apple
Report a problem

Apple announces MacBook Air

EL1TE   on 15 January 2008 - 19:35 · 164 comments & 110499 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Steve Jobs took the stage this morning at the Macworld Conference & Expo to exhort the Mac faithful and announce a handful of new products.

MacBook Air

The rumors were true. Steve Jobs unveiled Apple's latest portable, the $1,799 MacBook Air, which he called the "world's thinnest notebook." Dissing Sony's TX series, Jobs said that other subnotebook manufacturers inevitably compromise on the display, have mini-keyboards, and run too slowly due to heat issues.

Specs:
  • 1.6GHz or 1.8GHz Core 2 Duo
  • 80GB 1.8" Hard Drive standard, optional 64GB solid-state drive
  • 0.76" thick at thickest point, weighs 3lbs.
  • 2GB RAM
  • 5 hours of battery life
  • $1,799 for 1.6GHz, 80GB HD model; $3,099 for 1.8GHz, 64GB SSD model
  • Full aluminum case

The MacBook Air is silver, weighs 3 lbs. and has a wedge-shaped profile that's 0.76" thick at the fattest point and 0.16" thick at its thinnest point. There's a full-size keyboard, a 13.3" widescreen display with LED backlighting, and a built-in iSight. The keyboard has an ambient light sensor similar to that of the MacBook Pro, and the trackpad supports multitouch gestures for panning, zooming, and rotating.

On the hardware side, the MacBook Air comes standard with an 80GB 1.8" hard drive, with a 64GB solid-state drive available. It's powered by an Intel Core 2 Duo running at 1.6GHz, with an option for a 1.8GHz model. According to Jobs, the Core 2 Duo in the MacBook Air is 60 percent smaller than standard C2D CPUs.

There's no optical drive or Ethernet port on the MacBook Air. The new laptop only includes built-in 802.11n, USB, DVI, and a headphone jack. Software installations can be done remotely using "Remote Disk," which allows the MacBook Air to access the optical drive of a networked Mac or PC.

Jobs also touted the environmentally-friendly nature of the MacBook Air. It has a full aluminum case, which he said is "highly desired by recyclers," a bromide- and PVC-free motherboard, and the retail packaging takes less than 50 percent of the volume of the previous packaging.

View: Full Story @ ArsTechnica
Video: >> Click here <<
Link: MacBook Air - Home Page

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 164 additional comments
(6 replies) #1 vipwoody on 15 Jan 2008 - 19:42
NEAT!
#1.1 Steven on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:36
Any laptop that does not have a user-replaceable battery is not neat.

Last edited by Steven on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:37
#1.2 nekrosoft13 on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:49
Quote - (Steven said @ #1.1)
Any laptop that does not have a user-replaceable battery is not neat.


wow, thats low. not only its overpriced, but they also find another way to cheat a customer.
#1.3 evo_spook on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:51
Quote - (nekrosoft13 said @ #1.2)
Quote - (Steven said @ #1.1)
Any laptop that does not have a user-replaceable battery is not neat.


wow, thats low. not only its overpriced, but they also find another way to cheat a customer.



Well, seeing how they are not hiding this, they are in fact not cheating anyone
#1.4 whocares78 on 16 Jan 2008 - 00:51
Quote - (evo_spook said @ #1.3)
Quote - (nekrosoft13 said @ #1.2)
Quote - (Steven said @ #1.1)
Any laptop that does not have a user-replaceable battery is not neat.


wow, thats low. not only its overpriced, but they also find another way to cheat a customer.



Well, seeing how they are not hiding this, they are in fact not cheating anyone


no they are simply scamming them.
On a serious note, sometimes with laptops it is required to remove the battery to solve problems...how the hell is that goign to work..and befroe you say it not just PC laptops..or for long trips when you need more battery life.. you can't just take a spare battery with you..

hell apple even recommends removing it under certian circumstances
http://www.apple.com/au/batteries/notebooks.html

It is a bit of a worry that they havent learnt their lesson on user replaceable batteries by now....
#1.5 evo_spook on 16 Jan 2008 - 09:00
Quote - (whocares78 said @ #1.4)
Quote - (evo_spook said @ #1.3)
Quote - (nekrosoft13 said @ #1.2)
Quote - (Steven said @ #1.1)
Any laptop that does not have a user-replaceable battery is not neat.


wow, thats low. not only its overpriced, but they also find another way to cheat a customer.



Well, seeing how they are not hiding this, they are in fact not cheating anyone


no they are simply scamming them.
On a serious note, sometimes with laptops it is required to remove the battery to solve problems...how the hell is that goign to work..and befroe you say it not just PC laptops..or for long trips when you need more battery life.. you can't just take a spare battery with you..

hell apple even recommends removing it under certian circumstances
http://www.apple.com/au/batteries/notebooks.html

It is a bit of a worry that they havent learnt their lesson on user replaceable batteries by now....


No, they're not scamming either, a scam would also be where its hidden, this is not hidden, you know it upfront and its your choice
#1.6 Swordnyx on 17 Jan 2008 - 02:17
Quote - (evo_spook said @ #1.5)
Quote - (whocares78 said @ #1.4)
Quote - (evo_spook said @ #1.3)
Quote - (nekrosoft13 said @ #1.2)
Quote - (Steven said @ #1.1)
Any laptop that does not have a user-replaceable battery is not neat.


wow, thats low. not only its overpriced, but they also find another way to cheat a customer.



Well, seeing how they are not hiding this, they are in fact not cheating anyone


no they are simply scamming them.
On a serious note, sometimes with laptops it is required to remove the battery to solve problems...how the hell is that goign to work..and befroe you say it not just PC laptops..or for long trips when you need more battery life.. you can't just take a spare battery with you..

hell apple even recommends removing it under certian circumstances
http://www.apple.com/au/batteries/notebooks.html

It is a bit of a worry that they havent learnt their lesson on user replaceable batteries by now....


No, they're not scamming either, a scam would also be where its hidden, this is not hidden, you know it upfront and its your choice


Yes you are absolutely correct. They are not scamming. They are just ripping you off.
(5 replies) #2 eilegz on 15 Jan 2008 - 19:45
OVERPRICED, sorry i rather get a thinkpad X series.
#2.1 X'tyfe on 15 Jan 2008 - 19:46
Quote - (eilegz said @ #2)
OVERPRICED, sorry i rather get a thinkpad X series.


agreed, the hardware in macs are just so far behind that of a pc
i can get alot more than that for 3 grand

maybe if i was one of them rich mac fanboys...

Last edited by X'tyfe on 15 Jan 2008 - 19:47
#2.2 guruparan on 15 Jan 2008 - 19:50
Quote - (eilegz said @ #2)
OVERPRICED, sorry i rather get a thinkpad X series.

+1

Looks good..

but just found that it didnt have optical drive :-( (not a big issue though! , It shud have been 160GB..

too much pricey :-(
#2.3 whocares78 on 16 Jan 2008 - 00:53
+1

no ethernet port either.. what if i want to transfer files FAST...

#2.4 eAi on 16 Jan 2008 - 03:22
Quote - (whocares78 said @ #2.3)
+1

no ethernet port either.. what if i want to transfer files FAST...
Buy the like $20 USB ethernet dongle.
#2.5 whocares78 on 16 Jan 2008 - 04:44
Quote - (eAi said @ #2.4)
Quote - (whocares78 said @ #2.3)
+1

no ethernet port either.. what if i want to transfer files FAST...
Buy the like $20 USB ethernet dongle.


so that uses up the one and only USB port, so now i dont have USB port!!!
(8 replies) #3 tsupersonic on 15 Jan 2008 - 19:51
For those that are goin to say overpriced, the Sony TZ (Sony's lightweight series) is more expensive than this...

I'm not saying this is cheap, but compartively, it's cheaper.

I can't believe I said all this, I hate Apple...
#3.1 vetneufuse on 15 Jan 2008 - 19:55
Quote - (tsupersonic said @ #3)
For those that are goin to say overpriced, the Sony TZ (Sony's lightweight series) is more expensive than this...

