main

UK to invest in massive 'spy' database

Kevin Horrocks   on 20 August 2008 - 14:29 · 96 comments & 21089 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Something you would have thought would only be part of action movies may be a reality soon in the UK. The government has plans to create a massive database that will store all phone calls, emails, and internet logs of all UK citizens. The information can be stored for as long as 2 years.

The database will take time to create, but there are trials and tests set in place with pre-determined people.

This is a feasible solution to solving criminal cases, and lowering crime rates, however, many will see it as a very large invasion of privacy.

UK Home Office minister, Lord West, noted:
"It is a cross-government program, led by the Home Office, to ensure that our capability to lawfully intercept and exploit data when fighting crime and terrorism is not lost."

I would like to hear you opinions, Neowin. In an act to ensure safety, is this action taking it too far?

View: TechRadar

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 96 additional comments
(11 replies) #1 thealexweb on 20 Aug 2008 - 14:37
I know many will hate this but if it's any consolation it should help stop terrorism.
#1.1 +petroid on 20 Aug 2008 - 14:43
(thealexweb said @ #1)
I know many will hate this but if it's any consolation it should help stop terrorism.

No, Not really. The terrorist planning most likely occurs outside the country anyway. "Terrorism" is a means of controlling people via fear. If the government says terrorism is imminent, people won't be as concerned about having their phonecalls and emails monitored because hey, it will "stop terrorism."

"It's alright, we'll just go through your stuff. There will be no more terrorism very soon."
#1.2 RPDL on 20 Aug 2008 - 15:56
The real terrorists are the government.
#1.3 The Stylish Hobo on 20 Aug 2008 - 16:29
(RPDL said @ #1.2)
The real terrorists are the government.


Yeah, I think that is what he was getting at...
#1.4 +Lt-DavidW on 20 Aug 2008 - 16:55
What terrorism? I've never seen any terrorism except on TV. I'd rather take my chances with the terrorists.
#1.5 n_K on 20 Aug 2008 - 17:00
You think this will solve terroism? bull**** mate, its to invade peoples privacy. Terrorists have better encryption than what any home users have and all programs such as IM would have it built in. Well I'm definately leaving the UK now, thanks for basically telling me to **** off, labour.
#1.6 +GreyWolfSC on 20 Aug 2008 - 19:44
(thealexweb said @ #1)
I know many will hate this but if it's any consolation it should help stop terrorism.


Unfortunately with all this crap in the US, they don't seem to have been able to provide any evidence that it's helping at all. Welcome to your own Big Brother.
#1.7 Dakkaroth on 20 Aug 2008 - 20:16
Funny how we're supposed to have control of our government, yet the government seems to be the one controlling us...

By the way, where are the tin foil hats? As I've seen on the forums before, anyone who believes that the government is taking advantage of us, removing our rights, or simply stepping in for more control is laughed at. Oh, but that's just some science fiction mumbo jumbo, right? Oh wait...

@ n_K: Why leave? I mean, you can't run from a problem like this. How long before the next country is doing it?
#1.8 TRC on 20 Aug 2008 - 20:48
(thealexweb said @ #1)
I know many will hate this but if it's any consolation it should help stop terrorism.


Yes, because they always make their plans over the phone.
#1.9 toadeater on 20 Aug 2008 - 20:56
(thealexweb said @ #1)
I know many will hate this but if it's any consolation it should help stop terrorism.


If you want to stop terrorism, tell the UK government to stop using terrorist oil.

Middle Eastern oil = terrorism.
#1.10 Chicane-UK on 20 Aug 2008 - 21:18
it should help stop terrorism


What terrorism? We've had one bus bomb go off and that was through home grown terrorism. Our liberties are slowly eroded thanks to this seemingly invisible terrorist threat - the government needs to start being a bit more transparent with us.
#1.11 n_K on 21 Aug 2008 - 00:39
(Dakkaroth said @ #1.7)
@ n_K: Why leave? I mean, you can't run from a problem like this. How long before the next country is doing it?

