main
Report a problem

Adobe Acrobat Online Takes a Big Leap

Horrocks   on 02 June 2008 - 13:04 · 27 comments & 13952 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Adobe has just unleashed a new online platform containing a word processor, file storage and sharing, both tied together with a Flash-enabled Acrobat 9.

The free Acrobat.com beta includes the Buzzword word processor. Its ConnectNow Web conferencing and desktop sharing tool enables chatting via text, video, and voice. The hosted services invite file storage and sharing with the capability to convert up to five documents to PDF.

Users of Acrobat.com can join each other in virtual rooms, and all those in the room have access to the same document. This is a great feature for virtual meetings, paper editing, and much more.

Acrobat 9 will include many features aided by the integration of Flash. Some of these features include animation integration and dynamic maps.

For creating online forms, Acrobat 9 adds intelligence to recognize content for conversion to fillable fields. And a forms tracking dashboard will show, for instance, the status of responses to a mass party invitation e-mail and let a user send reminders to guests. Responses can be sorted, filtered, and exported to spreadsheets.

With this Acrobat facelift, we can also expect a speedier environment. Everyone has had the 'PDF opening blues', which is hoped to be eliminated with Acrobat 9.

View: news.com

Visit: Acrobat.com Beta

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 27 additional comments
(4 replies) #1 Julius Caro on 02 Jun 2008 - 13:19
No 64-bit, no care.
#1.1 niki_bl on 02 Jun 2008 - 15:08
(Julius Caro said @ #1)
No 64-bit, no care.


There is 64-bit support I'm one of beta testers and the new version of Acrobat is wonderful.

Is the Acrobat 9 family of products 64-bit compliant?
Yes, Acrobat continues to be a 32-bit application that can run and has been tested on Microsoft® Windows Vista® 64-bit, Windows XP 64-bit, and Windows Server® 2003 64-bit.


Last edited by niki_bl on 02 Jun 2008 - 16:26
#1.2 +Kushan on 02 Jun 2008 - 17:14
(niki_bl said @ #1.1)
(Julius Caro said @ #1)
No 64-bit, no care.


There is 64-bit support I'm one of beta testers and the new version of Acrobat is wonderful.

Is the Acrobat 9 family of products 64-bit compliant?
Yes, Acrobat continues to be a 32-bit application that can run and has been tested on Microsoft® Windows Vista® 64-bit, Windows XP 64-bit, and Windows Server® 2003 64-bit.


I think he's referring to there being no NATIVE 64bit support. Quite why this is such a big deal, I do not know.
#1.3 Julius Caro on 02 Jun 2008 - 20:20
Running a 32-bit app in an amd64 OS hardly qualifies as "64-bit" compliant, simply because the processor is supposed to be able to handle the binaries anyway.

And if acrobat/flash were standalone apps on their own, I wouldn't mind them being 32-bit, the same way I dont mind MOST of the apps today being 32-bit. But neither flash nor acrobat plugin will run on 64-bit browsers and that's a huge drawback.
#1.4 +Kushan on 02 Jun 2008 - 23:40
(Julius Caro said @ #1.3)
Running a 32-bit app in an amd64 OS hardly qualifies as "64-bit" compliant, simply because the processor is supposed to be able to handle the binaries anyway.

And if acrobat/flash were standalone apps on their own, I wouldn't mind them being 32-bit, the same way I dont mind MOST of the apps today being 32-bit. But neither flash nor acrobat plugin will run on 64-bit browsers and that's a huge drawback.


And the benefit of a 64bit browser is....?
#2 Lasker on 02 Jun 2008 - 13:21
I tested the beta site and is pretty cool, I like it
#3 Jugalator on 02 Jun 2008 - 13:51
We've seen those web apps before, but it's still a useful set of apps in one place. The interface looks nice and clean and while some will complain about the heavy flash usage rather than plain HTML, this is not really a problem for me. Details like the non-standard scroll bar on Buzzword can be irksome to some, but on the other hand, I kind of like the added functionality by dividing it into pages one can jump to. The page previews also looks to be of high quality. Oh, and it does even import Office 2007 native .docx documents.
(1 reply) #4 eilegz on 02 Jun 2008 - 13:59
lets hope this mark a return of flashpaper, a very useful program that adobe killed, the only thing more widespread than .pdf its flash.
#4.1 +Kushan on 02 Jun 2008 - 17:14
(eilegz said @ #4)
lets hope this mark a return of flashpaper, a very useful program that adobe killed, the only thing more widespread than .pdf its flash.


Dunno about there, there's always the good ol' .txt ;P
#5 sorlag on 02 Jun 2008 - 14:23
Acrobat 9, introducing even more bloat. jay
(4 replies) #6 SniperX on 02 Jun 2008 - 14:44
Everyone has had the 'PDF opening blues'...

