main
Report a problem

Japanese Citizens get Cell Tower Removed for Health Reasons

Frank   on 31 December 2007 - 07:54 · 27 comments & 18385 views

Advertisement (Why?)
NTT DoCoMo Kansa, Inc will be removing a tower that it installed in a local bus station December 2005. About 40 residents of Kawanishi, Hyogo formed a group to eliminate pollution triggered by electromagnetic waves. They claimed that after the tower was installed many people had problems with headaches, insomnia, high blood pressure and also ear ringing.

They filed a request for arbitration with the Osaka Summary Court and on Monday reached a settlement with NTT DoCoMo. NTT DoCoMo claims that these symptoms were not a cause of their tower and is pulling out because the bus station has decided not to renew their lease for the tower.

What do you think about the radiation omitting from Cell towers? Do you think they will find links between the radiation from the towers and illnesses with the general population?

News Source: Textually.org

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 27 additional comments
(4 replies) #1 Enrickey on 31 Dec 2007 - 08:08
Not a single decent study has yet show a link, so I doubt any is going to come up any time soon. Most of these people are just associating general bad health with it, and if it improves, it's only due to the placebo effect.
#1.1 xdcc on 31 Dec 2007 - 09:35
Cell Phone Radiation Triggers Measurable Brain Cell Changes in Mere Minutes

http://www.newstarget.com/022429.html
#1.2 excalpius on 31 Dec 2007 - 09:50
Direct Quote...."There was no direct evidence of cancer inducement in the current study. "
#1.3 ahhell on 31 Dec 2007 - 11:40
So what cell phone company do you work for?
#1.4 Athernar on 31 Dec 2007 - 11:58
Quote - (ahhell said @ #1.3)
So what cell phone company do you work for?


So what anti-cell phone organisation do you support?

There are various points on both sides of this argument supported by scientific studies, just because one doesen't say what you want it to does not mean that they are working for a phone company.

Last edited by Athernar on 31 Dec 2007 - 12:05
(2 replies) #2 x2p on 31 Dec 2007 - 09:06
In england we just tare them down lol.
#2.1 Athernar on 31 Dec 2007 - 12:00
Quote - (x2p said @ #2)
In england we just tare them down lol.


At which point the people who did it get sued or have criminal damage charges filed against them, thats to say if what you claim actually happened and isen't just bravado.
#2.2 Lant on 31 Dec 2007 - 12:05
If only... all the primary schools had them removed, because of parents complaining. But Orange still managed to get one down a busy road even with protesters there when they put it up.
#3 ibetheone on 31 Dec 2007 - 09:38
Since were on topic here are some good sites to check out on cell phone radation....

http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/cell-...e-radiation.htm

http://www.radiationtalk.com/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_phone_...tion_and_health

Also check your cell's SAR(Specific Absorption Rate: a way of measuring the quantity of radiofrequency (RF) energy that is absorbed by the body) rating here http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-6602_7-5020355-1.html



(2 replies) #4 winmoose on 31 Dec 2007 - 12:17
I saw a documentary once where they got a load of people who "suffer" from mobile phone radiation and put them in a house near a mobile phone mast to see how quickly they got ill.

Of course they all suffered illness very quickly (headaches etc.)

They were a little embarrassed when it was revealed that the mast was fake and there was no radiation, all the "illness" was psychological.
#4.1 vetmarkjensen on 31 Dec 2007 - 15:53
Classic!
#4.2 gunnerhkjp on 31 Dec 2007 - 16:41
That's quite interesting.
(1 reply) #5 plastikaa on 31 Dec 2007 - 13:35
I'd be more worried if you live near to an electricity pylon... as i think they actually have been proved to cause health problems.
#5.1 Tha Bloo Monkee on 31 Dec 2007 - 16:43
I have one about.. 400 meters away from my house The subdivision beside me has a tower directly beside a few houses :| I wouldn't live right beside that!

