Hitachi has announced plans to have a commercial 3.5-inch hard drive on the market that can hold 5TB. They hope for this to be available by 2010.

Hard drive specialist Hitachi Global Storage Technologies is continuing to push HDDs to the limit, with a strong emphasis on increasing capacity and with a clear goal in mind.

The space will be achieved using 'current perpendicular-to-the-plane giant magnetoresistance', or in short, CPP-GMR.
CPP-GMR pushes data density above 1TB per square inch, a long-awaited threshold that promises drives many times larger than those available today.

View: TechRadar



There are 33 additional comments
Advertisement
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #1 Posted by C++ on 03 Jul 2008 - 15:21
Of course they're pushing limits, Hitachi's storage division used to be IBM's storage division. And IBM is the ****.
(2 replies) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #2 Posted by hardgiant on 03 Jul 2008 - 15:47
Oh no a 5TB DeathStar



PS: Make em faster, they are big enough already.
Quote this comment #2.1 Posted by Digitalfox on 03 Jul 2008 - 16:47
It's like CPU's, first was the speed in Ghz, now is the number of cores and cache memory..

Next will be hard drives when they feel they can't push more GB for disk, they will focus on speed..

And I may be very wrong but I think in 3.5-inch size, there won't be much TB they can put in a drive.. Off course they may raise the physical size or just progress in speed..
Quote this comment #2.2 Posted by XerXis on 03 Jul 2008 - 21:49
(Digitalfox said @ #2.1)
It's like CPU's, first was the speed in Ghz, now is the number of cores and cache memory..

Next will be hard drives when they feel they can't push more GB for disk, they will focus on speed..

And I may be very wrong but I think in 3.5-inch size, there won't be much TB they can put in a drive.. Off course they may raise the physical size or just progress in speed..


you are very wrong if you think a few TB's are the limit
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #3 Posted by portauthority on 03 Jul 2008 - 16:05
Gogo Hitachi! Best bunch of hard drives I've ever used...
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #4 Posted by Digitalfox on 03 Jul 2008 - 16:14
Thank god..

Please introduce 10TB hard drives in 2012..

With Blue Ray disks of 25GB and in near future 50GB, how can somebody backup his movies..
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #5 Posted by tsupersonic on 03 Jul 2008 - 16:45
I think they (and other HDD manufacturers) should start making more solid state (or hybrid drives for that matter) which hopefully will bring prices down.

HDD's are still good, but at this point, I feel we need speed over storage
(1 reply) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #6 Posted by IntelliMoo on 03 Jul 2008 - 17:02
Gee, how about 1 TB SSD by.. NOW! heh
Quote this comment #6.1 Posted by SHS on 03 Jul 2008 - 18:27
(IntelliMoo said @ #6)
Gee, how about 1 TB SSD by.. NOW! heh

Do you got ton of cash for BiTMICRO Altima E3S320
(1 reply) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #7 Posted by pyehac on 03 Jul 2008 - 17:53
If I remember correctly, 10 years ago, 5gb drives just came out.
Quote this comment #7.1 Posted by Angel Blue01 on 03 Jul 2008 - 22:50
No, 10 years ago they had the 8GB drives.
(1 reply) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #8 Posted by 3rd impact on 03 Jul 2008 - 18:22
imagine how long would one defragment a 5tb drive...will i leave it defragmenting for the weekend?
Quote this comment #8.1 Posted by atari800 on 04 Jul 2008 - 17:55
I already do that for my 1 TB raid
So I am thinking - defrag in a work-week (?!?!?!?!!
(2 replies) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #9 Posted by Tager on 03 Jul 2008 - 18:23
nice... even more data to lose if the HDD fail!
Quote this comment #9.1 Posted by +stevember on 03 Jul 2008 - 19:35
My immediate thought...

Second thought was just more storage for porn.
Quote this comment #9.2 Posted by Jugalator on 04 Jul 2008 - 08:08
Yes, it's getting more and more important to back up things. At this scale, I'd buy them in pairs, one as the backup. They're quickly getting so cheap anyway.
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #10 Posted by Lowdown on 03 Jul 2008 - 18:23
I think the increase in drive space is great but I can just hear the tech support calls from the noobs that don't backup. "Um, yeah like my computer doesn't say I have a hard drive and like I had all my music from like 5 decades on there and all these videos, it was a few Terabytes." We'll need some other good formats out to backup all this massive amounts of information.
(4 replies) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #11 Posted by cold-peak on 03 Jul 2008 - 19:11
What ordinary person needs this? I store my music, games and pictures on 1 hdd and its only 80gb! Still have 20gb left!
Quote this comment #11.1 Posted by Airlink on 03 Jul 2008 - 22:56
Speak for yourself. I've got 600 GB of NAS storage and I need more. As a matter of fact, I'm heading down to the store not to pick up a pair of 1TB drives.
Quote this comment #11.2 Posted by RAID 0 on 04 Jul 2008 - 00:00
(Airlink said @ #11.1)
Speak for yourself. I've got 600 GB of NAS storage and I need more. As a matter of fact, I'm heading down to the store not to pick up a pair of 1TB drives.


