main
Report a problem

EU sets 2010 target for IPv6

Daniel Fleshbourne   on 27 May 2008 - 13:34 · 16 comments & 7963 views

Advertisement (Why?)
The European Commission has set a target for 25 per cent of the continent's businesses, authorities and homes to adopt IPv6 – the next generation internet protocol - by 2010. The previous protocol, IPv4, has been in use since 1984 and supports a total of 4.3 billion web addresses. But only 16 per cent of these are still available for the creation of new connections – a situation that could potentially curb the growth of the web.

The new protocol will remove this problem by making available a near-infinite selection of new addresses. The transition will take time, but such a move is essential for Europe to make the most of next-generation technology, said Viviane Reding, European commissioner for information society and media. "In the short term, businesses and public authorities might be tempted to try to squeeze their needs into the straitjacket of the old system, but this would mean Europe is badly placed to take advantage of the latest internet technology, and could face a crisis when the old system runs out of addresses," she said.

View: The full story @ vnunet

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 16 additional comments
(1 reply) #1 Unplugged on 27 May 2008 - 13:41
I think 2010 is a bit unrealistic.

Sure Windows Vista et al are starting to dish out IPv6 addresses until ISPs start dishing them out on hand and DNS is fully making use of them I think it will take a good few years yet.
#1.1 imis on 27 May 2008 - 21:07
(Unplugged said @ #1)
I think 2010 is a bit unrealistic.

Sure Windows Vista et al are starting to dish out IPv6 addresses until ISPs start dishing them out on hand and DNS is fully making use of them I think it will take a good few years yet.

+1
#2 Evolution on 27 May 2008 - 14:01
I'm pretty sure you can enable IPv6 for Windows XP as well.... so it's not unreasonable.... just difficult to convince everyone to make the changes.
#3 Julius Caro on 27 May 2008 - 14:09
the regular TCP can still work on top of IPv6 right? I dont think it's THAT far fetched to expect a wider adoption of IPv6. It's not like they want everyone using it by 2010. I guess that the reason IPv6 adoption was put "On hold" is because NAT and such things allow us to "live" with the limited address space.
(1 reply) #4 daPhoenix on 27 May 2008 - 14:57
You don't necessarily need to have IPV6 support in your machine at all, it can be handled by company routers/proxies and IPV4-to-6 gateways.
#4.1 Magallanes on 27 May 2008 - 16:49
indeed, also the ip trouble is a ISP matter and not to a common user.

(1 reply) #5 computergeek83 on 27 May 2008 - 16:23
my question is how many home users will get screwed because the cheap routers they bought at ***-mart dont support ipv6 and the manufacturer wont release new firmware....
#5.1 ThaCrip on 27 May 2008 - 23:16
thats why im running DD-WRT. as even though it currently does not support IPv6 but eventually will when the time is needed ill bet

and then i can just upgrade as almost all third party firmware (i.e. DD-WRT/Tomato etc etc) is much better than stock firmware anyways.

Last edited by ThaCrip on 27 May 2008 - 23:25
#6 rpgfan on 27 May 2008 - 16:34
Funny... I just read a blog entry or an article or something (thanks StumbleUpon) about the idea of us living on IPv4/NAT for the rest of our lives. If NAT happened to completely fail one day, it would be like our life support failed. That is seriously what is going on, and I'm all for IPv6.
#7 hal90001 on 27 May 2008 - 16:44
About damn time! I would go even further and issue a sort of compliance requirement--either comply or be left out, otherwise business will keep on dragging their feet for another 10 years!!
#8 rdmiller on 27 May 2008 - 17:09
Just exactly how does 25% adoption on the continent make anything different than it is today? Sounds like she is issuing edicts "because she can".
#9 Nanorobot on 27 May 2008 - 17:12
We've had this for years now in most modern OS, xp/vista supports it and almost any unix variant has for years. We just need most ISPs to support it. Its probably more in their interests to use the old stuff atm.

Even if your router doesn't support it, you can still tunnel IPv6 over IPv4.
#10 +M2Ys4U on 27 May 2008 - 17:24
I started a thread here on Neowin asking what UK ISPs were IPv6 enabled. Only one link was given. Most of the major ISPs won't comment on IPV6.

2010 is way too soon
#11 rpgfan on 27 May 2008 - 20:11
Wasn't there a goal to have everyone converted to IPv6 by 2015 or some other year like that?

I mean, software exists for even Windows 98 users to use IPv6 (Trumpet comes to mind)... Theoretically, 2015 wasn't an unrealistic goal at the time. Unfortunately, ISPs don't know how to move their butts fast enough to support the transition. Looking at it from a business perspective, however, some ISPs might be unable to afford the necessary equipment, hence the slow/nonexistent transition.
#12 Airlink on 28 May 2008 - 00:13
IF we want IPv6 adoption to accelerate, we need to start at the Internet backbone and work outwards.
First get the Internet backbone fully IPv6 compliant and then get the major routing equipment switched to IPv6, then do the same for the small ISPs, and then migrate the rest of the downstream hardware (server farms, webhosting companies, IPv4 browsers, etc.) over to IPv6. That's a lot of work.

It's my understanding that most of the backbone (if not all of it) already has support for IPv6, although most of it is probably running at IPv4 at any given moment just because that's what most of the internet traffic is coded for.
#13 sonusingh27 on 28 May 2008 - 11:05
DD-WRT DOES support IPv6

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)