-
- Neowin Hands-on: Windows Phone 7 review
- Did Google steal the Android logo from an Atar...
- Microsoft start advertising Internet Explorer ...
- New image of Windows Live Phone service appears
- Duke Nukem Forever...coming soon?
- Ping! iTunes goes social, Neowin goes mouse on
- Firefox 4 Beta 5 Lands
- Android now accounts for 25% of North American...
50 Windows XP & Vista Tips & Tricks
Computer Active has compiled a list of 50 tips to improve performance of both XP and Vista.
For most people using a computer means using Windows and over the years Microsoft's operating system has become easier to use.
However, there is always room for improvement, so in this feature we have compiled 50 of the finest tips for Windows XP and Vista. These can help to make Windows even better, easier to use and faster. Most don't even require you to install any extra software, so if you want to make your copy of XP or Vista better, it's possible to get started immediately.
- Access My Documents from the Taskbar (XP and Vista)
Right-click an empty section of the Taskbar and select toolbars, then New Toolbar. Navigate to the My Documents (XP) or Documents (Vista) folder and click the OK or Select Folder button. In its default position to the far right of the Taskbar, the toolbar provides menu access to the entire contents of the folder. - Extra speed with Readyboost (Vista)
Plugging in a USB memory key is one of the easiest ways to speed up Vista. When the Autoplay menu appears, select 'Speed up my system', or right-click the drive in Computer and select Properties. Move to the Readyboost tab, tick 'Use this device' and use the slider to choose how much space should be given up. Not all USB memory keys are fast enough to provide this boost. - Save folders after a crash (XP)
If you have lots of folders open in Windows XP, when one of them crashes, they will all close. This can be avoided by using a hidden option. Open the Control Panel, then choose Folder Options. Move to the View tab and scroll down through the list of options until you get to one called 'Launch folder windows in a separate process'. Place a tick next to it, then click OK. - Disable Aero Glass (Vista)
Vista's Aero Glass transparency effects may look great, but they also drain a computer's processing power. To speed up a struggling computer, right-click the desktop and select Personalize. Click the link 'Window Color and Appearance' at the top of the screen and untick the 'Enable transparency' box before clicking OK. - Save memory (XP)
When you run programs, Windows XP stores files known as DLLs in memory. When you close the programs, it usually leaves them there for later use but this can slow down the computer. If you are fine editing the Windows Registry, this can be fixed – but make suitable backups first and take great care. Click Start, then Run, type regedit and press Enter.

Comments (46)
leesmithg - 09 May 2008 - 11:22
All I know is that ReadyBoost don't work correctly on my system, slows it down and causes it not to boot.
It is set correctly (boot sequence) must be some system error in readyboost.
+Shadrack - 09 May 2008 - 16:24
Do you think that it could be related to the speed/quality of your USB memory stick or maybe you have too many USB devices on a single bus?
I have not tried ReadyBoost yet, but I am tempted to. I have a 2GB flash that I use for work, but I can temporarily backup the files so it can be used for this "ReadyBoost feature."
Has anyone had a good experience with ReadyBoost? As in, you installed it and said "wow, this really improved my performance!"
hustheman - 09 May 2008 - 19:13
Readyboost was a great help to my system. I plugged in a one gig stick and programs would boot up noticeably faster. Then again I am on a laptop system and that might have something to do with it.
hosebeast - 11 May 2008 - 19:20
When you first try to set up ReadyBoost, Vista will test the device to ensure compatibility. If the device or bus were a problem, it wouldn't let you enable it. In fact, most bus problems will prevent the ReadyBoost option from even appearing, so you can't even get to the speed test for the device itself unless the device's connection is good. His problem is some other issue. Note that there are known bugs in the ReadyBoost which were fixed in SP1, so my first suggestion would be to make sure SP1 has been applied.
When you go to enable it, it will allow you to specify how much you want to allocate. If you've got 512MB free, that's good for trying.
The only people who experience "wow" are the people who only have 512MB of main system RAM (or anything less than 1GB, especially if their motherboard uses "integrated video" which "shares" RAM with the system). If you've got 1GB-2GB of main system RAM, then you will see a very modest improvement (typically less than 5% for most tasks, rarely ever more than 10%, but almost always more than 1% and never a negative impact). Generally the very best improvements are seen on notebooks with 1GB or less of main system RAM and a built-in SD card reader with a high-speed SD card. That's because the typical notebook has a single hard drive spinning at only 4200-5400RPM so the regular pagefile is going to be much, much slower than the ReadyBoost cache, and the combination of the built-in reader with high-speed SD card tends to be a bit faster than the majority of USB sticks which are otherwise compatible with ReadyBoost. I'm not sure exactly why, because those built-in slots are supposedly interfaced thru the same USB circuitry.