I'm not saying this is cheap, but compartively, it's cheaper.

I can't believe I said all this, I hate Apple...


Apple also lied about the size of their one compared to others... Sony has one thinner then this
#3.2 tsupersonic on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:06
Quote - (neufuse said @ #3.1)
Quote - (tsupersonic said @ #3)
For those that are goin to say overpriced, the Sony TZ (Sony's lightweight series) is more expensive than this...

I'm not saying this is cheap, but compartively, it's cheaper.

I can't believe I said all this, I hate Apple...


Apple also lied about the size of their one compared to others... Sony has one thinner then this
Link?
#3.3 vetmarkjensen on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:23
I compared the published Apple Air specs to the Sony TX mentioned:

Air
Intel Core2 Duo @ 1.6GHz
2GB RAM
80GB HD
No Optical
0.76" @ thickest
3 lbs
$1,799

TX
Intel Core Solo @ 1.2GHz
1GB RAM (Max 1.5 GB)
80GB HD
DVD+-RW
0.83-1.23"
2.84 lbs
$1,999

Apple standard RAM is higher than the maximum you can get for the TX, a much better CPU, and the Air is thinner/sleeker in profile. The sacrifice for the reduced size is no optical drive, which might be a deal-breaker for some people. The cost is also $200 less than the Sony TX list price.

Seems in roughly the same pricing ballpark, yet some lament the Apples as being "way overpriced". I'm not seeing it here.

Last edited by markjensen on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:23
#3.4 vetneufuse on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:52
Quote - (tsupersonic said @ #3.2)
Quote - (neufuse said @ #3.1)
Quote - (tsupersonic said @ #3)
For those that are goin to say overpriced, the Sony TZ (Sony's lightweight series) is more expensive than this...

I'm not saying this is cheap, but compartively, it's cheaper.

I can't believe I said all this, I hate Apple...


Apple also lied about the size of their one compared to others... Sony has one thinner then this
Link?


Link to what? watch the key notes when Jobs says the size of the smallest Sony laptop he didn't talk about the SMALLEST sony laptop... which is a tad bit thinner then the mac
#3.5 eilegz on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:14
comparing mac with sony its useless since BOTH overprice their products.
#3.6 tsupersonic on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:25
Quote - (neufuse said @ #3.4)
Quote - (tsupersonic said @ #3.2)
Quote - (neufuse said @ #3.1)
Quote - (tsupersonic said @ #3)
For those that are goin to say overpriced, the Sony TZ (Sony's lightweight series) is more expensive than this...

I'm not saying this is cheap, but compartively, it's cheaper.

I can't believe I said all this, I hate Apple...


Apple also lied about the size of their one compared to others... Sony has one thinner then this
Link?


Link to what? watch the key notes when Jobs says the size of the smallest Sony laptop he didn't talk about the SMALLEST sony laptop... which is a tad bit thinner then the mac
Give me a link to the Sony website that lists the product specs. I checked sony's site and no sony sz series laptop is thinner.

Provide me with a link to the sony site, otherwise you fail.

I can't believe I'm defending a Mac... yikes

Last edited by tsupersonic on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:25
#3.7 tsupersonic on 15 Jan 2008 - 22:39
Quote - (tsupersonic said @ #3.6)
Quote - (neufuse said @ #3.4)
Quote - (tsupersonic said @ #3.2)
Quote - (neufuse said @ #3.1)
Quote - (tsupersonic said @ #3)
For those that are goin to say overpriced, the Sony TZ (Sony's lightweight series) is more expensive than this...

I'm not saying this is cheap, but compartively, it's cheaper.

I can't believe I said all this, I hate Apple...


Apple also lied about the size of their one compared to others... Sony has one thinner then this
Link?


Link to what? watch the key notes when Jobs says the size of the smallest Sony laptop he didn't talk about the SMALLEST sony laptop... which is a tad bit thinner then the mac
Give me a link to the Sony website that lists the product specs. I checked sony's site and no sony sz series laptop is thinner.

Provide me with a link to the sony site, otherwise you fail.

I can't believe I'm defending a Mac... yikes
Found the Sony X505 which is 0.75" thick.

http://tech.yahoo.com/blogs/null/65163
#3.8 vetmarkjensen on 16 Jan 2008 - 03:25
Quote - (tsupersonic said @ #3.7)
Found the Sony X505 which is 0.75" thick.

http://tech.yahoo.com/blogs/null/65163
That was a 2004 vintage unit, and is no longer in production.

And that, for a stab at a 0.01" thickness advantage. Better not set that on a piece of paper.
(5 replies) #4 vetneufuse on 15 Jan 2008 - 19:55
You pay for looks with a Mac... personally I'd get something way better for the money
#4.1 Axon on 15 Jan 2008 - 19:58
You also pay for looks with a car. But on one really seems to come down this hard on Mercedes-Benz.

I take it your deal-finding persona drives one sweet ass Hyundai Pony!
#4.2 Danrarbc on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:10
Quote - (Axon said @ #4.1)
I take it your deal-finding persona drives one sweet ass Hyundai Pony!

The sad part is you probably think that's an insult.


Anyways, I always like to see Apple get caught fibbing. Just like the 'World's fastest PC' commercials they had to stop airing.
#4.3 vetneufuse on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:12
Quote - (Axon said @ #4.1)
You also pay for looks with a car. But on one really seems to come down this hard on Mercedes-Benz.

I take it your deal-finding persona drives one sweet ass Hyundai Pony!


Uh no I buy used cars no sense in wasteing money for a new car when you can get it for at least half price 2 years later... same thing doesn't work with comps though... wouldn't want to buy a comp 2 years after it came out... so the car / comp analogy doesn't work right in this case for cost vs looks

Last edited by neufuse on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:13
#4.4 FusionOpz on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:48
Quote - (Axon said @ #4.1)
You also pay for looks with a car. But on one really seems to come down this hard on Mercedes-Benz.
I'd rather have a 95 Cutlass Supreme (I hate this car with a passion btw) then a Mercedes/BMW/Lincon

Last edited by FusionOpz on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:49
#4.5 vipwoody on 15 Jan 2008 - 23:16
exactly
#5 TR1GG3R on 15 Jan 2008 - 19:56
the older macbook looks better......
(1 reply) #6 Matija. on 15 Jan 2008 - 19:57
Ehhh... It's a really cool machine, but their other laptops are way better value. I don't have any problems carrying around a 1" thick laptop, so being thinner really isn't that big of a deal to me.
#6.1 eAi on 16 Jan 2008 - 03:25
I agree. As we all know, the smaller it is, the more you pay. Performance-wise a iMac or a Mac Pro is better value than any laptop. You pay for the miniaturization and the R&D costs of fitting everything in...
#7 Daokoras on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:02
im going to get myself some summer work stuff to do..

and get myself one of those..


sweeeet...
(2 replies) #8 Galley on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:06
It would've looked a whole lot better with a white keyboard.
#8.1 Apple Macintosh Lover on 16 Jan 2008 - 01:54
Quote - (Galley said @ #
It would've looked a whole lot better with a white keyboard.


A white keyboard with an aluminum finish? Yuck!
#8.2 Davie on 16 Jan 2008 - 05:33
Quote - (Apple Macintosh Lover said @ #8.1)
Quote - (Galley said @ #
It would've looked a whole lot better with a white keyboard.


A white keyboard with an aluminum finish? Yuck!


Thats exactly what the current Apple keyboards look like?

I agree, it would have looked much nicer with white keys.
(2 replies) #9 bibutteryboy on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:11
so basically, you are all getting worked up over laptop that costs 1800.00 but has no optical drive, no 2nd usb port, no ethernet capability and probably no upgradability?

This was probably the worst keynote for apple in a long time.
no 3g for iphone, Amazon beat them to the punch with movie rentals as did Netflix.
you got an upgraded Apple tv that no one wants anyway.
and the biggest announcement is a thin overpriced laptop.
#9.1 vetneufuse on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:14
Quote - (bibutteryboy said @ #9)
so basically, you are all getting worked up over laptop that costs 1800.00 but has no optical drive, no 2nd usb port, no ethernet capability and probably no upgradability?