Lol true, but I hate labour entirely, they are conservative scum and don't give a crap WHAT the people think. Oh and browns a bloody hypocrite, his website is illegal in that its entirely copyright theft yet he wants everyone that breaks the copyright law to be punished so badly, hope he gets sued loads and put in prison for it
(7 replies) #2 nmesisca on 20 Aug 2008 - 14:43


Last edited by shockz on 20 Aug 2008 - 17:13
#2.1 thealexweb on 20 Aug 2008 - 14:44
I'm not an idiot thank you very much and I live in the UK and since your in Ireland my opinion matters more on this news story because I live in where this will take place.
#2.2 nmesisca on 20 Aug 2008 - 15:05
(thealexweb said @ #2.1)
I'm not an idiot thank you very much and I live in the UK and since your in Ireland my opinion matters more on this news story because I live in where this will take place.



you say you're not an idiot and you still are happy about this? riiiiight.
are you going to be happy when your goverment will "lose" your phone number, credit card and DNA string as well?
#2.3 thealexweb on 20 Aug 2008 - 15:14
(nmesisca said @ #2.2)
(thealexweb said @ #2.1)
I'm not an idiot thank you very much and I live in the UK and since your in Ireland my opinion matters more on this news story because I live in where this will take place.



you say you're not an idiot and you still are happy about this? riiiiight.
are you going to be happy when your goverment will "lose" your phone number, credit card and DNA string as well?


I never said I'm completely happy with it or come to think of it I never said anything like I'm happy about it, I just meant I'm not completely against it.
#2.4 Ricky Smith on 20 Aug 2008 - 17:15
You must be from Ireland your first comment could only come from someone who's drank too much and can't think straight. Oh how stereotypes never cease to amaze me. Cause we all know everyone from Ireland is drunk right?

You realize that there's a good amount of Americans who don't support this kind of stuff and don't say everything is because of terrorism. Our government says everything is for terrorism not the people.
#2.5 39 Thieves on 20 Aug 2008 - 19:15
I thought in the UK, Irish were the terrorists..?
#2.6 nmesisca on 20 Aug 2008 - 19:16
(Ricky Smith said @ #2.4)
You must be from Ireland your first comment could only come from someone who's drank too much and can't think straight. Oh how stereotypes never cease to amaze me. Cause we all know everyone from Ireland is drunk right?

You realize that there's a good amount of Americans who don't support this kind of stuff and don't say everything is because of terrorism. Our government says everything is for terrorism not the people.



I am in Ireland.
I am not Irish.
And I do NOT drink. At all.
#2.7 Ricky Smith on 20 Aug 2008 - 19:52
(nmesisca said @ #2.6)
(Ricky Smith said @ #2.4)
You must be from Ireland your first comment could only come from someone who's drank too much and can't think straight. Oh how stereotypes never cease to amaze me. Cause we all know everyone from Ireland is drunk right?

You realize that there's a good amount of Americans who don't support this kind of stuff and don't say everything is because of terrorism. Our government says everything is for terrorism not the people.



I am in Ireland.
I am not Irish.
And I do NOT drink. At all.


Yes well I live in America, I was born and raised here. I'm Irish and English in decent, and guess what? I don't think everything is to prevent terrorism. So how about we don't generalize whole groups?
#3 Mike on 20 Aug 2008 - 14:44
main problem with this is the government can't keep anything safe or secure. you name it, our government has probably lost it, laptops, cds, prisoners all lost at some point
(1 reply) #4 +azcodemonkey on 20 Aug 2008 - 14:47
EPIC FAIL

Why not dispense with all the other freedoms while we're at it? It will certainly be easier to spot terrorists because they'll be the ones speaking out against the government. We'll just throw them in jail to ensure the domestic tranquility. Can't have people going on about invasive government. We're doing it to keep you safe. /sarcasm

