main

Microsoft Sphere

guruparan   via MSDN Blog on 01 August 2008 - 13:37 · 44 comments & 10696 views

Advertisement (Why?)
As you all know about Microsoft Surface....Microsoft Sphere is the current R&D product that Microsoft is developing.
Multi-touch, Natural interaction are few in the top good features.

Have a look...whats your feedback? is it just for Research? or can it be bought into Retail like Surface was into At&T stores!!

Video: >> Video page <<

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 44 additional comments
#1 mule on 01 Aug 2008 - 13:48
I dunno...it doesn't look useful.
Pass.
(2 replies) #2 Titoist on 01 Aug 2008 - 13:52
What a waste of resources. Sure, more people have access to it, and nobody has a "master" view/control but what bloody use is there for this thing?
#2.1 GP007 on 01 Aug 2008 - 23:07
I think there is a huge use for this in schools, and probably other places. You have to think outside the box as they say. Don't just shun something because you yourself don't see a use for it right from the start.
#2.2 HalcyonX12 on 02 Aug 2008 - 21:23
Yeah schools can afford that. Plus there's lots of educational applications out that support it now.

What's wrong with mapping something to a 3D accelerated sphere on a touch-screen though? I don't understand how you can effectively use a display where you have to walk around it to see the whole thing. Maybe for clubs they can make a new kind of disco ball or something

Who knows, maybe MS is designing this just for marketing like Surface. Plus look! They're innovative! They make crap nobody wants before anyone else! j/k, it may turn out to have some real cool use that nobody has forseen, but yeah count me in the same camp as the other skeptics...
(1 reply) #3 yakumo on 01 Aug 2008 - 14:07
wow, you guys aren't very imaginative are you.

right from the start I was mentally screaming out for a globe application, which I'm glad they did, but it was a wasted opportunity to not demonstrate it zooming in and out too. You can buy globes worth thousands already, there is certainly a market for a fully interactive Google earth on a spherical display unit.

Admittedly there are not a great deal of other applications where a spherical display is perhaps more apt than a flat one, but I'm sure there are some. and as a system for allowing the public to browse information in a museum or similar a globe is a much more...friendly display piece for crowds to walk around.

Also, making a large model the user steps inside (as it's a projected display it would be seen from either side) , multi touch manipulation for a planetarium, excellent.
#3.1 QuarterSwede on 03 Aug 2008 - 01:26
You hit the nail on the head here. Microsoft is great with the technical details but awful at marketing. Your example of a globe demo would have made a pretty big splash in the news. Instead no one cares.
#4 thealexweb on 01 Aug 2008 - 14:14
Very futuristic, but it's just for research, it'll be expensive and non-practical.
(1 reply) #5 +Antaris on 01 Aug 2008 - 14:34
Why do all these Microsoft Research projects always start with the same Image application?
#5.1 GP007 on 01 Aug 2008 - 23:09
Manipulating photos is the best way to demo multitouch features since it's something you can understand easy.
(1 reply) #6 digitalsoft on 01 Aug 2008 - 15:44
Doesnt look useful at all... neither does it look intuitive.
#6.1 +TCLN Ryster on 01 Aug 2008 - 17:14
Do you even know what intuitive means?

There's very little that's more intuitive than a globe that you can touch and spin with your finger.
The image viewing application is also very intuitive as you can "throw" pictures around, or zoom in and out, move them, etc.
#7 Xero on 01 Aug 2008 - 15:53
Pretty useless...

Although it did make a nice globe.
(2 replies) #8 morphen on 01 Aug 2008 - 16:13
most comments reek of "microsoft cannot make anything useful".

i bet if this was linux based and/or not a MS product, or a apple product, everybody would scream "I'AM GETTING ONE OF THOSE".

I would love to see this running google earth

and this would be a product for museums and that sort of institutions.

So, just because you cannot see this for use in your homes, doesn't mean it's "useless", "not intuitive", "a waste of resources".


Many of you seems to think that as long as you cannot see any use in a product for yourself, you think it's useless and so on.
Why don't we just stop all development and research, it's all a waste :p
#8.1 Faisal Islam on 01 Aug 2008 - 16:51
you r absolutely ryt. most of them are foooooooooooooooolish. They used to boot their PC with Windows. Run Microsoft office, write documents, spread sheet etc. Run IE, brows websites. Learn .NET Language, be computer engineers, earn money, run business, feed themselves, lead life. But at last they say "microsoft cannot make anything useful" like a perfidious!

