main
Report a problem

Nortel files patent lawsuit in the U.S. against Vonage

dl0711   on 16 December 2007 - 01:28 · 10 comments & 7463 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Nortel Networks Corp., the Canadian maker of telecom equipment, filed a lawsuit on Friday against Vonage - claiming that it violated nine patents related to Internet phone services and related features such as 911 and 411 calling and click to call. Nortel spokesman Mohammed Nakhooda said the lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Delaware, countered claims made by Vonage that Nortel had violated three of its patents. Vonage Holdings Corp., Holmdel, N.J., was dragged into the legal battle after it acquired three patents from Digital Packet Licensing last year, according to Vonage spokesman Charles Sahner.

View: Full Story @ CBC.ca

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 10 additional comments
#1 GreyWolfSC on 16 Dec 2007 - 01:51
I saw this on digg yesterday. Northern Telecom was THE network hardware company when the internet was coming into its heyday and they STILL managed to lose money. Now they're trying to make money off of Vonage seven years after its inception?
#2 +vlsi0n on 16 Dec 2007 - 03:16
Didn't vonage just settle similar patents not long ago..
#3 aStRaLgOd on 16 Dec 2007 - 03:47
Can you say different pack of wolves trying to catch a rabbit?

Idk, that idea came to mind when I think of vonage...
(1 reply) #4 randomlag on 16 Dec 2007 - 03:51
If you can't beat 'em, sue em, right?
#4.1 ir0nw0lf on 16 Dec 2007 - 22:44
Yup, goes along with "If you can't innovate, litigate."
#5 +mrbester on 17 Dec 2007 - 13:06
How can you patent calling the emergency services, even if it is via VoIP?
This will mean that a company is forced to licence (i.e. pay through the nose for) something that is required by law to be provided to the end user, or they can't produce a competing product.
Oh, wait, I forgot, it's a US patent story.
Still, it's a touch moneygrabbing to file suit (and patent) in the US if you aren't a US company. What other reason was the patent filed for if not to screw someone over in the future?
(3 replies) #6 geoken on 17 Dec 2007 - 13:34
Did any of you guys actually read the article? All you guys are trying to paint Nortel as patent trolls, but according to the article these claims were brought up after Vonage tried to sue Nortel.

Here is the quote straight from the article;
"In this particular case, Vonage is pursuing the legal action, rather than getting sued. Sahner said Nortel's countersuit was a defensive move."
#6.1 +mrbester on 17 Dec 2007 - 13:36
Fine. Not only are they patent trolls, they also show playgound mentality: "he started it". Happy now?
#6.2 geoken on 17 Dec 2007 - 13:40
So wait, they own a patent do nothing to defend it then when someone uses the IP and sues them for it they aren't allowed to launch a countersuit?

I can't believe you would call it playground mentality. Not launching a countersuit would be tantamount to admitting they have no claim.
#6.3 +mrbester on 17 Dec 2007 - 15:46
I don't see why a company should have a patent on the method some poor schmuck is able to call the emergency services.

This is irrespective of the fact that there shouldn't be software patents at all.

Is there any particular reason it was filed in Delaware? Are the local laws there more in favour of Nortel than Texas, Georgia, North Carolina, California, Massachusetts or Illinois, where they have offices?

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)