apple

Apple announces MacBook Air

EL1TE   on 15 January 2008 - 19:35 · 164 comments & 84956 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Steve Jobs took the stage this morning at the Macworld Conference & Expo to exhort the Mac faithful and announce a handful of new products.

MacBook Air

The rumors were true. Steve Jobs unveiled Apple's latest portable, the $1,799 MacBook Air, which he called the "world's thinnest notebook." Dissing Sony's TX series, Jobs said that other subnotebook manufacturers inevitably compromise on the display, have mini-keyboards, and run too slowly due to heat issues.

Specs:
  • 1.6GHz or 1.8GHz Core 2 Duo
  • 80GB 1.8" Hard Drive standard, optional 64GB solid-state drive
  • 0.76" thick at thickest point, weighs 3lbs.
  • 2GB RAM
  • 5 hours of battery life
  • $1,799 for 1.6GHz, 80GB HD model; $3,099 for 1.8GHz, 64GB SSD model
  • Full aluminum case

The MacBook Air is silver, weighs 3 lbs. and has a wedge-shaped profile that's 0.76" thick at the fattest point and 0.16" thick at its thinnest point. There's a full-size keyboard, a 13.3" widescreen display with LED backlighting, and a built-in iSight. The keyboard has an ambient light sensor similar to that of the MacBook Pro, and the trackpad supports multitouch gestures for panning, zooming, and rotating.

On the hardware side, the MacBook Air comes standard with an 80GB 1.8" hard drive, with a 64GB solid-state drive available. It's powered by an Intel Core 2 Duo running at 1.6GHz, with an option for a 1.8GHz model. According to Jobs, the Core 2 Duo in the MacBook Air is 60 percent smaller than standard C2D CPUs.

There's no optical drive or Ethernet port on the MacBook Air. The new laptop only includes built-in 802.11n, USB, DVI, and a headphone jack. Software installations can be done remotely using "Remote Disk," which allows the MacBook Air to access the optical drive of a networked Mac or PC.

Jobs also touted the environmentally-friendly nature of the MacBook Air. It has a full aluminum case, which he said is "highly desired by recyclers," a bromide- and PVC-free motherboard, and the retail packaging takes less than 50 percent of the volume of the previous packaging.

View: Full Story @ ArsTechnica
Video: >> Click here <<
Link: MacBook Air - Home Page

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 164 additional comments
(6 replies) #1 vipwoody on 15 Jan 2008 - 19:42
NEAT!
#1.1 +Steven on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:36
Any laptop that does not have a user-replaceable battery is not neat.

Last edited by Steven on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:37
#1.2 nekrosoft13 on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:49
Quote - (Steven said @ #1.1)
Any laptop that does not have a user-replaceable battery is not neat.


wow, thats low. not only its overpriced, but they also find another way to cheat a customer.
#1.3 evo_spook on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:51
Quote - (nekrosoft13 said @ #1.2)
Quote - (Steven said @ #1.1)
Any laptop that does not have a user-replaceable battery is not neat.


wow, thats low. not only its overpriced, but they also find another way to cheat a customer.



Well, seeing how they are not hiding this, they are in fact not cheating anyone
#1.4 whocares78 on 16 Jan 2008 - 00:51
Quote - (evo_spook said @ #1.3)
Quote - (nekrosoft13 said @ #1.2)
Quote - (Steven said @ #1.1)
Any laptop that does not have a user-replaceable battery is not neat.


wow, thats low. not only its overpriced, but they also find another way to cheat a customer.



Well, seeing how they are not hiding this, they are in fact not cheating anyone


no they are simply scamming them.
On a serious note, sometimes with laptops it is required to remove the battery to solve problems...how the hell is that goign to work..and befroe you say it not just PC laptops..or for long trips when you need more battery life.. you can't just take a spare battery with you..

hell apple even recommends removing it under certian circumstances
http://www.apple.com/au/batteries/notebooks.html

It is a bit of a worry that they havent learnt their lesson on user replaceable batteries by now....
#1.5 evo_spook on 16 Jan 2008 - 09:00
Quote - (whocares78 said @ #1.4)
Quote - (evo_spook said @ #1.3)
Quote - (nekrosoft13 said @ #1.2)
Quote - (Steven said @ #1.1)
Any laptop that does not have a user-replaceable battery is not neat.


wow, thats low. not only its overpriced, but they also find another way to cheat a customer.