This was probably the worst keynote for apple in a long time.
no 3g for iphone, Amazon beat them to the punch with movie rentals as did Netflix.
you got an upgraded Apple tv that no one wants anyway.
and the biggest announcement is a thin overpriced laptop.


Dont forget charging existing ipod touch users $20 to get stuff that is free for new owners even if they bought it yesterday! (heck in that case I'd return it and get a new one *LOL*)
#9.2 eAi on 16 Jan 2008 - 03:26
Creative beat Apple to the punch with their MP3 players too, look how that turned out.
(16 replies) #10 RAID 0 on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:19
This *looks* cool, but no optical drive? I can live with out a ethernet port... but no OPTICAL DRIVE?!?! Why? That's so stupid. Hey, I'm gonna go spend 3 grand on a computer that can't even burn me a DVD or CD!! YAY!! Oh reality distortion field, take me away!
#10.1 simon360 on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:25
Well, it is a subnotebook...

But at that price, I'd rather be carrying around my MacBook Pro and burn a DVD wherever I want, without doing it wirelessly with another computer.
#10.2 RAID 0 on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:43
Quote - (simon360 said @ #10.1)
Well, it is a subnotebook...

But at that price, I'd rather be carrying around my MacBook Pro and burn a DVD wherever I want, without doing it wirelessly with another computer.


A 3000 doallar "sub" notebook? I'd rather go get an EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEpc, as far as a "sub notebook" goes... and I can save oh... about 2,800 dollars.
#10.3 vetmarkjensen on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:52
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #10.2)
A 3000 doallar "sub" notebook? I'd rather go get an EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEpc, as far as a "sub notebook" goes... and I can save oh... about 2,800 dollars.
Now that is comparing a Porsche to a Schwinn!
#10.4 RAID 0 on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:55
Quote - (markjensen said @ #10.3)
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #10.2)
A 3000 doallar "sub" notebook? I'd rather go get an EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEpc, as far as a "sub notebook" goes... and I can save oh... about 2,800 dollars.
Now that is comparing a Porsche to a Schwinn!


How so? Both are "sub notebooks".. both have no optical drive... both have SSD... and yet... one is 2800+ more than the other. I know, I know... the Mac is more powerfull than the Eee PC, but is it worth 2800 dollars? Hell I could buy the Eee, another laptop, and build two desktops at the price of that thing.
#10.5 Shadow Dragon on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:04
I really like the looks, but I don't like the battery deal, and the lack of ethernet port. If that was fixed and they made it a bit smaller then I'd drop my eee on the spot and get this instead even if it costs 4 times as much.

edit:
just saw that it only has one usb port, that sucks, they should have had two atleast (eee has 3 which is pretty impressive)

Last edited by Shadow Dragon on 15 Jan 2008 - 22:32
#10.6 japroach on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:10
The optical drive takes a huge amount of space in a compact laptop, for something that is very rarely used. The best solution is to have a docking station with a dvd drive, extra ports, etc.

btw a 32GB SSD costs $400 from newegg, I can only assume a 64gb would cost over $800. Why you are comparing that model to the EEE pc is beyond me (which has a 4GB ssd, worth what, $60?)
#10.7 evo_spook on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:11
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #10.4)
Quote - (markjensen said @ #10.3)
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #10.2)
A 3000 doallar "sub" notebook? I'd rather go get an EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEpc, as far as a "sub notebook" goes... and I can save oh... about 2,800 dollars.
Now that is comparing a Porsche to a Schwinn!


How so? Both are "sub notebooks".. both have no optical drive... both have SSD... and yet... one is 2800+ more than the other. I know, I know... the Mac is more powerfull than the Eee PC, but is it worth 2800 dollars? Hell I could buy the Eee, another laptop, and build two desktops at the price of that thing.



You can do that with the Sony as well, which is more expensive then the Apple
#10.8 RAID 0 on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:20
Quote - (japroach said @ #10.6)
The optical drive takes a huge amount of space in a compact laptop, for something that is very rarely used. The best solution is to have a docking station with a dvd drive, extra ports, etc.

btw a 32GB SSD costs $400 from newegg, I can only assume a 64gb would cost over $800. Why you are comparing that model to the EEE pc is beyond me (which has a 4GB ssd, worth what, $60?)


Because it's a "sub-notebook" take that 800.. no, let's call it a 1000 dollars and upgrade the Eee with that SS drive. Ummm... a total of about... $1400 after all is said and done. IS that CLOSE to the 3 grand Apple wants? NOPE.
#10.9 vetmarkjensen on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:31
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #10.
Because it's a "sub-notebook" take that 800.. no, let's call it a 1000 dollars and upgrade the Eee with that SS drive. Ummm... a total of about... $1400 after all is said and done. IS that CLOSE to the 3 grand Apple wants? NOPE.
And upgrade the display, the RAM, the CPU... Get the idea?

Just because you call both of them "sub notebooks" doesn't mean they are equivalent and should be the same price. Just because a bicycle and a car are both "transportation" doesn't mean they have the same performance and features, and should cost the same.
#10.10 RAID 0 on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:52
Quote - (markjensen said @ #10.9)
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #10.
Because it's a "sub-notebook" take that 800.. no, let's call it a 1000 dollars and upgrade the Eee with that SS drive. Ummm... a total of about... $1400 after all is said and done. IS that CLOSE to the 3 grand Apple wants? NOPE.
And upgrade the display, the RAM, the CPU... Get the idea?

Just because you call both of them "sub notebooks" doesn't mean they are equivalent and should be the same price. Just because a bicycle and a car are both "transportation" doesn't mean they have the same performance and features, and should cost the same.


Mark, while I respect you AND your tech knowledge greatly... I don't think comparing a bike to a car is accurate in this case. More like... a Geo Storm to an Acura NSX. Both are cars.. and yet.. one is WAY better than the other. Sure you can put a new engine, exaust and ECM in the Geo and make it as fast as the NSX, but it will never be as good. That's why I compaired the Eee to the Air. I don't think the fetures of the Air are worth the price. For $299 you get something "similar" to the Air, granted not as powerfull or stylish. Yes no maybe so?

I like the idea of this Mac Air. I think it looks nice and has very good tech qualities, but it's not for me. Add a Super Drive to that setup, and I'd think it would be something to consider for less than two grand. Untill then, my next lappie is going to be.. a Mac Book. Only then, will I be legaly able to boot my four favorite OSes!
#10.11 whocares78 on 16 Jan 2008 - 01:00
Quote - (japroach said @ #10.6)
The optical drive takes a huge amount of space in a compact laptop, for something that is very rarely used. The best solution is to have a docking station with a dvd drive, extra ports, etc.

btw a 32GB SSD costs $400 from newegg, I can only assume a 64gb would cost over $800. Why you are comparing that model to the EEE pc is beyond me (which has a 4GB ssd, worth what, $60?)


rarely used by You maybe, i could not do a lot of work without an optical drive.. and a docking station makes the whole portable thing a joke, as a dockign station aint portable... i need to burn stufdf while i am away and onsite, not to mention when im a way i like to watch movies to pass the time, on planes in hotels etc etc
#10.12 vetmarkjensen on 16 Jan 2008 - 03:27
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #10.10)
...I don't think comparing a bike to a car is accurate in this case.
...
I was pointing out the absurdity of comparing a budget PC with an itty-bitty screen and keyboard to a full-power notebook. None of the specs between the two match up.
#10.13 NeoTrunks on 16 Jan 2008 - 04:18
Quote - (markjensen said @ #10.12)
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #10.10)
...I don't think comparing a bike to a car is accurate in this case.
...
I was pointing out the absurdity of comparing a budget PC with an itty-bitty screen and keyboard to a full-power notebook. None of the specs between the two match up.


