main
Report a problem

Can OpenOffice 3.0 finally replace MS Office?

Daniel Fleshbourne   on 16 May 2008 - 18:22 · 41 comments & 18083 views

Advertisement (Why?)
If you think that you always get what you pay for, the just-released beta of OpenOffice 3.0 should convince you otherwise. This free, open-source software suite provides most of what anyone could want in an office suite, including a word processor, spreadsheet, presentation program, database, drawing tools, and math equation editor. Although it doesn't include all of the high-end features and the slick user interface of Microsoft Office 2007 (for the PC) and Microsoft Office 2008 (for the Mac), it will handle just about any job you need done. If you're not working in an enterprise that has standardized on Microsoft Office, you should think twice before paying full freight for Office, and give serious consideration to this free alternative when the final version is released.

Keep in mind that OpenOffice 3.0 is in beta and should be used for evaluation purposes only. I tested the Windows version on a 1.83GHz Core Duo PC with 1 GB of memory, and found it to be somewhat buggy. For example, I was unable to create a document and save it without crashing -- I had to first create a document in another program, and then open it in OpenOffice; at that point it worked fine. These types of problems should come as no surprise; the final version isn't due until September, and this is a very early beta.

View: The full story @ InfoWorld

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 41 additional comments
(16 replies) #1 Xenomorph on 16 May 2008 - 18:40
Microsoft OUTLOOK

Hello? I said Microsoft OUTLOOK

Can OpenOffice finally replace MS Office? Are you retarded?

MS Office has Outlook, a great tool for use in the office. It works great with an Exchange server. Email, contacts, scheduling, shared address lists, etc. I spend more time in MS Outlook than any other Office app. My co-workers use Outlook more than any other Office app. Our clients use Outlook more than any other Office app.

To most of us, Outlook *IS* Microsoft Office. We can get word processors and spreadsheet programs anywhere. But there isn't an alternative to Outlook.

OpenOffice has ... a math equation editor?? Who needs contact management when you do math problems, right?

Really? That's going to replace MS Office??? Again, is this writer retarded?

#1.1 RAID 0 on 16 May 2008 - 18:49
You hit the nail right on the head. I feel the same way about Outlook. That program rocks!
#1.2 ThatOne6uy on 16 May 2008 - 19:06
While I agree with you about Outlook being a critial enterprise application, as well as a major selling point for MS Office, I really hate using it day-to-day while I am at work.

While I cannot be without it at work, at home, where I have a legal copy of Office 2007, I do not use it. I have gotten so used to the paradigm shift that is GMail's interface, with it's "labels" instead of folders, as well as other innovative features that it brings to the table.

Now, I am not trying to compare GMail to Outlook, as they are in different arenas all together, but for home use, I prefer anything but Outlook.

My 2 cents.
#1.3 RAID 0 on 16 May 2008 - 19:16
You can use Outlook to get your Gmail. That's what I do.
#1.4 Doli on 16 May 2008 - 19:19
I think you missed a key point.
If you're not working in an enterprise that has standardized on Microsoft Office, you should think twice before paying full freight for Office, and give serious consideration to this free alternative when the final version is released.


OO is great for students who dont really need the the whole Office 2007 experience.

OO Math is great for doing physics projects reports. You dont need it but do you have to knoct it down? (Office 2007 has a math equations also)


RAID0 I think ThatOne6uy knows that you can get Gmail in Outlook but he likes Gmail's labels instead of using folders.
#1.5 daPhoenix on 16 May 2008 - 19:31
(Xenomorph said @ #1)
Can OpenOffice finally replace MS Office? Are you retarded?

Great way to get yourself warned in here - trust me, I have experience. *looks at warning bar*

(Xenomorph said @ #1)
To most of us, Outlook *IS* Microsoft Office. We can get word processors and spreadsheet programs anywhere. But there isn't an alternative to Outlook.

Many businesses are actually moving away from having static mail servers in the traditional sense and moving more and more towards having the whole system run on a web based application - just look at products like Zimbra that offer mail, calendar, contacts etc. in a web based environment - always the same UI from any device or operating system.

