Apple Incorporated has released 31 new security-related fixes for both Tiger and Leopard; most of them were geared toward Mac OS X 10.4 as 10.5 was not always affected by the vulnerabilities. The flaws ranged from serious (meaning remote attackers could execute malicious code on an unpatched Mac) to mild (visiting a certain website could crash a given application). Mac programs affected include Address Book, iChat, Mail, Safari, among others. As usual, the updates in question can be downloaded via Software Update preferences, or downloaded directly from Apple’s website (links below).
Download Security Update 2007-009 for: 10.5.1 | 10.4.11 Universal | 10.4.11 PPC

don't be too blue about the world. its common to care for your second recent OS. see -> XP and all Windows before, or major linux distros...
Glassed Silver:mbl
don't be too blue about the world. its common to care for your second recent OS. see -> XP and all Windows before, or major linux distros...
Glassed Silver:mbl
At least that's what Jobs and company tells me in the Mac ads, and they never lie.
Nice try.
Well, if theres a vulnerability, that means its not impenetrable by worms/viruses.... if hackers would bother to waste their time exploiting a minority market-shared OS, you'd see more "worms and viruses" for mac.
Well, if theres a vulnerability, that means its not impenetrable by worms/viruses.... if hackers would bother to waste their time exploiting a minority market-shared OS, you'd see more "worms and viruses" for mac.
LOL, you clearly have NO understanding of the Mac's Unix foundation. These security update address vulnerabilities and potential exploits, not viruses which are completely impossible on Mac OS X. I know you PC nuts still computing in the stone ages don't like to hear that and you'll vehemently disagree but guess what? There are still no viruses for the Mac nor will there ever be.
Well, if theres a vulnerability, that means its not impenetrable by worms/viruses.... if hackers would bother to waste their time exploiting a minority market-shared OS, you'd see more "worms and viruses" for mac.
LOL, you clearly have NO understanding of the Mac's Unix foundation. These security update address vulnerabilities and potential exploits, not viruses which are completely impossible on Mac OS X. I know you PC nuts still computing in the stone ages don't like to hear that and you'll vehemently disagree but guess what? There are still no viruses for the Mac nor will there ever be.
If there are vulnerabilities, there will one day be malware. There isn't any now (well there is, but none are widespread), but saying there won't be any in the future is simply ignorant. If you take a minute and look at how many security flaws are found for the Macintosh and compare it to its rise in popularity, you will see a very obvious pattern. With time, the Mac will gain popularity. With time, its vulnerabilities will grow. Vulnerabilites are exploited for the Mac already, they will be exploited all the more as it grows in popularity.
"31 new security-related fixes." the bit that says security related, security issues exist which is how viruses etc get in
Well, if theres a vulnerability, that means its not impenetrable by worms/viruses.... if hackers would bother to waste their time exploiting a minority market-shared OS, you'd see more "worms and viruses" for mac.
LOL, you clearly have NO understanding of the Mac's Unix foundation. These security update address vulnerabilities and potential exploits, not viruses which are completely impossible on Mac OS X. I know you PC nuts still computing in the stone ages don't like to hear that and you'll vehemently disagree but guess what? There are still no viruses for the Mac nor will there ever be.
you clearly have NO understanding of security and programing, how the hell doe just being MAC make it impossible to get a virus on??? and get over the linux foundation we all know linux has viruses adn vulnerabiliteies too.
my favourite comment of yours which in all honesty just makes you look stupid
"These security update address vulnerabilities and potential exploits, not viruses which are completely impossible on Mac OS X"
know how viruses get into machines?? i didnt think so
Well, if theres a vulnerability, that means its not impenetrable by worms/viruses.... if hackers would bother to waste their time exploiting a minority market-shared OS, you'd see more "worms and viruses" for mac.
LOL, you clearly have NO understanding of the Mac's Unix foundation. These security update address vulnerabilities and potential exploits, not viruses which are completely impossible on Mac OS X. I know you PC nuts still computing in the stone ages don't like to hear that and you'll vehemently disagree but guess what? There are still no viruses for the Mac nor will there ever be.
Complete and utter nonsense.
Any system is vulnerable to viruses. Windows is the most frequently targetted for two simple reasons. One is its obvious market share, and two is how running code has traditionally had full access to the system. After Vista, this is obviouly no longer the case, but the market share and application compatibility certainly don't help it out much.
OSX is no less vulnerable to viruses that only need user-level access to the system than any other operating system. The only reason they don't exist is because they're very ineffective.
The real trick that malware can use it privledge escalation, which quite frankly OSX has had more of these exploits over the last year than Vista. If they should hit a double digit market share, and actually become a worthwhile target, you can bet you'll begin to see things that use these vulnerabilities.
You obviously have no idea what the "UNIX foundation" actually means, or does for the system.
Last edited by Wanderermy on 18 Dec 2007 - 05:29
At least Apple got to these before the vulnerabilities got to us.
They'll be equal when Macs no longer have a superior Unix foundation. Right now there are hundreds of thousands of viruses and spyware for Windows. Know how many exist for the Macintosh? 0. Know how many viruses will exist in the future for Windows? Millions. Know how many viruses will exist in the future for the Macintosh? 0.
