apple

Apple releases 31 Security Updates for Tiger & Leopard

Slimy   on 18 December 2007 - 03:49 · 57 comments & 25818 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Apple Incorporated has released 31 new security-related fixes for both Tiger and Leopard; most of them were geared toward Mac OS X 10.4 as 10.5 was not always affected by the vulnerabilities. The flaws ranged from serious (meaning remote attackers could execute malicious code on an unpatched Mac) to mild (visiting a certain website could crash a given application). Mac programs affected include Address Book, iChat, Mail, Safari, among others. As usual, the updates in question can be downloaded via Software Update preferences, or downloaded directly from Apple’s website (links below).

Download Security Update 2007-009 for: 10.5.1 | 10.4.11 Universal | 10.4.11 PPC

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 57 additional comments
#1 +Berserk87 on 18 Dec 2007 - 03:57
thats a lot of updates
(2 replies) #2 Relativity_17 on 18 Dec 2007 - 04:00
Its nice to see they're still taking care of their 10.4.x users.
#2.1 Glassed Silver on 18 Dec 2007 - 12:37
that is self-explaining!
don't be too blue about the world. its common to care for your second recent OS. see -> XP and all Windows before, or major linux distros...

Glassed Silver:mbl
#2.2 Glassed Silver on 18 Dec 2007 - 12:38
that is self-explaining!
don't be too blue about the world. its common to care for your second recent OS. see -> XP and all Windows before, or major linux distros...

Glassed Silver:mbl
(8 replies) #3 MadDog on 18 Dec 2007 - 04:07
But... but... Mac OS X is a flawlessly written operating system impervious to viruses, worms and other nasty things only Microsoft Windows users get.

At least that's what Jobs and company tells me in the Mac ads, and they never lie.
#3.1 vetsanctified on 18 Dec 2007 - 04:35
Excuse me, but where it saids this patch resolves worms or viruses?
#3.2 Tikitiki on 18 Dec 2007 - 04:55
Quote - (sanctified said @ #3.1)
Excuse me, but where it saids this patch resolves worms or viruses?


Nice try.
#3.3 +ispamforfood on 18 Dec 2007 - 05:02
Quote - (sanctified said @ #3.1)
Excuse me, but where it saids this patch resolves worms or viruses?


Well, if theres a vulnerability, that means its not impenetrable by worms/viruses.... if hackers would bother to waste their time exploiting a minority market-shared OS, you'd see more "worms and viruses" for mac.
#3.4 internetworld7 on 18 Dec 2007 - 05:59
Quote - (ispamforfood said @ #3.3)
Quote - (sanctified said @ #3.1)
Excuse me, but where it saids this patch resolves worms or viruses?


Well, if theres a vulnerability, that means its not impenetrable by worms/viruses.... if hackers would bother to waste their time exploiting a minority market-shared OS, you'd see more "worms and viruses" for mac.


LOL, you clearly have NO understanding of the Mac's Unix foundation. These security update address vulnerabilities and potential exploits, not viruses which are completely impossible on Mac OS X. I know you PC nuts still computing in the stone ages don't like to hear that and you'll vehemently disagree but guess what? There are still no viruses for the Mac nor will there ever be.
#3.5 vetSlimy on 18 Dec 2007 - 06:12
Quote - (internetworld7 said @ #3.4)
Quote - (ispamforfood said @ #3.3)
Quote - (sanctified said @ #3.1)
Excuse me, but where it saids this patch resolves worms or viruses?


Well, if theres a vulnerability, that means its not impenetrable by worms/viruses.... if hackers would bother to waste their time exploiting a minority market-shared OS, you'd see more "worms and viruses" for mac.


LOL, you clearly have NO understanding of the Mac's Unix foundation. These security update address vulnerabilities and potential exploits, not viruses which are completely impossible on Mac OS X. I know you PC nuts still computing in the stone ages don't like to hear that and you'll vehemently disagree but guess what? There are still no viruses for the Mac nor will there ever be.

If there are vulnerabilities, there will one day be malware. There isn't any now (well there is, but none are widespread), but saying there won't be any in the future is simply ignorant. If you take a minute and look at how many security flaws are found for the Macintosh and compare it to its rise in popularity, you will see a very obvious pattern. With time, the Mac will gain popularity. With time, its vulnerabilities will grow. Vulnerabilites are exploited for the Mac already, they will be exploited all the more as it grows in popularity.
#3.6 whocares78 on 18 Dec 2007 - 06:15
Quote - (sanctified said @ #3.1)
Excuse me, but where it saids this patch resolves worms or viruses?


