hardware

Diamond Viper Radeon HD 3650 1GB review

Julio Franco   on 21 May 2008 - 19:48 · 12 comments & 8558 views

Advertisement (Why?)
While admittedly I spend much of my time testing high-end motherboards that come at astronomical prices, and graphics cards that cost more than some people's first cars, I never forget about the importance of value. In fact, the one thing that I constantly keep in the back of my mind when evaluating any product is how well it stacks up in terms of value and its competitors.

The Radeon HD 3650 looks to be an attractive product on paper, it is the latest member of the Radeon HD 3000 series, and can carry up to 1GB of memory on-board. The 3650 is also a Direct X 10.1 compliant card that supports the PCI Express 2.0 bus. Furthermore, like all Radeon HD 3000 series products, this new low-end graphics card is built using a 55nm design process. Topped off with a 725MHz core speed, the Radeon HD 3650 sounds like quite a gutsy little graphics card.

But of course the card had to fell short in other places, otherwise we wouldn't be calling it a budget product. For example, it is limited to a 128-bit wide memory bus, and when combined with rather sluggish GDDR2 memory, the Radeon HD 3650 produces a memory bandwidth of just 16GB/s. To put this figure into perspective, it is comparable to the Radeon X700 XT which was released back in 2004. This goes to remind us what is the Radeon HD 3650 is targeted to a certain less demanding crowd and that we shouldn't expect spectacular results on the gaming front.

View: Diamond Viper Radeon HD 3650 1GB review @ TechSpot

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 12 additional comments
(2 replies) #1 chilliadus on 21 May 2008 - 20:13
What's the point of having 1GB on a sub-$100 video card?
#1.1 tmaxxtigger on 21 May 2008 - 20:16
To entice those that don't know better, just like mega pixels on digital cameras.
#1.2 +acxz on 22 May 2008 - 20:51
(tmaxxtigger said @ #1.1)
To entice those that don't know better, just like mega pixels on digital cameras.

Yeah, I fell for that a few years back. Never again .
#2 dagamer34 on 21 May 2008 - 20:34
But the x700 XT was around $200+ wasn't it?
(1 reply) #3 ahhell on 21 May 2008 - 20:39
Has ATI just given up?
#3.1 +stevember on 21 May 2008 - 20:49
Far from it, they have newer chipsets than Nvidia.

Plus wait for 4000 series... within couple months...
#4 virtorio on 21 May 2008 - 21:33
In summary: don't buy one.
#5 RanCorX2 on 21 May 2008 - 21:41
lol @ 16GB/s *shudder*
#6 Airlink on 21 May 2008 - 22:51
Diamond Viper Radeon HD 3650 1GB = MASSIVE FAIL!

WTF was he point of putting a D-SUB port on the back next to the HDMI and the DVI ports? Nostalgia? Economy?

DO NOT WANT!
#7 nonick on 21 May 2008 - 22:52
What a waste! Just like those 1GB 8500GT's
#8 Malbojia on 22 May 2008 - 03:23
Man enough of the revisions. Plenty going around to accomedate all needs. Nothing like saturation in the market.
#9 Galley on 22 May 2008 - 18:45
Could the name be any longer? Why can't they give it a simple name like "Fred"?

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)