I'm an American, nmesisca. So does that make me a complete idiot. I hate that European sense of superiority. It's just as much bull**** as the American sense of superiority many exude.
#4.1 nmesisca on 20 Aug 2008 - 15:10
actually, it wasnt meant to show a sense of superiority at all.
I just cant still come to terms with the fact that you confirmed your president for a second mandate.
And yeah, I am a bit unfair but I do think most responsibilities for where we all are at the moment are with the USA and the usual war to terror.
Stragely enough i dont recall ever being in such a pain to travel and go around in the world prior to the war on terror.
#5 ziadoz on 20 Aug 2008 - 14:55
This is just another invasion of privacy by a government determined to strip of us any basic freedoms and to sell our data on to the highest bidder (or give it away free on cd). This kind of unnecessary abuse of technology (and power) is just one of a million others reasons why Labour will be gone come the next general election. With their IT record it'll never be finished by then anyway.
#6 andy2004 on 20 Aug 2008 - 14:57
with the governments IT record this will be EPIC FAIL ! seriously how can we trust a government with this when so much data has been lost through incompetence ? give me a friggin break
#7 +kraized on 20 Aug 2008 - 15:05
Store all communication in one location. BAD TIMES!!!

Guess they've never seen Die Hard 4.0.
#8 Insolent1 on 20 Aug 2008 - 15:09
This is gonna be a massive waste of money that won't work & will be unsecure. The sheer amount of spam that they are going to have to go through is unbeliveable & probably impossible to do with current technology and all for stopping the elusive terrorist stuff. I wouldn't mind but the "war on terror" is just a excuse for gov's to improve their snooping on citizens & collecting more revenue to spend on crap like this so they can keep "their" pals(usual gov outsource companies) in wads of cash. No wonder they are tryin to let BT away with Phorm when all they want is a piece of the same cake. The continued errosion of civil liberties in the UK(and the speed nulab comes up with these BS ideas) is scary & the way they are tryin to slip this through under the guise of not wanting to waste parliments time debating it is even more scary.
Hopefully the sheer amount of money been wasted on this will create enough media hype to stop it but then most of media works for/is in the same group that controls the gov......theres a knock at me door :s
#9 TRC on 20 Aug 2008 - 15:10
"He thought of the telescreen with its never-sleeping ear. They could spy on you night and day, but if you kept your head you could still outwit them. With all their cleverness they had never mastered the secret of finding out what another human being was thinking."
(3 replies) #10 NinjaGinger on 20 Aug 2008 - 15:10
1984 has arrived. If proof was needed this is it.
#10.1 Insolent1 on 20 Aug 2008 - 15:15
(NinjaGinger said @ #10)
1984 has arrived.


Its been here for awhile, 14 million cameras already so it won't be long till we all have 1 each & of course we will have to pay for it, pay to run it & pay to have someone or something watch it. Thank feck I don't live in the UK but these c***s will give other gov's ideas about how to milk & police the cash cow that is the modern democratic citizen/consumer/slave.
#10.2 thealexweb on 20 Aug 2008 - 15:19
(Insolent1 said @ #10.1)
(NinjaGinger said @ #10)
1984 has arrived.


Its been here for awhile, 14 million cameras already so it won't be long till we all have 1 each & of course we will have to pay for it, pay to run it & pay to have someone or something watch it. Thank feck I don't live in the UK but these c***s will give other gov's ideas about how to milk & police the cash cow that is the modern democratic citizen/consumer/slave.


Oi there we go some one has to start calling other people, I'd like it if you didn't call my country thanks.
#10.3 Insolent1 on 20 Aug 2008 - 16:13
(thealexweb said @ #10.2)
(Insolent1 said @ #10.1)
(NinjaGinger said @ #10)
1984 has arrived.


Its been here for awhile, 14 million cameras already so it won't be long till we all have 1 each & of course we will have to pay for it, pay to run it & pay to have someone or something watch it. Thank feck I don't live in the UK but these c***s will give other gov's ideas about how to milk & police the cash cow that is the modern democratic citizen/consumer/slave.


Oi there we go some one has to start calling other people, I'd like it if you didn't call my country thanks.


