NTT DoCoMo Kansa, Inc will be removing a tower that it installed in a local bus station December 2005. About 40 residents of Kawanishi, Hyogo formed a group to eliminate pollution triggered by electromagnetic waves. They claimed that after the tower was installed many people had problems with headaches, insomnia, high blood pressure and also ear ringing.
They filed a request for arbitration with the Osaka Summary Court and on Monday reached a settlement with NTT DoCoMo. NTT DoCoMo claims that these symptoms were not a cause of their tower and is pulling out because the bus station has decided not to renew their lease for the tower.
What do you think about the radiation omitting from Cell towers? Do you think they will find links between the radiation from the towers and illnesses with the general population?
News Source: Textually.org
They filed a request for arbitration with the Osaka Summary Court and on Monday reached a settlement with NTT DoCoMo. NTT DoCoMo claims that these symptoms were not a cause of their tower and is pulling out because the bus station has decided not to renew their lease for the tower.
What do you think about the radiation omitting from Cell towers? Do you think they will find links between the radiation from the towers and illnesses with the general population?
















http://www.newstarget.com/022429.html
So what anti-cell phone organisation do you support?
There are various points on both sides of this argument supported by scientific studies, just because one doesen't say what you want it to does not mean that they are working for a phone company.
Last edited by Athernar on 31 Dec 2007 - 12:05
At which point the people who did it get sued or have criminal damage charges filed against them, thats to say if what you claim actually happened and isen't just bravado.
http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/cell-...e-radiation.htm
http://www.radiationtalk.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_phone_...tion_and_health
Also check your cell's SAR(Specific Absorption Rate: a way of measuring the quantity of radiofrequency (RF) energy that is absorbed by the body) rating here http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-6602_7-5020355-1.html
Of course they all suffered illness very quickly (headaches etc.)
They were a little embarrassed when it was revealed that the mast was fake and there was no radiation, all the "illness" was psychological.
Last edited by Tha Bloo Monkee on 31 Dec 2007 - 16:45
My personal opinion is that the vast majority of complaints regarding pain or discomfort are psychosomatic since I've seen people who've not experienced any alleged effects to RF exposure only complain after they learn they are near a cell tower. These same people have microwave ovens in their houses- and have had them for years- and experience none of the effects the cell towers are alleged to cause yet microwave ovens radiate 400 to 1000+ watts of energy internally and measured levels in front of the oven can approach 100% in the higher-wattage units.
I believe these people equate RF radiation with atomic related radiation / particle emissions and high-energy electro-magnetic radiation such as gamma and x-rays, which is far from true. The former does not strip electrons from atoms or add neutrons to the nucleus but it is called 'radiation' therefore it is bad for you, like the latter.
Last edited by Regression_88 on 31 Dec 2007 - 14:35
We tend to panic too much when we hear words like "radiation" or "nuclear", just this morning Radio 4 had a programme discussing how the Chernobyl disaster wasn't nearly as bad as the most optimistic expectations at the time.
The usual standard is to prove something true, not false.
its seems like everything causes cancer these days. What doesnt cause cancer?
back to topic, i hope they feel better with that thing gone whether it really did cause it or not.
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.