microsoft
Report a problem

Would you pay $1,500 for your very own Microsoft Surface?

Slimy   via ArsTechnica on 16 October 2008 - 14:33 · 24 comments & 6811 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Microsoft has more than once hinted that it is interested in releasing the Microsoft Surface to the general public, assuming that it can cut the price down significantly enough. We haven't heard many details about what Redmond has been up to on this front, but now some intriguing ones have surfaced (pardon the pun). Microsoft recently sent out a marketing survey for a horizontal multitouch computing device codenamed Oahu (which appropriately translates to "The Gathering Place"). Oahu is likely to be consumer version of the Microsoft Surface, and Microsoft is currently estimating that such a device would set a family back $1,500.

According to the survey's description of Oahu, it really is a Microsoft Surface: more than one person can interact with it at the same time, touching icons open up programs, games, or music, fingertips are used to expand and shrink objects on the screen, an on-screen keyboard can be used to input information, it communicates wirelessly with other devices (such as digital cameras, cell phones, and MP3 players), and there is no wait time to start it up. The survey also notes that Oahu can come as a freestanding table, placed into a piece of furniture, or built into a countertop. Microsoft also makes a point to emphasize that the device is in no way portable and that the size allows four people to sit around it "comfortably."

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 24 additional comments
(4 replies) #1 Skynetfuture on 16 Oct 2008 - 15:20
nice

but it is not something of neccity like tv , refgrator , telephone ,,, etc


but cool factor tho
#1.1 excalpius on 16 Oct 2008 - 23:47
a) Please learn to spell, or b) avoid posting drunk.
#1.2 tabsolution on 18 Oct 2008 - 22:45
excalpius said,
a) Please learn to spell, or b) avoid posting drunk.

Seconded.
#1.3 RAID 0 on 19 Oct 2008 - 07:27
excalpius said,
a) Please learn to spell, or b) avoid posting drunk.


Posting drunk is fun. I'm doing it now... I kinda like it... yeah. :-P
#1.4 offroadaaron on 20 Oct 2008 - 00:45
excalpius said,
a) Please learn to spell, or b) avoid posting drunk.


wow post police over here, its a forum people can post however they want within the rules.
#2 Poolius on 16 Oct 2008 - 15:22
MS had a demonstration of a surface-like product at Remix UK last month. It was being tested in some UK households at the time of demonstrating.

The idea was that you would use it to archive your family memories; you placed photographs on the surface and it would scan them in and 'place them in a box in the attic' (on the display). You could then use gestures to open up boxes, tip them over, spilling out the contents onto the 'floor'. You could then drag them around, enlarge them etc.

What was quite nifty was the device also had a special camera mounted on the top that would make a model of 3D objects; for example the presenter scanned his daughters first pair of shoes into the machine, which created a 3D model of them inside the surface. He could rotate them, zoom in etc. The concept was that it's not just photographs of memories but the actual objects themselves that you could 'backup'.

I can't remember what they called the product though. The guy said it was more than just surface though and was a whole separate project, perhaps this is the product the article is talking about being used in the home.
(1 reply) #3 thenonhacker on 16 Oct 2008 - 15:29
I hope it will not fail like the Microsoft Origami Project
#3.1 GreyWolfSC on 16 Oct 2008 - 17:51
#4 vetmarkjensen on 16 Oct 2008 - 15:29
It seems like a cool concept. Not sure that a display table is the optimal way to view "family memories", as the viewing angle is kind of funky, and the far end of the table is much less accessible (unless you are Mr. Fantastic), so the best workspace would be the little area right in front of you.

It is a good form for scanning though. Lay your picture down on the flat surface at the scanning location. Then.. umm... i guess close your eyes as the bright light illuminates the image.
#5 +Obi Wong on 16 Oct 2008 - 15:42
i remember watching videos of this
the way it communicates with other devices is with some kind of optical tag right?
so wouldn't there need to be a lot of these devices out there for "the average family" to even make use of the table?
#6 ghostwind on 16 Oct 2008 - 15:52
We have an MS surface computer at work right now. It is a great concept, but it is still to early in development to be deployed to the general public. I think at the moment, there are only a couple of applications that come with it that take advantage the surface computing
#7 shakey_snake on 16 Oct 2008 - 15:59
1,500 not that bad.
I've seen dining room tables that cost that much.


So if you're getting a computer and a table in one, that's pretty much a two-for-one!
#8 +acxz on 16 Oct 2008 - 16:06
In response to the headline: $1,500 is a lot of money for something I have absolutely no use for yet, so no.
#9 chicken-royal on 16 Oct 2008 - 16:34
Had a play on one of these in New York whilst we waited to leave the hotel. Really fun, but $1,500 is a bit steep, especially with the US$ so weak against the £. No at that price, but yes at a lower price.
#10 SilverBulletUK on 16 Oct 2008 - 16:51
I agree, they are very nice and just as cool; however I'd be more than a little upset if (like Windows Home Server fame) they sold and forgot it.

SilverB.
#11 guruparan on 16 Oct 2008 - 18:25
I would like to use if for sure at home..(and does it support all bluetooth enabled device (once paired?) with the surface?
#12 +shinji257 on 16 Oct 2008 - 20:12
I'd consider it but it would probably need to be more heavily developed first. It will have to mature more then I will reconsider.
#13 clotz2000 on 16 Oct 2008 - 22:34
Nah, I don't need to Dazzle anyone with the touchy picture albums at the moment, but when the need arises I guess I may look into it...
#14 Raa on 16 Oct 2008 - 22:51
**** yes, i'd pay 3 grand for it.....

..... in AUD that is
#15 Skwerl on 17 Oct 2008 - 17:22
$1,500 for one of those things? Tha seems awfully unlikely. If I understand, this would require a 30" monitor, a PC, the hardware for "multiple cameras" and the ir light source, a Vista/ Windows 7 license, and the table part. That sounds more like $3,000 if Microsoft or its vendors expect to make any profit. I don't think we'll be seeing this for $1,500 anytime soon.
#16 Jbenisek on 17 Oct 2008 - 19:04
Yes but it needs good 3D and interactive programs and interfaces, I also would pay that for a 60"+/- HDTV for the wall. I often stand in front of my big screen and wish I could just select the option I need or show to watch and not have to deal with the remote. At this point I'm not going to buy a Zune until it's touch screen. I'm not going to buy another LCD or HDTV until they are touch screen.

This is what Microsoft should be focused on. Great job now make good software to run it.
#17 morphen on 18 Oct 2008 - 02:00
I would gladly pay 1500$ for a interactive livingroomtable
#18 iampedro on 20 Oct 2008 - 12:22
I would pay that if couple of options...

1. If you spilled something or dropped something it wouldn't break it.
2. It was tested that it isn't harmful to your health
3. Updates are free and you had a great warranty with it.
#19 darkz on 22 Oct 2008 - 00:16
what could i possibly do on it, can't imagine

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)