main
Report a problem

For Microsoft shops, Silverlight 2.0 trumps Flash

Daniel Fleshbourne   on 01 October 2008 - 09:33 · 14 comments & 4842 views

Advertisement (Why?)
With the imminent release of Silverlight 2.0, developers and Web designers, particularly those already working in Microsoft IT environments, will have the first viable alternative technology to Adobe Flash for building rich Internet applications, analysts and developers said. Microsoft first released Silverlight, a cross-browser runtime for Web-based multimedia and 3D applications, about a year ago. However, the development of the 1.0 version, like many new Microsoft products, was rushed, and not even close to the vision the company had for the product.

"[Silverlight] 1.0 was a stop-gap measure -- they were late to market and wanted to get something out there early after Adobe had done an amazing success [with Flash]," said Al Hilwa, an application development software program director for research firm IDC. But Silverlight 2.0 "is the real deal -- they've put out architecturally what they've always wanted to do," he said.

View: The full story @ InfoWorld

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 14 additional comments
(5 replies) #1 Cpugeni Ω on 01 Oct 2008 - 10:20
I think Silverlight 1.0 was more a case of just get something out there to see what the initial response would be.

I'm looking forward to the release of Silverlight 2.0, I believe it will be another turning point for the web and open new doors and possibilities - some of the silverlight demos are truly amazing. One of them being the Hard Rock Memorabilia website which utilises the Deep Zoom technology.

Other demos can be seen on the Silverlight website.
#1.1 Pierreken on 01 Oct 2008 - 10:58
(Cpugeni Ω said @ #1)
I think Silverlight 1.0 was more a case of just get something out there to see what the initial response would be.

I'm looking forward to the release of Silverlight 2.0, I believe it will be another turning point for the web and open new doors and possibilities - some of the silverlight demos are truly amazing. One of them being the Hard Rock Memorabilia website which utilises the Deep Zoom technology.

Other demos can be seen on the Silverlight website.


Have you looked at the CPU usage when looking through that Hard Rock website? Idle usage looks ok but once you start moving around I'm getting CPU usage up to 90%.
#1.2 Antaris on 01 Oct 2008 - 11:20
(Pierreken said @ #1.1)
(Cpugeni Ω said @ #1)
I think Silverlight 1.0 was more a case of just get something out there to see what the initial response would be.

I'm looking forward to the release of Silverlight 2.0, I believe it will be another turning point for the web and open new doors and possibilities - some of the silverlight demos are truly amazing. One of them being the Hard Rock Memorabilia website which utilises the Deep Zoom technology.

Other demos can be seen on the Silverlight website.


Have you looked at the CPU usage when looking through that Hard Rock website? Idle usage looks ok but once you start moving around I'm getting CPU usage up to 90%.


90% not sure whats going on with your system, but mine peaks at 55% at most, Windows XP SP3, IE8 Beta 2.
#1.3 micheeeel on 01 Oct 2008 - 11:34
(Antaris said @ #1.2)
(Pierreken said @ #1.1)
(Cpugeni Ω said @ #1)
I think Silverlight 1.0 was more a case of just get something out there to see what the initial response would be.

I'm looking forward to the release of Silverlight 2.0, I believe it will be another turning point for the web and open new doors and possibilities - some of the silverlight demos are truly amazing. One of them being the Hard Rock Memorabilia website which utilises the Deep Zoom technology.

Other demos can be seen on the Silverlight website.


Have you looked at the CPU usage when looking through that Hard Rock website? Idle usage looks ok but once you start moving around I'm getting CPU usage up to 90%.


90% not sure whats going on with your system, but mine peaks at 55% at most, Windows XP SP3, IE8 Beta 2.


99% nonstop here... pretty much sucks b****
#1.4 Cpugeni Ω on 01 Oct 2008 - 15:14
(micheeeel said @ #1.3)
99% nonstop here... pretty much sucks b****


I didnt really notice but now you've pointed it out I had a look at it again and it was using around 55% CPU constantly.
I'm on Windows XP SP3 using Firefox 3.0.1. Hmmm...
#1.5 vetneufuse on 01 Oct 2008 - 15:27
(Cpugeni Ω said @ #1.4)
(micheeeel said @ #1.3)
99% nonstop here... pretty much sucks b****


I didnt really notice but now you've pointed it out I had a look at it again and it was using around 55% CPU constantly.
I'm on Windows XP SP3 using Firefox 3.0.1. Hmmm...


55%? by any chance do you have a dual core? and the one with 99% has a single core? because your CPU usage will only peak on a single threaded app at the max of one CPU so a dual core would be 50% (which most animation software uses one core, then if available part of another for timeing and calculations) which would explain the 55% on a dual core...
(1 reply) #2 nowimnothing on 01 Oct 2008 - 12:58
Just like the way I can write server-side code and windows apps code using the same languages, the fact that I can make flash-like applications in the languages i'm already comfortable with (C#, etc) is what has me so excited about Silverlight.
#2.1 Fanon on 01 Oct 2008 - 13:02
And not to mention that the development tools are superior to anything Adobe released for Flash.
(4 replies) #3 Lasker on 01 Oct 2008 - 13:22
That's the problem with Silverlight, you need to know programming in order to make a cool silverlight website, with flash 9 anyone can do animation without to know programming or even design videos in flash.
#3.1 Joshie on 01 Oct 2008 - 14:40
(Lasker said @ #3)
That's the problem with Silverlight, you need to know programming in order to make a cool silverlight website, with flash 9 anyone can do animation without to know programming or even design videos in flash.


And it's thanks to the ease of implementing flash that so many of us have flash-blockers installed and enabled.
#3.2 39 Thieves on 01 Oct 2008 - 15:01
(Joshie said @ #3.1)
(Lasker said @ #3)
That's the problem with Silverlight, you need to know programming in order to make a cool silverlight website, with flash 9 anyone can do animation without to know programming or even design videos in flash.


And it's thanks to the ease of implementing flash that so many of us have flash-blockers installed and enabled.


Exactly. It's like an that old adage; make something idiot-proof, only an idiot will use it.
#3.3 Kai Y on 01 Oct 2008 - 15:14
developers and Web designers ... will have the first viable alternative technology to Adobe Flash for building rich Internet applications ...

With flash 9 anyone can do animation without programming, but they can't build rich Internet applications without programming...
#3.4 Fanon on 01 Oct 2008 - 19:36
To my knowledge, you don't have to know programming to do animation. Microsoft has the Expression Blend application that's the equivalent to Adobe's Flash authoring application.
#4 Mathachew on 01 Oct 2008 - 17:40
I can't wait to start fiddling with this. My new job has me getting my hands into C#, so I'm excited to see what I learn

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)