Microsoft Extends Life of Windows XP
Posted by HappyAndyK via seattlepi on 04 April 2008 - 01:47 · 34 comments & 16248 views
- Advertisement
-
-
(1 reply)
#1 Posted by Unto Darkness on 04 Apr 2008 - 02:05
- Microsoft's most sensible decision to date. Go Microsoft!
-
(2 replies)
#5 Posted by Dr_Asik on 04 Apr 2008 - 02:18
- With 9 years of shelf life, XP will have been the longest-lived version of Windows ever, I believe. But it deserves it.
-
#5.1 Posted by Unto Darkness on 04 Apr 2008 - 02:23
- Agreed.
-
#5.2 Posted by ThaCrip on 04 Apr 2008 - 03:17
- +1 , it deserves it... it's stable and light on resources vs vista.
p.s. i recently switched to vista myself and you can tell it taxes the system more but on 'my' system it actually runs pretty good overall and im happy with it and would rather not go back to XP now
... but im sure there's LOTS of PC's Vista would suck on due to it needing a certain ammount of CPU/Graphics card power and if it dont have it... XP would be a overall far better choice on those pc's.... but if your pc can handle it... Vista is a solid all around choice.
-
(1 reply)
#6 Posted by Flae_qui on 04 Apr 2008 - 02:33
- what do you call a lost cost PC??? when you can get a Vista based PC for under 400 now...?
-
#7 Posted by soldier1st on 04 Apr 2008 - 02:33
- it may be the home edition but at least it is something.
-
(1 reply)
#9 Posted by [deXter] on 04 Apr 2008 - 03:30
- What about WinFLP? Also, is XP Home better than WinFLP?
-
#9.1 Posted by TRC on 04 Apr 2008 - 07:18
- Windows Fundamentals for Legacy PCs
-
#10 Posted by +HappyAndyK on 04 Apr 2008 - 03:40
- The move may be targetted to these low cost machines. And its the home user who whold go for such machines; so it makes sense to extend the life of XP Home !
-
#11 Posted by
sanctified on 04 Apr 2008 - 04:05
- I think WinFLP its the better option as deXter said, but this is good nonetheless.
-
#12 Posted by Redant751 on 04 Apr 2008 - 04:16
- Hey I am just happy that at least we get to keep XP home for a bit longer......
-
#13 Posted by rpgfan on 04 Apr 2008 - 04:20
- I still think Windows RG (Really Good Edition) was the best version of Windows to date...

Seriously, the extension of XP's life was a good move on MS' part. I can't stand Windows when a Linux computer is available, but I'd rather use XP over Vista. Much smoother.
-
(1 reply)
#14 Posted by Chrono951 on 04 Apr 2008 - 04:30
- Will this really matter in the long run? You won't be able to buy it unless it comes on a specific computer. This won't change the fact that Microsoft is going to push Vista on the mainstream. Even if you pick up a copy somehow OEM, it will be home, not pro and that just sucks. June 2008 still marks the end of XP and when that comes, most developers are going to start targeting Vista for future releases of their software.
Although I am glad that they are putting XP on these computers compared to Vista. In that environment, XP kicks Vista's butt.
Last edited by Chrono951 on 04 Apr 2008 - 04:58
-
#15 Posted by daniel_rh on 04 Apr 2008 - 04:59
- Happy for that decision, I like Vista but XP deserve more time and at the end Windows in any of its versions is Microsoft.
-
(1 reply)
#16 Posted by M118LR on 04 Apr 2008 - 05:45
- For those who care to actually read the press release from Microsoft.
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/feature...04-03xpeos.mspx
Sales of XP for Retail and OEM CD's will end 30 June 2008.
XP Home will only be available pre-installed on specific low cost Laptop Computers.
PressPass: Will Microsoft extend sales of other editions of Windows XP?
Dix: No, there is no plan to extend sales of other editions of Windows XP beyond June 30, 2008. We are very proud of the progress that we have made with Windows Vista over the last sixteen months. Since its launch, Windows Vista has become the fastest-selling operating system in Microsoft history, and more than 100 million Windows Vista licenses have been sold worldwide.
Last fall, our OEM partners asked us to extend sales of Windows XP to give their customers more time to transition to Windows Vista while we worked with other software vendors to expand application compatibility. Today, more than 2,500 applications have received the Windows Vista logo (a ten-fold increase since launch) and more than 78,000 devices and components are supported by drivers either in-box or on Windows Update. On NPD’s list of the top 100 consumer applications selling at retail, 98 are now compatible—and the latest versions of the top free downloads (Adobe Reader, Shockwave and iTunes) are all compatible.
Given this landscape and after consulting with our partners, apart from today’s announced extension of Windows XP Home for ULCPCs, we are maintaining the timelines we announced in September.