On a system with 2GB of main system RAM and properly sized pagefile on a 7200RPM hard drive, the difference in speed is too small to notice unless you're running more than 2-3 large-footprint apps at once, or if you're the type who loves to accumulate 20 little applets in your systray or otherwise hiding in the background. Example: editing three 6MB images in Photoshop at the same time as running Outlook 2007, Firefox, Windows Media Player, and Yahoo Messenger, while Google Desktop is quietly indexing and anything named Norton has been installed with default options. I never run my system like this, but many people do, so ReadyBoost can be a little helpful even at 2GB.
At 3-4GB of main system RAM with decently fast pagefile, ReadyBoost becomes essentially worthless.
shen - 09 May 2008 - 11:25
slow news day, eh?
Neobond - 09 May 2008 - 11:36
Not really, I have 8 up for todays 10 so far..
Kushan - 09 May 2008 - 11:38
Wait, neowin limits itself to 10 stories a day?
Isn't that a bit....senseless? Would it not be better to maybe have a "front page" that's limited like that, but a separate "news" page where everything else goes?
Neobond - 09 May 2008 - 11:44
Where did I say that we limit news stories to 10 a day?
Niels. - 09 May 2008 - 12:04
Wait, neowin limits itself to 10 stories a day?
Isn't that a bit....senseless? Would it not be better to maybe have a "front page" that's limited like that, but a separate "news" page where everything else goes?
Lol, no, he means he posted 8 posts out of the
101110 posts posted today.Kushan - 10 May 2008 - 01:32
Ohhh, I misunderstood what you said because you said you'd posted 8 for today's 10, not 8 of today's 10.
InsaneNutter - 09 May 2008 - 11:25
Doesn’t aero run on the graphics card processing power? If so I don’t see how disabling it would save on processing power...
Zanaffer - 09 May 2008 - 11:33
Aero does use system RAM. On a computer that may only have 1GB of memory total, it can be a significant drain. Aside from that, disabling it can save notebook battery power by not invoking the 3d processing.
+Northgrove - 09 May 2008 - 12:51
I think he wasn't talking of RAM usage though, but whether it runs mostly on the CPU or the GPU processor, and a bit like me confused about the article seemingly telling you can spare "processing power" by turning it off, i.e. make apps running on the system faster because they get more CPU cycles. I think the answer to that is no, as Aero indeed mostly run on the GPU, and turning it off won't make a major difference as for that. But yes, laptop power / battery life / electricity may be saved by turning it off. I'm not sure that's what he was asking for though.
+Shadrack - 09 May 2008 - 16:21
That is what I was thinking too. I'm not expert. Ideally, the GPU would handle all the heavy lifting of the UI while the CPU works on other things and just checks on the GPU occasionally to keep everything in sync. Seems like disabling this would actually add more of a load on the CPU. A slimmed down interface that still runs on the GPU would be better than a single fancy interface that works with the GPU while all others rely on the the CPU.
xendrome - 10 May 2008 - 01:56
That is what I was thinking too. I'm not expert. Ideally, the GPU would handle all the heavy lifting of the UI while the CPU works on other things and just checks on the GPU occasionally to keep everything in sync. Seems like disabling this would actually add more of a load on the CPU. A slimmed down interface that still runs on the GPU would be better than a single fancy interface that works with the GPU while all others rely on the the CPU.
That is correct it actually taxes the CPU more with Aero off, this is a bad tip..
helmers - 10 May 2008 - 07:11
While Aero indeed does do the heavy lifting on the GPU, what you're saying is totally wrong. If you turn off Aero, all the expensive 3d effects disappear. Got anything to back up the "uses more CPU with Aero enabled" claim?
Drakesh - 11 May 2008 - 05:39
The tip is improperly labeled. What they described doesn't disable Aero, it disables transparency. Aero is still in use, it's just not transparent.
+Northgrove - 09 May 2008 - 12:48
It should be noted though that it may be even more likely to slow down your computer if you deactivate this. A number of DLLs are *very frequently* re-used. There is a reason to why XP and other Windows operating systems do this. And obviously, it doesn't leave them there forever regardless of your RAM state.
OPaul - 09 May 2008 - 15:44
Actually, that key doesn't do anything in XP.
Romestar - 09 May 2008 - 12:58
Anybody who did the "performance" tweaks go read this (you wasted your time):
http://home.comcast.net/~SupportCD/XPMyths.html
For example, it mentions the unload DLL tweak, which is a myth:
"Adding this Registry Key in Windows 2000 or XP has no effect since this registry key is no longer supported in Microsoft Windows 2000 or later. The Shell automatically unloads a DLL when its usage count is zero, but only after the DLL has not been used for a period of time. This inactive period might be unacceptably long at times, especially when a Shell extension DLL is being debugged. For operating systems prior to Windows 2000, you can shorten the inactive period by adding this registry key."