eyes, helped students reach higher -- as did the standards set by the volunteer "Wikipedians" who police entries for accuracy and neutral tone, Groom said. The exercise also gave students a taste of working in the real world of peer-reviewed research. Most of the articles were well received, but Groom still had to teach the students the difference between good secondary research and the average college paper.
News source: CNN Technology
For her students, the Wikipedia experiment was "transformative," and students' writing online proved better than the average undergrad research paper. Knowing their work was headed for the Web, not just one harried professor's eyes, helped students reach higher -- as did the standards set by the volunteer "Wikipedians" who police entries for accuracy and neutral tone, Groom said. The exercise also gave students a taste of working in the real world of peer-reviewed research. Most of the articles were well received, but Groom still had to teach the students the difference between good secondary research and the average college paper.
















Personally, I love the idea, and I've thought it for around a year and a half, but never knew it was in current implementation. Only if all teachers were so.
Write an article that isn't deleted by overzealous Wikipedia moderators.
nowadays all our homeworks are just a copy paste from wiki ...
The problem, and everyone knows it, is peer review. Nothing has to go through the rigors of being torn to shreds by your colleagues.
That said, I think this assignment is innovative and worthwhile. It introduces the kids to a wider world of editing and being edited by people you don't know.
Maybe the fact I'm doing computer courses lends itself to having staff that are a bit less weary of things such as Wikipedia...I dunno. But yeah, if used right then why not.
"Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leaning_tower_of_Pisa"
Gotta love those textbooks!
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.