Well, seeing how they are not hiding this, they are in fact not cheating anyone


no they are simply scamming them.
On a serious note, sometimes with laptops it is required to remove the battery to solve problems...how the hell is that goign to work..and befroe you say it not just PC laptops..or for long trips when you need more battery life.. you can't just take a spare battery with you..

hell apple even recommends removing it under certian circumstances
http://www.apple.com/au/batteries/notebooks.html

It is a bit of a worry that they havent learnt their lesson on user replaceable batteries by now....


No, they're not scamming either, a scam would also be where its hidden, this is not hidden, you know it upfront and its your choice
#1.6 Swordnyx on 17 Jan 2008 - 02:17
Quote - (evo_spook said @ #1.5)
Quote - (whocares78 said @ #1.4)
Quote - (evo_spook said @ #1.3)
Quote - (nekrosoft13 said @ #1.2)
Quote - (Steven said @ #1.1)
Any laptop that does not have a user-replaceable battery is not neat.


wow, thats low. not only its overpriced, but they also find another way to cheat a customer.



Well, seeing how they are not hiding this, they are in fact not cheating anyone


no they are simply scamming them.
On a serious note, sometimes with laptops it is required to remove the battery to solve problems...how the hell is that goign to work..and befroe you say it not just PC laptops..or for long trips when you need more battery life.. you can't just take a spare battery with you..

hell apple even recommends removing it under certian circumstances
http://www.apple.com/au/batteries/notebooks.html

It is a bit of a worry that they havent learnt their lesson on user replaceable batteries by now....


No, they're not scamming either, a scam would also be where its hidden, this is not hidden, you know it upfront and its your choice


Yes you are absolutely correct. They are not scamming. They are just ripping you off.
(5 replies) #2 eilegz on 15 Jan 2008 - 19:45
OVERPRICED, sorry i rather get a thinkpad X series.
#2.1 X'tyfe on 15 Jan 2008 - 19:46
Quote - (eilegz said @ #2)
OVERPRICED, sorry i rather get a thinkpad X series.


agreed, the hardware in macs are just so far behind that of a pc
i can get alot more than that for 3 grand

maybe if i was one of them rich mac fanboys...

Last edited by X'tyfe on 15 Jan 2008 - 19:47
#2.2 guruparan on 15 Jan 2008 - 19:50
Quote - (eilegz said @ #2)
OVERPRICED, sorry i rather get a thinkpad X series.

+1

Looks good..

but just found that it didnt have optical drive :-( (not a big issue though! , It shud have been 160GB..

too much pricey :-(
#2.3 whocares78 on 16 Jan 2008 - 00:53
+1

no ethernet port either.. what if i want to transfer files FAST...

#2.4 eAi on 16 Jan 2008 - 03:22
Quote - (whocares78 said @ #2.3)
+1

no ethernet port either.. what if i want to transfer files FAST...
Buy the like $20 USB ethernet dongle.
#2.5 whocares78 on 16 Jan 2008 - 04:44
Quote - (eAi said @ #2.4)
Quote - (whocares78 said @ #2.3)
+1

no ethernet port either.. what if i want to transfer files FAST...
Buy the like $20 USB ethernet dongle.


so that uses up the one and only USB port, so now i dont have USB port!!!
(8 replies) #3 tsupersonic on 15 Jan 2008 - 19:51
For those that are goin to say overpriced, the Sony TZ (Sony's lightweight series) is more expensive than this...

I'm not saying this is cheap, but compartively, it's cheaper.