"31 new security-related fixes." the bit that says security related, security issues exist which is how viruses etc get in
#3.7 whocares78 on 18 Dec 2007 - 06:21
Quote - (internetworld7 said @ #3.4)
Quote - (ispamforfood said @ #3.3)
Quote - (sanctified said @ #3.1)
Excuse me, but where it saids this patch resolves worms or viruses?


Well, if theres a vulnerability, that means its not impenetrable by worms/viruses.... if hackers would bother to waste their time exploiting a minority market-shared OS, you'd see more "worms and viruses" for mac.


LOL, you clearly have NO understanding of the Mac's Unix foundation. These security update address vulnerabilities and potential exploits, not viruses which are completely impossible on Mac OS X. I know you PC nuts still computing in the stone ages don't like to hear that and you'll vehemently disagree but guess what? There are still no viruses for the Mac nor will there ever be.


you clearly have NO understanding of security and programing, how the hell doe just being MAC make it impossible to get a virus on??? and get over the linux foundation we all know linux has viruses adn vulnerabiliteies too.

my favourite comment of yours which in all honesty just makes you look stupid
"These security update address vulnerabilities and potential exploits, not viruses which are completely impossible on Mac OS X"

know how viruses get into machines?? i didnt think so
#3.8 MioTheGreat on 18 Dec 2007 - 12:30
Quote - (internetworld7 said @ #3.4)
Quote - (ispamforfood said @ #3.3)
Quote - (sanctified said @ #3.1)
Excuse me, but where it saids this patch resolves worms or viruses?


Well, if theres a vulnerability, that means its not impenetrable by worms/viruses.... if hackers would bother to waste their time exploiting a minority market-shared OS, you'd see more "worms and viruses" for mac.


LOL, you clearly have NO understanding of the Mac's Unix foundation. These security update address vulnerabilities and potential exploits, not viruses which are completely impossible on Mac OS X. I know you PC nuts still computing in the stone ages don't like to hear that and you'll vehemently disagree but guess what? There are still no viruses for the Mac nor will there ever be.


Complete and utter nonsense.

Any system is vulnerable to viruses. Windows is the most frequently targetted for two simple reasons. One is its obvious market share, and two is how running code has traditionally had full access to the system. After Vista, this is obviouly no longer the case, but the market share and application compatibility certainly don't help it out much.

OSX is no less vulnerable to viruses that only need user-level access to the system than any other operating system. The only reason they don't exist is because they're very ineffective.

The real trick that malware can use it privledge escalation, which quite frankly OSX has had more of these exploits over the last year than Vista. If they should hit a double digit market share, and actually become a worthwhile target, you can bet you'll begin to see things that use these vulnerabilities.

You obviously have no idea what the "UNIX foundation" actually means, or does for the system.
#4 vetsanctified on 18 Dec 2007 - 04:37
I just hope that this resolves Safari's nasty tendency of crashing when editing entired in Blogger.
#5 EpidemiK on 18 Dec 2007 - 04:51
But, Macs never have security problems and always JUST work flawlessly!
#6 elvenseven on 18 Dec 2007 - 05:11
So Macs Just Work, Huh?
#7 Wanderermy on 18 Dec 2007 - 05:17
nvm

Last edited by Wanderermy on 18 Dec 2007 - 05:29
#8 simon360 on 18 Dec 2007 - 05:27
No, Macs aren't perfect. It's market spin, get over it.

At least Apple got to these before the vulnerabilities got to us.
#9 jesseinsf on 18 Dec 2007 - 05:50
Most likely those security holes were Identified some "Months ago", it's not like they see the holes and the next day they patch them....though most security holes are patched before the hackers use them, Windows or Mac. Also, get use to it; we are the same, just in different flavors, though one has more market share than the other. One day we all will be equal in the market. As for the virus makers, they will actually have a choice then. Though if it was an even market share between all OSes then virus makers will not feel so good about what they did because it would not affect a large chunk of the world. And Windows would not be attacked as much if that happened.
(5 replies) #10 James812 on 18 Dec 2007 - 05:52
One day the mac and pc will be equal!!!!......In the amount of worms and viruses that are created for them! Eventually macs will have the same problems. YAY for equal rights!
#10.1 internetworld7 on 18 Dec 2007 - 06:05
Quote - (James812 said @ #10)
One day the mac and pc will be equal!!!!......In the amount of worms and viruses that are created for them! Eventually macs will have the same problems. YAY for equal rights!


They'll be equal when Macs no longer have a superior Unix foundation. Right now there are hundreds of thousands of viruses and spyware for Windows. Know how many exist for the Macintosh? 0. Know how many viruses will exist in the future for Windows? Millions. Know how many viruses will exist in the future for the Macintosh? 0.
#10.2 whocares78 on 18 Dec 2007 - 06:18
Quote - (internetworld7 said @ #10.1)
Quote - (James812 said @ #10)
One day the mac and pc will be equal!!!!......In the amount of worms and viruses that are created for them! Eventually macs will have the same problems. YAY for equal rights!


They'll be equal when Macs no longer have a superior Unix foundation. Right now there are hundreds of thousands of viruses and spyware for Windows. Know how many exist for the Macintosh? 0. Know how many viruses will exist in the future for Windows? Millions. Know how many viruses will exist in the future for the Macintosh? 0.


ok PC's also have a linux/unix foundation, and there are unix/linix viruses out there, you keep believeing what you believe, all it does is make you look ignorant and well stupid
#10.3 PsychoDoughBoy on 18 Dec 2007 - 10:31
Quote - (internetworld7 said @ #10.1)
Quote - (James812 said @ #10)
One day the mac and pc will be equal!!!!......In the amount of worms and viruses that are created for them! Eventually macs will have the same problems. YAY for equal rights!


They'll be equal when Macs no longer have a superior Unix foundation. Right now there are hundreds of thousands of viruses and spyware for Windows. Know how many exist for the Macintosh? 0. Know how many viruses will exist in the future for Windows? Millions. Know how many viruses will exist in the future for the Macintosh? 0.


As a Mac user myself, I find this "head in the sand" mentality frightening.
#10.4 whocares78 on 19 Dec 2007 - 01:16
Quote - (PsychoDoughBoy said @ #10.3)
Quote - (internetworld7 said @ #10.1)
Quote - (James812 said @ #10)
One day the mac and pc will be equal!!!!......In the amount of worms and viruses that are created for them! Eventually macs will have the same problems. YAY for equal rights!


They'll be equal when Macs no longer have a superior Unix foundation. Right now there are hundreds of thousands of viruses and spyware for Windows. Know how many exist for the Macintosh? 0. Know how many viruses will exist in the future for Windows? Millions. Know how many viruses will exist in the future for the Macintosh? 0.


As a Mac user myself, I find this "head in the sand" mentality frightening.



ahhhhhhh a mac user that doesnt have his head stuck in the proverbial MAC sand a breath of fresh air around here
#10.5 war on 19 Dec 2007 - 03:11
Quote - (internetworld7 said @ #10.1)
Quote - (James812 said @ #10)
One day the mac and pc will be equal!!!!......In the amount of worms and viruses that are created for them! Eventually macs will have the same problems. YAY for equal rights!


They'll be equal when Macs no longer have a superior Unix foundation. Right now there are hundreds of thousands of viruses and spyware for Windows. Know how many exist for the Macintosh? 0. Know how many viruses will exist in the future for Windows? Millions. Know how many viruses will exist in the future for the Macintosh? 0.
I bet you have spyware on your Mac right now, you just dont know it!
(8 replies) #11 birdie-87 on 18 Dec 2007 - 06:22
By now there should be at least one virus maker ****ed at those mac pussies singing "macs dont have viruses macs wont have viruses tralala and make one just to shut them up.
#11.1 toadeater on 18 Dec 2007 - 06:33
Quote - (birdie-87 said @ #11)
By now there should be at least one virus maker ****ed at those mac pussies singing "macs dont have viruses macs wont have viruses tralala and make one just to shut them up.


Mac pussies?
#11.2 birdie-87 on 18 Dec 2007 - 06:36
Quote - (toadeater said @ #11.1)
Quote - (birdie-87 said @ #11)
By now there should be at least one virus maker ****ed at those mac pussies singing "macs dont have viruses macs wont have viruses tralala and make one just to shut them up.


Mac pussies?


