main
Report a problem

E-Mail Addiction: Five Signs You Need Help

Daniel Fleshbourne   on 11 September 2008 - 10:37 · 21 comments & 8611 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Quick: When's the last time you checked your e-mail? If you're like most Americans, the answer is likely within the last 15 minutes -- even if you're not at work. And if you carry a PDA in your pocket, your problem is probably far worse. Some doctors estimate more than 11 million people have e-mail habits that interfere with their lives. Are you one of them?

Forming a deep relationship with your inbox can eat away at your real-life relationships -- you know, the ones with your friends, kids, or significant other...those people you used to converse with face-to-face.

View: The full story @ PCWorld

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 21 additional comments
(4 replies) #1 vetneufuse on 11 Sep 2008 - 11:43
People still use e-mail?... jk.. the only place I seem to get e-mail from anymore is work or advertisments for places like newegg, etc.... friends all seem to use more direct contact methods like calls and text messages
#1.1 vetmarkjensen on 11 Sep 2008 - 13:06
Email is the primary method that our schools communicate with parents. The teacher is able to type up something, include an attachment and send it to all parents. Can't really effectively do that with phone calls or texting. Maybe in IMs (providing you have ability for offline messaging, and just link to a document you put on a web server). But email is really best-suited for this type of communication.
#1.2 vetneufuse on 11 Sep 2008 - 13:26
(markjensen said @ #1.1)
Email is the primary method that our schools communicate with parents. The teacher is able to type up something, include an attachment and send it to all parents. Can't really effectively do that with phone calls or texting. Maybe in IMs (providing you have ability for offline messaging, and just link to a document you put on a web server). But email is really best-suited for this type of communication.


Around here that has been banned in schools, because they felt it "left out the lower income families"....
#1.3 vetmarkjensen on 11 Sep 2008 - 15:31
(neufuse said @ #1.2)
Around here that has been banned in schools, because they felt it "left out the lower income families"....
Wow, that's strange. Ban a system that might work efficiently for 95% of the people. Over at our schools, email is used for all that give their email to the teacher/school. For those who do not have email, or who choose not to receive emails, phones are an option. But the school doesn't eliminate email and force everyone to use a phone system because of a few.

I guess what I am saying is that common sense should make it apparent that the two can co-exist. But when does a government-run institution use common sense, right?
#1.4 Shadrack on 11 Sep 2008 - 15:54
(neufuse said @ #1.2)
(markjensen said @ #1.1)
Email is the primary method that our schools communicate with parents. The teacher is able to type up something, include an attachment and send it to all parents. Can't really effectively do that with phone calls or texting. Maybe in IMs (providing you have ability for offline messaging, and just link to a document you put on a web server). But email is really best-suited for this type of communication.


Around here that has been banned in schools, because they felt it "left out the lower income families"....


Not that I know exactly. But I'm pretty sure it would be the exact same with the school districts around where I live. They are really sensitive to the lower income families.
#2 theyarecomingforyou on 11 Sep 2008 - 14:31
Well, I have Outlook constantly open and have an IMAP email account. I received an email just seconds before reading this article; I don't know if that really counts as I read my mail as it comes in.
(1 reply) #3 C_Guy on 11 Sep 2008 - 14:35
Am I really reading these words? Someone took the time to write an article about e-Mail addiction? Wow, I sure hope there wasn't any compensation involved. If there were it should be for the reader.

MySpace (shudder), Facebook, IM... these are what people check 20 times an hour now, not e-Mail.

As usual, PCWorld has difficulty keeping up with the times.
#3.1 excalpius on 12 Sep 2008 - 00:30
Articles like this keep failure-in-life academics with grant money...ahem.

It's like those "that devil's music rock and roll must go!" articles forty years ago.

The future is change. Always.
(1 reply) #4 Shadrack on 11 Sep 2008 - 15:42
99.9% of my email is work related and if I don't check it every 15 mins than I will be in trouble....
#4.1 Magallanes on 11 Sep 2008 - 17:43
Me too.

So it is not a "i want" but "i must".

#5 Skyfrog on 11 Sep 2008 - 16:12
I think I checked mine about a month ago.
(2 replies) #6 BigBoy on 11 Sep 2008 - 16:31
Don't worry. Your helpful big pharma company is I am sure working on a pill that will help with this!

Kidding. But just a little.
#6.1 / -Razorfold on 11 Sep 2008 - 21:01
(BigBoy said @ #6)
Don't worry. Your helpful big pharma company is I am sure working on a pill that will help with this!

Kidding. But just a little.


The placebo effect =P
#6.2 Xeta on 16 Sep 2008 - 18:15
And then doctors can start labeling you with a syndrome! Think of it: "Electonic Communication Dependency Syndrome." Sounds like they should be able to charge a pretty penny for the magic pill that "fixes" that "problem."
#7 jordanthegreat on 11 Sep 2008 - 18:48
I just checked mine before reading this. But I don't go out of my way to check it. I only check it when I am already at the computer with my MSN signed in so it informs me if I have mail. This still results in me checking my mail every 20 minutes or so since I am at my computer all day at work. Though, I must point out that I do not use it for keeping in contact with personal friends. There are better ways to do that. Instead I use email for business purposes and notifications of things like a reply to a thread I was watching.

BTW, how is this news?
#8 _dandy_ on 11 Sep 2008 - 20:40
Do people actually stop what they're doing to check their email on a regular basis?

My mail client (Outlook) checks my email on my behalf every half hour. I might glance at it if it reports I have something; if the sender/subject line leave me no reason to believe it needs immediate attention, I'll get back to what I was doing and it'll sit there until I can take the time to respond as appropriate.

But if someone stops what they're doing to proactively hit a refresh button, that's...what's the word I'm looking for...pathetic?
#9 Nexx295 on 11 Sep 2008 - 22:42
So in other words, many people should quit their jobs.

I have Outlook almost always running in the background checking for emails every 5 minutes and my mobile phone is checking for emails every 30 minutes. Receiving all emails instantly on my mobile phone, laptop and desktop at the same time would be even better. I may be rated as an email junkie, but I would probably check my personal emails only once a day if I wouldn't have a company to run.
#10 excalpius on 12 Sep 2008 - 00:31
I'm in touch with more people on a daily basis than my parents have ever met in their entire lives. I don't any problem in this at all.
(1 reply) #11 +Troll on 12 Sep 2008 - 01:14
I've got work email + 2 gmail accounts + google talk + facebook on my BB and check it whenever there is a ding

So yes, I'm addicted, but those claiming that IM use is so much more prevalent than email probably haven't worked in the corporate world.
#11.1 Airlink on 12 Sep 2008 - 04:32
They have a pill for that now. I's called an iPhone. You set it to vibrate on new emails, swallow it, and then every time you get an e-mail your lower intestine hurts like hell. In only a few hours you'll wish you never heard of e-mail.
#12 2Cold Scorpio on 12 Sep 2008 - 16:42
Isn't this list about 10 years old now?

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)