I can't believe I said all this, I hate Apple...
#3.1 vetneufuse on 15 Jan 2008 - 19:55
Quote - (tsupersonic said @ #3)
For those that are goin to say overpriced, the Sony TZ (Sony's lightweight series) is more expensive than this...

I'm not saying this is cheap, but compartively, it's cheaper.

I can't believe I said all this, I hate Apple...


Apple also lied about the size of their one compared to others... Sony has one thinner then this
#3.2 tsupersonic on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:06
Quote - (neufuse said @ #3.1)
Quote - (tsupersonic said @ #3)
For those that are goin to say overpriced, the Sony TZ (Sony's lightweight series) is more expensive than this...

I'm not saying this is cheap, but compartively, it's cheaper.

I can't believe I said all this, I hate Apple...


Apple also lied about the size of their one compared to others... Sony has one thinner then this
Link?
#3.3 vetmarkjensen on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:23
I compared the published Apple Air specs to the Sony TX mentioned:

Air
Intel Core2 Duo @ 1.6GHz
2GB RAM
80GB HD
No Optical
0.76" @ thickest
3 lbs
$1,799

TX
Intel Core Solo @ 1.2GHz
1GB RAM (Max 1.5 GB)
80GB HD
DVD+-RW
0.83-1.23"
2.84 lbs
$1,999

Apple standard RAM is higher than the maximum you can get for the TX, a much better CPU, and the Air is thinner/sleeker in profile. The sacrifice for the reduced size is no optical drive, which might be a deal-breaker for some people. The cost is also $200 less than the Sony TX list price.

Seems in roughly the same pricing ballpark, yet some lament the Apples as being "way overpriced". I'm not seeing it here.

Last edited by markjensen on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:23
#3.4 vetneufuse on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:52
Quote - (tsupersonic said @ #3.2)
Quote - (neufuse said @ #3.1)
Quote - (tsupersonic said @ #3)
For those that are goin to say overpriced, the Sony TZ (Sony's lightweight series) is more expensive than this...

I'm not saying this is cheap, but compartively, it's cheaper.

I can't believe I said all this, I hate Apple...


Apple also lied about the size of their one compared to others... Sony has one thinner then this
Link?


Link to what? watch the key notes when Jobs says the size of the smallest Sony laptop he didn't talk about the SMALLEST sony laptop... which is a tad bit thinner then the mac
#3.5 eilegz on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:14
comparing mac with sony its useless since BOTH overprice their products.
#3.6 tsupersonic on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:25
Quote - (neufuse said @ #3.4)
Quote - (tsupersonic said @ #3.2)
Quote - (neufuse said @ #3.1)
Quote - (tsupersonic said @ #3)
For those that are goin to say overpriced, the Sony TZ (Sony's lightweight series) is more expensive than this...

I'm not saying this is cheap, but compartively, it's cheaper.

I can't believe I said all this, I hate Apple...


Apple also lied about the size of their one compared to others... Sony has one thinner then this
Link?


Link to what? watch the key notes when Jobs says the size of the smallest Sony laptop he didn't talk about the SMALLEST sony laptop... which is a tad bit thinner then the mac
Give me a link to the Sony website that lists the product specs. I checked sony's site and no sony sz series laptop is thinner.

Provide me with a link to the sony site, otherwise you fail.

I can't believe I'm defending a Mac... yikes

Last edited by tsupersonic on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:25
#3.7 tsupersonic on 15 Jan 2008 - 22:39
Quote - (tsupersonic said @ #3.6)
Quote - (neufuse said @ #3.4)
Quote - (tsupersonic said @ #3.2)
Quote - (neufuse said @ #3.1)
Quote - (tsupersonic said @ #3)
For those that are goin to say overpriced, the Sony TZ (Sony's lightweight series) is more expensive than this...

I'm not saying this is cheap, but compartively, it's cheaper.

I can't believe I said all this, I hate Apple...


Apple also lied about the size of their one compared to others... Sony has one thinner then this
Link?