"But I can't take my contact information or emails on the road if I have no internet.."

Yes you can because you can sync the data to a local client, the suite like so many other supports syncing to dozens of programs.

With the prevalance of WiFi, 3G and WLAN in general, there aren't really that many places where you don't have internet, especially if you are a business person as you stated.
#1.6 kaiwai on 16 May 2008 - 20:47
(Xenomorph said @ #1)
Microsoft OUTLOOK

Hello? I said Microsoft OUTLOOK

Can OpenOffice finally replace MS Office? Are you retarded?

MS Office has Outlook, a great tool for use in the office. It works great with an Exchange server. Email, contacts, scheduling, shared address lists, etc. I spend more time in MS Outlook than any other Office app. My co-workers use Outlook more than any other Office app. Our clients use Outlook more than any other Office app.

To most of us, Outlook *IS* Microsoft Office. We can get word processors and spreadsheet programs anywhere. But there isn't an alternative to Outlook.

OpenOffice has ... a math equation editor?? Who needs contact management when you do math problems, right?

Really? That's going to replace MS Office??? Again, is this writer retarded?


Interesting you mention this - Evolution supports Exchanage servers; then again, if you use exchange servers, then you've got bigger issues than just that. You've got an incompetent CIO who doesn't do their homework.
#1.7 Jexel on 16 May 2008 - 22:04
(kaiwai said @ #1.6)
Interesting you mention this - Evolution supports Exchanage servers; then again, if you use exchange servers, then you've got bigger issues than just that. You've got an incompetent CIO who doesn't do their homework.


I'm sure the CIO for Cisco Systems is really that incompetent. Maybe you should talk to the BIGGEST networking company in the world and advise them to use something different. Got any suggestions?
#1.8 C_Guy on 16 May 2008 - 22:11
"OO is great for students who dont really need the the whole Office 2007 experience. "

You know what's even better? Microsoft Office 2007 Home/Student edition. And oh yes! It's priced affordably for students. When I was a student I had to shell out over $300 for Office. Kids have it easy today.
#1.9 +stifler6478 on 16 May 2008 - 23:36
(Doli said @ #1.4)
I think you missed a key point.
If you're not working in an enterprise that has standardized on Microsoft Office, you should think twice before paying full freight for Office, and give serious consideration to this free alternative when the final version is released.


OO is great for students who dont really need the the whole Office 2007 experience.

OO Math is great for doing physics projects reports. You dont need it but do you have to knoct it down? (Office 2007 has a math equations also)


RAID0 I think ThatOne6uy knows that you can get Gmail in Outlook but he likes Gmail's labels instead of using folders.


Screw that. I'm a student and I got Office 2007 Ultimate from Microsoft for $70 through the Ultimate Steal program (which I believe ended last month). Even thought that's gone, you can still get Office 2007 Student at an affordable price and it'll do everything you need it to.

-Spenser
#1.10 Airlink on 17 May 2008 - 02:36
Open Office doesn't ship with an Outlook clone because that void is nicely filled by Mozilla Thunderbird with Lightning/Sunbird.
#1.11 Ledward on 17 May 2008 - 02:49
(kaiwai said @ #1.6)
(Xenomorph said @ #1)
Microsoft OUTLOOK

Hello? I said Microsoft OUTLOOK

Can OpenOffice finally replace MS Office? Are you retarded?

MS Office has Outlook, a great tool for use in the office. It works great with an Exchange server. Email, contacts, scheduling, shared address lists, etc. I spend more time in MS Outlook than any other Office app. My co-workers use Outlook more than any other Office app. Our clients use Outlook more than any other Office app.

To most of us, Outlook *IS* Microsoft Office. We can get word processors and spreadsheet programs anywhere. But there isn't an alternative to Outlook.

OpenOffice has ... a math equation editor?? Who needs contact management when you do math problems, right?

Really? That's going to replace MS Office??? Again, is this writer retarded?


Interesting you mention this - Evolution supports Exchanage servers; then again, if you use exchange servers, then you've got bigger issues than just that. You've got an incompetent CIO who doesn't do their homework.

