main
Report a problem

Queen Elizabeth embraces YouTube

Slimy   on 23 December 2007 - 18:05 · 52 comments & 33531 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Since 1957, the monarch has issued a yearly Christmas message to people in the United Kingdom and around the world. Fifty years ago this Christmas, Queen Elizabeth II's message was televised for the first time. This Christmas, the British Monarchy is embracing another new technology by launching The Royal Channel on YouTube. The first 1957 broadcast is also available on The Royal Channel, along with other rare and previously unreleased archive footage. At around 3pm BST on Christmas Day, this year's Christmas broadcast from the Queen will appear on YouTube as well as on television. Google does it again.

View: The Royal Channel (Thanks Hum)

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 52 additional comments
#1 theyarecomingforyou on 23 Dec 2007 - 18:19
It's a sensible move. It's good to see technology being embraced by establishments considered to be out-of-date by many.
(1 reply) #2 Bawx on 23 Dec 2007 - 18:22
Will people in the US be able to see it live anywhere? Sounds interesting, I'd like to see it.
#2.1 Chugworth on 24 Dec 2007 - 00:08
Well since it's YouTube, the videos posted to it are not "live." You will be able to watch them from anywhere though.
(1 reply) #3 Marshalus on 23 Dec 2007 - 18:27
Funny how her address from 1957 could be given mostly word for word 50 years later.
#3.1 +M2Ys4U on 23 Dec 2007 - 20:32
I noticed this too. I don't know what to make of it
#4 funkymunky on 23 Dec 2007 - 18:52
Queen FTW
(8 replies) #5 The Walker on 23 Dec 2007 - 19:14
Ridiculous... yet another reason why our worthless monarchy should be scrapped.

What is "royal" about her, when her cast will be next to the guy eating **** and the brain-donor doing stupid bike stunts?

No decorum whatsoever. This ranks up there with Blair doing 'The Simpsons'..

..The entire Brittish hirarchy is a very unfunny joke.
#5.1 TRC on 23 Dec 2007 - 19:36
Meh, I don't know if he's trolling or if he really is such a whiner.
#5.2 rob.derosa on 23 Dec 2007 - 19:38
exactly how is it a reason?
#5.3 ghostwind on 23 Dec 2007 - 19:55
-1

I guess this is another reason we shouldn't feed the trolls
#5.4 n_K on 23 Dec 2007 - 20:01
The queen doesn't really do anything but yeh shes fine.
Obvesly none of our royal people are english or british, they are all german or greek or something.
But yeh, william / harry or whichever douchebag will be next, they will be an *******, but the queen is fine
#5.5 metallithrax on 23 Dec 2007 - 20:11
Quote - (n_K said @ #5.5)
The queen doesn't really do anything but yeh shes fine.
Obvesly none of our royal people are english or british, they are all german or greek or something.
But yeh, william / harry or whichever douchebag will be next, they will be an *******, but the queen is fine


So someone who was born in England to English parents isn't English? Strange logic you have there.

On Topic: It's just another place for people not to watch her speech.
#5.6 TRC on 23 Dec 2007 - 20:52
Quote - (n_K said @ #5.5)
Obvesly none of our royal people are english or british, they are all german or greek or something.


She was born in London. Her father was born in Norfolk and her mother in London.
#5.7 theyarecomingforyou on 24 Dec 2007 - 03:04
Quote - (The Walker said @ #1)
Ridiculous... yet another reason why our worthless monarchy should be scrapped.

But you didn't actually give a reason why the monarchy should be scrapped. Extending the scope of the Queen's speech is a positive step if it is not compromising the format, which it is not. Your poor spelling, baseless statements and poor reasoning all make you look foolish and make me all the more thankful for the good breeding of our monarchy. That was just a rant, not an arguement.
#5.8 Peter Lyon on 25 Dec 2007 - 07:51
its probably worth adding, but the royal family bring in more money from tourism and such that they take out.