Link to what? watch the key notes when Jobs says the size of the smallest Sony laptop he didn't talk about the SMALLEST sony laptop... which is a tad bit thinner then the mac
Give me a link to the Sony website that lists the product specs. I checked sony's site and no sony sz series laptop is thinner.

Provide me with a link to the sony site, otherwise you fail.

I can't believe I'm defending a Mac... yikes
Found the Sony X505 which is 0.75" thick.

http://tech.yahoo.com/blogs/null/65163
#3.8 vetmarkjensen on 16 Jan 2008 - 03:25
Quote - (tsupersonic said @ #3.7)
Found the Sony X505 which is 0.75" thick.

http://tech.yahoo.com/blogs/null/65163
That was a 2004 vintage unit, and is no longer in production.

And that, for a stab at a 0.01" thickness advantage. Better not set that on a piece of paper.
(5 replies) #4 vetneufuse on 15 Jan 2008 - 19:55
You pay for looks with a Mac... personally I'd get something way better for the money
#4.1 +Axon on 15 Jan 2008 - 19:58
You also pay for looks with a car. But on one really seems to come down this hard on Mercedes-Benz.

I take it your deal-finding persona drives one sweet ass Hyundai Pony!
#4.2 Danrarbc on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:10
Quote - (Axon said @ #4.1)
I take it your deal-finding persona drives one sweet ass Hyundai Pony!

The sad part is you probably think that's an insult.


Anyways, I always like to see Apple get caught fibbing. Just like the 'World's fastest PC' commercials they had to stop airing.
#4.3 vetneufuse on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:12
Quote - (Axon said @ #4.1)
You also pay for looks with a car. But on one really seems to come down this hard on Mercedes-Benz.

I take it your deal-finding persona drives one sweet ass Hyundai Pony!


Uh no I buy used cars no sense in wasteing money for a new car when you can get it for at least half price 2 years later... same thing doesn't work with comps though... wouldn't want to buy a comp 2 years after it came out... so the car / comp analogy doesn't work right in this case for cost vs looks

Last edited by neufuse on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:13
#4.4 FusionOpz on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:48
Quote - (Axon said @ #4.1)
You also pay for looks with a car. But on one really seems to come down this hard on Mercedes-Benz.
I'd rather have a 95 Cutlass Supreme (I hate this car with a passion btw) then a Mercedes/BMW/Lincon

Last edited by FusionOpz on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:49
#4.5 vipwoody on 15 Jan 2008 - 23:16
exactly
#5 TR1GG3R on 15 Jan 2008 - 19:56
the older macbook looks better......
(1 reply) #6 Matija. on 15 Jan 2008 - 19:57
Ehhh... It's a really cool machine, but their other laptops are way better value. I don't have any problems carrying around a 1" thick laptop, so being thinner really isn't that big of a deal to me.
#6.1 eAi on 16 Jan 2008 - 03:25
I agree. As we all know, the smaller it is, the more you pay. Performance-wise a iMac or a Mac Pro is better value than any laptop. You pay for the miniaturization and the R&D costs of fitting everything in...
#7 Daokoras on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:02
im going to get myself some summer work stuff to do..

and get myself one of those..


sweeeet...
(2 replies) #8 Galley on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:06
It would've looked a whole lot better with a white keyboard.
#8.1 Apple Macintosh Lover on 16 Jan 2008 - 01:54
Quote - (Galley said @ #
It would've looked a whole lot better with a white keyboard.


A white keyboard with an aluminum finish? Yuck!
#8.2 Davie on 16 Jan 2008 - 05:33
Quote - (Apple Macintosh Lover said @ #8.1)
Quote - (Galley said @ #
It would've looked a whole lot better with a white keyboard.


A white keyboard with an aluminum finish? Yuck!


Thats exactly what the current Apple keyboards look like?

I agree, it would have looked much nicer with white keys.
(2 replies) #9 bibutteryboy on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:11
so basically, you are all getting worked up over laptop that costs 1800.00 but has no optical drive, no 2nd usb port, no ethernet capability and probably no upgradability?

