editorial
Report a problem

Motorola has fallen and it can't get up

Brad Sams   on 06 November 2008 - 18:19 · 34 comments & 10380 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Motorola was once a juggernaut of the cell phone world. Nearly everyone you talk has had at least one Motorola cell phone at some point in their cellular life cycle. The Motorola Razor was a huge success, the phone sold well beyond 50 million units and this padded the Motorola board room with fine wine and cheese. When one has a successful product its common place to ride that success into the ground (think tickle me Elmo). Motorola's problem was that they not only rode that success into the ground but they rode it so far into the ground that they were blinded by their own success.

Lets first look at the many variations of the Razr; this is where Motorola's downfall began. The variations included; V3. V3i, V3r, V3t, V3im, MS500, V3re, V3c, V3m, V3x, M702iG, V3xx, M702iS. Some of the variations are carrier specific models but regardless it shows how many different variations of the same phone Motorola released to the general public. Many of the models had slightly upgraded specs or an update to the operating system. While this practice is a common business model in the auto industry it does not work for the cell phone industry.

The build quality of the Razr was nothing short of terrible. A survey by Mobile, 78% of RAZR users would not buy another Motorola handset because of poor usability. This figure was even higher for first-time users. One company ranked it 11th out of 13 for ease-of-use, when compared to competitors' products the RAZR required extra steps and had poor usability, meaning that users had a 47% success rate for a given task. With such terrible user quality issues, it can be easily observed that the success of the Razr was due to it being a fashion accessory.

Motorola riding off the success of the Razr decided to ramp up production of other phones. They were modeling all their new offerings off the old success of the Razr. The Razr offered something new, incredible thinness for its time, but Motorola's other phones offered no such innovation. Taking a blind stab into Motorola's current handset lineup (excluding smart phones) you find nothing revolutionary and all are incredibly bland.

Motorola has vested little interest into a new OS; it has been essentially the same bland old OS. With the release of phones from Apple, HTC, and RIM all featuring slick new UI's, faster user integration and high build quality Motorola's offerings have fallen behind. The targeting of the low slung mobile has failed on massive accounts for Motorola. The essential idea that there is a strong demand for no feature low cost handsets has not prevailed. The profit margin for these phones resides on the idea of high volume and low margins to make up for the lower cost. When Motorola couldn't move the quantities needed jobs were slashed.

Motorola has been slashing jobs and is placing large bets on Google's new mobile OS Android. The OS does offer a huge potential but Motorola will not have a cell phone running the OS until 2009. The T-mobile G1 has stolen the spotlight for being the first phone with the OS. It garnered that spotlight because it was the first out the door but it can be described as an ugly duckling. HTC will pump out new handsets with Android and they have a long standing history of highly attractive looking phones with solid features. Motorola is banking on Android but does not have the same reputation for quality and design, its like putting brand new hardwood floors in your house but forgetting to fix the broken windows. People will see your broken windows and will never come in to look at your new hardwood floors. Android is representative of the hardwood floors as Google will help to create the open sourced OS but will not fix the broken windows, the phone design, of Motorola.

Motorola has a long way to go to gain consumer confidence. They fundamentally have the wrong business model and unattractive phone designs. If they want to get back on the game they need to increase quality, phone design and implement Android with feature competitive phones into the market. Do this and times will turn but until their phones can stand the test of two years (standard phone contract) without replacement, jobs will continue to be lost.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 34 additional comments
(1 reply) #1 PureLegend on 06 Nov 2008 - 18:30
I think the RAZR2 was pretty big in re-establishing Motorola as a serious phone brand.
#1.1 theyarecomingforyou on 06 Nov 2008 - 21:58
Not really. It had the same clumsy OS and a very similar design, merely adding a bit screen onto the outside. I never liked the original mind.

Really they just haven't got anything to compete with the Sony Ericsson Cybershot phones. I'm very happy with my K850i.
(4 replies) #2 Brandon on 06 Nov 2008 - 18:33
Yeah, I had one motorola phone (V525) and it broke even without dropping it. My Samsung has lasted a few spills and works just fine.

Their software does suck and really needs to be updated. Things like only being able to hold 30 texts... i mean seriously?????? My samsung can hold 250 before its full
#2.1 +techbeck on 06 Nov 2008 - 19:29
#2.2 +techbeck on 06 Nov 2008 - 19:29


Last edited by techbeck on 06 Nov 2008 - 19:36
#2.3 +techbeck on 06 Nov 2008 - 19:29
Brandon said,
Yeah, I had one motorola phone (V525) and it broke even without dropping it. My Samsung has lasted a few spills and works just fine.

Their software does suck and really needs to be updated. Things like only being able to hold 30 texts... i mean seriously?????? My samsung can hold 250 before its full


You must not have had a Motorola phone for a while. For the past few years, they updated their software to hold a heck of a lot more than 30 texts.
#2.4 gonchuki on 06 Nov 2008 - 22:40
techbeck said,
Brandon said,
Yeah, I had one motorola phone (V525) and it broke even without dropping it. My Samsung has lasted a few spills and works just fine.

