main
Report a problem

2008 International Broadband Rankings

dosha   via The Information Technology &amp Innovation on 02 May 2008 - 23:44 · 32 comments & 20957 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Information Technology and Innovation Foundation released a major new report, showing how the US and other countries compare in terms of broadband access, speed, and price. The rankings (PDF) place the US 15th, this country having fallen every year since 2001. Here's the full report (PDF). According to the report's executive summary:

"The US broadband policy environment is characterized on the one hand by market fundamentalists who see little or no role for government, and see government as the problem; and on the other by digital populists who favor a vastly expanded role for government (including government ownership of networks and strict and comprehensive regulation, including mandatory unbundling of incumbent networks and strict net neutrality regulations) and who see big corporations providing broadband as a problem. Given the policy advocacy and advice they are getting, it is no wonder that Congress and the Administration have done so little."

View: Ranking [PDF]
View: Full Report [PDF]
View: News Source

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 32 additional comments
(3 replies) #1 +Dakkaroth on 03 May 2008 - 01:00
Hrm.. I have friends in Australia complaining about the price they pay for the "crap" internet. Is it really a lot cheaper there, or is it my friends?
#1.1 duphus on 03 May 2008 - 02:07
The average speed is rather low, if you want faster than you have to pay A LOT more than the average price, it's the same here in NZ, the standards are really low.
#1.2 Burnz316 on 03 May 2008 - 04:20
yes Australia is above the United States BUT the average speed is only 1.7..

now south korea is pushing 50 and japan 63, yet the rest of the world is nowhere near that.. wow..
#1.3 ozgeek on 03 May 2008 - 04:52
(Dakkaroth said @ #1)
Hrm.. I have friends in Australia complaining about the price they pay for the "crap" internet. Is it really a lot cheaper there, or is it my friends?


Yep. That's true, we do have bad internet plans but we are coming out with speed. In fact I live in a small town and yet, we have ADSL2+. Many ISPs here provides mirror sites on their server to compensate for high prices and small usage limits. You can't really blame ISPs for providing crap plans. Blame the government, (though the new government that got voted have promised to look into our broadband network...that's why I voted for them and not howard's).
#2 mocax on 03 May 2008 - 01:41
omg.... I'm moving to japan
#3 X'tyfe on 03 May 2008 - 01:49
old news, internet is **** in the west
is it going to change anytime soon? hell ****ing no, no money in it
(5 replies) #4 duphus on 03 May 2008 - 02:03
Wow, and the NZ government doesn't seem to understand our internets sucks ass, someone send this to Hitler! Oops, I mean Helen.
#4.1 Digix on 03 May 2008 - 03:54
+1 only decent thing is we gone up list we were second to last above mexico the last two surveys but still same garbage as always.
#4.2 [deXter] on 03 May 2008 - 05:21
You should see the speeds in India. They average like 0.2 Mbps (256 Kbps), and they pay $15 per month for it. Many people are still on dialup. No 3G yet, and GPRS is slower than dialup. I heard they've started getting 2Mbps lines last year - they pay $22 per month and have a free-downlaod limit of 1.5 GB.

One would think that a country with such a large IT talent and being the backoffice for many MNCs would have a sem-decent net connectivity.
#4.3 +Dakkaroth on 03 May 2008 - 05:27
[deXter
said,#4.2]You should see the speeds in India. They average like 0.2 Mbps (256 Kbps), and they pay $15 per month for it. Many people are still on dialup. No 3G yet, and GPRS is slower than dialup. I heard they've started getting 2Mbps lines last year - they pay $22 per month and have a free-downlaod limit of 1.5 GB.

One would think that a country with such a large IT talent and being the backoffice for many MNCs would have a sem-decent net connectivity.


Huge population is huge.
#4.4 Digix on 03 May 2008 - 11:20
[deXter
said,#4.2]You should see the speeds in India. They average like 0.2 Mbps (256 Kbps), and they pay $15 per month for it. Many people are still on dialup. No 3G yet, and GPRS is slower than dialup. I heard they've started getting 2Mbps lines last year - they pay $22 per month and have a free-downlaod limit of 1.5 GB.

One would think that a country with such a large IT talent and being the backoffice for many MNCs would have a sem-decent net connectivity.