This was probably the worst keynote for apple in a long time.
no 3g for iphone, Amazon beat them to the punch with movie rentals as did Netflix.
you got an upgraded Apple tv that no one wants anyway.
and the biggest announcement is a thin overpriced laptop.
#9.1 vetneufuse on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:14
Quote - (bibutteryboy said @ #9)
so basically, you are all getting worked up over laptop that costs 1800.00 but has no optical drive, no 2nd usb port, no ethernet capability and probably no upgradability?

This was probably the worst keynote for apple in a long time.
no 3g for iphone, Amazon beat them to the punch with movie rentals as did Netflix.
you got an upgraded Apple tv that no one wants anyway.
and the biggest announcement is a thin overpriced laptop.


Dont forget charging existing ipod touch users $20 to get stuff that is free for new owners even if they bought it yesterday! (heck in that case I'd return it and get a new one *LOL*)
#9.2 eAi on 16 Jan 2008 - 03:26
Creative beat Apple to the punch with their MP3 players too, look how that turned out.
(16 replies) #10 RAID 0 on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:19
This *looks* cool, but no optical drive? I can live with out a ethernet port... but no OPTICAL DRIVE?!?! Why? That's so stupid. Hey, I'm gonna go spend 3 grand on a computer that can't even burn me a DVD or CD!! YAY!! Oh reality distortion field, take me away!
#10.1 simon360 on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:25
Well, it is a subnotebook...

But at that price, I'd rather be carrying around my MacBook Pro and burn a DVD wherever I want, without doing it wirelessly with another computer.
#10.2 RAID 0 on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:43
Quote - (simon360 said @ #10.1)
Well, it is a subnotebook...

But at that price, I'd rather be carrying around my MacBook Pro and burn a DVD wherever I want, without doing it wirelessly with another computer.


A 3000 doallar "sub" notebook? I'd rather go get an EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEpc, as far as a "sub notebook" goes... and I can save oh... about 2,800 dollars.
#10.3 vetmarkjensen on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:52
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #10.2)
A 3000 doallar "sub" notebook? I'd rather go get an EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEpc, as far as a "sub notebook" goes... and I can save oh... about 2,800 dollars.
Now that is comparing a Porsche to a Schwinn!
#10.4 RAID 0 on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:55
Quote - (markjensen said @ #10.3)
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #10.2)
A 3000 doallar "sub" notebook? I'd rather go get an EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEpc, as far as a "sub notebook" goes... and I can save oh... about 2,800 dollars.
Now that is comparing a Porsche to a Schwinn!


How so? Both are "sub notebooks".. both have no optical drive... both have SSD... and yet... one is 2800+ more than the other. I know, I know... the Mac is more powerfull than the Eee PC, but is it worth 2800 dollars? Hell I could buy the Eee, another laptop, and build two desktops at the price of that thing.
#10.5 Shadow Dragon on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:04
I really like the looks, but I don't like the battery deal, and the lack of ethernet port. If that was fixed and they made it a bit smaller then I'd drop my eee on the spot and get this instead even if it costs 4 times as much.

edit:
just saw that it only has one usb port, that sucks, they should have had two atleast (eee has 3 which is pretty impressive)

Last edited by Shadow Dragon on 15 Jan 2008 - 22:32
#10.6 japroach on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:10
The optical drive takes a huge amount of space in a compact laptop, for something that is very rarely used. The best solution is to have a docking station with a dvd drive, extra ports, etc.

btw a 32GB SSD costs $400 from newegg, I can only assume a 64gb would cost over $800. Why you are comparing that model to the EEE pc is beyond me (which has a 4GB ssd, worth what, $60?)
#10.7 evo_spook on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:11
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #10.4)
Quote - (markjensen said @ #10.3)
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #10.2)
A 3000 doallar "sub" notebook? I'd rather go get an EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEpc, as far as a "sub notebook" goes... and I can save oh... about 2,800 dollars.
Now that is comparing a Porsche to a Schwinn!