Some people won't let a little thing like logic get in their way .
#10.14 RAID 0 on 16 Jan 2008 - 05:15
Quote - (NeoTrunks said @ #10.13)
Quote - (markjensen said @ #10.12)
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #10.10)
...I don't think comparing a bike to a car is accurate in this case.
...
I was pointing out the absurdity of comparing a budget PC with an itty-bitty screen and keyboard to a full-power notebook. None of the specs between the two match up.


Some people won't let a little thing like logic get in their way .


Yeah ok. Please show me where I'm wrong.
#10.15 NeoTrunks on 16 Jan 2008 - 06:53
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #10.14)
Quote - (NeoTrunks said @ #10.13)
Quote - (markjensen said @ #10.12)
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #10.10)
...I don't think comparing a bike to a car is accurate in this case.
...
I was pointing out the absurdity of comparing a budget PC with an itty-bitty screen and keyboard to a full-power notebook. None of the specs between the two match up.


Some people won't let a little thing like logic get in their way .


Yeah ok. Please show me where I'm wrong.


The two machines that you're comparing. It would be like comparing a low end eMachines, around the ballpark price of $200-$300, to a quad Xeon based Precision Workstation. Sure, they're both computers, but they are not on the same spec level.
#10.16 RAID 0 on 16 Jan 2008 - 08:21
Quote - (NeoTrunks said @ #10.15)
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #10.14)
Quote - (NeoTrunks said @ #10.13)
Quote - (markjensen said @ #10.12)
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #10.10)
...I don't think comparing a bike to a car is accurate in this case.
...
I was pointing out the absurdity of comparing a budget PC with an itty-bitty screen and keyboard to a full-power notebook. None of the specs between the two match up.


Some people won't let a little thing like logic get in their way .


Yeah ok. Please show me where I'm wrong.


The two machines that you're comparing. It would be like comparing a low end eMachines, around the ballpark price of $200-$300, to a quad Xeon based Precision Workstation. Sure, they're both computers, but they are not on the same spec level.


YES I KNOW THAT! I'm saying the DIFFERENCE DOES NOT JUSTIFY THE HIGHER PRICE!!
(4 replies) #11 peacemf on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:23
i hate apple
but at least they are trying to do something new and cool

cant say the same for others!

also how uses optical drives?!!! its USB external HDD's and flash!! we all download stuff now!

Last edited by neufuse on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:59
#11.1 evo_spook on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:29
Quote - (peacemf said @ #11)
i hate apple
but at least they are trying to do something new and cool

cant say the same for others!

also how uses optical drives?!!! its USB external HDD's and flash!! we all download stuff now! !


wierd the amount of PC users that come out and say "I hate Apple" thats as strange as people coming out and saying "I love apple" Its just a company, you either like or not like its products. MS has done a lot of dodgy stuff in the past, but can't say I'd waste any thought on hating them, they have good things and bad things.

This Air, quite nice, but it, like the iPhone is too compromissed, so if I was going to spend that money on a Apple laptop I'd get a Mac Book Pro for the price. The price as mentioned I don't think it is too bad when compared to other ultra portables, but..... until I see it in real life, I prefer the Sony Ultraportable, the Airs should maybe have had more then one option, the 13" down to a 11" screen, now that AND a 11" screen I might have being tempted.

Last edited by neufuse on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:59
#11.2 evo_spook on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:09
neufuse you edited my post, but nothign has changed??? whats going on?
#11.3 whocares78 on 16 Jan 2008 - 01:32
how does removing half the stuff that every other machien on the market has make it 'new' what the hell is 'new' about it.... cool maybe but thats just the pretty design, nothing to do with hardware specifications..

p.s. he probably edited the quote part, if you hadent noticed he edited the top one too....

Last edited by whocares78 on 16 Jan 2008 - 01:33
#11.4 GreyWolfSC on 16 Jan 2008 - 03:57
Quote - (evo_spook said @ #11.2)
neufuse you edited my post, but nothign has changed??? whats going on?


He edited the post you responded to. You quoted it, so he had to edit yours, too.

(I had to edit this just because everyone else is doing it.)

Last edited by GreyWolfSC on 16 Jan 2008 - 03:58
(6 replies) #12 WolfDV on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:38
nice, but vastly overpriced

I'll wait and see what other companies come out with.

#12.1 evo_spook on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:40
Quote - (WolfDV said @ #12)
nice, but vastly overpriced

I'll wait and see what other companies come out with.


No, costly, but not overpriced compared to similar manufacturers sub notebooks, the sony is more expensive.
#12.2 RAID 0 on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:50
Quote - (evo_spook said @ #12.1)
Quote - (WolfDV said @ #12)
nice, but vastly overpriced

I'll wait and see what other companies come out with.


No, costly, but not overpriced compared to similar manufacturers sub notebooks, the sony is more expensive.


Interesting... what about the Asus EEEPC? Kinda close, sub notebook, no optical drive... but how much is the EEEPC? $299... how much is the Mac Book Air? STARTS AT $1799. Not overpriced? Oh you want the SSD... starting at $3098!! WOW!!! You're SOOOOOOOOOO RIGHT!!! THAT'S NOT OVER PRICED!!! THAT'S A ****ING RIP OFF!!
#12.3 evo_spook on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:00
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #12.2)
Quote - (evo_spook said @ #12.1)
Quote - (WolfDV said @ #12)
nice, but vastly overpriced

I'll wait and see what other companies come out with.


No, costly, but not overpriced compared to similar manufacturers sub notebooks, the sony is more expensive.


Interesting... what about the Asus EEEPC? Kinda close, sub notebook, no optical drive... but how much is the EEEPC? $299... how much is the Mac Book Air? STARTS AT $1799. Not overpriced? Oh you want the SSD... starting at $3098!! WOW!!! You're SOOOOOOOOOO RIGHT!!! THAT'S NOT OVER PRICED!!! THAT'S A ****ING RIP OFF!!


THEN WHAT ABOUT THE BLOODY SONY, COME ONE?????????????????????????
#12.4 RAID 0 on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:14
Quote - (evo_spook said @ #12.3)
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #12.2)
Quote - (evo_spook said @ #12.1)
Quote - (WolfDV said @ #12)
nice, but vastly overpriced

I'll wait and see what other companies come out with.


No, costly, but not overpriced compared to similar manufacturers sub notebooks, the sony is more expensive.


Interesting... what about the Asus EEEPC? Kinda close, sub notebook, no optical drive... but how much is the EEEPC? $299... how much is the Mac Book Air? STARTS AT $1799. Not overpriced? Oh you want the SSD... starting at $3098!! WOW!!! You're SOOOOOOOOOO RIGHT!!! THAT'S NOT OVER PRICED!!! THAT'S A ****ING RIP OFF!!


THEN WHAT ABOUT THE BLOODY SONY, COME ONE?????????????????????????



I wouldn't buy that POS either. I only have one laptop, it's a Compaq and it's not fast.. but it only cost me $599. My 3 other PCs, I built myself. Later this year I am looking at the Mac Book only because I want to quad boot OS X, Ubuntu, XP and Vista. Makes for one nice all-in-one machine.
#12.5 evo_spook on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:20
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #12.4)
Quote - (evo_spook said @ #12.3)
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #12.2)
Quote - (evo_spook said @ #12.1)
Quote - (WolfDV said @ #12)
nice, but vastly overpriced

I'll wait and see what other companies come out with.


No, costly, but not overpriced compared to similar manufacturers sub notebooks, the sony is more expensive.


Interesting... what about the Asus EEEPC? Kinda close, sub notebook, no optical drive... but how much is the EEEPC? $299... how much is the Mac Book Air? STARTS AT $1799. Not overpriced? Oh you want the SSD... starting at $3098!! WOW!!! You're SOOOOOOOOOO RIGHT!!! THAT'S NOT OVER PRICED!!! THAT'S A ****ING RIP OFF!!


THEN WHAT ABOUT THE BLOODY SONY, COME ONE?????????????????????????



