main
Report a problem

DivX Announces Plans to Shut Down Stage6.com

dosha   via BusinessWire on 25 February 2008 - 21:04 · 33 comments & 20116 views

Advertisement (Why?)
DivX, Inc., a digital media company, today announced that the Company will cease operation of its Stage6.com video service on February 28, 2008.

Following an exploration of strategic options that began in July 2007, the Company has decided to cease operation of the site and focus its resources on the Company’s core DivX technology licensing business while also continuing to power the distribution of DivX video content on third-party sites.

“Our core business is to work with a wide variety of partners to give consumers a high-quality digital video experience on any device or platform,” said Kevin Hell, CEO of DivX, Inc. “By no longer expending resources on Stage6, we sharpen our focus on creating a global standard for digital video while building a business that maximizes shareholder value. We will provide more information related the Stage6.com shutdown on our fourth quarter earnings call, scheduled for March 11, 2008.”

Videos on Stage6.com will be available for viewing and download through February 28, 2008. The Company will work with certain content publishers to migrate content to alternative web distribution platforms.

Link: Stage6

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 33 additional comments
#1 Bhav on 25 Feb 2008 - 21:21
Real shame
(2 replies) #2 Boramas on 25 Feb 2008 - 21:26
This i really dont get as a business practice, shut down the showcasing of your own product to save a few thousand dollars a month on web hosting etc, to focus on core business.......PAHH.
Lame excuse for not being able to make money!!!!
#2.1 Boramas on 25 Feb 2008 - 21:34
#2.2 theyarecomingforyou on 25 Feb 2008 - 23:57
Yes, but it depends how much money they're actually making from their core business. There's no point throwing away money just so a few people can access some videos on the web.
#3 -Vendetta- on 25 Feb 2008 - 21:26
Meh.
(1 reply) #4 Typhon on 25 Feb 2008 - 21:30
Hum what about Vista support????
#4.1 GreyWolfSC on 26 Feb 2008 - 01:20
(Typhon said @ #4)
Hum what about Vista support????


DivX software works fine on Vista. x64 support is what they need.
(11 replies) #5 +MichaelBL on 25 Feb 2008 - 21:44
I would've used their services had they found a way to stream high-quality media without me having to install some of their software.
#5.1 Banjo on 25 Feb 2008 - 21:55
What? How is that even possible? You'll always have to install something to watch video on the internet. What do you think is going to decode it?
#5.2 +MichaelBL on 25 Feb 2008 - 22:05
(Banjo said @ #5.1)
What? How is that even possible? You'll always have to install something to watch video on the internet. What do you think is going to decode it?


YouTube does the job for me.
#5.3 simon360 on 25 Feb 2008 - 22:11
YouTube uses Flash, which has ****-poor video and sound quality IMO.
#5.4 +MichaelBL on 25 Feb 2008 - 22:14
(MichaelBL said @ #5.2)
(Banjo said @ #5.1)
What? How is that even possible? You'll always have to install something to watch video on the internet. What do you think is going to decode it?


YouTube does the job for me.


Have you seen some of the latest quality of videos on there? No?

Decent quality is possible with flash. No need for half-arsed services and extra software.
#5.5 Banjo on 25 Feb 2008 - 22:24
Flash is still extra software
#5.6 +MichaelBL on 25 Feb 2008 - 22:52
(Banjo said @ #5.5)
Flash is still extra software


True, but so many things require flash other than YouTube.

ONLY Stage6 requires that stupid extra software they offer, no thanks.
#5.7 testman on 25 Feb 2008 - 23:44
(MichaelBL said @ #5.6)
(Banjo said @ #5.5)
Flash is still extra software


True, but so many things require flash other than YouTube.


That's hardly Stage6's fault. As it is, it only requires their DivX web player. YouTube requires Flash. Same requirement (as in 1 external plug-in), different plug-in.
#5.8 Esvandiary on 26 Feb 2008 - 00:30
(testman said @ #5.7)
That's hardly Stage6's fault. As it is, it only requires their DivX web player. YouTube requires Flash. Same requirement (as in 1 external plug-in), different plug-in.

I think his point is that Flash is a de facto standard around the web. It's used on many (too many) websites, whereas the DivX Web Player isn't really used anywhere except Stage6 and other DivX-owned sites (and said plugin has numerous interesting practices like making extra folders in My Documents and a shortcut on your desktop).