You know pussy?
#11.3 whocares78 on 18 Dec 2007 - 06:41
yeah but they all have windows boxes so how are they gonna write it???????

people with MACS luv them way to much to write a virus for them
#11.4 birdie-87 on 18 Dec 2007 - 06:47
Quote - (whocares78 said @ #11.3)
yeah but they all have windows boxes so how are they gonna write it???????

people with MACS luv them way to much to write a virus for them


Ha ha you are a mac pussy
#11.5 whocares78 on 18 Dec 2007 - 06:54
Quote - (birdie-87 said @ #11.4)
Quote - (whocares78 said @ #11.3)
yeah but they all have windows boxes so how are they gonna write it???????

people with MACS luv them way to much to write a virus for them


Ha ha you are a mac pussy


i hate macs
#11.6 +Axon on 18 Dec 2007 - 07:46
Quote - (whocares78 said @ #11.5)
i hate macs


Why?
#11.7 birdie-87 on 18 Dec 2007 - 07:47
Quote - (whocares78 said @ #11.5)
Quote - (birdie-87 said @ #11.4)
Quote - (whocares78 said @ #11.3)
yeah but they all have windows boxes so how are they gonna write it???????

people with MACS luv them way to much to write a virus for them


Ha ha you are a mac pussy


i hate macs


I see
#11.8 whocares78 on 19 Dec 2007 - 01:20
Quote - (Axon said @ #11.6)
Quote - (whocares78 said @ #11.5)
i hate macs


Why?

in no particular order

1. they dont do what i want to do with computers, im a techy and simply half the stuff i run will not run on MAC.
2. the marketing BS MAC does annoys me
3. MAC users ignorance when it comes to security related issues
4. Hardware compatibility
5. upgradeability
6.Price

ill leave it at that. adn before all the have you ever used one questions, yes i was a mac admin for over a year
#12 Gnome on 18 Dec 2007 - 06:44
As soon as I saw the title of this post I knew there would be some sort of mad Windows/Mac argument going on.

They should have five main headings on the front page...

News
Software
Games
OSX vs. Windows
Firefox/Opera vs. IE7

Then maybe we could just skip all of these bull**** arguments and get to something useful.
#13 Boiling Ice on 18 Dec 2007 - 06:53
31 security updates!!!?! come on Microsoft, when you will ever make a perfect OS... every day/week/month we see new security holes... exploits... and it takes time to fix it... damn you Bill Gates and your crapy OS...

oooh wait..... it's Mac OS...

great job Apple... you always keep us safe
#14 Nomad559 on 18 Dec 2007 - 06:57
#15 .kvn on 18 Dec 2007 - 07:18
The usual lame arguments.
(1 reply) #16 slang123 on 18 Dec 2007 - 07:53
Apple never said OSX was perfect, only that it is better than Windows. Which IMO it is.
#16.1 war on 19 Dec 2007 - 03:13
Quote - (slang123 said @ #1)
Apple never said OSX was perfect, only that it is better than Windows. Which IMO it is.
If it was so much better than people would be switching at a lot higher rate, so sorry but your wrong!
(3 replies) #17 RAID 0 on 18 Dec 2007 - 08:11
OS X IS better than Windows... if you're looking for a OS that does not run much software....
#17.1 mrmckeb on 18 Dec 2007 - 10:10
A padded cell is safer than my bedroom. I still wouldn't want to be in a padded cell... unless I was sleeping, it might be comfortable.
#17.2 hagjohn on 18 Dec 2007 - 12:25
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #17)
OS X IS better than Windows... if you're looking for a OS that does not run much software....


I'm not so sure about that but then again, If I find software that I can't run, I can run parallels (for mac) with windows on it and then run the programs. I can have my cake and eat it too.
#17.3 RAID 0 on 19 Dec 2007 - 06:13
Quote - (hagjohn said @ #17.2)
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #17)
OS X IS better than Windows... if you're looking for a OS that does not run much software....


I'm not so sure about that but then again, If I find software that I can't run, I can run parallels (for mac) with windows on it and then run the programs. I can have my cake and eat it too.



So... you need Windows... on a mac... to run software the Mac can't run? It's all so clear to me now.
#18 X@vier on 18 Dec 2007 - 14:20
I hope this resolves my wireless problems!! stupid Leopard

~X
(3 replies) #19 LTD on 18 Dec 2007 - 15:03
A bone stock retail OS X machine ships in an OS configuration that is impervious to receipt of a viral application load from a network connection. "Impervious" translates to "it is impossible." Impossible means what it means... It cannot be done. No matter how smart you are, how good looking, how many little voodoo dolls you make and stick pins in, or how intellectual your hypothetical argument might be... it cannot be done. Period. Zero possibility. Not "near zero."... zero.