How so? Both are "sub notebooks".. both have no optical drive... both have SSD... and yet... one is 2800+ more than the other. I know, I know... the Mac is more powerfull than the Eee PC, but is it worth 2800 dollars? Hell I could buy the Eee, another laptop, and build two desktops at the price of that thing.



You can do that with the Sony as well, which is more expensive then the Apple
#10.8 RAID 0 on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:20
Quote - (japroach said @ #10.6)
The optical drive takes a huge amount of space in a compact laptop, for something that is very rarely used. The best solution is to have a docking station with a dvd drive, extra ports, etc.

btw a 32GB SSD costs $400 from newegg, I can only assume a 64gb would cost over $800. Why you are comparing that model to the EEE pc is beyond me (which has a 4GB ssd, worth what, $60?)


Because it's a "sub-notebook" take that 800.. no, let's call it a 1000 dollars and upgrade the Eee with that SS drive. Ummm... a total of about... $1400 after all is said and done. IS that CLOSE to the 3 grand Apple wants? NOPE.
#10.9 vetmarkjensen on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:31
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #10.
Because it's a "sub-notebook" take that 800.. no, let's call it a 1000 dollars and upgrade the Eee with that SS drive. Ummm... a total of about... $1400 after all is said and done. IS that CLOSE to the 3 grand Apple wants? NOPE.
And upgrade the display, the RAM, the CPU... Get the idea?

Just because you call both of them "sub notebooks" doesn't mean they are equivalent and should be the same price. Just because a bicycle and a car are both "transportation" doesn't mean they have the same performance and features, and should cost the same.
#10.10 RAID 0 on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:52
Quote - (markjensen said @ #10.9)
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #10.
Because it's a "sub-notebook" take that 800.. no, let's call it a 1000 dollars and upgrade the Eee with that SS drive. Ummm... a total of about... $1400 after all is said and done. IS that CLOSE to the 3 grand Apple wants? NOPE.
And upgrade the display, the RAM, the CPU... Get the idea?

Just because you call both of them "sub notebooks" doesn't mean they are equivalent and should be the same price. Just because a bicycle and a car are both "transportation" doesn't mean they have the same performance and features, and should cost the same.


Mark, while I respect you AND your tech knowledge greatly... I don't think comparing a bike to a car is accurate in this case. More like... a Geo Storm to an Acura NSX. Both are cars.. and yet.. one is WAY better than the other. Sure you can put a new engine, exaust and ECM in the Geo and make it as fast as the NSX, but it will never be as good. That's why I compaired the Eee to the Air. I don't think the fetures of the Air are worth the price. For $299 you get something "similar" to the Air, granted not as powerfull or stylish. Yes no maybe so?

I like the idea of this Mac Air. I think it looks nice and has very good tech qualities, but it's not for me. Add a Super Drive to that setup, and I'd think it would be something to consider for less than two grand. Untill then, my next lappie is going to be.. a Mac Book. Only then, will I be legaly able to boot my four favorite OSes!
#10.11 whocares78 on 16 Jan 2008 - 01:00
Quote - (japroach said @ #10.6)
The optical drive takes a huge amount of space in a compact laptop, for something that is very rarely used. The best solution is to have a docking station with a dvd drive, extra ports, etc.

btw a 32GB SSD costs $400 from newegg, I can only assume a 64gb would cost over $800. Why you are comparing that model to the EEE pc is beyond me (which has a 4GB ssd, worth what, $60?)


rarely used by You maybe, i could not do a lot of work without an optical drive.. and a docking station makes the whole portable thing a joke, as a dockign station aint portable... i need to burn stufdf while i am away and onsite, not to mention when im a way i like to watch movies to pass the time, on planes in hotels etc etc
#10.12 vetmarkjensen on 16 Jan 2008 - 03:27
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #10.10)
...I don't think comparing a bike to a car is accurate in this case.
...
I was pointing out the absurdity of comparing a budget PC with an itty-bitty screen and keyboard to a full-power notebook. None of the specs between the two match up.
#10.13 NeoTrunks on 16 Jan 2008 - 04:18
Quote - (markjensen said @ #10.12)
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #10.10)
...I don't think comparing a bike to a car is accurate in this case.
...
I was pointing out the absurdity of comparing a budget PC with an itty-bitty screen and keyboard to a full-power notebook. None of the specs between the two match up.


