A top official with the U.S. White House's Office of Management and Budget (OMB) gave her strongest endorsement yet to software as a service, saying Wednesday it can help federal agencies cut development costs.
A speech on Wednesday at the SaaS/Gov conference in Washington, D.C., wasn't the first time Karen Evans, administrator of the OMB's Office of Electronic Government and Information Technology, endorsed software as a service. Despite Evans' continuing advocacy of the concept, adoption has been slow among government agencies, according to one vendor.
A speech on Wednesday at the SaaS/Gov conference in Washington, D.C., wasn't the first time Karen Evans, administrator of the OMB's Office of Electronic Government and Information Technology, endorsed software as a service. Despite Evans' continuing advocacy of the concept, adoption has been slow among government agencies, according to one vendor.
Asked whether the OMB should more strongly promote software as a service, Evans said U.S. agencies need to weigh cost, security and other factors. But the U.S. government needs to move to a more service-oriented software model, she said. "Our track record is clear-- we are not very good at delivering our own software in the time frame set," Evans said at the conference. "We're also not very good at managing large projects."
Some agencies haven't embraced the service approach, often because they want hands-on control of software development, Evans said. But government agencies can't afford to keep developing their own software without sharing with other agencies, she said. "We can't continue to maintain all of the things we have," she added. "We have to start shutting down some of our legacy systems. We really have to move to a... service-oriented market."
Although there's been no prohibition against U.S. agencies using software-as-a-service models, many agencies have been reluctant to move to a service-based approach, partly because of concerns about the security of Web-based services, said Dan Burton, senior vice president of global public policy for Salesforce.com. Evans' speech on Wednesday could create a "tipping point" for the use of software-as-a-service models in the U.S. government, Burton said. Many agencies seem to believe that they don't have the authority to take a chance on the new model, he said.
One step that service-based software vendors can take is to seek security certifications and map out how their services meet Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) requirements, Evans said. Some agencies are reluctant to move to software as a service without certifications, she said. However, some agencies are already using software as a service to cut down development times. Rezaur Rahman, enterprise architect and Web services manager for the U.S. Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, said his agency began using Salesforce.com offerings in its information management systems in recent months. Budget constraints helped push the agency toward software as a service, he said. The agency is using services to take care of many functions it would have had to write its own code for in the past, including reading and writing to databases, Rahman said. The agency can often make tweaks to its information management systems in a day or less, he added.

Probably. But it could also be Google, Red Hat, or Sun. Maybe even IBM.
No matter who it is, the idea sucks. I can't believe someone could say with a straight face that SaaS is more secure, faster, or less costly than desktop apps. These agencies already use custom apps, migrating those to 3rd party servers will be a pointless waste of our taxes.
Instead of SaaS, they should be pushing virtualization. The fewer khaki-clad middle-men or penguins involved, the better.
The problem they are worried about is that non-government employees may potentially have access to classified and private information. Or at least if they don't have access directly to that kind of information, they at least know how the systems that hold that information work, therefore a rogue employee could easily obtain that information. Or he could program a backdoor to the system and later take advantage of it.
If they are referring to web services, i'm a little confused why this is big news, unless they were announcing that they'd be exposing certain web services to the public.
Software as a service is similar to a paid-subscription to a magazine or a contract for a cell phone.
ie. Symantec Antivirus Software subscription is paid for the year
You rent Microsoft Office for 2 years
You use Adobe Photoshop for 2 months paid
etc, etc...
it would be like buying TV or Internet (like fir3x said). You pay for the service and not the product.
Subscribe now! Pay forever! **** you!
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.