Last edited by simon360 on 18 Dec 2007 - 15:47
#19.1 C_Guy on 18 Dec 2007 - 16:18
I guess all those security updates are pretty pointless if your Mac is invincible.

And you clearly missed the many articles dealing with Leopard's firewall flaws.

At least Apple doesn't believe their own hype. They know there's no such thing as perfect code, otherwise there would be no Software Update.

I hope LTD never does get malware on his computer. It would shatter his whole belief system.
#19.2 whocares78 on 19 Dec 2007 - 01:31
your ignorance astounds me, NOTHING is secure if it has an internet connection, NOTHING AT ALL. p.s i thought the firewall was OFF by default on MACS, but in reality it is not important

what you seem to forget is all these programs are coded up by HUMANS, humans make mistakes which is why vulnerabilites exist in the first place, if you have any ports open at all you are vulnerable, the only way your supposed 'impossible to hack' could even close to exist is if all network traffic is blocked, whch will generally make it hard to use the internet please before you post any more ridiculous comments like this, go learn the BASICS of hacking.

to make a computer competely secure (i am going to use the old bill gates one)
you wil need to bury your computer under ground cover it with cement and make sure it is not connected to anything, even then someone could dig it up adn plug it in.

Last edited by whocares78 on 19 Dec 2007 - 01:53
#19.3 whocares78 on 19 Dec 2007 - 01:32
Quote - (C_Guy said @ #19.1)
I hope LTD never does get malware on his computer. It would shatter his whole belief system.


i cant wait, i will laugh my ass off for hours
#20 TRC on 18 Dec 2007 - 15:36
Seems that when Apple releases security fixes they are "taking care of their users". When Microsoft does the same thing they are incompetent baffoons.

Oh and LTD, that post is a bunch of nonsense. You can spout impervious and impossible all you want but it's still foolish, and putting your entire post in bold doesn't make you any more correct. It just makes your post obnoxious. Any operating system has the potential to be exploited, anyone who says there is a "zero possibility" is ignorant.
(1 reply) #21 Thrawn on 18 Dec 2007 - 15:37
^---!LTD You're hilarious.

Anyways, as I was saying... Are mac releases going to be front page news now? I think this is a new trend. (New as in, half a year?) Just wondering.
#21.1 C_Guy on 18 Dec 2007 - 16:20
It would be cool if Neowin could allow you to filter news according to your preferences. Eg: Turn Mac news on or off. Microsoft news on or off. Hardware news on or off, etc. Customize your own front page so to speak.

Might reduce the number of articles that degenerate into pointless and heated Apple vs. Microsoft superiority debates.
(4 replies) #22 GEIST on 18 Dec 2007 - 17:10
Updating right now.

I wished all you Pro/Anti Mac/Windows idiots would STFU already. Unless you are using both systems, you are merely regurgitating fanboy bile from either camp. I doubt most of you ever actually encountered any issue that needed to be patched.
#22.1 RAID 0 on 18 Dec 2007 - 20:14
I'm using 2000, XP, Vista, OS X, and Ubuntu. I think I'm covered.
#22.2 whocares78 on 19 Dec 2007 - 01:50
never encountered an issue that needed to be patched, do you understand what a security isseue is, if you have encountered it you are screwed. ill patch mine before i encounter them thanks. i guess thats why i have never encountered one, becausei patch my machine!!!!

and yeah i haveused both. and i dont just hate mac, i hate MS too. what was your point again
#22.3 +GreyWolfSC on 19 Dec 2007 - 22:51
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #22.1)
I'm using 2000, XP, Vista, OS X, and Ubuntu. I think I'm covered.


Ha! My BeBox will crush your puny operating systems! ;D
#22.4 RAID 0 on 20 Dec 2007 - 01:53
Quote - (GreyWolfSC said @ #22.3)
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #22.1)
I'm using 2000, XP, Vista, OS X, and Ubuntu. I think I'm covered.


Ha! My BeBox will crush your puny operating systems! ;D



Unless you're a woman, I have no interest in your "box".

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)