So if you're NOT going to pick up a pair of 1 TB drives, what are you going to pick up?
Quote this comment #11.3 Posted by Airlink on 04 Jul 2008 - 01:01
Sorry, somehow I inserted a "not" in there. I do believe I need more coffee.
Quote this comment #11.4 Posted by RAID 0 on 04 Jul 2008 - 04:43
(Airlink said @ #11.3)
Sorry, somehow I inserted a "not" in there. I do believe I need more coffee.


I was just messin with ya.
(1 reply) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #12 Posted by Drimacus on 03 Jul 2008 - 19:12
They should make the hard drives more reliable and resistant to mechanical failures instead of focusing solely on storage capacity...... i'm tired of having to replace at least one of my hds every 1.5-2 years.
Quote this comment #12.1 Posted by +stevember on 03 Jul 2008 - 19:38
I'm sure they are.

Also technically bigger means a lot less wear.
(3 replies) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #13 Posted by WolfDV on 03 Jul 2008 - 21:18
I can't wait to make a nice raid array out of a few of these
Quote this comment #13.1 Posted by Skynetfuture on 03 Jul 2008 - 21:31
(WolfDV said @ #13)
I can't wait to make a nice raid array out of a few of these



lol 1TB is overkill


5TB SSC overkill edtion IMO


2X 5TB HDD Raid0 will be ****** insane speedwise/storage i guess i will be really tidy to have em in raid5
Quote this comment #13.2 Posted by WolfDV on 03 Jul 2008 - 21:59
(Skynetfuture said @ #13.1)
(WolfDV said @ #13)
I can't wait to make a nice raid array out of a few of these

lol 1TB is overkill
5TB SSC overkill edtion IMO
2X 5TB HDD Raid0 will be ****** insane speedwise/storage i guess i will be really tidy to have em in raid5


thats what I was thinking

5 x 5TB Raid5 = 20TB of redundant usable space. Thats a lot of data, Hell just one of these drives alone is more than my current raid5 array (5 x 1TB = 4TB unformatted redundant space)
Quote this comment #13.3 Posted by SHS on 03 Jul 2008 - 22:49
(Skynetfuture said @ #13.1)
(WolfDV said @ #13)
I can't wait to make a nice raid array out of a few of these



lol 1TB is overkill


5TB SSC overkill edtion IMO


2X 5TB HDD Raid0 will be ****** insane speedwise/storage i guess i will be really tidy to have em in raid5

1TB is way to small for the Media Server folk, We need lots of room for SD/HD, DVD Rips, BluRay Rip Video
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #14 Posted by stezo2k on 04 Jul 2008 - 08:07
Sweet ive gotta get me one of those
(1 reply) Quote this comment Reply to this comment #15 Posted by TRC on 04 Jul 2008 - 17:12
I've still got an old Circuit City sales paper advertising 1GB hard drives, 1GB!! I remember looking at it the morning it came and thinking how incredible that was and how I'd probably never need or be able to afford such a massive drive.
Quote this comment #15.1 Posted by jafoman on 05 Jul 2008 - 06:31
(TRC said @ #15)
I've still got an old Circuit City sales paper advertising 1GB hard drives, 1GB!! I remember looking at it the morning it came and thinking how incredible that was and how I'd probably never need or be able to afford such a massive drive.


An ad? I actually bought a Micropolis 1GB drive for $999. I ran a BBS in the early 90s...

The drive was a 5.25" full height (two drive bays!) drive... I think I still have it somewhere. LOL.
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #16 Posted by Doom1468 on 05 Jul 2008 - 09:35
Excellent.
I plan for a new PC in 2010/11/12 so this'll be a nice addition
Not close to using my current 250GB so that'll be massive.
Quote this comment Reply to this comment #17 Posted by burfadel on 09 Jul 2008 - 19:09
With hard drives, the performance is directly related to the density and speed of the drive. The denser the platter inside the drive, the faster the drive will be. The most dense platters now are around 334GB, so 1TB drives are made up of 3 platters. Actually most use 4 platters and some even use 5! (which is bad for heat). So, if the limit for each platter is 1gb, that gives you 5gb with 5 platters. Now performance wise, there will only be so much data underneath the head on each rotation, and drives are already tweaked fairly well for performance, so performance won't leap that much above the very latest current technology (like supposedly the new 32mb cache twin processor WD drives coming out). The only way to increase performance above this is to increase the rotation speed, we may see slighly faster drives but the faster they spin the more power they use, which is a big issue these days. We probably wouldn't have seen 10,000rpm drives, but if efficiency wasn't such an issue we may have seen say 8400rpm drives by now
[1]

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.


Scroll to the Top
....
My Preferences
....
Communicating with server
Loading
Please Wait...
....
Loading
 X 
....