NZ is what you'd call an established western country. In retrospect to place like australia we have very low quality. As of now i'm paying $60 [46 usd] odd for 7.6Mbps (realisticly get about 5-6 if i'm lucky)/768k with a 6GB data limit. which lasts me about a day but compared to all other isps i can get internet from this is about normal which quite frankly when you look at data limits in the US 6GB is bs pretty much. So basically i'm paying $60+ NZD a month for essentially 64k dial up. We have no better plan to go to without shelling out hundreds nor do we even have ADSL2+ yet either as an option so yeah. maybe we unbundled local loop but that's now turning out to be a waste of time really since 1 out of 5 or so major isps is only one taking advantage of it but they're still practicing this idea of not letting you have it unless you get your toll calls with them which again is another bs tactic.

heck we don't even have a cable infrastructure thats open to public to use...
#4.5 The Gunslinger on 05 May 2008 - 14:39
[deXter
said,#4.2]You should see the speeds in India. They average like 0.2 Mbps (256 Kbps), and they pay $15 per month for it. Many people are still on dialup. No 3G yet, and GPRS is slower than dialup. I heard they've started getting 2Mbps lines last year - they pay $22 per month and have a free-downlaod limit of 1.5 GB.

One would think that a country with such a large IT talent and being the backoffice for many MNCs would have a sem-decent net connectivity.


You should see the prices in South Africa...

We have a fixed line monopoly, and we pay around $30 for a 1 gig cap, on a 384 Kbps line!!!!

In fact we also pay for the damn line rental. So if you dont already have a phone line, factor in another $20 for the phone line rental!!!!!!!
#5 vetneufuse on 03 May 2008 - 02:58
I always love how they don't take into account how big a country is and how spread out it is along with how hard it is to deploy services over wide areas like that... notice all the top countries are smaller then you get the the larger ones the rank drops drastically pretty much...
#6 ambiance on 03 May 2008 - 03:30
How the hell is America Jr. rated higher than America?

(2 replies) #7 RADicaLMMS on 03 May 2008 - 09:17
United Arab Emirates
Broadband Rates


Same place that's got stupidly hyped up Dubai and Abu Dhabi for people who don't know. Net sucks here, Skype and all VoIP SIP traffic is blocked and illegal here.

Duopoly providers - Etisalat & du

Home Users

* Superior User - 4Mbps - AED 449 per month (USD 123)
* Heavy User - 2Mbps - AED 349 per month (95 USD)
* Active User - 1Mbps - AED 249 per month ( USD 68 )
* Moderate User - 512Kbps - AED 189 per month (USD 52)
* Light User - 256Kbps - AED 149 per month (USD 41)
* Light User - 256Kbps Limited Access (15 hrs per month) - AED 79 per month (USD 22)


Business Users

* 4 Mbps Multi-User - AED 2595 per month (USD 711)
* 3 Mbps Multi-User - AED 1895 per month (USD 519)
* 2 Mbps Multi-User - AED 1295 per month (USD 355)
* 1 Mbps Multi-User - AED 895 per month (USD 245)
* 512 Kbps Multi-User - AED 595 per month (USD 163)
* 512 Kbps Single User - AED 295 per month (USD 81)


Last edited by RADicaLMMS on 03 May 2008 - 09:26
#7.1 V9s on 03 May 2008 - 15:43
(RADicaLMMS said @ #7)
United Arab Emirates
Broadband Rates


Same place that's got stupidly hyped up Dubai and Abu Dhabi for people who don't know. Net sucks here, Skype and all VoIP SIP traffic is blocked and illegal here.

Duopoly providers - Etisalat & du

Home Users

* Superior User - 4Mbps - AED 449 per month (USD 123)
* Heavy User - 2Mbps - AED 349 per month (95 USD)
* Active User - 1Mbps - AED 249 per month ( USD 68 )
* Moderate User - 512Kbps - AED 189 per month (USD 52)
* Light User - 256Kbps - AED 149 per month (USD 41)
* Light User - 256Kbps Limited Access (15 hrs per month) - AED 79 per month (USD 22)


Business Users

* 4 Mbps Multi-User - AED 2595 per month (USD 711)
* 3 Mbps Multi-User - AED 1895 per month (USD 519)
* 2 Mbps Multi-User - AED 1295 per month (USD 355)
* 1 Mbps Multi-User - AED 895 per month (USD 245)
* 512 Kbps Multi-User - AED 595 per month (USD 163)
* 512 Kbps Single User - AED 295 per month (USD 81)


Holy ****!...etisalat provides internet service over here in Pakistan (PTCL)....and we have WAYYYY better rates than that! ahahh