I should also note that there will also be no impact on our technical support plans—mainstream technical support will continue to be available until April 2009 and extended support will continue until April 2014. -
#16.1 Posted by MtDewCodeRedFreak on 04 Apr 2008 - 07:13
- Hahaha - reading comprehension owns all who thought XP could be up a bit longer.
I knew it.
-
(5 replies)
#17 Posted by +tunafish on 04 Apr 2008 - 07:29
- why wont it just die!!! why continue using old software
-
#17.1 Posted by zoonyx on 04 Apr 2008 - 07:47
- (tunafish said @ #17)why wont it just die!!! why continue using old software
The short answer is because the replacement software is a steaming pile of ****
I have a full, legal copy of Ultimate, and would love be using it, but right now (post SP1), its just not good enough for my needs, and within a week of trying it yet again, I end up pining for the speed and usability of XP. -
#17.2 Posted by
sanctified on 04 Apr 2008 - 07:48
- Because there is a need for it, there is demand.
Just because you dont need it doesnt mean no one does. -
#17.3 Posted by TRC on 04 Apr 2008 - 09:01
- (tunafish said @ #17)why wont it just die!!! why continue using old software
Because it works, why not use it? Not everyone wants to run out and buy a brand new computer to do something that their current system with XP still does perfectly well. Did you know you can run Firefox on NT 3.51? My old 486 can still browse Neowin.
-
#17.4 Posted by D-M on 04 Apr 2008 - 10:03
- (tunafish said @ #17)why wont it just die!!! why continue using old software
Because I do not need a quad core processor, 10 PCI-e bridged video cards, 1000 gigs of ram, 10000 TB of HD space & a 40,000 watt power supply to run all my high powered peripherals, just to surf the web & check my email.... Or do I?
-
#17.5 Posted by +tunafish on 04 Apr 2008 - 10:13
- (D-M said @ #17.4)(tunafish said @ #17)why wont it just die!!! why continue using old software
Because I do not need a quad core processor, 10 PCI-e bridged video cards, 1000 gigs of ram, 10000 TB of HD space & a 40,000 watt power supply to run all my high powered peripherals, just to surf the web & check my email.... Or do I?
thats utter FUD.
Technology changes daily. Everyone said the same about XP, it was eXPansive eXPensive.
Oh noes what you mean i need more RAM to run XP, thats utter BS. etc etc. Im sorry but 7 years since XP was released i would EXPECT it to require MORE resources as technology changes. Most people now days should have atleast 1gb ram with a fairly good CPU. It's not as if hardware is as expensive as it was 7 years ago, so really there is no excuse to have a modern PC thats 64bit enabled atleast.
Its a case of either adapt or die.
-
#18 Posted by tinyman on 04 Apr 2008 - 08:47
Long live Windows XP - it has brought me years of fun using the OS.
Considering it's an aging OS it isn't doing too badly..
-
(2 replies)
#19 Posted by GEIST on 04 Apr 2008 - 09:29
- What's the point of keeping XP Home but not Professional?
-
#19.1 Posted by TRC on 04 Apr 2008 - 09:54
- As the article points out it's only for low cost computers. Selling them with Professional installed wouldn't exactly make much sense when they are trying to be as inexpensive as possible, and the people who buy these probably aren't going to need anything more than Home Edition anyway. Most people don't.
Last edited by TRC on 04 Apr 2008 - 10:00 -
#19.2 Posted by Jugalator on 04 Apr 2008 - 09:59
- It might be a reaction to things like the cheap Eee PC's running Linux. If MS would stop supporting XP Home after a while, they would have no product suitable for this segment as, again, even Vista Home Basic is bulkier. This is less of a big deal for the high-end markets, where MS thinks you could just as well run Vista, hence no extended support for XP Pro.
-
#20 Posted by hapbt on 07 May 2008 - 21:07
- im not even going to bother responding to the 'vista sucks' comments, anyone who has actually used vista and has any knowledge of PCs understands that vista is fine, many manufacturers and software vendors in fact suck.
but using xp is just stupid, xp is dead, it wont be but a couple years and you wont even be able to find a machine you can boot and install it on without serious kludging if at all.
id love to see a message about vista sucking that actually explained what problems the user had and gave the specs of their machine.
also, just because your machine shipped with vista dosent mean it can run it, remember that whole intel-microsoft lawsuit?
Submit to reddit
Submit to blinklist
Bookmark on del.icio.us
Add to furl
Share on Facebook
Add to Windows Live

The software maker said Windows XP Home will be available through June 2010, or for a year beyond the release of the next version of Windows, for computers like Intel Corp.'s Classmate PC and ASUSTek Computer Inc.'s Eee PC. Those machines have smaller hard drives, less memory and slower processors than most Windows computers sold today, and most would have a hard time running the bulkier Windows Vista.
Microsoft had planned to stop selling most versions of XP at the end of June 2008, with exceptions for small computer-building shops and PCs sold in developing countries. But surprising demand in developed countries for what it calls ultra-low-cost personal computers prompted Redmond-based Microsoft to extend that deadline.