What? Exchange is a pretty awesome product, it integrates mail and scheduling into one application and then shares it through the entire userbase. It's available on both PCs, Macs and phones, and even Apple has bent over and implemented Exchange support.

Have you even used it?
#1.12 kaiwai on 17 May 2008 - 02:57
(Jexel said @ #1.7)
(kaiwai said @ #1.6)
Interesting you mention this - Evolution supports Exchanage servers; then again, if you use exchange servers, then you've got bigger issues than just that. You've got an incompetent CIO who doesn't do their homework.


I'm sure the CIO for Cisco Systems is really that incompetent. Maybe you should talk to the BIGGEST networking company in the world and advise them to use something different. Got any suggestions?


Easy, the little UNIX company called Sun sells a complete Exchange replacement (and more):

http://www.sun.com/software/communications_suite/index.xml

The fact that you can't even Google tells me that you shouldn't even be allowed on a computer let alone managing computers (if you are employed).
#1.13 Doli on 17 May 2008 - 04:10
(stifler6478 said @ #1.9)
(Doli said @ #1.4)
I think you missed a key point.
If you're not working in an enterprise that has standardized on Microsoft Office, you should think twice before paying full freight for Office, and give serious consideration to this free alternative when the final version is released.


OO is great for students who dont really need the the whole Office 2007 experience.

OO Math is great for doing physics projects reports. You dont need it but do you have to knoct it down? (Office 2007 has a math equations also)


RAID0 I think ThatOne6uy knows that you can get Gmail in Outlook but he likes Gmail's labels instead of using folders.


Screw that. I'm a student and I got Office 2007 Ultimate from Microsoft for $70 through the Ultimate Steal program (which I believe ended last month). Even thought that's gone, you can still get Office 2007 Student at an affordable price and it'll do everything you need it to.

-Spenser


Screw what?
You bought it ok... What is the point of your post? To tell me you bought it?
#1.14 daPhoenix on 17 May 2008 - 06:11
(Ledward said @ #1.11)
What? Exchange is a pretty awesome product, it integrates mail and scheduling into one application and then shares it through the entire userbase. It's available on both PCs, Macs and phones, and even Apple has bent over and implemented Exchange support.

Apple actually implemented OWA support and not true Exchange protocol support because it's proprietary - only Outlook (Entourage) itself currently implements this on a Mac.

Exchange is bad because it enforces multiple nasty things - OS/vendor lock-in is one of them and forced upgrade path is another one. Exchange 2000 had several flaws that were never fixed, Microsoft more or less shafted users and told "You shall buy Exchange 2003 or you're fscked - if you don't like it, haha because there are no alternatives."

(Ledward said @ #1.11)
Have you even used it?

I have, I have also spent countless hours fixing myriad issues in the 2k and 2k3 versions including such trivial little issues as MDB/STM file corruption, store.exe crashing due to a number of myriad issues (Which I've spent a good hour exchanging emails and phone calls with Microsoft support and Technet guys) and loads of other fun stuff.

Tried Exchange 200 - the new System Manager replacement was enough to **** us all off and write down 2k7 as a "never upgrade" - the day 2k3 support ends, so ends Exchange and Win2k3 servers that runs it at our business. Luckily alternatives already exist.

It's a nice program but like most Microsoft programs it looks pretty, runs great for a while but eventually it will - for no apparent reason - completely explode. Then again, that's what I get paid the big bucks for, eh
#1.15 Athernar on 18 May 2008 - 23:20
(kaiwai said @ #1.12)
(Jexel said @ #1.7)
(kaiwai said @ #1.6)
Interesting you mention this - Evolution supports Exchanage servers; then again, if you use exchange servers, then you've got bigger issues than just that. You've got an incompetent CIO who doesn't do their homework.


I'm sure the CIO for Cisco Systems is really that incompetent. Maybe you should talk to the BIGGEST networking company in the world and advise them to use something different. Got any suggestions?


Easy, the little UNIX company called Sun sells a complete Exchange replacement (and more):

http://www.sun.com/software/communications_suite/index.xml

The fact that you can't even Google tells me that you shouldn't even be allowed on a computer let alone managing computers (if you are employed).