Last edited by Faisal Islam on 01 Aug 2008 - 16:56
#8.2 +TCLN Ryster on 01 Aug 2008 - 17:15
(Faisal Islam said @ #8.1)
you r absolutely ryt. most of them are foooooooooooooooolish. They used to boot their PC with Windows. Run Microsoft office, write documents, spread sheet etc. Run IE, brows websites. Learn .NET Language, be computer engineers, earn money, run business, feed themselves, lead life. But at last they say "microsoft cannot make anything useful" like a perfidious!

Huh?
(2 replies) #9 Vista on 01 Aug 2008 - 16:31
It's just embarrassing to see how they're trying to make us like this useless technology.

I'm sure the Iphone-fashion-freaks will love this, but this is a step back for the advanced computer users.
#9.1 morphen on 01 Aug 2008 - 16:37
(Vista said @ #9)
It's just embarrassing to see how they're trying to make us like this useless technology.

I'm sure the Iphone-fashion-freaks will love this, but this is a step back for the advanced computer users.


who EVER said that this is for your living room?

Is Surface for your living room?

please, write something constructive :p
#9.2 aboi on 02 Aug 2008 - 09:53
(Vista said @ #9)
It's just embarrassing to see how they're trying to make us like this useless technology.

I'm sure the Iphone-fashion-freaks will love this, but this is a step back for the advanced computer users.


Dude I am a proud owner of an iPhone and I find this stuff useless. maybe a fortune teller might find this useful
#10 stifler6478 on 01 Aug 2008 - 17:12
You guys are ridiculous. I could easily see these being used in retail locations like store lobbies or other such places with high traffic. It's not like this is meant for home use, and the guy even implies that.

Very cool technology.

-Spenser
#11 guruparan on 01 Aug 2008 - 18:23
Yeap...i meant that this is a R&D at MS...they arent going to sit in your home...maybe they will be in the museums, educational institutions etc...

As some Morphen pointed it out in few blogs above...if this same Sphere had be developed by Apple..and if Steve jobs shows the demo zooming into the upper part of his house...everyone would had said "i wanted it in my home, i can show my house in that iSphere!!"...crazy people!!
#12 Crazy Eddy on 01 Aug 2008 - 18:29
Even if the product is useless in the home the things they will learn about touch interfaces through this project are more than worth the cost of these guys have fun with their spheres. Isn't that the point of these research divisions?
#13 +njlouch on 01 Aug 2008 - 18:48
These interfaces are amazing and have such potential in health, education, design and many other industries. I am very intrigued.
#14 +njlouch on 01 Aug 2008 - 18:52
Also, research is a journey, not a destination. In making one possibly non-practical application, you can learn about 5 practical ones. It's not about the end result always, it's about the learning.
(1 reply) #15 vipwoody on 01 Aug 2008 - 18:53
save people from aids instead of doing this
#15.1 +njlouch on 01 Aug 2008 - 19:00
What a meaningless line of drivel.

The people researching this do not have that remit, nor would they be qualified to chase it. They are IT developer, not medicial ones.

Moreover, who is to say that the use of a 3d scaling technology isn't later used when we have supermegamicroscopes to see inside cells and so on.

Microsoft already donate HUGE sums, as does Bill Gates, to AIDS charities. Moreover, Microsoft have been instrumental in outfitting related research labs with cutting edge technologies.

If it's such a priority to you, what are you currently doing to help the cause?

Don't spout such hogswash!
#16 Genghis Thom on 01 Aug 2008 - 19:37
Now, if they made it into the shape of a boob...
(3 replies) #17 obsolete_power on 01 Aug 2008 - 20:56
I think it's pretty flimsy. Did you see how at times it struggled to detect his hand or the picture would jitter a little. It looks very open-sourcey. Until they can deliver a perfect one I will put it down.
#17.1 morphen on 01 Aug 2008 - 21:28
lol, do you really think this is the final product? :p

it should be very clear to everyone than watches the clip that it's a RESEARCH project, and i mean...
what do you really mean by open-sourcey?
#17.2 obsolete_power on 02 Aug 2008 - 05:45
(morphen said @ #17.1)
lol, do you really think this is the final product? :p

it should be very clear to everyone than watches the clip that it's a RESEARCH project, and i mean...
what do you really mean by open-sourcey?