They actually help our economy lol.
#6 guruparan on 23 Dec 2007 - 19:18
yawn
(1 reply) #7 TRC on 23 Dec 2007 - 19:34
I wouldn't really give Google the credit just because they bought something that was already popular.
#7.1 cork1958 on 24 Dec 2007 - 01:27
Yeah,
How'd that get thrown in. Dang Google fanboys. Almost as sickening as the Firefox fanboys!!

#8 Allan® on 23 Dec 2007 - 20:49
50 years ago, she was a pretty young lady.

I, personally, still think of her as The Queen. My Queen. Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Jamaica, Barbados, the Bahamas, Grenada, Papua New Guinea, the Solomon Islands, Tuvalu, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Antigua and Barbuda, Belize, and Saint Kitts and Nevis are countries she's "The Queen" in, and represented by a Governer General.

Meh, it was a great speech.
#9 ecotrojan on 23 Dec 2007 - 21:53
Better than any U.S president though so has something good going for her
(2 replies) #10 -Hiroshi- on 23 Dec 2007 - 21:56
I'm honestly not too fond on the brittish imperial monarchy. Still bad blood in my eyes between the US and UK when you really dig deep into history. I for one, regardless, will never.. EVER recognize this woman as anything more than a woman and this "queen" is just an aging old woman to me.

Last edited by -Hiroshi- on 23 Dec 2007 - 22:02
#10.1 TRC on 23 Dec 2007 - 22:30
If you dig deep into history there is bad blood between everyone.
#10.2 chicken-royal on 23 Dec 2007 - 23:59
That's alright, I'm not too fond of the US presidency. I also don't see why you should let distant past influence your decision on someone/something a lot more recent. Forgive and forget and all that? (Gross generalisation, I know, some things are best not forgotten but learnt from. I'll stop now, this hole is getting deeper )

Last edited by chicken-royal on 24 Dec 2007 - 00:00
(1 reply) #11 dacris2000 on 23 Dec 2007 - 21:58
I've never met this self-proclaimed monarch. I don't see why we ought to recognize certain people as being above us. We should just call her Elizabeth (if that is her real name) and recognize that inbreeding does not give one the right to divine rule.
#11.1 -Hiroshi- on 23 Dec 2007 - 22:02
lol +1
#12 vetJames7 on 23 Dec 2007 - 22:04
God save the Queen!
(6 replies) #13 Lasker on 23 Dec 2007 - 22:29
I can't understand why UK, Spain and many others European countries are staying having Queens, Kings and monarchy, Come on European people, wake up! its the 21st century, not the 15th century. The only country that waked up already more than 200 years ago was France.
#13.1 kezzzs on 23 Dec 2007 - 22:33
Aside from the fact that it brings millions of pounds of tourist money into the country
#13.2 Slimy on 23 Dec 2007 - 22:35
What are you talking about? France is not the only European country without a royal family.
#13.3 empty on 24 Dec 2007 - 02:33
Quote - (Lasker said @ #13)
I can't understand why UK, Spain and many others European countries are staying having Queens, Kings and monarchy, Come on European people, wake up! its the 21st century, not the 15th century. The only country that waked up already more than 200 years ago was France.


bit of a ridiculous thing to say surely? you americans (im guessing you are american) celebrate columbus day every year, something that marks an event almost 520 years old, and you do so because its tradition and because it marks a big part of your history and culture - the same as the monarchy does for us. Its part of who we are and whilst there is a lot of debate about just how relevant they have become in recent years, i for one, am proud to call her my queen and think that this was a very wise decision. Move on troll.
#13.4 theyarecomingforyou on 24 Dec 2007 - 03:12
The monarchy represents our history, where we came from. The role is purely symbolic and only carries power on paper. Why should we scrap everything that came before us? We already have a parliament that makes the laws of the country. It is also a wealth of history that the US doesn't have and represents the many thousands of lives lost in conflict during our history.
#13.5 -Hiroshi- on 24 Dec 2007 - 07:40
Quote - (theyarecomingforyou said @ #13.4)
The monarchy represents our history, where we came from. The role is purely symbolic and only carries power on paper. Why should we scrap everything that came before us? We already have a parliament that makes the laws of the country. It is also a wealth of history that the US doesn't have and represents the many thousands of lives lost in conflict during our history.