They do? They have? What's that then?
#6.1 Belazor on 02 Jun 2008 - 14:58
(SniperX said @ #6)
Everyone has had the 'PDF opening blues'...

They do? They have? What's that then?
The fact that unless you let your computer pre-load Adobe files, it takes a fair bit longer to start than it should for a simple reader.
#6.2 +Kushan on 02 Jun 2008 - 17:17
(SniperX said @ #6)
Everyone has had the 'PDF opening blues'...

They do? They have? What's that then?


It's when you're happily browsing the web, click a link and THEN realise it was to a PDF. Cue a solid 5-10min wait while your browser attempts to load the adobe reader plugin, just so you can close the tab.
Any attempt to close it early, so you can get back to good ol' web browsing, results in you shutting down your browser because windows thinks it's hung.

It's why I use foxit reader instead.
#6.3 Jugalator on 02 Jun 2008 - 18:27
(Belazor said @ #6.1)
(SniperX said @ #6)
Everyone has had the 'PDF opening blues'...

They do? They have? What's that then?
The fact that unless you let your computer pre-load Adobe files, it takes a fair bit longer to start than it should for a simple reader.

But wasn't that about Acrobat 9 which isn't just a reader, not a new version of Adobe Reader (I can't see Reader 9 even being released yet)? That's what confused me a bit, at least. I thought they meant opening stuff in Acrobat itself. But maybe Reader is part of that package too, I can't say I remember.
#6.4 Havin_it on 03 Jun 2008 - 11:44
(Belazor said @ #6.1)
(SniperX said @ #6)
Everyone has had the 'PDF opening blues'...

They do? They have? What's that then?
The fact that unless you let your computer pre-load Adobe files, it takes a fair bit longer to start than it should for a simple reader.


A lot of the delay is due to loading squillions of plugins that are almost never required. There are (were?) a couple of freeware apps kicking around (PDF Speedup is one I think) that let you disable these selectively. I got Acrobat 7's startup time down to a couple of seconds using one of these, and never came across a document I couldn't open with the plugins removed.

I've hardly used Acrobat since I went Linux, anyway: KPDF is much faster and I haven't had a compatibility issue yet.
#7 niki_bl on 02 Jun 2008 - 15:31
Adobe Reader 9 and Adobe Acrobat 9 also are incredibly fast.
#8 bbfc_uk on 02 Jun 2008 - 15:51
Its just one of those apps you can't live without.
(1 reply) #9 Clueless Fox on 02 Jun 2008 - 16:17
when it says up to 5 times... is that during one login duration.. or overall?
#9.1 Jugalator on 02 Jun 2008 - 18:37
Overall, afterwards they recommend purchasing either a subscription for their online conversion tool, or Adobe Acrobat itself. So I think it just clutters the UI a bit, and I guess it's best treated as an advertisement to have you get introduced to their other tools. I'd better be without that free service, personally.

However, if you create or import your existing documents into Buzzword, you can export them as PDF unlimited times, I believe. Just use the Document -> Export menu.
(2 replies) #10 boho on 02 Jun 2008 - 18:55
FoxIT reader (free), opens PDF's. A single 5 Mb executable file, opens like lightening (compared to Acrobat 5 and on)

Adobe has become huge bloat, starting with version 6 and above.
#10.1 xcguy87 on 02 Jun 2008 - 20:38
FoxIT reader (free), opens PDF's. A single 5 Mb executable file, opens like lightening (compared to Acrobat 5 and on)

Adobe has become huge bloat, starting with version 6 and above.


+1

Yep, I also use FoxIT. Got tired of all the adobe updates, startup programs, and that bloated piece of software that adobe put out.
#10.2 niki_bl on 03 Jun 2008 - 06:20
(boho said @ #10)
FoxIT reader (free), opens PDF's. A single 5 Mb executable file, opens like lightening (compared to Acrobat 5 and on)

Adobe has become huge bloat, starting with version 6 and above.


v9 is different, trust me Adobe Reader is beta 3 now, and very soon we'll see the final version.
#11 Joey992 on 02 Jun 2008 - 20:40
I might be in the minority here but I don't think 8.0 was all that slow. I use Foxit at home but at work we use Adobe Reader and Acrobat and neither one of them seem particularly slow to me.
(1 reply) #12 :: Lyon :: on 03 Jun 2008 - 00:06
So this is to compete with Google Docs and Microsoft Office Live?
#12.1 toadeater on 03 Jun 2008 - 18:07
(:: Lyon :: said @ #12)
So this is to compete with Google Docs and Microsoft Office Live?


Looks like it. There are lots of these online office suites now. I'm not sure if anyone's using them, or why they'd want to.
#13 Quick Reply on 03 Jun 2008 - 12:49
yay more bloat
#14 Dave Hybrid on 21 Oct 2008 - 12:30
Interesting article, a good read. It's actually given me a great idea for a project so thanks! Dave @ Superantispyware.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)