They'll be equal when Macs no longer have a superior Unix foundation. Right now there are hundreds of thousands of viruses and spyware for Windows. Know how many exist for the Macintosh? 0. Know how many viruses will exist in the future for Windows? Millions. Know how many viruses will exist in the future for the Macintosh? 0.
ok PC's also have a linux/unix foundation, and there are unix/linix viruses out there, you keep believeing what you believe, all it does is make you look ignorant and well stupid
They'll be equal when Macs no longer have a superior Unix foundation. Right now there are hundreds of thousands of viruses and spyware for Windows. Know how many exist for the Macintosh? 0. Know how many viruses will exist in the future for Windows? Millions. Know how many viruses will exist in the future for the Macintosh? 0.
As a Mac user myself, I find this "head in the sand" mentality frightening.
They'll be equal when Macs no longer have a superior Unix foundation. Right now there are hundreds of thousands of viruses and spyware for Windows. Know how many exist for the Macintosh? 0. Know how many viruses will exist in the future for Windows? Millions. Know how many viruses will exist in the future for the Macintosh? 0.
As a Mac user myself, I find this "head in the sand" mentality frightening.
ahhhhhhh a mac user that doesnt have his head stuck in the proverbial MAC sand
They'll be equal when Macs no longer have a superior Unix foundation. Right now there are hundreds of thousands of viruses and spyware for Windows. Know how many exist for the Macintosh? 0. Know how many viruses will exist in the future for Windows? Millions. Know how many viruses will exist in the future for the Macintosh? 0.
Mac pussies?
Mac pussies?
You know pussy?
people with MACS luv them way to much to write a virus for them
people with MACS luv them way to much to write a virus for them
Ha ha you are a mac pussy
people with MACS luv them way to much to write a virus for them
Ha ha you are a mac pussy
i hate macs
Why?
people with MACS luv them way to much to write a virus for them
Ha ha you are a mac pussy
i hate macs
I see
Why?
in no particular order
1. they dont do what i want to do with computers, im a techy and simply half the stuff i run will not run on MAC.
2. the marketing BS MAC does annoys me
3. MAC users ignorance when it comes to security related issues
4. Hardware compatibility
5. upgradeability
6.Price
ill leave it at that. adn before all the have you ever used one questions, yes i was a mac admin for over a year
They should have five main headings on the front page...
News
Software
Games
OSX vs. Windows
Firefox/Opera vs. IE7
Then maybe we could just skip all of these bull**** arguments and get to something useful.
oooh wait..... it's Mac OS...
great job Apple... you always keep us safe
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_F9gdx_LIAc
I'm not so sure about that but then again, If I find software that I can't run, I can run parallels (for mac) with windows on it and then run the programs. I can have my cake and eat it too.
I'm not so sure about that but then again, If I find software that I can't run, I can run parallels (for mac) with windows on it and then run the programs. I can have my cake and eat it too.
So... you need Windows... on a mac... to run software the Mac can't run? It's all so clear to me now.
~X
Last edited by simon360 on 18 Dec 2007 - 15:47
And you clearly missed the many articles dealing with Leopard's firewall flaws.
At least Apple doesn't believe their own hype. They know there's no such thing as perfect code, otherwise there would be no Software Update.
I hope LTD never does get malware on his computer. It would shatter his whole belief system.
what you seem to forget is all these programs are coded up by HUMANS, humans make mistakes which is why vulnerabilites exist in the first place, if you have any ports open at all you are vulnerable, the only way your supposed 'impossible to hack' could even close to exist is if all network traffic is blocked, whch will generally make it hard to use the internet please before you post any more ridiculous comments like this, go learn the BASICS of hacking.
to make a computer competely secure (i am going to use the old bill gates one)
you wil need to bury your computer under ground cover it with cement and make sure it is not connected to anything, even then someone could dig it up adn plug it in.
Last edited by whocares78 on 19 Dec 2007 - 01:53
i cant wait, i will laugh my ass off for hours
Oh and LTD, that post is a bunch of nonsense. You can spout impervious and impossible all you want but it's still foolish, and putting your entire post in bold doesn't make you any more correct. It just makes your post obnoxious. Any operating system has the potential to be exploited, anyone who says there is a "zero possibility" is ignorant.
Anyways, as I was saying... Are mac releases going to be front page news now? I think this is a new trend. (New as in, half a year?) Just wondering.
Might reduce the number of articles that degenerate into pointless and heated Apple vs. Microsoft superiority debates.
I wished all you Pro/Anti Mac/Windows idiots would STFU already. Unless you are using both systems, you are merely regurgitating fanboy bile from either camp. I doubt most of you ever actually encountered any issue that needed to be patched.
and yeah i haveused both. and i dont just hate mac, i hate MS too. what was your point again
Ha! My BeBox will crush your puny operating systems! ;D
Ha! My BeBox will crush your puny operating systems! ;D
Unless you're a woman, I have no interest in your "box".
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.