Some people won't let a little thing like logic get in their way .
#10.14 RAID 0 on 16 Jan 2008 - 05:15
Quote - (NeoTrunks said @ #10.13)
Quote - (markjensen said @ #10.12)
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #10.10)
...I don't think comparing a bike to a car is accurate in this case.
...
I was pointing out the absurdity of comparing a budget PC with an itty-bitty screen and keyboard to a full-power notebook. None of the specs between the two match up.


Some people won't let a little thing like logic get in their way .


Yeah ok. Please show me where I'm wrong.
#10.15 NeoTrunks on 16 Jan 2008 - 06:53
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #10.14)
Quote - (NeoTrunks said @ #10.13)
Quote - (markjensen said @ #10.12)
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #10.10)
...I don't think comparing a bike to a car is accurate in this case.
...
I was pointing out the absurdity of comparing a budget PC with an itty-bitty screen and keyboard to a full-power notebook. None of the specs between the two match up.


Some people won't let a little thing like logic get in their way .


Yeah ok. Please show me where I'm wrong.


The two machines that you're comparing. It would be like comparing a low end eMachines, around the ballpark price of $200-$300, to a quad Xeon based Precision Workstation. Sure, they're both computers, but they are not on the same spec level.
#10.16 RAID 0 on 16 Jan 2008 - 08:21
Quote - (NeoTrunks said @ #10.15)
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #10.14)
Quote - (NeoTrunks said @ #10.13)
Quote - (markjensen said @ #10.12)
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #10.10)
...I don't think comparing a bike to a car is accurate in this case.
...
I was pointing out the absurdity of comparing a budget PC with an itty-bitty screen and keyboard to a full-power notebook. None of the specs between the two match up.


Some people won't let a little thing like logic get in their way .


Yeah ok. Please show me where I'm wrong.


The two machines that you're comparing. It would be like comparing a low end eMachines, around the ballpark price of $200-$300, to a quad Xeon based Precision Workstation. Sure, they're both computers, but they are not on the same spec level.


YES I KNOW THAT! I'm saying the DIFFERENCE DOES NOT JUSTIFY THE HIGHER PRICE!!
(4 replies) #11 peacemf on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:23
i hate apple
but at least they are trying to do something new and cool

cant say the same for others!

also how uses optical drives?!!! its USB external HDD's and flash!! we all download stuff now!

Last edited by neufuse on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:59
#11.1 evo_spook on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:29
Quote - (peacemf said @ #11)
i hate apple
but at least they are trying to do something new and cool

cant say the same for others!

also how uses optical drives?!!! its USB external HDD's and flash!! we all download stuff now! !


wierd the amount of PC users that come out and say "I hate Apple" thats as strange as people coming out and saying "I love apple" Its just a company, you either like or not like its products. MS has done a lot of dodgy stuff in the past, but can't say I'd waste any thought on hating them, they have good things and bad things.

This Air, quite nice, but it, like the iPhone is too compromissed, so if I was going to spend that money on a Apple laptop I'd get a Mac Book Pro for the price. The price as mentioned I don't think it is too bad when compared to other ultra portables, but..... until I see it in real life, I prefer the Sony Ultraportable, the Airs should maybe have had more then one option, the 13" down to a 11" screen, now that AND a 11" screen I might have being tempted.

Last edited by neufuse on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:59
#11.2 evo_spook on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:09
neufuse you edited my post, but nothign has changed??? whats going on?
#11.3 whocares78 on 16 Jan 2008 - 01:32
how does removing half the stuff that every other machien on the market has make it 'new' what the hell is 'new' about it.... cool maybe but thats just the pretty design, nothing to do with hardware specifications..

p.s. he probably edited the quote part, if you hadent noticed he edited the top one too....

