main
Report a problem

AMD Fusion details leaked

Daniel Fleshbourne   on 05 August 2008 - 09:35 · 6 comments & 4033 views

Advertisement (Why?)
AMD pushed Fusion as one of the main reasons to justify its acquisition of ATI. Since then, AMD’s finances have changed colors and are now deep in the red, the top management has changed, and Fusion still isn’t anything AMD wants to discuss in detail. But there are always “industry sources” and these sources have told us that Fusion is likely to be introduced as a half-node chip.

It appears that AMD’s engineers in Dresden, Markham and Sunnyvale have been making lots of trips to little island of Formosa lately - the home of contract manufacturer TSMC, which will be producing Fusion CPUs. Our sources indicated that both companies are quite busy laying out the productions scenarios of AMD’s first CPU+GPU chip.

View: The full story @ TGDaily

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 6 additional comments
#1 Shadow Dragon on 05 Aug 2008 - 11:36
I hope AMD get fusion out within the next couple of years, because right now it's the only thing in AMD's roadmap that seems like it could be a success.
(3 replies) #2 Gotenks98 on 05 Aug 2008 - 14:19
My question is why would anyone want this when clearly you are going to get a better performance from cpu and gpu being seperate, and chances are it will be cheaper to keep them seperate.
#2.1 RAID 0 on 05 Aug 2008 - 18:00
I think they might add the GPU to aide with intense number crunching and things of that nature. The GPU can tear apart floating point problems much faster than a CPU.
#2.2 ViperAFK on 06 Aug 2008 - 01:58
(Gotenks98 said @ #2)
My question is why would anyone want this when clearly you are going to get a better performance from cpu and gpu being seperate, and chances are it will be cheaper to keep them seperate.


I dubt it will be more expensive combining them, and there are benefits like low power consumption, small size, and no latency. This could be great for laptops.
#2.3 Eldoen on 06 Aug 2008 - 14:48
Obviously both Intel and AMD think otherwise, AMD with Fusion and Intel with Larabee(sp).

But seriously discrete gpu's only bring in the feature that you can upgrade them at a later date. The only other GPU have not been at cpu standards (integrated with the north bridge, which generally is 2 to 3 technology steps behind GPU production let alone compared to CPU.

My General question is how the Mother board is going to be laid out to allow for a relative short path between memory and the gpgpu section of the combined processor. That is a Limiting factor on todays discrete GPU, and Stream (gpgpu) cards. It would be time to seperate over how a IGP is currently setup to use Main Memory (which is slower than the graphics memory)

GoTenks,
The second question will be what do you want them to do as the number of computing units go up??
by the end of 2009, 8 core will be generally available. 2011 16 core, 2013 32 core, 2015 64 core, 2017 128 core, 2019 256 core. (disclaimer that is if moores law continues (which it appears will be true until 2020)

And GPGPU does so much more than just calculate 3d for imageing.

El
#3 eilegz on 05 Aug 2008 - 18:50
this its a future converge many things into a single chip thats would be cost effective and power efficient.

Lets hope Intel do this in their future, and improve their integrated graphics

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)