WTF is that supposed to mean I have not slagged off the UK or any other country for that matter in my 2 comments. I also have a vested interest in what happens in the UK as I have many relations there, the UK still controls part of my country & we are also both part of the EU(which looks like it might be the only chance to save you from your countries current & probably future goverment).
Your apathetic comment at the start of the comments section pretty much sums up the problem with modern democracies. On a lighter & overplayed note I would like to take the time to welcome your Nu all seeing, all knowing, all tracking, all controlling overlords.
#11 Glassed Silver on 20 Aug 2008 - 15:23
Shhht: listen up!
Latest terrorism practice is making the countries so affraid that they practically rip themselves apart by giving up their highest principles!
Such governemental actions rather make terrorists happy than stop their actions.
It's totally ridiculous that terrorists would still use such means of information exchange. many things happen on a local base anyways, too.
You don't need contact to your taliban friends in some far away countries to know "what to do" and "when".
People should immediately tell their governements to stop this BC ASAP and return to not eating ourselves up.
Terrorism starts right here, giving up our own principles for the sake of "security", which is a null point as I pointed out.

Glassed Silver:mac
#12 este on 20 Aug 2008 - 15:26
yeah how the hell are they going to secure this.. if the wrong person gains access....
(3 replies) #13 vetneufuse on 20 Aug 2008 - 15:45
*waits for the only in the Land of the not-free USA comments* oh wait no? oh right this is about the UK
#13.1 TRC on 20 Aug 2008 - 15:58
Give us time, we're working on it.
#13.2 vetneufuse on 20 Aug 2008 - 16:48
(TRC said @ #13.1)
Give us time, we're working on it.


Can't be "only" when there is more then one though
#13.3 TRC on 20 Aug 2008 - 20:50
Ah yes, that's true.
#14 jwjw1 on 20 Aug 2008 - 16:01
its Bond.....James Bond
#15 Tai on 20 Aug 2008 - 16:03
This seems to be more about controlling the UK than controlling crime.

Think of it, emails or telephone calls from journalists to contacts, clients to lawyers, patients to doctors, anything which could or should be thought of as privileged could be read under the proposed system, and will be read under the proposed system - by anyone who can gain access to the database.

Not so long ago we were told the hordes of CCTV cameras (must be upwards of 6million now in the UK) would stop crime but now they are used to fine people whose dogs are caught fouling under the wrong tree or spy on garbage bins which may not be closed properly. Have these CCTV cameras stopped crime ? maybe a few, but with record handgun deaths, record levels of white collar fraud and politicians on the take nearly everywhere .. they don't seem to have stopped much crime ...

Remember folks, which party the current UK government are .. Labour .. yes that's right .. Labour .. famous years ago for being in with the socialists & communists east side .. who along with their organisations such as the Stasi kept such databases on their population and held them almost in terror .. neighbour telling on neighbour, even kids ratting out their own parents .. so, despite it being 'New" Labour .. the old habits seem to die hard ?
(4 replies) #16 ramesees on 20 Aug 2008 - 16:04
When are the people going to realise this is complete and utter bull**** ?

Terrorism is a scare tactic used by governments to utterly control its population by keeping them living in fear, and having them hand over their freedoms all in the name of "security".

Governments around the world who are dreaming these proposals up must be sitting having a good laugh at our expense, knowing full well that enough people dont care enough and are just docile enough to think "awww its the goverment saying we need protection. They obviously know better than us, so lets allow them to ride roughshod over us and every facet of our lives. As long as we can watch Eastenders, Big Brother, and read about vacuous celebrities then everything will be allright."

For f**ks sake everyone ... the time has long past for the people to speak up and do something, yet all the while the government have been putting measures in place to ensure that if an uprising did occur, those protesting etc.. would be either arrested or shot on site (As an example .. investigate how close to Westminster / Houses of Parliament you can get to stage a protest).

**** weather, **** government, sheep like people who just accept everything they are spoon fed by the television / newspapers / magazines. Is it any wonder Britain is a joke (and no 16 golds in the Olympics doesnt change my opinion - its a 2 week event that pales in comparison to the real world that the rest of us have to live in day by day) and needs to be cleaned up on all fronts - Education, Crime, Housing, Equal rights ...
#16.1 thealexweb on 20 Aug 2008 - 16:08
I hate to say it but it sounds like you've really lost it.
#16.2 Nose Nuggets on 20 Aug 2008 - 16:31
(thealexweb said @ #16.1)
I hate to say it but it sounds like you've really lost it.