Is it really nessesary to get so agressive over a Email server?

I realise Email servers must be really exciting for you, and you must prefer Sun's alternative Email server product.

But regardless of how passionate you are about Email servers, it still doesn't give you an excuse to be rude.

Edit: I mean, it's not like he came and ejaculated over your copy of Sun Java Communications Suite before you had, right?
#1.16 Jexel on 19 May 2008 - 07:26
(kaiwai said @ #1.12)
Easy, the little UNIX company called Sun sells a complete Exchange replacement (and more):

http://www.sun.com/software/communications_suite/index.xml

The fact that you can't even Google tells me that you shouldn't even be allowed on a computer let alone managing computers (if you are employed).


The fact that you can't comprehend a rhetorical question tells me that you shouldn't even be on the internet let alone telling other people what they should or shouldn't do.
(1 reply) #2 vetmarkjensen on 16 May 2008 - 18:46
"slick user interface of Microsoft Office 2007" Looks slick, yes. We just got upgraded here at work, and the thing that really annoyed me was even though I have a CRT and do NOT use cleartype on the PC at all, the Office apps all overrode this and forced cleartype individually, giving me pretty (annoying) blue and red colors on my text. Took me a while to find out that this was set on the no-named symbol in the titlebar that looks like an upside-down "eject" icon on a CD player. Then "More Commands..." then "Popular" to find the "Always use ClearType" check box. It takes some getting used to.

As for OO.o, I have used it (and, more frequently, Abiword and Gnumeric) without problems for years, so yes, it can replace MS Office for many users. Even my wife used it on her Windows PC. We're still on OO.o 2.x, so will wait for 3.0 final before considering upgrading.


EDIT: Sorry I took so long to type my post. I guess it is because I am "retarded", right, Xenomorph?
#2.1 EduardValencia on 16 May 2008 - 20:05
True i have it installed and it does the basics.
#3 BigBoy on 16 May 2008 - 18:46
I guess it all depends on what you need. I find Open Office to be "good enough" for most things but not good enough to go away from Office 2007. The ribbon interface is awesome. Outlook - yeah, can't live without that at home or at work!
(2 replies) #4 Defiantly on 16 May 2008 - 19:07
LOL!
"If you think that you always get what you pay for, the just-released beta of OpenOffice 3.0 should convince you otherwise."

" was unable to create a document and save it without crashing "

Great, more open source garbage hoisted upon the unsuspecting WalMart crowd, looking for a cheap alternative. Please.
#4.1 daPhoenix on 16 May 2008 - 19:19
(Defiantly said @ #4)
Great, more open source garbage.

Apparently you've never used early Office betas - for example the Microsoft Office Beta 2008 for Mac crashed on resizing the window - limiting its usefullness a bit.
#4.2 +Dakkaroth on 16 May 2008 - 23:41
Betas not stable?! No way!!@
#5 lars77 on 16 May 2008 - 19:13
I've found that OpenOffice is OK for home use (eg: if you really only use word processing & some spreadsheets every now & then), & yes I do use it at home.

But I can't see using it in a business environment. Besides Outlook, businesses usually have all those Access files laying around, & are heavy VBA users. And last I heard (unless they've fixed it?) OpenOffice 3.0 still can't handle Office 2007 files properly, not something I'd want to deal with in a business environment.
(1 reply) #6 GEIST on 16 May 2008 - 19:26
It depends on an individual user's or a user group's needs and the environment of use. Open Office has been perfectly good enough for me since years. I don't really MS Office. I think Open office can very well replace MS Office for average home users and maybe even small businesses, but not quite be a large corporate player. Just my personal thoughts. As mentioned, it all depends on the wants and needs of the individual user or user group.
#6.1 imis on 16 May 2008 - 20:37
(GEIST said @ #6)
It depends on an individual user's or a user group's needs and the environment of use. Open Office has been perfectly good enough for me since years. I don't really MS Office. I think Open office can very well replace MS Office for average home users and maybe even small businesses, but not quite be a large corporate player. Just my personal thoughts. As mentioned, it all depends on the wants and needs of the individual user or user group.

i agree with it. open office can take home and small office away from ms but it still take time for them to take large businesses. i hope that time will come soon.
#7 EduardValencia on 16 May 2008 - 19:56
Hmm i think it can replace a very basic user ,it's a good program,(actually installed on my pc),and my impression was good,because Oo interface is similar to older versions of office (not 2007),howevre i think Office 2007 offers a more practical and intutitive menus on top + more advanced features to corporate users.

