JPEG XR: Microsoft's HD Photo format is endorsed by JPEG
Posted by Fred Derf on 07 February 2008 - 20:34 · 18 comments & 17827 views
- Advertisement
-
-
(3 replies)
#1 Posted by Fred Derf on 07 Feb 2008 - 20:43
- First of all, this news is a few days old but it seems to have slid under the radar a bit. That may be because an announcement of this kind was expected almost a year ago but now we have a formal confirmation.
I thought it was worth bringing to the attention of Neowinians. If you've already heard about it then you can move on. There probably is a forum thread but the search function is being worked on.
Edit: I manually looked in BPN and I didn't see anything. -
#1.1 Posted by
markjensen on 07 Feb 2008 - 20:49
- What a shame that so many disclaimers have to be posted at the start of a FPN item.

And, heaven forbid, someone mis-type "MB" instead of "GB".
As for the news item, glad to see that the format will lose proprietary controls. Should aid in cross-platform (and cross-vendor) use without need to license and such. -
#1.2 Posted by Fred Derf on 07 Feb 2008 - 20:54
- (markjensen said @ #1.1)And, heaven forbid, someone mis-type "MB" instead of "GB".

What idiot would do that?
I'm still nearly a front-page virgin. Don't hurt me.
-
#1.3 Posted by Angel Blue01 on 07 Feb 2008 - 21:40
- (markjensen said @ #1.1)What a shame that so many disclaimers have to be posted at the start of a FPN item.

And, heaven forbid, someone mis-type "MB" instead of "GB".
As for the news item, glad to see that the format will lose proprietary controls. Should aid in cross-platform (and cross-vendor) use without need to license and such.
I hope you're right, and any editor will be able to use this even under the GPL.
-
#2 Posted by simon360 on 07 Feb 2008 - 21:23
- Another renaming of HD Photo? It's already been through 2 or 3

Good news to hear, anyway
-
#5 Posted by dentaku on 07 Feb 2008 - 23:37
- I tried out this new format right when the Photoshop plug-in came out and I'm quite impressed by it. I hope camera makers start adding it to their hardware because we need something like this to fill in the space between artifact filled jpegs and giant RAW files.
I hope Canon is listening.
-
#6 Posted by bangbang023 on 07 Feb 2008 - 23:41
- I wonder if current cameras will be given the opportunity to support this through a firmware update. I literally just purchased a Canon SD1000 and would love support for this in the future.
-
#8 Posted by TigerFX on 08 Feb 2008 - 00:36
- No, .wdp and .hdp. I've just installed the CS2 plugin:

http://allenellis.com/public/Textopia.jpg (8 bits per channel jpeg @ 28KB)
http://allenellis.com/public/Textopia.hdp (16 bits per channel HD photo @ 140KB)
What's odd is that Microsoft's file association search doesn't know about either format:
http://shell.windows.com/fileassoc/0409/xm...dir.asp?Ext=HDP
http://shell.windows.com/fileassoc/0409/xm...dir.asp?Ext=WDP
-
(1 reply)
#9 Posted by Intelman on 08 Feb 2008 - 02:09
- I love .wdp, but no one supports it.
Getting support is so hard, which is why we'll be using mp3 for a while, i prefer aac, but not everything supports that still. -
#9.1 Posted by toadeater on 08 Feb 2008 - 03:27
- (Intelman said @ #9)I love .wdp, but no one supports it.
Getting support is so hard, which is why we'll be using mp3 for a while, i prefer aac, but not everything supports that still.
If MS serious about keeping it an open format then it will get adopted. But no one wants a new format with a licensing time bomb in it, like what was tried with the GIF format.
-
#10 Posted by Shadrack on 08 Feb 2008 - 05:01
- Thats cool. Its about time that there is a successor to JPEG that is 'better' (although I don't fully understand technically how exactly, I'd have to see it).
-
#11 Posted by randomevent on 08 Feb 2008 - 08:41
- Am I missing something? The 'source' is from November 2007.
-
#12 Posted by +Orlando Rays on 08 Feb 2008 - 13:28
- The question is, what will the extension be? Will it remain .hdp or will it move to another one like .jxr?
-
#13 Posted by ryoohki on 10 Feb 2008 - 03:59
- Nice.. i downloaded a photo from dpreview.com (jpeg) at FUll 10mpixel res that was 4.5megs, i use the CS plugin.. with 100 quantization , cut down to 88k, and unless i use a painfull about of zoom it (even at 400% it's not evident to find a difference) doest show the flaw. It will be great for online photo, save bandwitdh and space..
Submit to reddit
Submit to blinklist
Bookmark on del.icio.us
Add to furl
Share on Facebook
Add to Windows Live

Microsoft believes that wide-spread use of this file format could begin in about a year.
Key features include: