main
Report a problem

AMD Initiates Pilot Production of 45nm Chips

Daniel Fleshbourne   on 22 July 2008 - 12:02 · 11 comments & 5501 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Dirk Meyer, the new chief executive officer of Advanced Micro Devices, said during a conference call with financial analysts that the company had initiated pilot production of microprocessors using 45nm fabrication process and that the chipmaker was on track to deliver actual products in volume in early fourth quarter.

“We are well on track with the 45nm plan as we have been telling this group about in the past. We have actually started production late last quarter and are on track to start buying shipments early in Q4,” said Dirk Meyer during the conference call. Earlier it was widely believed that AMD will only manage to start shipments of its 45nm microprocessors late in Q4, however, the company now seems to be a bit more optimistic about its 45nm transition.

View: The full story @ Xbit-Labs

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 11 additional comments
#1 hardgiant on 22 Jul 2008 - 14:14
Will the newer 45nm be any good though or the same old stuff?

Answer: Same old stuff...

Last edited by hardgiant on 22 Jul 2008 - 14:22
(1 reply) #2 nmesisca on 22 Jul 2008 - 15:09
.. says the intel fanboy..
#2.1 kaiwai on 22 Jul 2008 - 23:07
(nmesisca said @ #2)
.. says the intel fanboy..


Learn how to use the forum properly before making snarky remarks about other peoples opinions.
#3 ViperAFK on 22 Jul 2008 - 16:20
Weren't the new FX's supposed to come out soon after they move to 45 nm?
(1 reply) #4 Lasker on 22 Jul 2008 - 16:44
This is why they are behind the industry, when they start selling 45nm processors, Intel will be with 25nm or even less
#4.1 2xSilverKnight on 22 Jul 2008 - 19:52
well actually the next step is 32nm and is probably set for 2009 in mass production. so no they are not that far behind.
they just need a better cpu architecture now
(3 replies) #5 maudit on 22 Jul 2008 - 18:06
Poor amd... I wish they'd get there arse in gear and take intels performance crown with cheaper parts like they did with ATI... But I really don't see it happening
#5.1 kaiwai on 22 Jul 2008 - 23:09
(maudit said @ #5)
Poor amd... I wish they'd get there arse in gear and take intels performance crown with cheaper parts like they did with ATI... But I really don't see it happening


Unfortunately AMD's success in the past has been off the back of Intels stupid mistakes (aka P4 as one example). Unfortunately when you build your whole model off the basis of whether your competition fails to execute a plan, things go pear shaped when the competition doesn't make a mistake for quite some time.
#5.2 Star_Hunter on 23 Jul 2008 - 02:00
(kaiwai said @ #5.1)
(maudit said @ #5)
Poor amd... I wish they'd get there arse in gear and take intels performance crown with cheaper parts like they did with ATI... But I really don't see it happening


Unfortunately AMD's success in the past has been off the back of Intels stupid mistakes (aka P4 as one example). Unfortunately when you build your whole model off the basis of whether your competition fails to execute a plan, things go pear shaped when the competition doesn't make a mistake for quite some time.


Kinda hard to beat a company that is over 15(more then this now but this was how it was back in 2005 or so) times larger than you and can just throw wads of cash at problems. The sad part is that even with that much more money Intel lost the lead for a few years before retaking it, imagine if Intel had a little money as AMD did and then pulled that P4, they might not have survived.
#5.3 webbwbb on 12 Aug 2008 - 13:36
(Star_Hunter said @ #5.2)
Kinda hard to beat a company that is over 15(more then this now but this was how it was back in 2005 or so) times larger than you and can just throw wads of cash at problems. The sad part is that even with that much more money Intel lost the lead for a few years before retaking it, imagine if Intel had a little money as AMD did and then pulled that P4, they might not have survived.


Actually, they would have survived and continued to do quite well because of AMD's success. Intel owns patents on x86 and AMD has to pay Intel if they want to use it.
#6 maudit on 22 Jul 2008 - 18:08
snip doudble post

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)