In my case i have already bought 2007 ,and theres no reason to switch,otherwise i would loose my money

8 out of 10 for me
#8 Wolfout on 16 May 2008 - 20:50
Ok, for Xenomorph, you are the ignorant one. Outlook is NOT office, it is one application in a full suite of apps. So you spend a large chunk of time in it. GREAT for you, buy it separate then if that is the best thing. I want the best features I can get that do not feed a company that has no desire to treat it's customer's with respect. The people behind OO.o will actually listen to what people want and put forth an effort to make it happen.

OO.o works well in alot of areas where MS is just overkill and not needed. 90% of the users out there do not use enough of the "features" within MSOffice to justify that cost. I have most of my home customers using OO.o quite well and the fact that I did NOT have to spend HOURS trying to reteach them how to use MSOffice 2k7 is a big part of that also. They do not have a need for the bloatware of MSOffice 2k7 when OO.o meets their needs and they are still compatible with others that do have MSOffice.

As for the MSOffice 2k7 compatibility, there is a little company out there called Novell, you might have heard of them. They have an extension for OO.o that is used to give you compatibility to open, edit, and save MSOffice 2k7 files. The fact that I can add functionality to OO.o through extensions is very nice plus! The speed of OO.o 3 on a Mac makes MSoffice 2k8 look like a sloth at best.

I have used Lookout and it sucks in comparison to GroupWise from that same little company, Novell. Their web access is hands down years ahead of MS Lookout. I have also used Thunderbird with Sunbird and that is not bad at all as is Evolution. On top of that, they don't have the stigma/downsides to using Lookout. I don't like using an email client that is a VBS (Virus Broadcasting System).

I have used OO.o for 3 years and Firefox for 4 years without any real incident that required that I MUST go back to MS for their kool-aid and am better for it. Xenomorph, try to be a little more open-minded about things. Lookout will NOT meet or exceed everyone's needs. Without competition, we end up with something like IE 6 that is just stagnant because the people behind it don't HAVE to listen to their customers.

BTW. I have 3 small business' using OO.o and gmail. They had no need, currently, for calendars. When they do, things like Zimbra may be the fit for them but we will help them determine what will meet their needs since "I need a calendar" can mean different things to different people. Lookout may be what they need after all the fact-finding and we will approach it then...
(1 reply) #9 C_Guy on 16 May 2008 - 22:17
The answer very simply is no. It's never bad to have a competitor in the marketplace but OpenOffice will simply never replace Microsoft Office. Will some people use it? I guess. Will some downgrade from MS Office? Maybe. And if they are downgrading from a pirated version of MS Office then I am all for it. But OO won't replace the majority of MS Office users.


"90% of the users out there do not use enough of the "features" within MSOffice to justify that cost."

An excellent point. Of all the users who use Excel, I bet less than 1% use even half of it's capabilities. But what is Microsoft to do, follow suit of Adobe and offer Excel Elements? I believe that's called Microsoft Works.
#9.1 Jugalator on 18 May 2008 - 10:10
(C_Guy said @ #9)
The answer very simply is no. It's never bad to have a competitor in the marketplace but OpenOffice will simply never replace Microsoft Office. Will some people use it? I guess. Will some downgrade from MS Office? Maybe. And if they are downgrading from a pirated version of MS Office then I am all for it. But OO won't replace the majority of MS Office users.

I think what the article questioned wasn't whether OO would replace the majority of Office users, but whether it could work as a good replacement for Office. There's an important difference here.
#10 some_guy on 16 May 2008 - 23:31
for those who need ONLY the basic stuff like something to write letters and such, or as a free alternative 2003, then OpenOffice can be used.

