Posted by Tom Warren on 10 January 2008 - 01:47 · 37 comments & 29142 views
Yesterday we visited the Microsoft booth to take a look at the surface computer first hand.

This year Microsoft has no big announcements and the stand is very similar to last year with the exception of having the surface computer to play around with. This was the first time that any of us at Neowin have played on the surface as previously the unit was not functioning correctly and we were unable to see it at the Microsoft Partner Pavilion.

The multi touch side of the surface seemed a little laggy and you couldn't help thinking that it wouldn't be easy to shift the device around. You can't fault the interface though it was futuristic, fun and yet simple for anyone to use.

We managed to play around with the photo application and the friendly Microsoft employee had a camera to take a picture of Josh from WindowsConnected.com. As you can see from the videos we have uploaded it was blisteringly fast and very simple to get the picture onto the device. Anyone without computing knowledge could have achieved this.

I asked the MS rep if this technology was fully patented and he said that Microsoft had tried to patent as much as possible but that some of the multi touch functions weren't Microsoft patented.

Microsoft believes we will see these units in retail stores and restaurants in the course of 2008 and these are the perfect devices to put into the bars at the casinos in Vegas!

Check out the videos below to see some real life experiences with the surface.

Video: Water Demo | Picture Demo | Paint Application



There are 37 additional comments
Advertisement
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #1 Posted by Co_Co on 10 Jan 2008 - 01:53
i love the paint demo, NEOWIN
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #2 Posted by Lasker on 10 Jan 2008 - 02:05
yup, that was funny!
(9 replies) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #3 Posted by evo_spook on 10 Jan 2008 - 02:15
Its wonderful, loved the water ripple effect.

but....................


The problem with it is that its a full, good technology without an use.

We have the Answer, but at the moment, theres no question, usually you have a question first.

Find an application for it and great, but no, restaurants and retail stores ARE NOT going to be it.!!!!


Come on MS!!! why the hell do Restaurants and Retail stores need that!!!!

Education facilities and Museums YES!!!!



Find a bloody use for it instead of it being a toy
Quote this comment #3.1 Posted by +Digix on 10 Jan 2008 - 04:28
if you look at the technical release demos when surface was release the videos for some of what they were showing was possible shows many advantages of having it in retail or a restaurant.
Quote this comment #3.2 Posted by whocares78 on 10 Jan 2008 - 07:15
you have to be kidding me, there are a million uses for it,

retail, product demos, being able ot look at products from every angle, hell the CES demo bill did of it, browsing through catalogues, the possibilities are endless. want to buy a product but not sure if ya missus will like it, hell stick ya phone on the screen and send. hair cuts, get a photo of you off your phone, and use the software to pick a haircut that works..

restuarant and bars, ordering food, looking through menus ordering drinks, imagine sitting at a bar, u just put your wallet on it and order a drink, it automatically takes your money from your smart card or whatever and a bar person brings you your drink or food..no tryign to yell at a bar person to order a drink and no not getting the right change!!!!

design industry - a hell of a lot of possibiliteis right there

just becasue you cant think of any reasons doesnt mean there isnt any it just means you cant think of any...hell you even came up with 2 pretty decent uses for it yourself...

i think the tech is brilliant and has endless possibilities

Quote this comment #3.3 Posted by Jugalator on 10 Jan 2008 - 08:15
Quote - (Digix said @ #3.1)
if you look at the technical release demos when surface was release the videos for some of what they were showing was possible shows many advantages of having it in retail or a restaurant.

As would a regular touch screen be? If these haven't been adopted there much yet, I don't really see why this product would be?

The only difference I can tell is that this device supports several people/hands touching it at once, but that is also no requirement at e.g. a restaurant or a retail store. So they could have just used the over a decade old touch display technology anyway, and probably far cheaper too because of its age and how common the technology is. Yes, it can also work on any surface, but with the disadvantage of setting it up instead being moved to rigging cameras for the displays and introducing more lag.

Last edited by Jugalator on 10 Jan 2008 - 08:22
Quote this comment #3.4 Posted by evo_spook on 10 Jan 2008 - 09:12
year right, restaurants really need a couple of k touch screen table when a few pound paper menu will do a lot better job
Quote this comment #3.5 Posted by +Antaris on 10 Jan 2008 - 10:28
You will find over the next few years, the surface computer will find different form factors, new software and applications. I think one day it is entirely plausible to come home and have some sort of wall-mounted surface. This is the starting point for this technology
Quote this comment #3.6 Posted by Croquant on 10 Jan 2008 - 12:19
Quote - (Antaris said @ #3.5)
You will find over the next few years, the surface computer will find different form factors, new software and applications. I think one day it is entirely plausible to come home and have some sort of wall-mounted surface. This is the starting point for this technology

And I suppose the flying car, the 7-hour work week and the robot maid are due to hit the market any second now, right?
I suppose you could find lots of usefull purposes for a surface computer, but what can it do that a multi-touch screen can't do?
Quote this comment #3.7 Posted by MioTheGreat on 10 Jan 2008 - 14:16
Quote - (Jugalator said @ #3.3)
Quote - (Digix said @ #3.1)
if you look at the technical release demos when surface was release the videos for some of what they were showing was possible shows many advantages of having it in retail or a restaurant.