I wouldn't buy that POS either. I only have one laptop, it's a Compaq and it's not fast.. but it only cost me $599. My 3 other PCs, I built myself. Later this year I am looking at the Mac Book only because I want to quad boot OS X, Ubuntu, XP and Vista. Makes for one nice all-in-one machine.


Sorry, like the Mac Air, the Sony is expensive, but both of them are not POS and I can't see why you would call them such. Ultraportables have always cost more.

Like you, as I said earlier, I would not buy the Air, too compromised, I would get another of the range instead of that, but just cause it is the same price as the competition and not suitable to my needs, I don't see a need to go on a tirade about it. Its different, priced for the market, will not suit most, but that is the same for other PC in the same market THAT ARE PRICED SIMILAR.
#12.6 GreyWolfSC on 16 Jan 2008 - 04:01
Quote - (evo_spook said @ #12.5)
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #12.4)
Quote - (evo_spook said @ #12.3)
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #12.2)
Quote - (evo_spook said @ #12.1)
Quote - (WolfDV said @ #12)
nice, but vastly overpriced

I'll wait and see what other companies come out with.


No, costly, but not overpriced compared to similar manufacturers sub notebooks, the sony is more expensive.


Interesting... what about the Asus EEEPC? Kinda close, sub notebook, no optical drive... but how much is the EEEPC? $299... how much is the Mac Book Air? STARTS AT $1799. Not overpriced? Oh you want the SSD... starting at $3098!! WOW!!! You're SOOOOOOOOOO RIGHT!!! THAT'S NOT OVER PRICED!!! THAT'S A ****ING RIP OFF!!


THEN WHAT ABOUT THE BLOODY SONY, COME ONE?????????????????????????



I wouldn't buy that POS either. I only have one laptop, it's a Compaq and it's not fast.. but it only cost me $599. My 3 other PCs, I built myself. Later this year I am looking at the Mac Book only because I want to quad boot OS X, Ubuntu, XP and Vista. Makes for one nice all-in-one machine.


Sorry, like the Mac Air, the Sony is expensive, but both of them are not POS and I can't see why you would call them such. Ultraportables have always cost more.

Like you, as I said earlier, I would not buy the Air, too compromised, I would get another of the range instead of that, but just cause it is the same price as the competition and not suitable to my needs, I don't see a need to go on a tirade about it. Its different, priced for the market, will not suit most, but that is the same for other PC in the same market THAT ARE PRICED SIMILAR.


Why are you harping on the Sony? It's only one of hundreds of PC notebook models. We know Sony is overpriced. Fortunately, they're not the only company that makes Windows notebooks.
(2 replies) #13 +Hell-In-A-Handbasket on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:38
i like apple's stuff,,, but this laptop doesnt have a replaceable battery
#13.1 evo_spook on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:40


Last edited by evo_spook on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:41
#13.2 vetneufuse on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:57
Quote - (Hell-In-A-Handbasket said @ #13)
i like apple's stuff,,, but this laptop doesnt have a replaceable battery


Yikes, didn't even notice that.. no way would I buy one of these now after having now many notebook batteries die over the years
(6 replies) #14 .kvn on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:44
That's the best looking laptop ever. Period.
#14.1 C_Guy on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:57
Would look 100x better running BootCamp actually.
#14.2 evo_spook on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:00
Quote - (C_Guy said @ #14.1)
Would look 100x better running BootCamp actually.


yawn
#14.3 C_Guy on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:06
Is your Macbook boring you again? Either way that's a great contribution. to the thread, thanks.
#14.4 evo_spook on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:08
Quote - (C_Guy said @ #14.3)
Is your Macbook boring you again? Either way that's a great contribution. to the thread, thanks.



almost as good as yours..
#14.5 eilegz on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:19
sure you can run bootcamp but no dvd drive or cd drive how are you gonna install xp or vista on this.
#14.6 whistlerxp on 15 Jan 2008 - 23:13
Quote - (eilegz said @ #14.5)
sure you can run bootcamp but no dvd drive or cd drive how are you gonna install xp or vista on this.


Either buy the external disk drive, or run the included software on another computer and install it wirelessly through the other computers disk drive. Or get an ISO...
(2 replies) #15 seamer on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:53
The Air isn't about price, power or performance (as such). Its designed for the roadwarrior salesmen, reps and other positions constantly travelling who need a pc. These are the kind of positions where salary sacrifice and tax writeoffs make anything cheap/free.

Then you have the weight aspect, hence the name. Its really light. 3 pounds means you can literally stand and rest the thing on your arm while you bash away entering someone's report. Being so thin, not even an -inch-, makes it easy to pack, and would thrive in a travelling case built for a bigger machine.

The environmental angle is obviously to placate the general public over previous waste concerns. Its good practise, soon the iphone, imac and ipod range will incorporate all the same features.
#15.1 C_Guy on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:59
In other words, it appeals to those seeking some sort of status symbol more than a functional computer?

That explains the Apple logo.
#15.2 whocares78 on 16 Jan 2008 - 01:40
umm just one question.. do you travel??
i agree weigth is a big deal, but if i gave my sales guys a laptop like that theyd throw it at me, 'how am i supposed to watch DVD's, how do i burn a CD for a customer', and the boss's would have a fit and ask why they all have such expensive machines and i have no idea where you get the 'free' bit. it may be a tax right off, but management still cares about price..
(3 replies) #16 instant.human on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:55
dont like it - dont buy it.

think its overpriced - dont buy it.

hate apple - dont buy anything by them.

its as simple as that.

#16.1 EL1TE on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:59
Quote - (instant.human said @ #17)
dont like it - dont buy it.

think its overpriced - dont buy it.

hate apple - dont buy anything by them.

its as simple as that.

Exactly.

Same thing for those which say the same of Microsoft.
#16.2 instant.human on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:00


Last edited by instant.human on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:03
#16.3 evo_spook on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:02


Last edited by evo_spook on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:08
(3 replies) #17 MGS4-SS on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:59
To expensive.
#17.1 .kvn on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:02
So are many other notebooks but none look as good as this.
#17.2 MGS4-SS on 15 Jan 2008 - 23:42
How cool, to have a good looking notebook that does nothing.
#17.3 eAi on 16 Jan 2008 - 03:31
Quote - (MGS4-SS said @ #18.2)
How cool, to have a good looking notebook that does nothing.
Really? It does nothing?
(2 replies) #18 on 01 Jan 1970 - 00:00
#18.1 .kvn on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:01
It's overpriced. Yes but only because there is nothing like it anywhere else. Therefore we all know only the enthusiast will buy this as soon as it is released. The rest of the consumers will wait a very long time for a price drop.
#18.2 jgrodri on 16 Jan 2008 - 13:22
Sure we can RAID. What we shouldnt have is people coming here with no constructive comment just to say things like "reality distortion field", "icrap", fanboys and such.
Ever noticed how all apple-related news have like 100+ posts on them? it's not the "apple fanboys", it's losers who need to come in and trash talk a piece of plastic (or aluminum)
(2 replies) #19 atari800 on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:02
It doesnt mention if there is USB or firewire
If theres an external port for external devices - that would be a good thing
I am thinking, trying to install Farcry or some game thats on 4+ DVD's, how long would that take to install wirelessly
#19.1 .kvn on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:08
It has a USB port, mic socket and a Micro-DVI port. They are recessed at the side hidden behind a flap door. There's no firewire. Apple have also announced 500gb and 1tb external HD's that support wireless backup's and are also wireless base stations.
#19.2 whocares78 on 16 Jan 2008 - 01:42
it does say, read it again
(2 replies) #20 C_Guy on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:03
No one seems to have noticed but isn't it odd that Steve can't... just absolutely cannot... sell ANY Apple product without first downplaying the competition? Are Apple products really so bad that they can't sell themselves? Come ON, you even used Windows to help sell Macs! Can't they invent anything that sells itself?

Who will they compare themselves to next?
#20.1 .kvn on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:09
Not you.
#20.2 eAi on 16 Jan 2008 - 03:32
Noticed the iPod?
#21 ahhell on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:10
No Ethernet jack??? WTF?