512k Unlimited - $20 per month

1mbps unlimited - $33 per month

and 2 mbps for $80 per month
#7.2 rrr_radesh on 03 May 2008 - 18:52


Last edited by Triliaeris on 04 May 2008 - 00:29
#8 Foub on 03 May 2008 - 09:28
I think that the main problem with it in the US is too much capitalism getting in the way of progress. It seems to be getting in the way of much as well there. Maybe that is why things are going the way they are now?
(1 reply) #9 +nezermundy on 03 May 2008 - 09:37
The UK should get a higher in the next few years now that BT is rolling out ADSL2+
#9.1 Twisted Chaz on 03 May 2008 - 09:53
Yeah I hope so, but something tells me it's gonna take BT more than a few years to sort it out. They seem to be such a backwards company
#10 BilliShere on 03 May 2008 - 11:35
but..but i thought they had lotsa internet at the internet refugee camp in silicon valley!?
lol.
(2 replies) #11 tiagosilva29 on 03 May 2008 - 15:50
Portugal shouldn't be in that position. This is a bloody third-world contry.
#11.1 Digitalfox on 03 May 2008 - 16:44
(tiagosilva29 said @ #11)
Portugal shouldn't be in that position. This is a bloody third-world contry.


No it's not.. While a big part of Portuguese people think we are very late in technology we are not..

And this study doesn't even take the study of mobile speeds where we are the in the first to ten spot in the world..
Hey we have 7.2Mbs on mobile phones available in 3 ISP's on any place of Portugal..
Ask other world folks what are there to speeds?

Also I have a speed of 24Mb/1Mb in ADSL2+ and unlimited traffic and pay 49€ month..
#11.2 tiagosilva29 on 03 May 2008 - 21:03
(Digitalfox said @ #11.1)
No it's not.. While a big part of Portuguese people think we are very late in technology we are not..

And this study doesn't even take the study of mobile speeds where we are the in the first to ten spot in the world..
Hey we have 7.2Mbs on mobile phones available in 3 ISP's on any place of Portugal..
Ask other world folks what are there to speeds?

Also I have a speed of 24Mb/1Mb in ADSL2+ and unlimited traffic and pay 49e month..


It doesn't matter claims for technological superiority when the products do not deliver.
Portuguese IPSs are obnoxious and rarely give a crap about the client. I've been trying to connect for the past 30 minutes, and I live less than a mile away from a Novis node, with perfect sockets. With phone(s)/without phones, it doesn't matter.
DECO is flooded with complaints against the telecoms. Julgados and civil courts are flooded with cases.
Telecoms take advantage of the user. Yay.

Unless you live in a zone with new cabling like Carnaxide (even with optics!) and decent zone managers, you'll always get the up-to-fun! speeds. Just the up, no fun. Stuck on Gdmt, unsync and living next to a node? I'm not the only one with these problems, and there are people dealing with larger crap.

Unlimited traffic? Netcabo, perhaps. I'm in the near-equivalent plan on Clix, with no throttled torrents.

We have great mobile speeds? Who uses these services? If it wasn't for the novoriquismo, nobody would use it, except for the proverbial it-guys, managers, marketeers, etc.
Maybe in France they have less downstream available, but I can assure you that are more users there than here, because... they can afford it (and like anything else, it's more expensive than here).

At least the narrowband days are over. So they say.
#12 Lycaon on 03 May 2008 - 23:04
I would just like to say to every one living in NZ you may get a nice surprise soon if you have not all ready, the whole country is being upgraded to ADSL2+ and in most cases you dont have to pay any extra for it, And i know this to be true cause the company i work for have been installing the equipment

Last edited by Lycaon on 04 May 2008 - 01:18
#13 LTD on 04 May 2008 - 01:26
Canada is 11th. Not bad at all.

With good old Rogers I get 10 down and 1 up. No complaints.
#14 dosha on 04 May 2008 - 01:42
ONE SITE VOTE NOW !! http://savetheinternet.com/
#15 daPhoenix on 04 May 2008 - 06:00
Darn, still 3rd place behind Japan and Korea - well, we'll beat them eventually
#16 Krpano on 04 May 2008 - 12:35
damn, some cheap connections there, and i thought it was cheap here in Switzerland.
I pay about 55 USD for a 5 Mbps.
For 10 bucks more i could get a 20 Mbps, ill do it after i move.
Still cheap for the salaries here, i cant complain.
But it could always be cheaper.
Actually you can have a 3,5 Mpbs for free if you sign home and cell line with Sunrise.
#17 imis on 04 May 2008 - 15:31
In Canada it can be improve by give more company license and bring them to compete with Rogers and Bell
#18 spetz on 04 May 2008 - 16:58
I am in Canada and get no where near the average i get 3mbits cause bell wont upgrade there publicly funded telephone system. Its stupid because you are so limited by where you live as to what internet provider you can go with and how fast it will be.
#19 +.Vamp on 05 May 2008 - 21:40
Wow, reading some of the comments makes me feel damn privileged! I get 24meg (realistic speed I get would be around 6-8meg cos my line isn't very good) and unlimited usage for £18.99 a month. Good old Be*

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)