main

US Fails to Protect Against the Living Dead & Other Dangers

Jessica Kelley   on 13 August 2008 - 18:56 · 21 comments & 5716 views

Advertisement (Why?)
The week of August 7th, 2008 the amount of malicious spam a single computer user received finally overtook health and product spam. Meant to exploit holes in your operating system, get credit card information from you, or simply just to copy your contact list, spam emails have become more than just a nuisance for the States, they have become outright dangerous.

Unfortunately, our government has not made a substantial leap to protect its citizens from this danger that is lurking in our homes and offices.

The Center for American Progress and the Center for Democracy and Technology have released a report which shows in 2007 “the FTC reported 221,226 internet-related fraud complaints, up from almost 16,000 in 2006 and more than 24,000 from 2005.” With these numbers so drastically high, and probably even higher than stated as many computer users don’t report all of the malware they receive via email, why don’t we hear about our states taking more action against spammers?

States generally have brought charges against those who they find are seeking personal data or cases where it involves pornography, but for cases involving spyware, adware and other types of phishing the Cyber-crime Newsletter released bi-monthly by the National Association of Attorneys General highlighted only 14 cases in which individuals or groups were brought before the states.

One of the reasons it may be so hard for states to bring charges against users that help promote this dangerous spam, is because so many aren’t aware their computers are zombies and have been turned into spamming machines. Panda Security, has just reported that on average, during the second quarter of 2008, there were more than 10 million zombie computers worldwide spewing spam emails to others and ultimately a computer user can’t be held responsible for something they didn’t even know that was occurring. Most states are generally unorganized when it comes to cyber crimes at these levels and don't have the knowledge or resources to begin a program which actively seeks to prosecute those involved with crimes linked to spam.

It’s unfortunate, but even knowing how many millions are affected by phishing and spam each year, states simply aren’t equipped in man power or financial resources. With no changes expected in the near future, computer and data safety will be left up to the average computer user who will need to further educate themselves about the latest viruses and scams to protect themselves from the millions of living dead computers and other online dangers that are facing them each time they login to check their email.

Link: Panda Security
Download: Online Consumers at Risk and the Role of State Attorneys General - Full Report PDF

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 21 additional comments
#1 Geranium_Z__NL on 13 Aug 2008 - 19:01
get a firewall
(6 replies) #2 EduardValencia on 13 Aug 2008 - 19:14
Agree U.S hasn´t done jack about spam,something must be done,radically done!
#2.1 Danielx714 on 13 Aug 2008 - 19:28
(EduardValencia said @ #2)
Agree U.S hasn´t done jack about spam,something must be done,radically done!

radically?

amish doesnt get spam, maybe we should learn from them
#2.2 toadeater on 13 Aug 2008 - 19:44
(EduardValencia said @ #2)
Agree U.S hasn´t done jack about spam,something must be done,radically done!


Not just spam, but US corporations spying on users and installing unwanted "features." The latest example being Apple's installation of Safari on PCs without clear notification to users. Another example is Apple's Bonjour service that they somehow managed to convince Adobe (bribe, no doubt) to install with Photoshop. These unwanted "features" are worse than spam because they can damage an entire OS installation, or even damage data. I'd rather have a law against that than some harmless spam that is easily blocked. Tell me how I can block Steve Jobs and Steve Ballmer!
#2.3 Danielx714 on 13 Aug 2008 - 20:08
(toadeater said @ #2.2)
Tell me how I can block Steve Jobs and Steve Ballmer!


Linux?

if that fails, there's always dos
#2.4 Magallanes on 13 Aug 2008 - 23:55
(EduardValencia said @ #2)
Agree U.S hasn´t done jack about spam,something must be done,radically done!


No, you don't want to the government of the US of A playing as the cop.

#2.5 The_Decryptor on 14 Aug 2008 - 04:23
(toadeater said @ #2.2)
...
Another example is Apple's Bonjour service that they somehow managed to convince Adobe (bribe, no doubt) to install with Photoshop.
...
I'm assuming you don't actually know what Bonjour is then, because if you did you wouldn't have said that.
#2.6 RealFduch on 14 Aug 2008 - 17:49
(The_Decryptor said @ #2.5)
(toadeater said @ #2.2)
...
Another example is Apple's Bonjour service that they somehow managed to convince Adobe (bribe, no doubt) to install with Photoshop.
...
I'm assuming you don't actually know what Bonjour is then, because if you did you wouldn't have said that.

And why would I need that ugly thing from a company of liars?