Last edited by Tha Bloo Monkee on 31 Dec 2007 - 16:45
#6 Regression_88 on 31 Dec 2007 - 14:29
I've participated in several EME surveys, most of which measured significantly higher radiation exposure levels from overhead power lines than from cell towers. The FCC / OSHA have specific guidelines regarding safe, continuos RF exposure limits and several of the surveys I've seen demonstrate 100KVA overhead transmission lines at greater than 200% of the limit. The output from a 1900 MHz / 50 watt transmitter with a radiation height of 50 feet above ground when measured at ground level and 100 feet from the base of the tower was less than 30% of the limit. Microcells such as the ones found in buildings, subways, tunnels and other confined spaces rarely exceed 5 watts and measurements taken directly in front of the antennae are in the 25-50% range. So if you had to choose, would you rather have a cell site or power lines overhead?

My personal opinion is that the vast majority of complaints regarding pain or discomfort are psychosomatic since I've seen people who've not experienced any alleged effects to RF exposure only complain after they learn they are near a cell tower. These same people have microwave ovens in their houses- and have had them for years- and experience none of the effects the cell towers are alleged to cause yet microwave ovens radiate 400 to 1000+ watts of energy internally and measured levels in front of the oven can approach 100% in the higher-wattage units.

I believe these people equate RF radiation with atomic related radiation / particle emissions and high-energy electro-magnetic radiation such as gamma and x-rays, which is far from true. The former does not strip electrons from atoms or add neutrons to the nucleus but it is called 'radiation' therefore it is bad for you, like the latter.

Last edited by Regression_88 on 31 Dec 2007 - 14:35
(4 replies) #7 hagjohn on 31 Dec 2007 - 14:59
I would think radiation of any kind would harm our bodies at some point. Depending how much radiation we absorb/exposed too.
#7.1 winmoose on 31 Dec 2007 - 15:09
Life has evolved over millions of years to tolerate (arguably need) natural levels of radiation.

We tend to panic too much when we hear words like "radiation" or "nuclear", just this morning Radio 4 had a programme discussing how the Chernobyl disaster wasn't nearly as bad as the most optimistic expectations at the time.
#7.2 Mackster on 31 Dec 2007 - 15:22
It is usually common sense that these radiating cellphone base stations or power lines are not good for your health. Who really wants to go ahead and live 20 meters away from a base station for a year or two? I am pretty sure it will not decrease your chances to develop brain cancer...
#7.3 +M2Ys4U on 31 Dec 2007 - 16:39
you'd better stay in total darkness because light is electromagnetic radiation. RUN FOR THE HILLS!!!11oneeleven
#7.4 Daninku on 31 Dec 2007 - 18:45
Even rock ommits electromagnetic radiation.
#8 shakey on 31 Dec 2007 - 16:37
who cares what it emits. If the residence dont want it up where they live, they should have a say. Just cause its a business doesnt mean that they can build whatever where-ever they want. Usually it does, but i believe that the people who live in the area should have a say, reasonable or not, they should have a say.
(1 reply) #9 - Kaboose - on 31 Dec 2007 - 16:58
i agree....health risk...just because not enough adequate research have been performed...doesnt mean it not a health hazard
#9.1 Joe USer on 31 Dec 2007 - 17:32
Quote - (- Kaboose - said @ #9)
just because not enough adequate research have been performed...doesnt mean it not a health hazard


The usual standard is to prove something true, not false.
#10 Roscomac on 31 Dec 2007 - 22:52
Nuclear, solar and other forms of radiation were not considered a potential health risk until proven so - why is electromagnetic any likely to prove different. True, the power of these emissions are not very high but there is evidence to show the phone user is at risk.
#11 kaelsmith on 31 Dec 2007 - 23:33
so is any other wireless tech gonna cause cancer or other pains? 360s, wireless routers and such? does it use the same kinda stuff?

its seems like everything causes cancer these days. What doesnt cause cancer?

back to topic, i hope they feel better with that thing gone whether it really did cause it or not.
(1 reply) #12 plastikaa on 02 Jan 2008 - 00:47
Another ironic but interesting point is that all these "health problems" these towers cause, have created research that has proved little in low power everyday cases we are all exposed to.... but have actually sparked interesting studies into regrowing cells and repairing the body. As when tests were done at extreme levels much higher than you would ever be exposed to it created incredible results.
#12.1 CFer on 02 Jan 2008 - 17:49
Ofcourse they have. And next thing you'll hear is Tobacco cures Heart Disease right? How likely do you think that the same people profiteering from such devices are going to discover something inherently dangerous in it.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)