However, OpenOffice is light years behind MS Office 2007/2008 for mac in terms of what can be done. I have files doc and docx files that are displayed terribly using OpenOffice. It cant be taken seriously until it can read all of doc and docx files 100%.

Again... if you are just writing simple papers and letters, OpenOffice is more than enough. Heck you could use notepad to do the same things. But if you are some one who is a power user, or needs full compatibility with every single file, OpenOffice is just a weak wannabe.
#11 Darken on 16 May 2008 - 23:56
"Can OpenOffice 3.0 finally replace MS Office?" > Hmmm...
#12 noPCtoday on 17 May 2008 - 00:10
I think its kinda like comparing GIMP and photoshop, both are good, but you can't compare an enterprise level software with a community supported software. Perhaps community supported softwares can gain crowd from minorities such as linux user. It's very hard for a community software to surpass a enterprise software, it will only push the enterprise software move faster, but its not very hard for a community server to change strategy and aim for what the big companies do not see.
#13 Julius Caro on 17 May 2008 - 01:48
I hate outlook.
But anyway, I'm so used to Office 2007 that I HATE when I have to use the current open office version. NOt sure about open office 3.0 And I'm beginning to hate GTK, because its lack of responsiveness and somewhat limited interface options. So I dont think that any GTK based app can be considered 'sleek experience'.

OO is a nice office suite, unless it has to compete with office 2007.
(2 replies) #14 Chaks on 17 May 2008 - 02:24
OO is not even comparable with MS Office 2007! OMG, OO is such a dumb interface to work and missing live previews makes my writing time more! OO is now similar to how Office 2000 was. It still needs more time to compete and compared with Microsoft Office suites. May be OO can be a replacement of Notepad and Wordpad, lol.

OO is for Linux people who do not have the choice of using Microsoft Office (blame MS??). Office 2008 for Mac is also so good and its compatible with Office 2007 and vice versa. I have Macbook and have Office 2007 and Office 2008 installed. Editing my documents are now so easy with these two tools.

OO is good for students? Students can get Office for cheap prices and MS Office 2007 (please note that its not Office 2003) has really good features for even writing thesis. I am currently writing my thesis using MS Word 2007 - I tried OO, but it sucks!

So, it boils down to personal choice. For me MS Office Suites are really great and worth paying for!
#14.1 Airlink on 17 May 2008 - 02:51
You can't get Office for free, and there is where your argument collapses in on itself.
OO costs = $0. MS Office costs ≠ $0
It's the one feature you can't disparage.

Oh, and frankly I like the OO GUI a lot better than that stupid "ribbon-bar" that Office 2007 swiched to.

[q]OMG, OO is such a dumb interface to work and missing live previews makes my writing time more![/q]
Apparently it's not helping you spelling or grammar, though. Perhaps Clippy can help you.
(Here's a hint: You can't make writing time "More". You can make your writing time longer, but not more. It's like having more run. Or more drown. Or more stupid. You get the picture?)
#14.2 eck0 on 18 May 2008 - 22:49
(Chaks said @ #14)
OO is not even comparable with MS Office 2007! OMG, OO is such a dumb interface to work

May be OO can be a replacement of Notepad and Wordpad, lol.

I tried OO, but it sucks!!


Comments such as these make you look stupid and are not worth reading. I think the ribbon interface takes up too much space in my honest opinion but I don't go around complaining about it.
(1 reply) #15 toadeater on 17 May 2008 - 07:23
For Word, yes. For Excel, no.
#15.1 eck0 on 18 May 2008 - 22:05
(toadeater said @ #15)
For Word, yes. For Excel, no.


This is so true, the spreadsheet solution from OO is no way near as good as Excel All in due time though.
#16 MightyJordan on 17 May 2008 - 08:28
IMO, no, it won't be able to replace Office. It still looks ugly, and it's probably still slower to start than Office. I remember using OO2.0 on my old XP machine. It took ages to boot up the first time when you've switched on, even with the quickstart enabled. Office 2007 loaded up much faster.

Don't get me wrong. If you want a free equivalent to Microsoft Office, than get OpenOffice and Thunderbird, by all means!
#17 Sirius on 19 May 2008 - 08:31
OpenOffice will never replace MS Office

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)