As would a regular touch screen be? If these haven't been adopted there much yet, I don't really see why this product would be?

The only difference I can tell is that this device supports several people/hands touching it at once, but that is also no requirement at e.g. a restaurant or a retail store. So they could have just used the over a decade old touch display technology anyway, and probably far cheaper too because of its age and how common the technology is. Yes, it can also work on any surface, but with the disadvantage of setting it up instead being moved to rigging cameras for the displays and introducing more lag.



One of the advantages of it was also that it can recognize different objects placed on it. Any 'regular' touch screen can't do that. That feature was crucial to a lot of the applications demoed.
Quote this comment #3.8 Posted by Croquant on 10 Jan 2008 - 15:17
Quote - (MioTheGreat said @ #3.7)
Quote - (Jugalator said @ #3.3)
Quote - (Digix said @ #3.1)
if you look at the technical release demos when surface was release the videos for some of what they were showing was possible shows many advantages of having it in retail or a restaurant.

As would a regular touch screen be? If these haven't been adopted there much yet, I don't really see why this product would be?

The only difference I can tell is that this device supports several people/hands touching it at once, but that is also no requirement at e.g. a restaurant or a retail store. So they could have just used the over a decade old touch display technology anyway, and probably far cheaper too because of its age and how common the technology is. Yes, it can also work on any surface, but with the disadvantage of setting it up instead being moved to rigging cameras for the displays and introducing more lag.



One of the advantages of it was also that it can recognize different objects placed on it. Any 'regular' touch screen can't do that. That feature was crucial to a lot of the applications demoed.

That's a gimmick. What does it actually DO?
Quote this comment #3.9 Posted by +GreyWolfSC on 10 Jan 2008 - 15:57
Quote - (Croquant said @ #3.
Quote - (MioTheGreat said @ #3.7)
Quote - (Jugalator said @ #3.3)
Quote - (Digix said @ #3.1)
if you look at the technical release demos when surface was release the videos for some of what they were showing was possible shows many advantages of having it in retail or a restaurant.

As would a regular touch screen be? If these haven't been adopted there much yet, I don't really see why this product would be?

The only difference I can tell is that this device supports several people/hands touching it at once, but that is also no requirement at e.g. a restaurant or a retail store. So they could have just used the over a decade old touch display technology anyway, and probably far cheaper too because of its age and how common the technology is. Yes, it can also work on any surface, but with the disadvantage of setting it up instead being moved to rigging cameras for the displays and introducing more lag.



One of the advantages of it was also that it can recognize different objects placed on it. Any 'regular' touch screen can't do that. That feature was crucial to a lot of the applications demoed.

That's a gimmick. What does it actually DO?


It recognizes other electronics like MP3 players and cameras so you can transfer media to and from them. It also lets you use objects with 'bump codes' on them as controls. It will be cool to be able to just flick the ring around your coaster on the table and the waitress just brings you a refill of what you already have because the coaster indicated what it was. Other people have created their own surface computing tables and used them for music composition, too.
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #4 Posted by shen on 10 Jan 2008 - 02:20
perfect for bars and casinos in vegas? gee, y'think? they've been in the revolution lounge at the mirage for over a year, now. afaik, it was one of the first places in the world to get them.
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #5 Posted by simon360 on 10 Jan 2008 - 02:38
Looks cool, wish it wasn't based on cameras, though. The lag isn't good, and it doesn't seem like the most reliable way of detecting touch.

But nonetheless, I'd love one of these for myself. Won't happen for a while, though
(4 replies) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #6 Posted by LTD on 10 Jan 2008 - 03:29
It's a table.

Lets see that in a notebook. Then maybe I'll be impressed.
Quote this comment #6.1 Posted by vetSlimy on 10 Jan 2008 - 03:34
http://www.neowin.net/news/main/07/10/26/w...ltitouch-laptop
Quote this comment #6.2 Posted by MrA on 10 Jan 2008 - 03:49
pfft. The Dell Latitude XT is a better example. Production hardware with multi-touch. Too bad there's no software for it.
Quote this comment #6.3 Posted by vetSlimy on 10 Jan 2008 - 03:53
Quote - (MrA said @ #6.2)
pfft. The Dell Latitude XT is a better example. Production hardware with multi-touch. Too bad there's no software for it.

