main

eBay announces job cuts

Tom Warren   via BBC on 06 October 2008 - 21:47, updated 06 October 2008 - 21:51 · 11 comments & 3479 views

Advertisement (Why?)
eBay has said it is laying off 10% of its workforce, as part of a move to streamline the business.

The amount is approximately 1,000 staff and hundreds of temporary workers. It is also expected a number of "open" positions will now be closed.

The firm hopes to cut costs and strengthen the organisation and its competitiveness. EBay - which already owns online payment firm Paypal - has signed an agreement to buy Bill Me Later for $820m in cash and $125m in options.

"PayPal and Bill Me Later belong together," said eBay president and chief executive John Donahoe in a statement.

View: eBay


Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 11 additional comments
(3 replies) #1 smooth_criminal1990 on 06 Oct 2008 - 22:00
"streamline" eh..?

love the blatant management speak!
#1.1 atari800 on 06 Oct 2008 - 22:42
Hehehehe... I was expecting the ineffective management keywords of "paradigm" and "segway" to be in here myself.
#1.2 Kirkburn on 06 Oct 2008 - 23:27
(atari800 said @ #1.1)
Hehehehe... I was expecting the ineffective management keywords of "paradigm" and "segway" to be in here myself.

Segway is a brand of two wheeled vehicle. Segue is a smooth transition from one topic or section to the next.
#1.3 Shiranui on 07 Oct 2008 - 05:24
(Kirkburn said @ #1.2)
Segway is a brand of two wheeled vehicle. Segue is a smooth transition from one topic or section to the next.


Good man! I was about to berate him for that one myself.
#2 KavazovAngel on 06 Oct 2008 - 23:40
"PayPal and Bill Me Later belong together," said eBay president and chief executive John Donahoe in a statement.


OK. I'll stick with Amazon. I've used Ebay previously, but now I think Amazon is much better. Plus, they get nice pre-order stuff which you can get for a lot less money than the original release price.
#3 James Riske on 06 Oct 2008 - 23:46
Ebay has been slowly committing suicide by treating their sellers with pure contempt, I hope they crash and burn.
#4 ChrisJ1968 on 07 Oct 2008 - 01:33
Ebay bites anyway
#5 C++ on 07 Oct 2008 - 02:39
I think they could save some money by not spending stupid amounts of dollars every time they choose to acquire another company. $2 billion for Skype?! $945 million for Bill Me Later? I mean really...
(2 replies) #6 Shiranui on 07 Oct 2008 - 05:26
John Donahoe never considered streamling his salary?
#6.1 Frazell Thomas on 07 Oct 2008 - 06:30
Are you jumping up and down to take a pay cut so your company can keep another person on the job? I love how you expect him to do it, but I'm sure you're not even thinking about doing it yourself.

Before you jump up with the "but he makes $XX Million a year!" argument compare your salary to those we outsource to in India, Bangladesh, and related cheap labor markets. I'm sure they consider the middle class salary that's common to be as exuberant as we consider CEO pay.
#6.2 arsekicker on 08 Oct 2008 - 17:53
(Frazell Thomas said @ #6.1)
Are you jumping up and down to take a pay cut so your company can keep another person on the job? I love how you expect him to do it, but I'm sure you're not even thinking about doing it yourself.

Before you jump up with the "but he makes $XX Million a year!" argument compare your salary to those we outsource to in India, Bangladesh, and related cheap labor markets. I'm sure they consider the middle class salary that's common to be as exuberant as we consider CEO pay.


That's a pretty bad analogy as neither we nor John live in any of those locales, we're all here in the US. Therefore to compare our salaries to theirs without taking into account cost of living is pretty simple-minded.

Also, why should of the employees have to take a pay cut when it's not theirs, but the ceo's job to make sure the company is profitable enough to keep the employees they chose to employ.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)