Last edited by whocares78 on 16 Jan 2008 - 01:33
#11.4 +GreyWolfSC on 16 Jan 2008 - 03:57
Quote - (evo_spook said @ #11.2)
neufuse you edited my post, but nothign has changed??? whats going on?


He edited the post you responded to. You quoted it, so he had to edit yours, too.

(I had to edit this just because everyone else is doing it.)

Last edited by GreyWolfSC on 16 Jan 2008 - 03:58
(6 replies) #12 WolfDV on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:38
nice, but vastly overpriced

I'll wait and see what other companies come out with.

#12.1 evo_spook on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:40
Quote - (WolfDV said @ #12)
nice, but vastly overpriced

I'll wait and see what other companies come out with.


No, costly, but not overpriced compared to similar manufacturers sub notebooks, the sony is more expensive.
#12.2 RAID 0 on 15 Jan 2008 - 20:50
Quote - (evo_spook said @ #12.1)
Quote - (WolfDV said @ #12)
nice, but vastly overpriced

I'll wait and see what other companies come out with.


No, costly, but not overpriced compared to similar manufacturers sub notebooks, the sony is more expensive.


Interesting... what about the Asus EEEPC? Kinda close, sub notebook, no optical drive... but how much is the EEEPC? $299... how much is the Mac Book Air? STARTS AT $1799. Not overpriced? Oh you want the SSD... starting at $3098!! WOW!!! You're SOOOOOOOOOO RIGHT!!! THAT'S NOT OVER PRICED!!! THAT'S A ****ING RIP OFF!!
#12.3 evo_spook on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:00
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #12.2)
Quote - (evo_spook said @ #12.1)
Quote - (WolfDV said @ #12)
nice, but vastly overpriced

I'll wait and see what other companies come out with.


No, costly, but not overpriced compared to similar manufacturers sub notebooks, the sony is more expensive.


Interesting... what about the Asus EEEPC? Kinda close, sub notebook, no optical drive... but how much is the EEEPC? $299... how much is the Mac Book Air? STARTS AT $1799. Not overpriced? Oh you want the SSD... starting at $3098!! WOW!!! You're SOOOOOOOOOO RIGHT!!! THAT'S NOT OVER PRICED!!! THAT'S A ****ING RIP OFF!!


THEN WHAT ABOUT THE BLOODY SONY, COME ONE?????????????????????????
#12.4 RAID 0 on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:14
Quote - (evo_spook said @ #12.3)
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #12.2)
Quote - (evo_spook said @ #12.1)
Quote - (WolfDV said @ #12)
nice, but vastly overpriced

I'll wait and see what other companies come out with.


No, costly, but not overpriced compared to similar manufacturers sub notebooks, the sony is more expensive.


Interesting... what about the Asus EEEPC? Kinda close, sub notebook, no optical drive... but how much is the EEEPC? $299... how much is the Mac Book Air? STARTS AT $1799. Not overpriced? Oh you want the SSD... starting at $3098!! WOW!!! You're SOOOOOOOOOO RIGHT!!! THAT'S NOT OVER PRICED!!! THAT'S A ****ING RIP OFF!!


THEN WHAT ABOUT THE BLOODY SONY, COME ONE?????????????????????????



I wouldn't buy that POS either. I only have one laptop, it's a Compaq and it's not fast.. but it only cost me $599. My 3 other PCs, I built myself. Later this year I am looking at the Mac Book only because I want to quad boot OS X, Ubuntu, XP and Vista. Makes for one nice all-in-one machine.
#12.5 evo_spook on 15 Jan 2008 - 21:20
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #12.4)
Quote - (evo_spook said @ #12.3)
Quote - (RAID 0 said @ #12.2)
Quote - (evo_spook said @ #12.1)