This is not the first time this has happened. go read some Joseph Goebbels.
#16.3 +ckempo on 20 Aug 2008 - 17:38
(ramesees said @ #16)
Terrorism is a scare tactic used by governments to utterly control its population by keeping them living in fear, and having them hand over their freedoms all in the name of "security".


Absolutely, completely totally and utterly bang on.

What a joke.
#16.4 +zer0day on 20 Aug 2008 - 21:39
Exactly, this reeks of Big Brother law by stealth. Heck, after 9/11, the Patriot Act was dropped on to Congress, but the law had been drafted up well before, they just needed an excuse to implement it.

I've completely lost trust with this Govt. who thinks taking away privacy will stop terrorists. If there's a will, there's a way.
#17 nmesisca on 20 Aug 2008 - 16:12
he may have lost it but i feel the same, and we are not the only 2 people feeling this way.
(1 reply) #18 exotoxic on 20 Aug 2008 - 16:30
This will certainly cut crime like pircay and peadophiles in the short term until some new method of distribution is developed. As for the general law abiding users, the government really doesnt care about our pointless little lives.
#18.1 thealexweb on 20 Aug 2008 - 16:37
Good point, they are interested in looking at most people anyway.
(2 replies) #19 notta on 20 Aug 2008 - 16:33
This world is getting out of hand. Our rights are getting violated more and more each day. When does it end? It won't be long before we're fined 200 credits for using profanity like in Demolition Man.
#19.1 hackncrap on 20 Aug 2008 - 16:54
(notta said @ #19)
This world is getting out of hand. Our rights are getting violated more and more each day. When does it end? It won't be long before we're fined 200 credits for using profanity like in Demolition Man.


just thought id point this out this guy is right and il tell you when it ends... when the 5th is recreated and succeded or when the country warsagainst the government ..which WILL happen
#19.2 TRC on 20 Aug 2008 - 20:51
(notta said @ #19)
This world is getting out of hand. Our rights are getting violated more and more each day. When does it end? It won't be long before we're fined 200 credits for using profanity like in Demolition Man.


We're already beyond that, remember the woman who got arrested at Wal-Mart for saying the F word...
#20 Insolent1 on 20 Aug 2008 - 16:38
Secure indeed since nearly half the populations data is already in the public domain

theregister.co.uk
#21 hackncrap on 20 Aug 2008 - 16:50
like one guy said up there terrorism is control caused by fear.. this system will cause that...the uk government will become the biggest terrorists known... this is a step in to communism and a leap in to terrorism... im jealous of irlend they did the right thing and got out early..

i live not for queen nore for country (espically not this rubbish one) i live and die for the freedom of my loved ones and self and england is getting in the way of my life

Last edited by hackncrap on 20 Aug 2008 - 16:56
#22 vomit on 20 Aug 2008 - 17:09
perhaps pointless spam and useless file transfers might bork it all up, especially if keywords that might be used to trigger further investigation are used completely out of their usual context, information overload.

now if i was a terrorist or a criminal would i really be using the usual insecure ways to communicate?, i think not
#23 The Dark Wanderer on 20 Aug 2008 - 17:14
Considering the British government sells our personal information to anyone who asks I wonder how much my e-mails and web browsing habits will sell for?

I think its a terrible idea which I hope for sanities sake will fail before it becomes to late.
#24 hackncrap on 20 Aug 2008 - 17:28
i propse ifthis dose happen evey one crashes the system by send the max emails they can at the same time... this is the dawn of the cyber war
#25 EduardValencia on 20 Aug 2008 - 17:31
Where is V?
#26 CaptainSlow on 20 Aug 2008 - 17:59
I encourage uk citizens against this to fill on the petition on the 10 downing street website...

http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/edatabase
(2 replies) #27 Magallanes on 20 Aug 2008 - 18:06
Sound intimidating but

IT IS NOT FEASIBLE

How much petabytes they want to store? (or Zettabyte?)

how they will be able to examine it?. We talk about *a lot* of data and can growth even bigger than Internet.

how valid and trustworthy is this information?.

And, UK lacks of pre-paid cellphone, anonymous cibercafe or free and anonymous wifi spot? Or even yet to use a public telephone box?