Oh well, too bad one of our earliest historical moments were oppression, taxation without representation by your Monarchy. As well as the deaths of hundreds of thousands of americans just fighting that oppression.
#13.6 SimpleRules on 24 Dec 2007 - 10:36
Quote - (-Hiroshi- said @ #13.5)
Quote - (theyarecomingforyou said @ #13.4)
The monarchy represents our history, where we came from. The role is purely symbolic and only carries power on paper. Why should we scrap everything that came before us? We already have a parliament that makes the laws of the country. It is also a wealth of history that the US doesn't have and represents the many thousands of lives lost in conflict during our history.


Oh well, too bad one of our earliest historical moments were oppression, taxation without representation by your Monarchy. As well as the deaths of hundreds of thousands of americans just fighting that oppression.


And now you're the oppressor, circle of life, eh?

I'm sure your history is just full of wonderful Americans freeing helpless sufferers ... oh wait.
(2 replies) #14 hardbag on 23 Dec 2007 - 22:35
KILL USA
KILL BUSH
#14.1 solardog on 24 Dec 2007 - 00:44
This has got to be so frustrating for you. Thats a shame.
#14.2 -Hiroshi- on 24 Dec 2007 - 07:41
Take a ritalin, it'll do you some good. While your add it, drink some vodka..
(3 replies) #15 funkymunky on 23 Dec 2007 - 23:21
The Queen and the rest of the Royal Family have no power.

They are good to have for the revenue that they bring into the Country.
#15.1 OPaul on 24 Dec 2007 - 00:15
She has the power to disolve Parliament ... I'd call that pretty powerful myself.
#15.2 theyarecomingforyou on 24 Dec 2007 - 03:14
That power is only on paper - it could never be used to overthrow a government in practice.
#15.3 TRC on 24 Dec 2007 - 04:29
Quote -
That power is only on paper


So is the Constitution and everything else.
(1 reply) #16 Naveen on 24 Dec 2007 - 00:33
I wonder why myspace was not chosen. Youtube seems a fairly silly name for a service?
#16.1 cork1958 on 24 Dec 2007 - 01:29
Hopefully, they didn't choose my(wasted)space because they have SOME intelligence!
#17 boho on 24 Dec 2007 - 01:23
I prefer the video that connect our monarchy to the East India Company drug running and the current day Rothschild banking system. The Lord Mayor of London (Rothschild representative) is the only person the Queen bows to! I bet they wont show that! YouTube and Google Video have far more interesting channels (LonleyGirl 15 to mention one )
#18 Doli on 24 Dec 2007 - 02:18
It would have made it to YouTube anyways right?
By the users who post it.
(3 replies) #19 SoulEata on 24 Dec 2007 - 05:14
Google does it again? What the bloody hell is with the corporate whores writing here nowadays. Just because there is now a "Royal" channel on YouTube, DOES NOT MEAN IT HAS A THING TO DO WITH GOOGLE.
#19.1 FloatingFatMan on 24 Dec 2007 - 07:14
Quote - (SoulEata said @ #19)
Google does it again? What the bloody hell is with the corporate whores writing here nowadays. Just because there is now a "Royal" channel on YouTube, DOES NOT MEAN IT HAS A THING TO DO WITH GOOGLE.


+1

I bore of all the rabid Google fanboyism. Google have bugger all to do with this beyond the fact that they own YouTube. It would be the Queens army of advisors and assistants who decided hosting her speeches online is a good idea. I doubt she's ever even BEEN to YouTube, or knows what it is.



