main

Via's Nano processor tops Intel's Atom in first reviews

Daniel Fleshbourne   on 30 July 2008 - 13:20 · 10 comments & 3668 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Performance comparisons of Via Technologies' Nano processor and Intel's Atom chip conducted by several hardware-enthusiast sites confirmed what many industry observers have long suspected: the Taiwanese processor company has produced a chip that outperforms Intel's offering for low-cost computers. "Both the VIA Nano and Intel Atom processors and platforms have their own positives and drawbacks but it was really the Via Nano L2100 processor that impressed me the most," wrote Ryan Shrout, editor-in-chief of PC Perspective, in a review of the two processors.

"Coming from a very small CPU design team here in the U.S., the Isaiah architecture is able to outperform Intel's similarly priced and placed Atom processor while offering a much more open platform design," he wrote. Shrout's verdict was echoed by reviewers at HardOCP and HotHardware, which also found Via's new processor had more processing muscle than Intel's Atom.

View: The full story @ InfoWorld

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 10 additional comments
#1 Lasker on 30 Jul 2008 - 13:27
Interesting, Apple should take seriously this processor for their mobile computers, better than the atom from Intel.
#2 alsheron on 30 Jul 2008 - 13:33
You can't teach a grandma to suck eggs.
#3 Beastage on 30 Jul 2008 - 13:34
From the link I got to hardocp (ugh) and hothardware , what a waste of my time.

The VIA sampels were not retail, so no cost+performance figures.
Hardocp did a memory bandwidth test, nice... but the VIA uses a 333mhz DDR2 while Intel had 266mhz DDR2 , way to go.

But in anyway, the lack of cost vs performance figures makes any test done null and void as it offers us no valid points of comparison.
#4 tsupersonic on 30 Jul 2008 - 13:54
I saw benchmarks between the Via and the Atom and the Via kicks the Atom's butt. Go Via, competition ftw. And AMD get your ass in the game
#5 some_guy on 30 Jul 2008 - 15:39
according to Tom's Hardware, they say that these 2 processors each had different purposes.

but yea Nano looks promising....
#6 RPDL on 30 Jul 2008 - 16:29
These low-cost low-power processors are the first thing that come to mind when I think about VIA. I wouldn't want them to be crushed by Intel.
(3 replies) #7 excalpius on 30 Jul 2008 - 16:30
VIA = Crap

I don't think any vendor, OEM or otherwise, will ever trust them again. I know I won't ever recommend them.
#7.1 +Antaris on 30 Jul 2008 - 17:11
And how have they stung you in the past? Any information to back up your statement?
#7.2 Dakkaroth on 31 Jul 2008 - 00:03
Eh, we've all had our experiences with them. It's no shocker seeing comments like these.
#7.3 excalpius on 05 Aug 2008 - 05:14
Precisely. I've yet to find anyone who's been in this business seriously for the past 20 years who HASN'T had reason to curse Via repeatedly.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)