hardware
Report a problem

Intel teams with Oprah Winfrey for ad campaign

Sagittarius   on 24 October 2008 - 20:07 · 29 comments & 6328 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Intel and Oprah Winfrey. You don't hear these two words often in the same sentence, but perhaps you may want to get used it, at least for this year. Intel announced today that for the 2008-2009 season, it will be partnering up with the popular talk show host for an ad campaign emphasizing the power of its processors as well as the company's investment in education. The partnership seems to have been in the works for a while, as tomorrow's O You! event in San Francisco, California, will be made live at www.oyouonline.com, powered, of course, by Intel Centrino 2 processors.

O You! is an annual self-help event hosted by the Oprah Magazine where the publication's lead specialists come in and talk to those attending. Intel, obviously attracted by the mass following of Ms. Winfrey's media network, is hoping to tap into her viewers. Although Oprah Winfrey watchers are probably not in Intel's target demographic, the company presumably wants to capitalize on increased name recognition afforded by the campaign. Whether this turns out to be a productive measure, however, remains to be seen.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 29 additional comments
(2 replies) #1 tiagosilva29 on 24 Oct 2008 - 20:40
#1.1 Tantawi on 25 Oct 2008 - 04:35
LOL!!!
#1.2 apotsi on 25 Oct 2008 - 11:59
ha ha ha... nice pic.... and comment .
#2 afusion on 24 Oct 2008 - 22:34
OMG this is just wrong.. I wish they picked Jerry Seinfeld instead.. "What's the deal w/ AMD processors?" lol
#3 quirkatron on 25 Oct 2008 - 02:14
this is terrible, Oprah is so wrong for this
#4 Skynetfuture on 25 Oct 2008 - 13:06
why the hell ??
(2 replies) #5 Krome on 25 Oct 2008 - 15:07
Jerry Seinfeld isn't funny. Oprah isn't the right idol for techno geeks! WTF is going on with this world?!?!?!?!

This article contains a few errors or typo if you want to call it. Proof-read before publish.

Last edited by Krome on 25 Oct 2008 - 15:16
#5.1 +Dakkaroth on 25 Oct 2008 - 17:18
I think Intel is trying to get the women population who follow Oprah religiously. I can see it now...

"Oprah only uses Intel! I will only use Intel! Honey, buy me a computer with an Intel processor thingy!!"
#5.2 Krome on 25 Oct 2008 - 18:57
Dakkaroth said,
I think Intel is trying to get the women population who follow Oprah religiously. I can see it now...

"Oprah only uses Intel! I will only use Intel! Honey, buy me a computer with an Intel processor thingy!!"

LOL "processor thingy"
#6 vetneufuse on 25 Oct 2008 - 17:06
what? not Jessica Alba (sp?)? comon.... pick someone geeks would go omg intel over
#7 TRC on 25 Oct 2008 - 19:32
Oprah is a hardcore geek. She codes in assembly language and builds her own PCs. The components she uses are also hand built in her garage. I can understand why Intel picked her, she'll really pull in the tech crowd.

Wait...
#8 Impact on 25 Oct 2008 - 20:10
Oprah is completely the wrong person for this.
#9 afusion on 25 Oct 2008 - 20:36
Oprah's too fat for this.

Jessica Alba will be advertising for AMD Deneb Phenom FX processors "oh yeah!"
(1 reply) #10 RangerLG on 25 Oct 2008 - 23:07
Next up, Martha Stewart for AMD.
#10.1 Krome on 26 Oct 2008 - 04:50
RangerLG said,
Next up, Martha Stewart for AMD.

lol... I can't wait for her cooking recipe for 64bit chicken stew
(3 replies) #11 Turbonium on 26 Oct 2008 - 00:10
Everyone saying Oprah is the "wrong" pick...

Do you know more than the market research depts. that Intel hired? You know... the ones they invest millions of dollars into? The ones that actually come out with meaningful statistical data on their target market and how best to reach them for a given product or product cycle?

As for Intel's primary market: it isn't you. It's your average Jo Blo or soccer mom. While you already know where to get the best bang for the buck, or the best chip... they don't. Thus, they need to be reached the best way possible with directed marketing campaigns in order to take advantage. It just so happens that Oprah is a good way to reach them, the determination of which is, again, the result of a lot of market research.

Short version: millions of average Americans don't read tech reviews, listen to Microsoft keynote speeches, or even watch Jerry Seinfeld. They watch Oprah. The p value said so.
#11.1 afusion on 26 Oct 2008 - 00:41
Turbonium said,
Everyone saying Oprah is the "wrong" pick...

Do you know more than the market research depts. that Intel hired? You know... the ones they invest millions of dollars into? The ones that actually come out with meaningful statistical data on their target market and how best to reach them for a given product or product cycle?

As for Intel's primary market: it isn't you. It's your average Jo Blo or soccer mom. While you already know where to get the best bang for the buck, or the best chip... they don't. Thus, they need to be reached the best way possible with directed marketing campaigns in order to take advantage. It just so happens that Oprah is a good way to reach them, the determination of which is, again, the result of a lot of market research.

Short version: millions of average Americans don't read tech reviews, listen to Microsoft keynote speeches, or even watch Jerry Seinfeld. They watch Oprah. The p value said so.


Some of us knew this from the start but we too have preferences..
#11.2 warwagon on 26 Oct 2008 - 16:35
Well Said Turbonium. I agree 100%
#11.3 +Dakkaroth on 26 Oct 2008 - 17:04
That's exactly the point I was trying to get across earlier. Well said.
(1 reply) #12 Gabe3 on 26 Oct 2008 - 04:20
Oprah ? what? with that logic, they should use Dr. Phil instead.
#12.1 afusion on 26 Oct 2008 - 05:28
Gabe3 said,
Oprah ? what? with that logic, they should use Dr. Phil instead.

rofl Dr. Phil looks look Video Professor "Try my product.."
#13 warwagon on 26 Oct 2008 - 05:35
They are trying to relate the regular house holds. All the women watch Oprah.
#14 cork1958 on 26 Oct 2008 - 09:54
Personally,
When companies start buying big name people to advertise with, it usually turns me off from them and/or that. Usually means that is simply what they're trying to do, buy people with other people influencing them and frankly, Oprah is a very highly over rated act!

I'm not so brain dead like so many others I can make my own decisions without being influenced by some person who was only paid to endorse the product to begin with.
#15 Apple-a-Day on 26 Oct 2008 - 19:01
How much are they paying the "Mighty O" for this?
Will they be developing a dual or quad core O? (God help us if so)
Why not Judge Judy? " Don't you dare use AMD thought's in my courtroom!!! Judgement for Intel"
#16 Airlink on 26 Oct 2008 - 20:41
Why not Oprah? She's good at what she does. I don't see the problem.
#17 2III7 on 27 Oct 2008 - 00:31
Intel and Oprah Winfrey. You don't hear these two words often in the same sentence...


really.... ? two words ?
(1 reply) #18 TC17 on 27 Oct 2008 - 01:06
Oprah=Bill Gates, both the richest snobs on the planet.
#18.1 C_Guy on 27 Oct 2008 - 14:59
Awww it's ok to be jealous but calling them snobs only makes you look even worse. Let's compare your charitable efforts to theirs, shall we?
#19 C_Guy on 27 Oct 2008 - 15:01
It's Oprah's newest FAVORITE THING!!!!!!!!!

(And everyone in the audience gets one!!!!!!!

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)