main
Report a problem

Intel's Core 2 Extreme Mobile Chips: A New Speed King

Daniel Fleshbourne   on 21 August 2008 - 12:50 · 16 comments & 7143 views

Advertisement (Why?)
How do you define "Extreme"? How about as a high-velocity, quad-core processor packed into a mobile platform? That's what Intel announced this afternoon at the Intel Developers Forum. Heretofore known as Core 2 Extreme, the cat (or chips) are now officially out of the bag.

In July, the first Core 2 Duo Extreme Mobile X9100--a Penryn dual-core CPU--to show up at our labs debuted inside Micro Express's JFL9290 laptop. The PC World Test Center is still putting that machine through its paces (you can check out our assessment of its little brother, the Micro Express JFL9226, in the meantime), but the initial numbers are impressive. It dominated our WorldBench 6 tests, notching a score of 115 and posting decent frame rates in Doom 3 (47 frames per second at 1024 by 768 resolution, with antialiasing) courtesy of a 256MB nVidia GeForce 9600M GT GPU. The real speed king, though, is the QX9300 (a Penryn Quad Core)--and it's now out the door, launching this week.

View: the full story @ PCWorld

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 16 additional comments
#1 tsupersonic on 21 Aug 2008 - 14:04
Finally, a mobile quad core processor. Hopefully we'll be seeing more of these in the future
(3 replies) #2 IceBreakerG on 21 Aug 2008 - 14:19
Nice to think about, but I'm sure battery life will suck, at least compared to the dual core variants. Still interested to see how these play out though, since my Inspiron 9300 is starting to crap out (need to replace the motherboard due to a power circuit issue, and I don't want to spend $300+ on a new board for a nearly 3yr old laptop). Still though, it'd be nice to be able to have that kind of processing power on the go.
#2.1 ec4912 on 21 Aug 2008 - 17:14
I'm with you man. My XPS Gen 2's screen has a bunch of vertical lines on it. It won't last much longer. It's $200 to replace the screen, and I see $550 17" laptop at the Dell Outlet. What to do?
#2.2 Mando on 21 Aug 2008 - 19:21
(IceBreakerG said @ #2)
Nice to think about, but I'm sure battery life will suck, at least compared to the dual core variants. Still interested to see how these play out though, since my Inspiron 9300 is starting to crap out (need to replace the motherboard due to a power circuit issue, and I don't want to spend $300+ on a new board for a nearly 3yr old laptop). Still though, it'd be nice to be able to have that kind of processing power on the go.


im not so sure bud, my q6600 uses no more power than my old p4D 3.4ghz cpu did @800fsb. So id imagine comparable power requirements as the mobile core 2 duos.

to ec4912 if its out of warranty check your copper heatpipe cooler, had a M-1330 mobo swapped today at work, under the heatsink ontop of the nvidia gpu chip was a german shift key between gpu and heatpipe!

guy still swapped the motherboard anyway
#2.3 Peas on 22 Aug 2008 - 02:54
(Mando said @ #2.2)
im not so sure bud, my q6600 uses no more power than my old p4D 3.4ghz cpu did @800fsb. So id imagine comparable power requirements as the mobile core 2 duos.

CPUs are not comparable between generations. The Pentium4 was a terrible architecture in terms of power efficiency. It was designed for one thing only: high clock speed. Its hyperpipeline wastes tons of processing time on branch mispredictions, a common occurrence in x86 code. The Core(1,2) architectures are much more power efficient, derived from the Pentium3 instead of the P4. No surprise that a dual-core Core chip consumes about as much as a single-core P4 if you factor in power efficiency differences. That said, a quad-core Core chip will most certainly suck down more power than a dual-core Core chip (same generation). The reduced transistor size will offer some power savings but not enough to compensate for twice the number of transistors.
#3 Skynetfuture on 21 Aug 2008 - 14:28
i think it will sell for 1300$

extream braging rights haha
(4 replies) #4 RPDL on 21 Aug 2008 - 14:42
So you need an ultra-expensive mobile CPU to be able to play an old game at a below-average resolution with a decent frame rate? I think what mobile gamers really need is better graphics solution.
#4.1 tsupersonic on 21 Aug 2008 - 15:21
If you have big bucks, you can get SLI cards in laptops. I know some laptops that come with 8800M GTX's in SLI. There's also nothing wrong with the mobile line of Core 2, they are very powerful. Granted, gaming laptops ruin the battery life, but they are mobile, if you have an AC adapter at all times.
#4.2 Lasker on 21 Aug 2008 - 19:26
Best laptop for the money: MacBook Pro
#4.3 portauthority on 21 Aug 2008 - 21:44
BAAHAHA!!!

Yeah, you keep thinking that...
#4.4 RealFduch on 21 Aug 2008 - 22:10
(Lasker said @ #4.2)
Best laptop for the money: MacBook Pro

Is it Tablet PC?
Does it have Core 2 Duo dual-core Penryn T8300 processr? 3 Gb RAM? 250 Gb HDD? Radeon HD 2300 video card? Normal weight. Long battery work time....
Does it have the cost of $1099? Like Gateway C-142XL.
#5 booboo on 21 Aug 2008 - 21:07
Hopefully alienware will include it in the m15x so I can have it in my laptop for my birthday
#6 Ohwhyme on 22 Aug 2008 - 00:26
Radeon HD 2300 is terrible anyways..
(2 replies) #7 Airlink on 22 Aug 2008 - 06:01
Intel can introduce all the laptop chips they want, and that's fine: there's obviously a market for that. Just don't think your laptop hardware is going to out-horsepower an equally hardcore desktop gaming rig of the same generation. It doesn't work that way.

When you get yourself a liquid-cooled quad-SLI dual-CPU/8-core hyper threaded laptop that can run Crysis at a constant 60 FPS, then you can claim that your laptop is "extreme".
#7.1 RAID 0 on 22 Aug 2008 - 08:20
+1
#7.2 ApuBo on 22 Aug 2008 - 11:02
+2

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)