Wireless is weak as hell.

Lame.
#22 betasp on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:11
I used to have a Sony sub-notebook (with the optical only in the base station) and I never really missed it the optical drive. The unit was small and light. Once you use one, you will hate going back to the large, heavy things we carry today.
#23 n_K on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:16
HEAT ISSUES !? cheecky ******, when I was at work, someone got a Mac Book Pro and had to get a raplacement twice and eventually get a full refund due to it overheating, it killed a fly that landed on it from being that hot... who the **** does that jobs idiot think he is
#24 EL1TE on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:21


Last edited by EL1TE on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:35
(1 reply) #25 Julius Caro on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:42
Well, the specs are quite good for a "sub-notebook", considering that iMacs and MacBooks (except pro's) dont even come with 2gb of RAM.
It still doesn't appeal me, for some reason.

I like the portability of regular macbooks.
#25.1 whistlerxp on 15 Jan 2008 - 23:18
iMacs and MacBooks, for the record can both carry 4GB of RAM.
(6 replies) #26 NateB1 on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:46
Downsides:

No replaceable battery
1 USB 2.0
No optical drive
80GB 4200rpm HD PATA (wow. Talk about slooooooooooooooow!)
RAM not upgradeable
Mono Speaker
No Ethernet
No Express Card
No Card Reader
No WWAN
No Firewire


You can get a USB ethernet adapter, but that would use up the 1 USB port.

$1800 to start. OK, who is buying this overpriced, stylish piece of junk?

Last edited by NateB1 on 15 Jan 2008 - 22:13
#26.1 msuh on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:54
Quote - (NateB1 said @ #1)
OK, who is buying this overpriced, stylish piece of junk?


Brainwashed apple fanboys?
#26.2 RAID 0 on 15 Jan 2008 - 22:08
I've been looking on the Aple site, and you can add a "super drive" for $99. That's weak. For $29 you can get the friggin Ethernet Adapter. Also weak.
#26.3 NateB1 on 15 Jan 2008 - 22:12
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #26.2)
I've been looking on the Aple site, and you can add a "super drive" for $99. That's weak. For $29 you can get the friggin Ethernet Adapter. Also weak.


Yeah. The USB Ethernet Adapter. To plug into your one USB port. What happens if you want to use the USB Super Drive and the USB Ethernet Adapter at the same time? Buy a hub?
#26.4 RAID 0 on 15 Jan 2008 - 22:16
Quote - (NateB1 said @ #26.3)
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #26.2)
I've been looking on the Aple site, and you can add a "super drive" for $99. That's weak. For $29 you can get the friggin Ethernet Adapter. Also weak.


Yeah. The USB Ethernet Adapter. To plug into your one USB port. What happens if you want to use the USB Super Drive and the USB Ethernet Adapter at the same time? Buy a hub?


Exaclty. It's not so thin when you carry around an external "super drive", Ethernet Adapter and USB hub.
#26.5 eAi on 16 Jan 2008 - 03:33
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #26.4)
Quote - (NateB1 said @ #26.3)
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #26.2)
I've been looking on the Aple site, and you can add a "super drive" for $99. That's weak. For $29 you can get the friggin Ethernet Adapter. Also weak.


Yeah. The USB Ethernet Adapter. To plug into your one USB port. What happens if you want to use the USB Super Drive and the USB Ethernet Adapter at the same time? Buy a hub?


Exaclty. It's not so thin when you carry around an external "super drive", Ethernet Adapter and USB hub.
So, don't carry them around then. It's your choice, rather than your computer's.
#26.6 RAID 0 on 16 Jan 2008 - 08:22
Quote - (eAi said @ #26.5)
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #26.4)
Quote - (NateB1 said @ #26.3)
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #26.2)
I've been looking on the Aple site, and you can add a "super drive" for $99. That's weak. For $29 you can get the friggin Ethernet Adapter. Also weak.


Yeah. The USB Ethernet Adapter. To plug into your one USB port. What happens if you want to use the USB Super Drive and the USB Ethernet Adapter at the same time? Buy a hub?


Exaclty. It's not so thin when you carry around an external "super drive", Ethernet Adapter and USB hub.
So, don't carry them around then. It's your choice, rather than your computer's.


You want your computer making choices? No thanks.
#27 Azmodan on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:54
Awesome and expensive. Seems to go hand by hand. But expensive is already a Mac standard.

Anyways, we'll see a large line of people waiting outside a store, maybe for days... Ahhh, geek trends.
#28 shockz on 15 Jan 2008 - 22:00
What's so over priced about it??? Similar things are either equal, slightly cheaper, or slightly more.

3000 for a ssd may seem like a lot... but for ssd thats a pretty big drive... not to mention the technology is new.

Just like with everything else thats new... it will come down in time.
(1 reply) #29 MulletRobZ on 15 Jan 2008 - 22:19
WTF? $1 025 CDN to go from an 80 GB hard drive to a 64 GB SSD drive? What kind of an f***ing idiot would do something so irrational? You could get 1-2 TB of external storage for the same price or even another laptop! And not to mention, $1 899 CDN for that sub-notebook is definitely not worth the price, even though it offers better value than the Sony equivalent.

If Apple were to have any hope in hell in selling this thing, they'll really need to drop the prices considerably to say in the $1 200 to $1 500 CDN range (or even less if possible). I may find their products very innovative (I own an iBook and an iPod Nano), but let's face it. This product's going to flop!
#29.1 whistlerxp on 15 Jan 2008 - 23:20
It's aiming for the same market as the Sony, it undercuts the Sony, why should it be cheaper?
(1 reply) #30 Solecs on 15 Jan 2008 - 22:21
hmm, I think it looks pretty nice. I suppose that goes with the apple moniker though, the aluminum chassis is especially nice to me. As for the price, I think it's fair given what the market is charging for other similar products.

What I don't get is why the heck they really need to put that fast of a processor in there. I mean honestly, for what it would be used for I think that's somewhat overkill. I imagine the most intensive app you'd be running on it would be parallels, so I'd be perfectly happy if they offered a model with an even slower processor giving the comp less heat generated and lower price while increasing battery life most likely.

Also, as far as comparing this to the EeePC, I don't think it's a valid comparison. I mean the Air has a much nicer screen and is loaded with a full OS. Additionally, it's got a heck of a lot more storage capacity and processing power in comparison. With the OS and computing power, the Air is a much more flexible mobile platform that can perform a much wider variety of tasks.

Just noticed, I kind of feel like the trackpad button should be bigger. I rather like the size of it on my macbook pro...

Last edited by Solecs on 15 Jan 2008 - 22:33
#30.1 .fahim on 16 Jan 2008 - 00:46
You don't think the Eee has a full OS? You have obviously never used one!
#31 Richteralan on 15 Jan 2008 - 22:25
After reading all comments here I decided to say:

It looks so nice! I wanna buy one!

#32 IceBrewedBeer on 15 Jan 2008 - 22:38
The Sony x505 was released 5 years ago.. GG

Now everyone thinks apple is high tech ****. **** steve jobs
(4 replies) #33 Neo-Lenin on 15 Jan 2008 - 22:46
The Macbook Air is not the thinnest notebook. As usual, they lie in their marketing. The worlds thinnest notebook is held by Intel's Metro notebook... its only 0.69 inches thick and weighs 2.25 pounds. Unlike the Macbook Air, it has a secondary screen on the top for that mobile functionality in Vista with a fully backlit keyboard. (In my opinion, the colour of the lighting is better.... its red/orange)

Here: http://images.businessweek.com/ss/07/05/05...op/index_01.htm

Oh, and unlike Airs 5hr batterylife... this beauty has 14hrs!