In fact, these annoyances were the first thing I ever saw of the plugin, and decided there and then I wouldn't be installing it no matter what. Especially as you could quite easily just download the *.divx file from the Stage6 servers and watch at your leisure in whatever media player you prefer. (In before "but you still need the DivX codecs" - codec packs are very good, you get what you need to watch the films without all the software you don't need).
#5.9 linuxamp on 26 Feb 2008 - 01:59
I agree that installing software is not the best thing but I'm very impressed with the Divx web player. The best features to me are the background dimming and download/auto-download capability.
#5.10 obsolete_power on 26 Feb 2008 - 06:19
(MichaelBL said @ #5.6)
(Banjo said @ #5.5)
Flash is still extra software


True, but so many things require flash other than YouTube.

ONLY Stage6 requires that stupid extra software they offer, no thanks.


You mean the DivX web-plugin? Uhhh, let me spell it out for you, the DivX codec is much better than flash and it is resource-friendly!
#5.11 LaXu on 26 Feb 2008 - 07:50
(MichaelBL said @ #5.4)
(MichaelBL said @ #5.2)
(Banjo said @ #5.1)
What? How is that even possible? You'll always have to install something to watch video on the internet. What do you think is going to decode it?


YouTube does the job for me.


Have you seen some of the latest quality of videos on there? No?

Decent quality is possible with flash. No need for half-arsed services and extra software.


I agree. Just look at Vimeo for example. The video quality is pretty good IMO.

Besides DivX sucks because they keep cramming all kinds of **** with their stuff.
#6 npe on 25 Feb 2008 - 21:51
I like Stage6, much better video quality than sites like YouTube. Too bad, too bad!!!
#7 vetLOC on 25 Feb 2008 - 21:54
I'm pretty sure the real reason they are shutting it down is because of all the copyrighted content on the site. They just couldn't handle it towards the end. There was SO much stuff on there, it was nuts. Not to mention the whole hacking things recently. I just don't think it has to do with money at this point.
#8 TGT on 25 Feb 2008 - 22:46
This is a real shame! I was just saying to my friend yesterday, that out of all the online video hosting sites out there, that Stage6 was the only one doing it right. Quality videos not only resolution wise, but also content wise. It will be missed
#9 sorlag on 25 Feb 2008 - 22:56
Stage6 has really nice quality and performance...
Don't shut it down
#10 The Gooch on 25 Feb 2008 - 23:08
Wouldn't have anything to do with all the illegal content linked from Joox would it?
#11 Tech Star on 26 Feb 2008 - 00:02
Wow, that sucks. Stage6 is so much better than youtube.
#12 Kushan on 26 Feb 2008 - 01:03
Hopefully google will take the hint and start offering high-quality videos on wootube (I think they said a while back that they had plans for it).
But these kind of sites are like P2P sites, if one goes down then 3 more will pop up in it's place. I believe the pirate bay was working on it's own version of the site.
#13 ajua on 26 Feb 2008 - 01:32
i just received an email from them. sad to hear that they are shutting it down.

i liked the resolutions, quality and design of their site. i upload home movies there for me to share with family and friends.

i just hope that someone pulls a site like stage6 soon.
#14 Nose Nuggets on 26 Feb 2008 - 01:36
cant say i blame them. there is virtually no direct income from the site, it serves only as advertising for the product. however, their product is going to gain little income generating 'buzz' from a site that hosts video like a YouTube. the money is in enterprise sales, and company's who want to integrate DivX products into into their own products and/or services. if anything its been a public service, and expensive public service. lets say you had a single 42u rack at a competitive data center, thats at somewhere around ~$800 a month in real estate alone, plus power, plus bandwidth, plus an on hands team to conduct maintenance and manage, or your paying a current employee to go out there and conduct the maintenance. its expensive, with little to no return.
#15 Code.Red on 26 Feb 2008 - 01:48
What the
#16 linuxamp on 26 Feb 2008 - 02:03
There are petitions to save stage 6. Not sure if Divx will listen especially since the email sounded like they've already made up their minds. Just google save stage 6 and you can find some places to voice your vote.

FYI, their site will probably have the slashdot effect with everyone trying to download everything before it goes down.
#17 FloatingFatMan on 26 Feb 2008 - 08:00
Well, that's going to royally bugger up TV Links! :p
#18 Krome on 26 Feb 2008 - 08:32
Someone trying to clone stage6. I don't think he come close to call it a clone. The current look of the site does not look anywhere close to Stage6. check this site out http://www.highlol.com/
#19 ermax on 26 Feb 2008 - 13:09
Stage6 is great when it works but 9 times out of 10 the videos get stuck on Step 3 for weeks at a time. I will miss being able to upload 720x480 at 3000Mbit. Well, that was what I uploaded anyways. That isn't the limit though. I like how you can upload what ever you want, any res, at any bitrate and they don't touch the file at all other then renaming the file and giving it a divx file extension.

And for those that don't like all the crap packed into DivX, just use Xvid. It's free and works with Stage6.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)