I thought that was a tablet?
Quote this comment #6.4 Posted by excalpius on 10 Jan 2008 - 05:11
LTD would gizz if it was an APPLE table.
(7 replies) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #7 Posted by Gabe3 on 10 Jan 2008 - 03:31
my itouch can do all that but on a smaller screen...
Quote this comment #7.1 Posted by shockz on 10 Jan 2008 - 03:36
Quote - (Gabe3 said @ #7)
my itouch can do all that but on a smaller screen...


Stop kidding yourself.
Quote this comment #7.2 Posted by vetSlimy on 10 Jan 2008 - 03:37
It can't do half the things in this video: http://www.neowin.net/index.php?act=view&id=40611
Do you know why? They're different products. It's like taking a plane and a car and saying "My car can get me from point A to point B and it's much smaller."
Quote this comment #7.3 Posted by osirisX on 10 Jan 2008 - 05:06
I didn't know my iPod touch could have a camera sit on it and transfer the photos...
Quote this comment #7.4 Posted by IdenticalJet on 10 Jan 2008 - 14:31
Quote -
itouch


iPod Touch *
Quote this comment #7.5 Posted by +Digix on 10 Jan 2008 - 16:46
I have one too, but I know it cannot do this stuff.
Quote this comment #7.6 Posted by Gabe3 on 10 Jan 2008 - 17:50
Quote - (Digix said @ #7.5)
I have one too, but I know it cannot do this stuff.

Mine does everything in the 3 posted videos above. Yours is jailbroke right?
Quote this comment #7.7 Posted by MioTheGreat on 11 Jan 2008 - 13:32
Quote - (Gabe3 said @ #7.6)
Quote - (Digix said @ #7.5)
I have one too, but I know it cannot do this stuff.

Mine does everything in the 3 posted videos above. Yours is jailbroke right?


Can it tell the difference between a brush and a finger for the painting?
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #8 Posted by +lylesback2 on 10 Jan 2008 - 04:17
that water demo looks like an amazing coffee table of the future.... *drools* god i want one on my coffee table to play movies / music from my pc
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #9 Posted by WarLuigi on 10 Jan 2008 - 05:54
It's just a natural progressoin of input styles. Pair this with perfect voice recognition and you got a winner in the home market.
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #10 Posted by Doli on 10 Jan 2008 - 05:54
I think its nice but nothing that special until they show some new demos and not that same stuff we seen before. IF you go to the website http://www.microsoft.com/surface/ they have three videos shoing the same stuff over and over in each video.
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #11 Posted by coolvi on 10 Jan 2008 - 07:06
That + Windows Mobile 7...Only if...Wow...
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #12 Posted by Gabe3 on 10 Jan 2008 - 07:06
Well I was talking about the 3 videos posted in this news article. But the video showing some of the other features is great. Not like you will find them in many restaurants anytime soon. Maybe 10 years from now but thats pushing it.
(1 reply) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #13 Posted by Zerosignull on 10 Jan 2008 - 08:00
Microsoft have been bangin on about this idea for years.

This is not the first time they have shown this wonderfull peace of "new" technology.
Quote this comment #13.1 Posted by Harreh on 10 Jan 2008 - 15:09
The point of this article is because it's the first time Neowin have got their hands on it.
(1 reply) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #14 Posted by Computer Guru on 10 Jan 2008 - 09:14
Cameras!?

I must say, that's pretty shocking. So long as there is a post-processing and filtering involved in the multi-touch hardware interface, there is no way it'll ever be close to lag-free.

This is a nice prototype, but MS will need to find a better hardware implementation because there is no way cross-referencing input from an array of cameras will ever be responsive enough.

This isn't my field of expertise, but I know that better alternatives exist. I'm sure they all have their drawbacks and there is a reason MS is using cameras, but pressure-sensitive pads and other technologies can be adapted to the Surface without the horrid lag effect.

Sure, it's only a couple of milliseconds, but that's a couple of milliseconds too much.

Cool stuff though
Quote this comment #14.1 Posted by MioTheGreat on 10 Jan 2008 - 14:18
The wiimote is a camera, and it works virtually instantly.

It's certainly possible to get the hardware real time, they just haven't done it yet.
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #15 Posted by hewitt s. on 10 Jan 2008 - 13:45
Say what you want about Microsoft, but Surface is freaking cool! (and innovative)

Last edited by hewitt s. on 10 Jan 2008 - 13:46
[1]

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.


Scroll to the Top
....
My Preferences
....
Communicating with server
Loading
Please Wait...
....
Loading
 X 
....