main

AMD Reports Net Loss of $358 Million

Bezhou Feng   on 18 April 2008 - 23:52 · 18 comments & 10512 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Chip-maker AMD revealed some first quarter financial numbers today, and the results aren't exactly stellar. Total revenue for the company was $1.505 billion, but it had sustained a net loss of $358 million, or $0.59 per share, and an operating loss of $264 million. These results include an impact of $50 million, or $0.08 per share, from ATI acquisition-related charges. However, although first quarter revenue decreased 15% compared to the fourth quarter of 2007, it actually increased 22% compared to the first quarter of 2007.

A seasonally weak first quarter was amplified by a challenging economic environment for consumers and lower than expected revenues of previous generation products, resulting in lower than expected revenues in all business segments.” said Robert J. Rivet, AMD’s Chief Financial officer. “We remain committed to achieve operating profitability in the second half of the year, driven by our portfolio of new products and platforms and aggressive restructuring programs.

Thanks for the tip, HenryC!

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 18 additional comments
(1 reply) #1 Tikitiki on 18 Apr 2008 - 23:57
Ouch
#1.1 non.sequitur on 18 Apr 2008 - 23:59
lol. I read this and immediately thought "ouch", then I read your post....
(1 reply) #2 Neoauld on 18 Apr 2008 - 23:59
the only reason i DONT want this company 2 die
is that they motivated intel to shape up and make better stuff
once theyre dead..intel will just..not innovate
#2.1 +DrDrrae on 19 Apr 2008 - 00:30
Exactly. When AMD released their AMD64 and AMD64 X2 processors, they were miles ahead of what Intel had to offer at that time. They gave a slap to Intel's face and look what Intel came up with after that (Hint: the Core 2 Duo) and release them at competitive prices. If AMD hadn't been a threat to Intel, Intel could and would have released similar processors at a much higher price because they could.

Now, Intel fans should want to support AMD to come out with a new competing processor to Intel's current offerings because it will only push innovation and keep prices low for both sides.
(1 reply) #3 +chconline on 19 Apr 2008 - 00:21
Hector Ruiz just needs to lower his salary just... a bit... before AMD makes money again.
#3.1 dewaaz on 19 Apr 2008 - 00:32
yeh i guess if he lowered his salary by $358 million perhaps AMD would be profitable! i mean if $358 million is only "a bit" of his salary, he must make plenty to live on!

OT: perhaps if we take a closer look at the article it mentions increased revenue from 1Q 07... which means the Phenoms must be doing 'alright' (long-term view) and perhaps we may expect to see a somewhat stronger recovery from now on... as long as AMD is the underdog it will keep pushing hard to come up with new designs, and if its next design is any good, we should be back to where we should be
(3 replies) #4 sullysnet on 19 Apr 2008 - 00:45
sad I love this company and it would be a shame for anything to happen to them. They should of left ATI alone.
#4.1 Dakkaroth on 19 Apr 2008 - 04:31
+1

Let's just hope someone can do something with AMD. They absolutely cannot die for the sake of competition.
#4.2 Sakesaru on 19 Apr 2008 - 08:28
(Dakkaroth said @ #4.1)
They absolutely cannot die for the sake of competition.

+1
#4.3 +macf13nd on 20 Apr 2008 - 16:43
(Dakkaroth said @ #4.1)
+1

Let's just hope someone can do something with AMD. They absolutely cannot die for the sake of competition.


+1
#5 Thrawn on 19 Apr 2008 - 01:04
Yes. Also Nvidia has slowed their launches due to ATI's slumber. Currently, it looks like we'll be at 128 stream processors for a total of 3-3.5 years. Obviously, 256 stream processors are the way to go for Nvidia's architecture.
(3 replies) #6 Typhon on 19 Apr 2008 - 03:07
It's not over yet. I hope Microsoft buys them.
#6.1 GP007 on 19 Apr 2008 - 04:09
That deal would never go through. Though the way AMD is now, MS has enough money to buy them easy. But then if MS did this they'd get on Intels bad side, which would just make a bigger mess of things. And MS owning and making PC hardware would make them more like Apple in a sense.
#6.2 RAID 0 on 19 Apr 2008 - 15:53
(GP007 said @ #6.1)
That deal would never go through. Though the way AMD is now, MS has enough money to buy them easy. But then if MS did this they'd get on Intels bad side, which would just make a bigger mess of things. And MS owning and making PC hardware would make them more like Apple in a sense.


Intel& Apple, AMD& MS.
#6.3 +macf13nd on 20 Apr 2008 - 16:44
(GP007 said @ #6.1)
That deal would never go through. Though the way AMD is now, MS has enough money to buy them easy. But then if MS did this they'd get on Intels bad side, which would just make a bigger mess of things. And MS owning and making PC hardware would make them more like Apple in a sense.


yep.
#7 Lasker on 19 Apr 2008 - 10:14
You know what, I see Microsoft more friendly with AMD than with Intel, did u remember the Windows Vista Bus that Microsoft had when they introduced Windows Vista to the public? well that Bus had the AMD logo and I did not saw Intel in that Bus, so this speak for itself why Microsoft is pro AMD. Don't get me wrong, I am a intel user
#8 Burst404 on 19 Apr 2008 - 18:45
Intel makes a good product, sure... But AMD can't die... I bought three processors that quarter alone. I did my part!
#9 C_Guy on 21 Apr 2008 - 15:42
I'm shocked (and pleased) they didn't immediately point their finger at Intel and cry.

Step it up AMD. ATI certainly isn't helping you.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)