main
Report a problem

Fujitsu Exec says solid-state disk doesn't measure up

Daniel Fleshbourne   on 09 July 2008 - 09:03 · 14 comments & 6916 views

Advertisement (Why?)
While most major disk-drive manufacturers have developed or are already selling solid-state disk drives or hybrid drives, which use a combination of flash memory and spinning disk, Fujitsu Ltd. has chosen not to develop a product for market. Joel Hagberg, Fujitsu's vice president of business development, said his company does not plan to launch any solid-state disk-drive products over the next two years because the value proposition of the technology is not compelling enough and won't be until technology breakthroughs change solid-state disk's performance and reliability.

View: The full story @ ComputerWorld

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 14 additional comments
(1 reply) #1 rev3nant on 09 Jul 2008 - 11:41
Bad for them. Not sure if the will be able to catch up in two years.
#1.1 theyarecomingforyou on 09 Jul 2008 - 12:03
Why not? Instead of investing in failed technologies they simply wait until it matures and let the others take the risk.
#2 mocax on 09 Jul 2008 - 13:43
SSD still too expensive.
(2 replies) #3 bobbba on 09 Jul 2008 - 13:47
it should read:

"the solid state disk market is a market that requires a whole new set of resources and expertise. it is also one that directly competes with our own existing hard disk market so we will declare that these products are slow and unrelaible for as long we are not offering them"
#3.1 ahhell on 09 Jul 2008 - 13:56
Well said.
#3.2 vetmarkjensen on 09 Jul 2008 - 15:17
bobbba,

I have opened many a fortune cookie and have yet to find words as wise as your post just now.

A big "+1" from me!
#4 X'tyfe on 09 Jul 2008 - 15:28
if its indeed true that SSD are so bad atm, then id call this a smart move
on the other hand, its not really helping move us toward SSD any faster

i want to have dual 1TB SSD in raid 0 in the next 2-3 years
(2 replies) #5 +TCLN Ryster on 09 Jul 2008 - 17:42
I thought SSD had faster transfer rates than hard drives? Or is that just a misconception?
#5.1 cloudstrife13 on 09 Jul 2008 - 19:28
It really depends on the drive. You probably could find a 32GB SSD for $200 and another 32GB SSD for $550

The $200 one seems like a deal but when you look and realize it has 50mpbs read and 20mbps write, and the $550 drive has 120mbps read and 80mbps write you soon realize that the cheap drive isn't worth it and a hard drive will perform better.

The good SSD's are still to expensive for the consumer market, buying a "cheap" SSD is pointless because a standard hard drive beats them.
#5.2 bobbba on 09 Jul 2008 - 20:02
it's not all about transfer rates, it's also about access and seek times which the ssd's are much quicker at
(1 reply) #6 vetneufuse on 09 Jul 2008 - 19:45
Yep they dont measure up... My 2 drive SATA SSD RAID array is outragiously faster then my 2 drive 7200RPM Drive array... and not having to hear the drive heads move around or the motors is a LOT nicer and quieter
#6.1 ec4912 on 10 Jul 2008 - 16:59
Which brand SSD did you get?
#7 Airlink on 10 Jul 2008 - 06:13
This is just Fujitsu blowing smoke. Ignore it, and ignore them.
If they wanna get left behind, I say let them. Fujitsu isn't what I'd call a major player anyways, so who cares what they think?
#8 kaiwai on 11 Jul 2008 - 09:59
Good lord, the stench of cluelessness is unbearable. Fujitsu has a vested interest in both magnetic storage and flash. The simple fact of the matter is that there are issues that need to be addressed - and its time that the 'flash fanboys' realise this instead of claiming a conspiracy theory where there is none.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)