Last edited by Neo-Lenin on 15 Jan 2008 - 22:47
#33.1 evo_spook on 15 Jan 2008 - 22:50
Just a pity you are comparing a actual product available for sale with a show prototype
#33.2 Neo-Lenin on 15 Jan 2008 - 22:54
Quote - (evo_spook said @ #33.1)
Just a pity you are comparing a actual product available for sale with a show prototype

The Air wont be available for sale for another couple of weeks, and less than a month ago it was "a prototype", just like all the other "prototypes" out there that apple decided to use and rush to release first.
#33.3 evo_spook on 15 Jan 2008 - 23:01
Quote - (Neo-Lenin said @ #33.2)
Quote - (evo_spook said @ #33.1)
Just a pity you are comparing a actual product available for sale with a show prototype

The Air wont be available for sale for another couple of weeks, and less than a month ago it was "a prototype", just like all the other "prototypes" out there that apple decided to use and rush to release first.


Theres quite a difference between a technological showcase prototype to sell a new technology to manufacturers and a released product.
#33.4 LTD on 16 Jan 2008 - 12:06
Busted.
(2 replies) #34 soldiers33 on 15 Jan 2008 - 22:58
aint they copying microsoft surface with the multi-touch features?
#34.1 evo_spook on 15 Jan 2008 - 23:00
not really since they hold the patent on a lot of multi-touch stuff and already use it on the iphone and touch.

MS isn't the only company doing multi-touch.
#34.2 whistlerxp on 15 Jan 2008 - 23:21
The iPhone was announced BEFORE the Surface.
(3 replies) #35 bibutteryboy on 15 Jan 2008 - 23:04
Let's be realistic here mac fanboys.
My XPS 1330 might weigh more but I'm getting a 160 GB - 5400 diskdrive, DVD±RW, 8 in 1 card reader,2 Megapixel camera, modem, network adapter, 2 usb ports, firewire, 13.3" screen and a battery that lasts longer than 5 hours. and more...Plus it's expandable...
It my weigh more but I'm willing to live with a few extra pounds for what I'm getting...
oh yea, I paid less than 1500.00.
I just wish you fanboys could at some time in your life actually admit when you have a product that doesn't live up to what it should instead of wrapping yourself inside the RDF.
Just one Apple fanboy. Please. Just admit this is one of the most ridiculous notebooks you've seen. It might look ok but as far as usability? please........

#35.1 whistlerxp on 15 Jan 2008 - 23:22
You're preaching to the converted. But the MacBook Pro is what Apple sell to your market, not the Air.

Seriously.

Last edited by whistlerxp on 15 Jan 2008 - 23:23
#35.2 eilegz on 16 Jan 2008 - 01:17
Quote - (whistlerxp said @ #35.1)
You're preaching to the converted. But the MacBook Pro is what Apple sell to your market, not the Air.

Seriously.


and still macbook pro its overpriced....

#35.3 eAi on 16 Jan 2008 - 03:36
Quote - (eilegz said @ #35.2)
Quote - (whistlerxp said @ #35.1)
You're preaching to the converted. But the MacBook Pro is what Apple sell to your market, not the Air.

Seriously.


and still macbook pro its overpriced....
I decided it was a good investment as my first Mac 6 months or so ago and I've not been disappointed, I still love it.
#36 npe on 15 Jan 2008 - 23:05
Any actual picture of the laptop (not computer render)?

For an ultra portable laptop you don't need optical drive; it saves some battery, too.

Missing quite a lot of important features and finger print reader.

But if you're in the market for a really light and thin notebook this looks good (price is a little too high though). Maybe it's a good idea to wait until the 2nd or 3rd generation.
#37 PsykX on 15 Jan 2008 - 23:16
Hm, I'd love this for university, but I'll stick to my main idea because of the price : I'll buy a used Macbook.
#38 LTD on 16 Jan 2008 - 00:11
Nice!

And it runs OS X.

Leave it to Apple to impress.
#39 LTD on 16 Jan 2008 - 00:16
I just had a look at the ad over at Apple.com

This thing looks crazy good.

It's not about what's "missing" . . . it's about where Apple is headed with this technology. For what it is, this thing will simply fly off the shelves, and hey, people (like me) will certainly be willing to pay a premium for a premium experience.
(3 replies) #40 whocares78 on 16 Jan 2008 - 00:17
why does jobs always have to say bad things about the competition, cant he sell mac on it's own merits rather than what the competition does.... if apple stuff was so great he woudlnt have to bag the competition every chance he gets, to try and convince people mac is better..
#40.1 LTD on 16 Jan 2008 - 00:35
He says it because it works. And because he knows that Apple makes the competition look, slow, dated, and dumb.

Ask any Mac user just how right he is.
#40.2 whocares78 on 16 Jan 2008 - 01:53
Quote - (LTD said @ #40.1)
He says it because it works. And because he knows that Apple makes the competition look, slow, dated, and dumb.

Ask any Mac user just how right he is.


ok well thats good, there no technical reason's for it, they just think they're better than everyone else.... we all know the just works isn't alwasy true (keyboard problems, patches do get released, etc etc) look slow dated and dumb, ummm how does that work again, my PC at home is way faster than any mac on the market, and i got a real pretty case, that i picked myself. personally i think the apple cases are ugly...dumb well i wont comment on that.
#40.3 evo_spook on 16 Jan 2008 - 02:16


Last edited by evo_spook on 16 Jan 2008 - 02:21
(2 replies) #41 Apple Macintosh Lover on 16 Jan 2008 - 02:02
Thin is in! How can you watch that keynote address and not want one of these? Apple's innovation is breath taking! They simply do this year after year after year after year... Were it not for Apple, we would all be stuck in the 80's when it comes to computing. Give credit were credit is due.
#41.1 whocares78 on 16 Jan 2008 - 02:53
ummmm are you serious or just trying to get someone to bite, well i'll bite.... what about this is inovative??? just one thing this has that no other laptop has.

as for the if it werent for apple, you do realise apple was on the brink of bankrupcy a few years ago, before the ipod was released... before that PC's were still advancing and were not stuck in the 80's. if it wasn't for intel and AMD, and the million and one other tech companies that actully came up with the hardware and inovations we see today in computers, then yeah we'd still be stuck in the 80's, but one thing you definatley cannot claim is apple is the reason we are not still stuck in the 80's when it comes to computing....i have no problem giving credit where credit is due e.g. apple created the MP3 player market..yes even though some came before, it was apple that made them mainstream... but reallly dont give them credit for something they had nothgin to do with..
#41.2 RAID 0 on 16 Jan 2008 - 05:18
Hello Internetworld7. I know it's you.
#42 bibutteryboy on 16 Jan 2008 - 02:51
.

Last edited by bibutteryboy on 16 Jan 2008 - 03:01
#43 bibutteryboy on 16 Jan 2008 - 03:01
Quote -
Apple's innovation is breath taking!

a slim laptop with a slower CPU, a small and slow HD, just a single USB port, no firewire, a mono speaker, a non-removable battery, and no expansion options?
Not truly innovative when you really look at it now is it?


Quote -
Were it not for Apple, we would all be stuck in the 80's when it comes to computing. Give credit were credit is due.

actually, if not for Bill Gates, Apple may not even be here....Give credit where credit is due indeed.
(2 replies) #44 stylemessiah on 16 Jan 2008 - 03:07
So, its a PC (its using Intel chips), but theres a price premium because its got the Crapple name stamped on it.

As usual Crapple proclaiming something earth shatteringly new using the same hardware as the rest of the market, just in a different wrapper. Give me a break.

We all know that the only reason Crapple is still around is to keep that c0cksp@nk Jobs in constant supply of turtle neck sweaters...............

As usual...under-spec'd, overpriced

Its easy to see why Apple will never subscribe to truth in advertising....."Its got less, but costs more, because its Crapple"

Why doesnt God kill the Apple fanatics (Job's sheep i call them) and make the world a saner and less smelly place.....