Of course this is not the final product but it's Microsoft, the final product is expected to be much worse than the prototype, everybody knows that.
#17.3 basix on 04 Aug 2008 - 17:25
^Source for this known fact?
(1 reply) #18 lylesback2 on 01 Aug 2008 - 22:07
All inventions must start from somewhere! When Microsoft thinks outside of the box, and makes a prototype, everyone screams "useless". You know that the entire world is based off improvements of other peoples ideas.

Give Microsoft a break, they are at least developing something that MIGHT be useful later on in life.
#18.1 GP007 on 01 Aug 2008 - 23:14
Weren't many of these same people screaming the original surface tables were useless also? Yet they're popping up in stores and other places.

This technology opens the way for many cool things down the road. Come on multitouch wall! I'll never have to hang another picture frame again!
(2 replies) #19 Izlude on 01 Aug 2008 - 22:13
AUNTIE EM DON'T GO AWAY!!! COME BACK!!! COME BACK!!!

come back come back! i'll give you auntie em!!!! aaaah ha ha ha ha ha.... aaaaah...

hehe this thing looks kinda neat. useful for a world map?
#19.1 morphen on 01 Aug 2008 - 22:31
#19.2 tbcarey on 04 Aug 2008 - 15:23
(Izlude said @ #1)
AUNTIE EM DON'T GO AWAY!!! COME BACK!!! COME BACK!!!

come back come back! i'll give you auntie em!!!! aaaah ha ha ha ha ha.... aaaaah...


This is pretty much the best quote from this thread. I couldn't stop laughing. Oh, what a world, what a world.
#20 iSimx on 01 Aug 2008 - 22:53
I can't see a use for it although I'm sure this is not the finished article. The globe was pretty cool.
(1 reply) #21 nunjabusiness on 02 Aug 2008 - 00:33
Amazing to me that out of 30 posts only a handful of posters actually seem to have a coherent grasp of what "useful, intuitive and worthwhile" mean. Being an "advanced computer user" does not mean 4-boxing WOW and stealing your neighbor's wi-fi.

This is one of the more exciting advances in technology in a while. Surface and Sphere's underlying mechanics are so freakin' revolutionary it boggles the mind. You want Star Trek technology? You want holodecks? Of course you do! Where the hell do you think it will come from?

And for you gamers - you are absolutely going to kill for the advanced UIs that will be made possible through this.
Can you say Life-Sized 3D Holographic Interface?

Damn, this is cool.
#21.1 MioTheGreat on 04 Aug 2008 - 00:26
Can you say Life-Sized 3D Holographic Interface?


For the immediate future, I'd like an RTS game that worked like this:
http://www.stargatecaps.com/sga/s3/315/html/thegame0665.html
#22 Sevan on 03 Aug 2008 - 05:29
Well, to be quite honest, it depends.

It could be used in education and security scenarios, but I don't see it in a home environment.
(1 reply) #23 cork1958 on 03 Aug 2008 - 11:58
I know there are a ton of total nit wits out there, but who here DIDN'T know from the first time they ever visited myspace, it was a virus? I mean that site sucks so bad, I don't know how anyone can even stand it?!!
#23.1 Sevan on 03 Aug 2008 - 17:05
(cork1958 said @ #23)
I know there are a ton of total nit wits out there, but who here DIDN'T know from the first time they ever visited myspace, it was a virus? I mean that site sucks so bad, I don't know how anyone can even stand it?!!

I barely tolerate it. I have AdBlock Plus to remove ads and such. But your going way offtopic dude.
#24 Tzimisce on 03 Aug 2008 - 15:57
This is an awesome.

The people that are saying this is useless are the same people that said "Who would ever need two moniters.".

This is very useful. Unmanned Information Kiosk, Group therapy, (as mentioned before schools),
Do I see it ever being used? No. This is r&d they are working on something much bigger and this is just a step

Also the R&D is not developing application for a spherical display they are studying touch-sensitive applications. They said themselves that they were researching handling multiple responses in a spherical environment.
#25 sathenzar on 03 Aug 2008 - 20:53
I have to say I normally back Microsoft up, but I just really don't use it's uses to make me go OMG! I NEED ONE OF THOSE RIGHT NOW! But maybe I'm wrong. I'll wait for further judgment until I see more things it can do.
#26 Joshie on 06 Aug 2008 - 16:38
What's with this bizarre attitude that all technology has to be for home use? o.O

Everyone knows this is how they would want the bridge control interface on a space shuttle to work (being inside the sphere, at least). :3

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)