main
Report a problem

ASUS Extreme Radeon HD 3870 review

Julio Franco   on 17 November 2007 - 10:07 · 13 comments & 14736 views

Advertisement (Why?)
This week AMD came to unveil its latest generation of ATI graphics hardware, an awaited release that without a doubt created a lot of expectations and speculation especially because of two factors:
1) The dominant player, Nvidia had just killed its whole high-end line up two weeks before, in favor of an affordable and more efficient model, the GeForce 8800GT.
2) A holiday season that has shaped up to become one of the most exciting in recent times for PC gamers, with a buttload of good titles like Unreal Tournament 3, Crysis, Call of Duty 4, World in Conflict, The Orange Box, Bioshock, Hellgate: London, and the list goes on...

So, designed to combat the GeForce 8800 GT is the Radeon HD 3870, which features a long list of very impressive specifications. Already we have learned that the Radeon HD 3870 delivers 2900XT-like performance for the most part, which is both disappointing and impressive. It is disappointing because the GeForce 8800 GT is faster than the 2900XT in a majority of titles. On the other hand this new Radeon features an attractive price tag of just $220, making it a fair bit cheaper than the 8800 GT.

What is more impressive is the fact that AMD just announced the Radeon HD 3870 and it's already selling for just $220. For the time being, GeForce 8800 GT cards are very hard to come by and often users are forced to pay considerably more than the $250 MSRP.

View: ASUS Extreme Radeon HD 3870 review

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 13 additional comments
(3 replies) #1 +Berserk87 on 17 Nov 2007 - 10:28
wow, its $30-50 cheaper then the 8800GT and performs equally for the most part, sometimes a little bit worse, sometimes a little bit better.


edit: i miss read a couple of the benchmarks...i would rather pay the extra $30 for the 8800GT.

Last edited by Berserk87 on 17 Nov 2007 - 10:43
#1.1 Hitman2000 on 17 Nov 2007 - 10:32
Quote - (Berserk87 said @ #1)
wow, its $30-50 cheaper then the 8800GT and performs equally for the most part, sometimes a little bit worse, sometimes a little bit better.


but i was a little dissapointed that it underperformed to the 2900. so how does that work out.... i mean AMD/Ati have had a long time to work on this.
Although it could be a driver issue...

But its a fairly competative card and it managed to stay within 10-15% at most times of the 8800 and the price and power consumption make it fairly decent.
#1.2 Doli on 17 Nov 2007 - 15:36
Quote - (Berserk87 said @ #1)
wow, its $30-50 cheaper then the 8800GT and performs equally for the most part, sometimes a little bit worse, sometimes a little bit better.


edit: i miss read a couple of the benchmarks...i would rather pay the extra $30 for the 8800GT.


Good luck finding one for $250 and in stock.

Quote -
GeForce 8800 GT cards are very hard to come by and often users are forced to pay considerably more than the $250 MSRP.


I have to wonder if the same markup on the price from retailers will happen with the 3870 and 3850.
#1.3 +Berserk87 on 18 Nov 2007 - 00:38
Quote - (Doli said @ #1.2)
Quote - (Berserk87 said @ #1)
wow, its $30-50 cheaper then the 8800GT and performs equally for the most part, sometimes a little bit worse, sometimes a little bit better.


edit: i miss read a couple of the benchmarks...i would rather pay the extra $30 for the 8800GT.


Good luck finding one for $250 and in stock.

Quote -
GeForce 8800 GT cards are very hard to come by and often users are forced to pay considerably more than the $250 MSRP.


I have to wonder if the same markup on the price from retailers will happen with the 3870 and 3850.


i already have found a couple locally for $250
#2 EL1TE on 17 Nov 2007 - 10:31
As i said before i think we should wait for new and final drivers, then we will see if it's good or not.
(1 reply) #3 Digix on 17 Nov 2007 - 14:47
4 3870's in crossfireX > sli 88GTs
#3.1 Bosaka on 17 Nov 2007 - 15:24
Yeah because Nvidia's offering in 6 months in SLI wont smoke that at all. Not that I'm trying to be a fanboy or anything but I don't feel like buying a specialty motherboard and massive PSU just to run 4 mid range GPUs.
#4 theyarecomingforyou on 17 Nov 2007 - 16:22
I've already ordered an 8800GT. ATi hasn't been doing well with graphics cards lately and I find their drivers bloated and not as fully featured as those from nVidia. I am happy to buy an ATi card if it offers better performance and a reasonable price but these cards did not interest me.
(1 reply) #5 shakey on 17 Nov 2007 - 21:37
how is it that the ATI cards really havent gotten any better. I would think with AMD now holding their hand they would have some awesome options by now, but eh. It makes me sad that AMD and ati are together now, cause i really think amd would have benefitted more from Nvidia.
#5.1 chilliadus on 17 Nov 2007 - 22:21
38xx and 8800GT are basically die-shrink so all the performance data are expected.
#6 Croquant on 17 Nov 2007 - 22:52
8800GTX/Ultra still is king of the GPUs. All hail the mighty 8800GTX!
#7 Atlonite on 18 Nov 2007 - 03:12
seems to be they haven't learnt the lessons from their last product... they should have stuck with the 512bit bus then maybe it might have out performed its rival and its own product, all i can say is nice step backwards ATI, I'd still like to see how they perform in crossfire mode though and with full AA and AN not just 4x/0x
#8 TC17 on 19 Nov 2007 - 03:26
You can't trust that review posted here. Apparently he is the same author of another review that got caught playing with the numbers to favor Nvidia.

http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=44484

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)