Google founders defend website after Big Brother claims

Welcome Guest (Log In or Join our Community)

Stop · · · Show More

Latest Forum Activity

Topic Starter

Replies

Views

Last Action

2 Pages

[1] 2 ... Next

Google founders defend website after Big Brother claims, May 21, 2008

Hum

Post #1

May 21 2008, 17:08

totally wAcKed
Group Icon

Group: Registered
Posts: 22,984
Joined: 5-October 03
From: Odder Space
Member No.: 37,120

Google has tried to dismiss fears it is becoming the "Big Brother of the internet" by storing details of people's personal searches.

The founders of the world's largest search engine said that those who were worried about their privacy should be more concerned about posting photographs and personal information on social networking sites such as Facebook and MySpace.

The company was accused of breaching privacy after it emerged that it was planning to "read" customers' Google Mail emails to offer them targeted advertisements. However, Sergey Brin, 34, who with Larry Page, 35, founded the company 10 years ago, said social networking sites were the "number one privacy concern".

"There are things that end up there, especially if you are young and you are going out to parties and getting drunk and then decide to take a few pictures and put them on social networking sites," he said at Google's Zeitgeist conference in Chandler's Cross, Herts. "These things pop up and may haunt you for days, months or even years later. We go through a huge amount of effort to protect people's private data."

He said targeting customers with advertising that matches their hobbies would improve their internet experience.

source

- Kaboose -

Post #2

May 21 2008, 17:11

Resident Elite
Group Icon

Group: Registered
Posts: 1,795
Joined: 25-June 07
From: Cape Town
Member No.: 231,269

its a good thing that i do dont post my man whoring pictures on facebook then

bmaher

Post #3

May 21 2008, 17:12

Neowinian UNSTOPPABLE

Group: Global Moderator
Posts: 7,127
Joined: 7-January 05
From: London, UK
Member No.: 89,580

I really wish companies would stop with the "targetting ads will improve your internet experience" crap. Ads are there to make money, not improve experiences.

Granted, most websites wouldn't survive without them, however, stop trying to push them off as a "feature" or "benefit".

BigBoy

Post #4

May 21 2008, 17:38

Neowinian

Group: Registered
Posts: 464
Joined: 28-August 01
Member No.: 922

That's pretty cool you got to admit.

The defense here seems to be that "you can (and many are) doing things that are worse for their privacy than what we do".

Right.

And how many people do those things in comparison to using Google stuff? So - which is a bigger problem?

C_Guy

Post #5

May 21 2008, 17:58

Immune to Steve Jobs' Reality Distortion Field
Group Icon

Group: Registered
Posts: 2,124
Joined: 10-July 03
Member No.: 32,457

Quote - (bmaher @ May 21 2008, 11:12)

I really wish companies would stop with the "targetting ads will improve your internet experience" crap. Ads are there to make money, not improve experiences.

Ha ha ha ha! Yes and I wish Google would stop their "do no evil" crap. How stupid do they think we are?

So now, let me get this straight:
"The company was accused of breaching privacy after it emerged that it was planning to "read" customers' Google Mail emails to offer them targeted advertisements." and yet "{Google goes} through a huge amount of effort to protect people's private data." Interesting.

" {Google} said targeting customers with advertising that matches their hobbies would improve their ~~internet experience~~ profitability." Ahhhh there ya go!

Primexx

Post #6

May 22 2008, 04:46

----------------
Group Icon

Group: Registered
Posts: 7,969
Joined: 24-April 05
Member No.: 107,134

being a privacy zealot, i personally don't see any problems with machine-targeted ads as long as they're not making a separate copy of the data (which includes identifiable record keeping). And as far as I'm aware, Gmail's system falls within these bounds.

iconoclast

Post #7

May 22 2008, 04:48

Resident Fanatic
Group Icon

Group: Registered
Posts: 972
Joined: 12-May 06
Member No.: 166,463

Sadly, I'm more scared of the federal government at this point than Google, although I know the USG would just take Google's files if they wanted. I do try to throw them off with this little extension, however:
http://mrl.nyu.edu/~dhowe/trackmenot/

Every few seconds it sends a random search to google, yahoo, and MSN.

A log of the past few minutes:

Quote -

Primexx

Post #8

May 22 2008, 04:56

----------------
Group Icon

Group: Registered
Posts: 7,969
Joined: 24-April 05
Member No.: 107,134

Quote - (iconoclast @ May 21 2008, 21:48)

...or you could just randomize the cookie ID, which seems to be a more secure way as well as less wasteful of bandwidth.

PureLegend

Post #9

May 22 2008, 08:43

egg-knee-shun

Group: Moderator
Posts: 10,271
Joined: 2-August 05
From: Brighton, England
Member No.: 121,608

Quote - (Hum @ May 21 2008, 18:08)

The company was accused of breaching privacy after it emerged that it was planning to "read" customers' Google Mail emails to offer them targeted advertisements.

Doesn't this already happen?

+mad_onion

Post #10

May 22 2008, 09:32

Neowinian Senior

Group: +Subscriber
Posts: 2,036
Joined: 8-July 04
From: London, UK
Member No.: 61,844

yeah, they already read people's emails. it's always happened. it's surprising how little these journalists need to know about technology to wirte articles about it.

Eoin

Post #11

May 22 2008, 09:49

Neowinian

Group: Registered
Posts: 63
Joined: 4-June 04
From: Ireland
Member No.: 57,943

The problem isn't if they read emails to offer you targeted ads, the danger is that they might store that information to build up some sort of profile about you. Werther they do that or not I really don't know.

But beside all that, if you want to keep private you shouldn't use the likes of Gmail. Find a provider who guarantees privacy, you'll probably have to pay but you can't really expect such service to be free. Or set up your own email server, it's actually very simple if you've an always on connection

Osiris

Post #12

May 22 2008, 11:05

Neowinian God!
Group Icon

Group: Registered
Posts: 7,875
Joined: 31-October 01
From: Australia
Member No.: 2,594

But thats the thing people dont know gmail scans their emails for advertising keywords/phrases (although it sounds alot sinister saying they "read" them). I mean I think the journalists could probably do a lil more research but realistically it still shocks people reporting about it know because the masses do not know. If anything this is probably one of the few areas where government regulation would be handy so that lilttle things like this cannot be stuffed into EULA or pages of pages of terms of conditions that you cannot expect the majority of people to read.

Majesticmerc

Post #13

May 22 2008, 11:16

Evil Genius
Group Icon

Group: Registered
Posts: 545
Joined: 24-August 05
From: Lincoln/Middlesbrough, UK
Member No.: 125,341

Search Profiling + Email Reading + medical information + satellite images of your house. Some governments would kill (and most have) to get this kind of information about you, and we all cry out when they do. Yet by some strange quirk of fate, Google can do this and no-one says a thing.

+TCLN Ryster

Post #14

May 22 2008, 11:25

Halo 3 Yeah!

Group: +Subscriber
Posts: 1,007
Joined: 2-August 04
From: Uttoxeter, UK
Member No.: 64,792

Google, stop trying to shift attention away from yourself... just because Facebook is a privacy risk, doesn't mean you aren't.

Neobond

Post #15

May 22 2008, 11:27

Steven Parker

Group: Administrator
Posts: 12,956
Joined: 9-July 01
From: Neowin HQ
Member No.: 2

Thing is, people choose what they want to disclose on Facebook/MySpace. Not so on Google, and despite the claims it's very hard to "opt out" of Googles data crunch on you.

« Older · Breaking News · Newer »

2 Pages

[1] 2 ... Next