Last edited by FloatingFatMan on 24 Dec 2007 - 07:56
#19.2 boho on 24 Dec 2007 - 10:22


Last edited by boho on 24 Dec 2007 - 10:25
#19.3 boho on 24 Dec 2007 - 10:23
Quote - (SoulEata said @ #19)
Google does it again? What the bloody hell is with the corporate whores writing here nowadays. Just because there is now a "Royal" channel on YouTube, DOES NOT MEAN IT HAS A THING TO DO WITH GOOGLE.


Bli'me Steve Ballmer posts here, who'd have thought it?

Youtube is to Google, as MSN is to Microsoft, or My Space is to News Corp. (Rupert Murdoch) Though why I'm trying to educate such an ignorant post, lord only knows. Is their such Microsoft byile outside MS?
#20 waqastariq on 24 Dec 2007 - 11:10
Long live the Queen!
(2 replies) #21 +Octol on 24 Dec 2007 - 12:08
Subject: NOTICE OF REVOCATION OF INDEPENDENCE

Buckingham Palace
14th November 2000

NOTICE OF REVOCATION OF INDEPENDENCE

To the residents of the United States of America,

In view of your abject failure to elect a President and thus to govern yourselves, We give hereby Notice of the Revocation of your Independence, effective today at Five O'Clock Greenwich Mean Time.

Her Britannic Majesty Queen Elizabeth II will resume sovereign duties forthwith over all states, commonwealths and other territories. Except Florida, which Shall be returned to His Illustrious Catholic Majesty, King Juan Carlos of Spain. Your new Prime Minister (The Rt. Hon Tony Blair, for the 97.85% of you who have until now been unaware that there is a world outside your borders) will suggest to Her Majesty a Governor-General for America without the need for further elections. Congress and the Senate will be disbanded. A questionnaire will be circulated next year to determine whether any of you noticed. To aid in the transition to a British Crown Dependency, the following rules are introduced with immediate effect:

1. You should look up "revocation" in the Oxford English Dictionary. Then look up “aluminium”. Check the pronunciation guide. You will be amazed at just how wrongly you have been pronouncing it. Generally, you should raise your vocabulary to acceptable levels. Look up "vocabulary". Using the same twenty seven words interspersed with filler noises such as "like" and "you know" is an unacceptable and inefficient form of communication. Look up "interspersed".

2. There is no such thing as "US English". We will let Microsoft know on your behalf.

3. You should learn to distinguish the English and Australian accents. It really isn't that difficult.

4. Hollywood will be required occasionally to cast British actors as the good guys.

5. You should relearn your original national anthem, "God Save The Queen", but only after fully carrying out task 1. We would not want you to get confused and give up half way through.

6. You should stop playing American "football". There is only one kind of football. What you refer to as American "football" is not a very good
game. The 2.15% of you who are aware that there is a world outside your borders may have noticed that no one else plays "American" football. You will no longer be allowed to play it, and should instead play proper football. Initially, it would be best if you played with the girls. It is a
difficult game. Those of you brave enough will, in time, be allowed to play rugby (which is similar to American "football", but does not involve stopping for a rest every twenty seconds or wearing full kevlar body armour). We are hoping to get together at least an American rugby sevens side by 2005.

7. You should declare war on Quebec and France, using nuclear weapons if they give you any merde. The 98.85% of you who were not aware that there is a world outside your borders should count yourselves lucky. The Russians have never been the bad guys.

8. July 4th is no longer a public holiday. November 8th will be a new national holiday, but only in the British Empire. It will be called "Indecisive Day".

9. All American cars are hereby banned. They are crap and it is for your own good. When we show you German cars, you will understand what we mean.

10. Please tell us who killed JFK. It's been driving us crazy.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Welcome Back.
#21.1 Lasker on 24 Dec 2007 - 13:53
that's cute
#21.2 leo_the_lion on 25 Dec 2007 - 11:41
priceless

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)