main
Report a problem

Clinton Defends Net Neutrality Position

Sagittarius   on 16 November 2007 - 05:13 · 12 comments & 8444 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Sen. Hillary Clinton's campaign said Nov. 15 her long silence on network neutrality should not be interpreted as waning support for the idea of mandating that broadband providers treat all network use in a nondiscriminatory manner. Two weeks before announcing her presidential campaign in January, Clinton, along with Sen. Barack Obama, signed on as original co-sponsors of legislation that would make network neutrality the law of the land.

Since the campaign began, though, Clinton hasn't mentioned network neutrality, despite having issued a nine-point technology plan. In October, she announced an Internet strategy, also without a reference to network neutrality. "Hillary Clinton has been and continues to be a strong supporter of net neutrality," Jin Chon, a spokesperson for the Clinton campaign, told eWEEK. Chon also said Clinton told the YearlyKos convention in August that she will "make sure that the architecture of the Internet stays open."

View: Full Story on eWeek


Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 12 additional comments
(6 replies) #1 nX07 on 16 Nov 2007 - 05:19
If I was American I would put net neutrality as one of my top priorities when looking for someone to vote for. We know that if it becomes controlled, it will never, NEVER be this "free" again.
#1.1 rpgfan on 16 Nov 2007 - 05:29
Quote - (nX07 said @ #1)
If I was American I would put net neutrality as one of my top priorities when looking for someone to vote for. We know that if it becomes controlled, it will never, NEVER be this "free" again.

I agree with you completely, though I have honestly given up on the USA ever being free again. For some reason, I feel like a prisoner even though there are no bars and no boundaries other than the oceans and neighboring countries. Then again, maybe it is just my accursed youth thinking for me.

To be Kin of the Stars... That is a dream worth having. ^_^
#1.2 +Octol on 16 Nov 2007 - 13:35
Quote - (rpgfan said @ #1.1)
I have honestly given up on the USA ever being free again.

I'm afraid you may be right.

The problem isn't that the people here couldn't set things right if they wanted to, it's that the powers-that-be have such total control over the thought processes of the average American that he just doesn't seem to give a damn any more.

Many years ago an acquaintance told me [only half-jokingly, I've always thought] that McDonald's was an international conspiracy to lower the average intelligence of the human race to make it more susceptible to advertising. And frankly, it makes me a little queasy these many years later to see how prophetic [and accurate] his tongue-in-cheek comment turned out to be.

Well, conspiracy or not, fa[s]t food, a broken educational system, massive drug over-prescription, and the inculcation of a value system that goes no deeper than rock videos, "reality" shows, sporting events, and swilling beer has done its dirty work. The people have their "bread and circuses," and the rulers do whatever pleases them.

In other words, Americans have become too stupid to adequately respond to the problems facing them. The best they can now manage is to pop open another beer and crank up the volume.
#1.3 EJocys on 16 Nov 2007 - 14:59
Quote - (Octol said @ #1.2)
In other words, Americans have become too stupid...


I think, we need to remove safety labels so Evolution can take care of stupidity problem.
#1.4 PureLegend on 16 Nov 2007 - 19:52
Quote - (nX07 said @ #1)
If I was American I would put net neutrality as one of my top priorities when looking for someone to vote for. We know that if it becomes controlled, it will never, NEVER be this "free" again.

I agree fully.
#1.5 Tzimisce on 16 Nov 2007 - 20:40
Quote - (rpgfan said @ #1.1)
Quote - (nX07 said @ #1)
If I was American I would put net neutrality as one of my top priorities when looking for someone to vote for. We know that if it becomes controlled, it will never, NEVER be this "free" again.

I agree with you completely, though I have honestly given up on the USA ever being free again. For some reason, I feel like a prisoner even though there are no bars and no boundaries other than the oceans and neighboring countries. Then again, maybe it is just my accursed youth thinking for me.

To be Kin of the Stars... That is a dream worth having. ^_^



i actually agree with your last statement, the final frontier. Even the internet wasn't big enough to have its havens. But space, on the other hand, its impossible to see them trying to control all of it!
#1.6 carmatic on 16 Nov 2007 - 22:58
Quote - (Tzimisce said @ #1.5)
Quote - (rpgfan said @ #1.1)
Quote - (nX07 said @ #1)
If I was American I would put net neutrality as one of my top priorities when looking for someone to vote for. We know that if it becomes controlled, it will never, NEVER be this "free" again.

I agree with you completely, though I have honestly given up on the USA ever being free again. For some reason, I feel like a prisoner even though there are no bars and no boundaries other than the oceans and neighboring countries. Then again, maybe it is just my accursed youth thinking for me.

To be Kin of the Stars... That is a dream worth having. ^_^



i actually agree with your last statement, the final frontier. Even the internet wasn't big enough to have its havens. But space, on the other hand, its impossible to see them trying to control all of it!


are we going back to the 60's now? or are we looking at private space ventures and stuff... even then, if you try to go up against the governments in space, they will totally dominate you...
(1 reply) #2 X'tyfe on 16 Nov 2007 - 15:15
the internet is the last truly free place in the world
i will not let them take that away from me
#2.1 nvme on 16 Nov 2007 - 21:39
i've never thought about it before but i 100% agree with you on this. the internet is truly the only free place left.
(2 replies) #3 Naveen on 16 Nov 2007 - 15:31
A perhaps who is we're done am.

So yeah the net is good and censorship is silly?
#3.1 +Octol on 16 Nov 2007 - 22:15
I'm not exactly sure of your meaning, but one thing is for sure: free speech is of paramount importance to whatever freedoms people may still possess. That doesn't mean that all speech and expression should be free. You still can't yell "FIRE!" in a crowded theater, and kiddie porn ought to be fiercely censored and violations severely punished.

However, most of the jerk-offs that want to control the Internet simply want to prohibit any speech and behavior they don't agree with. And that – in a nutshell – is intolerable.
#3.2 carmatic on 16 Nov 2007 - 23:00
Quote - (Naveen said @ #3)
So yeah the net is good and censorship is silly?


perhaps you've never actually experienced censorship firsthand?

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)