Last edited by RealFduch on 14 Aug 2008 - 18:08
(2 replies) #3 gnuman on 13 Aug 2008 - 19:33
Do you want the government to even take greater lengths and lose your privacy? It would be hard to track down phishers and spammers as most trojans will make your system a zombie and you'll be sending spam without knowing it. People will be sued for not even knowing they were sending spam messages.

Remember these are novice users who don't know how to use a computer properly. Look at ISPs who offer antivirus products to the unknowing and still do not know how to scan their system thinking well we got an antivirus program thus we are safe.

Best security method? Get Linux less chance of something going wrong there or a Mac.
#3.1 XerXis on 13 Aug 2008 - 20:09
(gnuman said @ #3)
Do you want the government to even take greater lengths and lose your privacy? It would be hard to track down phishers and spammers as most trojans will make your system a zombie and you'll be sending spam without knowing it. People will be sued for not even knowing they were sending spam messages.

Remember these are novice users who don't know how to use a computer properly. Look at ISPs who offer antivirus products to the unknowing and still do not know how to scan their system thinking well we got an antivirus program thus we are safe.

Best security method? Get Linux less chance of something going wrong there or a Mac.

bull**** and you know it, 90% of those malicious spam mails are phishing attacks that go like "Hi, i'm your bank, give me all your details because we have lost them". As long as there are users stupid enough to fall for this the world is doomed.
#3.2 Danielx714 on 13 Aug 2008 - 20:18
correction:
(gnuman said @ #3)
Best security method? Use your brain when using a computer.


it doesnt matter which brand or type of computer you use, it all has flaws, all you can do is be cautious. If not, then want some candy?
#4 zeta_immersion on 13 Aug 2008 - 21:42
no1 is forcing you to open unknown e-mails and other things ... and besides, it is your resonsibility not to get a virus .. and if you to it is your own fault
#5 IntelliMoo on 13 Aug 2008 - 21:54
It's an addiction! Must... open... run... unknown things!!!
#6 Danielx714 on 13 Aug 2008 - 22:37
but but but, i wanted to see web cam girls live! i was told to just download this player to play it! Its not my fault!
(1 reply) #7 +yurithedragon on 13 Aug 2008 - 23:39
Was i the only one who only saw the title and nothing else for a few seconds?
#7.1 Smashing Pumpkin on 13 Aug 2008 - 23:42
(yurithedragon said @ #7)
Was i the only one who only saw the title and nothing else for a few seconds?


Nope, glad someone else did !
#8 dalmatian76 on 14 Aug 2008 - 00:15
I agree with previous posters. We do NOT want the government involved. These guys can't even balance a checkbook, I don't want them involved in my email. Legislation won't fix the problem any more than making drugs illegal solved the drug problem. If people wouldn't open these things, then they would stop sending them. The only reason they do it is because they make money. There is plenty of very good software out there to filter out SPAM effectively. I would personally rather handle it myself than depend on the government OR my ISP to do a poor job of it. As far as the general public, if you can't spend a few minutes learning about the risks and responsibilities of having a computer connected to the Internet and having an email address, then you probably shouldn't have either.
Americans (of which I am one) are the laziest people on the planet. Nothing is our fault or responsibility. We blame the government for not protecting us from ourselves, then we complain that they tax us to death. Well, cut out all the useless government programs that treat us like children and redistribute the wealth in a very socialist like way and taxes could be cut to nothing.
#9 zape on 14 Aug 2008 - 01:33
Did anyone else notice that was really well written? Damn Neowin increasing standards.

Good job Jessica Kelley!
#10 chilliadus on 14 Aug 2008 - 04:35
People complaining that the US government didn't protect them enough should move to China, and hopefully the rest of us will never see your posts here as long as you stay and enjoy the government's protection there.
#11 Airlink on 14 Aug 2008 - 07:05
I don't know how to protect against the Living Dead, but to protect against the Evil Dead you need the twelve-gauge double-barreled Remington. S-Mart's top of the line. You can find this in the sporting goods department. That's right, this sweet baby was made in Grand Rapids, Michigan. Retails for about a hundred and nine, ninety five. It's got a walnut stock, cobalt blue steel, and a hair trigger. That's right. Shop smart. Shop S-Mart. You got that?
#12 +Xtreme2damax on 16 Aug 2008 - 08:11
I keep getting these spam emails that claim to be the Microsoft Lottery/Sweepstakes or National Lottery. The ****er is I have never given this email address out to anyone, only thing I've used it for was to sign up at legit forums who I know wouldn't give out users emails.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)