They are afraid of something but im not sure who or what.


Last edited by Magallanes on 20 Aug 2008 - 18:14
#27.1 +Inertia on 20 Aug 2008 - 19:19
(y)
#27.2 Ruciz on 21 Aug 2008 - 03:42
Umm, for one the space size wouldn't be incredibly large, call quality can be very poor taking up only a few kb per minute if that, most emails are reasonably short.

I am wondering how secure these files are planned to be? could they be altered? what happens to it after 2 years? could citizens be retroactively convicted of crimes from past emails longer than 2 years ago?

It just seems to be a horrendous invasion of privacy for a 3rd party to hold this private information that could be potentially breached in security. Even if its to prevent terrorism, what ordinary citizens will be terrorized through a justice system for emails and phone calls that shouldn't have put them there?
#28 Pygmy_Hippo on 20 Aug 2008 - 18:51
"He who gives up freedom for safety deserves neither." - Benjamin Franklin

Now the only question is - who the hell do we vote for next time?? All of them are a dead loss!! :s
#29 Smashing Pumpkin on 20 Aug 2008 - 19:11
Dark Knight Sonar Technology FTW
#30 sibot on 20 Aug 2008 - 20:10
Big Mother Is Watching You
#31 C_Guy on 20 Aug 2008 - 21:14
April 1 was over a few months ago. Nice try though.
#32 Chicane-UK on 20 Aug 2008 - 21:19
This is insane. We need to get Labour out.
#33 Xilo on 20 Aug 2008 - 22:10
And people say the US is bad...
#34 JasonC on 20 Aug 2008 - 22:17
This is all Biblical, and prophecy.
This is nothing for whats to come.
Before you flame me, do your research.
The EU is the revival of the roman empire.

You have nothing else to loose researching this, except more of your freedom if the government chooses.
#35 Skyfrog on 20 Aug 2008 - 22:20
On the wall outside his former residence - flat number 27B - where Orwell lived until his death in 1950, an historical plaque commemorates the anti-authoritarian author. And within 200 yards of the flat, there are 32 CCTV cameras, scanning every move. Link


I thought that was crazy enough, but recording every telephone call, email, etc? I'd expect things like that from China...but the UK?
(1 reply) #36 Jelly2003 on 21 Aug 2008 - 00:10
That's terrible news, probably the biggest invasion of privacy that you could image, all in the name of terrorism... yeah right.

Sadly these days it seems that no amount of outrage can stop politicians from doing what they want so unfortunately UK citizens should brace themselves for it.

No doubt eventually we'll see it rolled across the rest of the world once the UK perfects the technology.
#36.1 jwjw1 on 21 Aug 2008 - 00:20
once the UK perfects the technology.

gonna be a looooooooooong wait....maybe they will sue MS for help.
#37 RAID 0 on 21 Aug 2008 - 04:55
It's time to take the power back and rally around the family with a pocket full of shells.
(1 reply) #38 Geranium_Z__NL on 21 Aug 2008 - 05:16
Haha, Sweden was doing the same?
#38.1 owziee on 21 Aug 2008 - 14:50
Yup unfortunately the situation is the same here in sweden aswell...
#39 metro on 21 Aug 2008 - 05:26
The irony in this is a bit amusing to me although I am not happy that the privacy of people is being stepped on, but for the people who always talk trash about the United States... Well, it looks like they got a taste of their own medicine. It's really too bad that people can't have their privacy anymore, not just in with what will happen in the UK but also in the US. The Bush Administration has been hiding behind the excuse of protecting everyone from terrorism but they are guilty of terrorism themselves.

Things like the alert system put fear into people. The ability to wiretap without a subpoena or detain someone in custody for any amount of time they want with no trial... All of that is used to put fear into people to get what they want. It's ridiculous.
#40 funkymunky on 21 Aug 2008 - 07:14
lol, get over yourselves. Why do you think you're all so important??

Plus what do you think GCHQ does??
#41 jonnytabpni on 21 Aug 2008 - 07:28
Please digg my article on this issue:

http://digg.com/politics/UK_Government_to_...mails_and_calls

Hop