Last edited by stylemessiah on 16 Jan 2008 - 03:38
#44.1 evo_spook on 16 Jan 2008 - 03:25
No its high price because of what it is, like the Sony ultraportable , nothing to do with the Apple name.
#44.2 whocares78 on 16 Jan 2008 - 04:50
Quote - (evo_spook said @ #44.1)
No its high price because of what it is, like the Sony ultraportable , nothing to do with the Apple name.


so what about every single other apple product??
(1 reply) #45 bibutteryboy on 16 Jan 2008 - 03:13

If the macbook air was human....
human air

If Windows Based laptops were human...
sexy
#45.1 evo_spook on 16 Jan 2008 - 03:26
Its really getting quite sureal

Last edited by evo_spook on 16 Jan 2008 - 08:55
#46 Albert on 16 Jan 2008 - 03:32
hm. when the turtle necker start touting the recycleability of its latest product (and its packaging), instead of its feature set, you know something is terribly, terribly wrong.

Last edited by Albert on 16 Jan 2008 - 03:33
(8 replies) #47 bibutteryboy on 16 Jan 2008 - 03:35
I don't hate apple....I hate apple fanboys...there is a difference.
When Jobs announces a scaled down laptop with crappy specs and the fanboys drool over it then I get a little frustrated.
See, the difference between mac fanboys and Windows fanboys is that we will let everyone know if we feel that the product being presented is crap. When Apple fanboys see a product being presented and even if it isn't a very good product, they will never admit it.
#47.1 eAi on 16 Jan 2008 - 03:40
Indeed, but it's fun to go with the flow and enjoy the ride It's because Mac fanboys are a minority, they have to defend things, plus having a single source of all the appley goodness means you've got 'one god', where as Windows users have many gods - Dell, Acer, Microsoft etc all competing for your Windows fanboyism causing division in the flock...
#47.2 evo_spook on 16 Jan 2008 - 03:43
Quote - (bibutteryboy said @ #47)
I don't hate apple....I hate apple fanboys...there is a difference.
When Jobs announces a scaled down laptop with crappy specs and the fanboys drool over it then I get a little frustrated.
See, the difference between mac fanboys and Windows fanboys is that we will let everyone know if we feel that the product being presented is crap. When Apple fanboys see a product being presented and even if it isn't a very good product, they will never admit it.


The problem is, not many Mac people have "drooled" over this mac, most have said they wouldn't buy it, as such are you bashing the laptop on them or on your perception of them.

The machine isn't for everyone, but it isn't crap, but it is compromised, the problem is you slamming it for overpriced, but totally ignoring the competiton is the same price and also going on a tirade on perceived fanboyism rather then evidence on show. Don't you think the windows fanboys who find pleasure coming in and bashing the new mac no matter if they are justified or not are just as bad as those who will blindly praise.

As for saying windows fanboys will let everyone know if they feel a product is crap they will let everyone know, I'm sorry but my opinion that is just a personal opinion of what you want to believe, people are people, there will be mac people who are hard to please, just as there are as many Windows people who will blindly follow and praise MS no matter what.
#47.3 stylemessiah on 16 Jan 2008 - 03:44
You've just arrived at the reason why Crapple still even exists.

Classic blind faith by the fanboys, theyve never even heard of "reality"

"We must obey Steve, for Steve is god"

Jobs is lucky he's at Crapple, in any other business he'd be shown for the techno fraud he is, he merely peddles others ideas and probably hasnt written code since Sinclairs were new......Oh and lets not mention that share fraud thing he narrowly escaped from....

any idiot thinking Steve Jobs is a "man of vision" needs medication, he's a figurehead and a questionable one at that

Last edited by stylemessiah on 16 Jan 2008 - 03:47
#47.4 evo_spook on 16 Jan 2008 - 03:47
Quote - (stylemessiah said @ #47.3)
You've just arrived at the reason why Crapple still even exists.

Classic blind faith by the fanboys, theyve never even heard of "reality"

"We must obey Steve, for Steve is god"

Jobs is lucky he's at Crapple, in any other business he be shown for the techno fraud he is, he merely peddles others ideas and probably hasnt written code since Sinclairs were new......Oh and lets not mention that share fraud thing he narrowly escaped from....


When you make a argument that makes sense, we will be able to sensibly reply but just at the moment theres nothing to reply back to
#47.5 stylemessiah on 16 Jan 2008 - 03:58
Quote - (evo_spook said @ #47.4)
Quote - (stylemessiah said @ #47.3)
You've just arrived at the reason why Crapple still even exists.

Classic blind faith by the fanboys, theyve never even heard of "reality"

"We must obey Steve, for Steve is god"

Jobs is lucky he's at Crapple, in any other business he be shown for the techno fraud he is, he merely peddles others ideas and probably hasnt written code since Sinclairs were new......Oh and lets not mention that share fraud thing he narrowly escaped from....


When you make a argument that makes sense, we will be able to sensibly reply but just at the moment theres nothing to reply back to


Ill start making arguments that make sense (to you), right after Crapple sells hardware at realistic prices......
#47.6 whocares78 on 16 Jan 2008 - 04:55
Quote - (evo_spook said @ #47.2)
but it isn't crap, but it is compromised, the problem is you slamming it for overpriced, but totally ignoring the competiton is the same price and also going on a tirade on perceived fanboyism rather then evidence on show.


'compromised' ????? WTF.... and your comparing to sony, we all know sony is overpriced, and personally i think all sony laptops are also CRAP, the amount of problems ive had with vaio's.. give me a toshiba anyday..
#47.7 evo_spook on 16 Jan 2008 - 08:57
Quote - (whocares78 said @ #47.6)
Quote - (evo_spook said @ #47.2)
but it isn't crap, but it is compromised, the problem is you slamming it for overpriced, but totally ignoring the competiton is the same price and also going on a tirade on perceived fanboyism rather then evidence on show.


'compromised' ????? WTF.... and your comparing to sony, we all know sony is overpriced, and personally i think all sony laptops are also CRAP, the amount of problems ive had with vaio's.. give me a toshiba anyday..


So Whocares78 thinks they're crap so they must be crap.
#47.8 whocares78 on 17 Jan 2008 - 01:27
Quote - (evo_spook said @ #47.7)
Quote - (whocares78 said @ #47.6)
Quote - (evo_spook said @ #47.2)
but it isn't crap, but it is compromised, the problem is you slamming it for overpriced, but totally ignoring the competiton is the same price and also going on a tirade on perceived fanboyism rather then evidence on show.


'compromised' ????? WTF.... and your comparing to sony, we all know sony is overpriced, and personally i think all sony laptops are also CRAP, the amount of problems ive had with vaio's.. give me a toshiba anyday..


So Whocares78 thinks they're crap so they must be crap.


from personal expierience, my personal opinion is yeah, theyare crap.. doesnt mean others wont like them..
(1 reply) #48 bibutteryboy on 16 Jan 2008 - 04:13
Quote -
but totally ignoring the competiton is the same price...


Take a look here. This is just one example from one company. Do you NOT see the difference? Not only in functionality but price?

Dell

#48.1 evo_spook on 16 Jan 2008 - 08:58
how thick is the dell? the weight

I think some people fail to grasp how engineering/cost works
#49 obsolete_power on 16 Jan 2008 - 05:23


Last edited by obsolete_power on 16 Jan 2008 - 05:23
#50 Shiranui on 16 Jan 2008 - 05:43
0.76" thick at thickest point, weighs 3lbs. Great, now I can carry it around in my pocket!!

I no longer need a suitcase on wheels to transport my old 1.5" thick 6lbs notebook.


too subtle?
#51 Wiggz on 16 Jan 2008 - 11:06
Am I the only person that thinks, whilst it has some drawbacks (non-user removable battery, no optical drive..etc) this actually looks a good little machine.

Expensive yes. But a nice standard unit (by standard I mean that it's be used for daily tasks which don't vary much)
#52 Doli on 16 Jan 2008 - 16:31
Quote -
Software installations can be done remotely using "Remote Disk," which allows the MacBook Air to access the optical drive of a networked Mac or PC.


Yikes... so you will need another PC around to install software from a disk.
#53 JunkMail on 21 Feb 2008 - 20:54
holy shiet, this page is full of comments that i can't even finish reading

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)