Their software does suck and really needs to be updated. Things like only being able to hold 30 texts... i mean seriously?????? My samsung can hold 250 before its full


You must not have had a Motorola phone for a while. For the past few years, they updated their software to hold a heck of a lot more than 30 texts.

my L7e can hold around 600
#3 Soldiers33 on 06 Nov 2008 - 18:42
motorola sucks. had one and then scrapped it
(1 reply) #4 Daniel on 06 Nov 2008 - 18:47
I had a v3x (3) and boy was it rubbish, it had glass over the screens (it had two) and that lasted all of 5 minutes in a pocket with keys...then i got a nokia and nver looked back
#4.1 Steve B on 06 Nov 2008 - 20:41
While agree that Motorola has f'd up big time....your issue is not that of Motorola because you shouldn't be putting a phone in your pocket with loose keys. Common sense there. Any kind of device constantly put into a pocket with loose keys with get ruined in some fashion at some point.
#5 stifler6478 on 06 Nov 2008 - 19:12
I just got a new phone. I was able to renew my plan so I could get it cheap. I had a Moto SLVR L7c, which was a great phone for me. I didn't have any problems with it. I went to the store to check out new ones and I was choosing between the Moto ROKR and LG UX830. I asked the guy there and he said they've been getting way too many complaints about the ROKR, so I went with the LG and couldn't be any happier. It's an excellent phone. Sucks for Motorola that they're phones have gone to the gutters though.

-Spenser
#6 Majesticmerc on 06 Nov 2008 - 19:14
I had a Motorola clamshell for 2 years (between 2004 and 2006) and I loved it, the only downside was that the operating system was shoddy (I'm not a particularly fast text-message-writer, but I managed to make it lag behind everytime I was keying in a message). Aside from the OS, the phone itself was rock solid, my newer Samsung (which is showing its age more, despite only having it 18 months) has reacted much worse to droppings, and is literally falling apart. In my experience, the RAZR was actually one of the worst phones Motorola brought out, but ironically it was the most publicized.

As a result of the failings the RAZR had, and the way that the RAZRs success brought about an entire range of phones based on these failings, Motorola has all but disappeared off the face of the Mobile handset scene, and it's paying for this.

Business only works if you're good at it, and Motorola aren't good at business anymore.
#7 +techbeck on 06 Nov 2008 - 19:14
I just got the new Motorola ZINE and I like it. Has a Kodak 5mp camera, FM tuner, MP3 player, and WiFi...plus all the regular stuff. The UI is easy to use and runs pretty smoothly.

I had the Razor, the Rizor, the V3, and several other motorola phones. Never had any problem with them. I like that their phones have a long battery life/talk time and they never once broke on me and I dropped my phones a lot. To me this is more important that having a touch screen or being able to get on the internet. I need to know that my phone will work when I need it to and Motorola has been really good to me.

I dont like the Google phone, the iPhone, or Blackberrys. All I ever need/want to do with a phone is make a call. I have no need to get on the internet, check my email, or run the space shuttle from a phone. I have a BB curve, but it is my work issued cell phone.

While it is good to have newer innovative stuff in products, not everyone needs or wants them.
(1 reply) #8 Red Dragon on 06 Nov 2008 - 19:48
Geez, my Moto Razr v3xx is doing fine so far. I can't imagine what ya'll are doing to them.
#8.1 Netrack on 06 Nov 2008 - 20:07
using them? I had one for about a year and the battery life was nothing short of horrific
#9 SMELTN on 06 Nov 2008 - 20:07
you know I just got a LG Shine, and the buttons on it are almost IDENTICAL to the Razr and I hate it.. I love the shine itself, the screen, the slide, the options/menus, etc.. But the actual buttons are horrible and hard to reach under the slide.
#10 unknownsoldierX on 06 Nov 2008 - 20:28
I've had the RAZR2 V9 for a while and I really like it. Doesn't seem as sturdy as the first series though. I put a V3c through the washer and dryer (on low heat) and it still worked.
(1 reply) #11 MightyJordan on 06 Nov 2008 - 20:31
When one has a successful product its common place to ride that success into the ground (think tickle me Elmo). Motorola's problem was that they not only rode that success into the ground but they rode it so far into the ground that they were blinded by their own success ended up right in the center of the earth.


Fixed.
#11.1 Netrack on 06 Nov 2008 - 20:56
lmao so true though
#12 LTD on 06 Nov 2008 - 21:14
The only good phone they ever made.





#13 +Dale on 06 Nov 2008 - 21:37
I... Disagree.. I'm running the Motorola W385, based off of the popular KRZR design.. I am a sheet metal worker by profession, I keep it in a dirty pocket (With my keys) and the phone hasn't failed me yet.. Its battery life is very decent, and it looks like its been through a battle zone.. It has fallen off of max so far of 6 feet high and still managed to work. The only feature that broke on the phone that I never used anyways was the camera phone.. The camera phone lens became so scratched up that it is unable to take a clear picture of anything anymore..

I would recommend this cellphone to anybody looking for a phone, although most people my age these days do not want a phone, they want a smart phone. It isn't a very flashy phone.. it just talks and texts and takes pictures.. But that is all I need.



BTW.. Ive had it for about 14 months so far.. It shows no sign of needing to be replaced yet..

Last edited by Dale on 06 Nov 2008 - 21:42
#14 dewaaz on 06 Nov 2008 - 21:47
I'm glad Motorola has suffered... they need to take a good hard look at themselves.

I bought a Moto E1000 in 2004 - it had GPS in it... YES, GPS

Stereo speakers too, QVGA resolution - all things unheard of in mobiles until two years later.


And then the RAZR came out... and they just wanted to sell one phone, with the same variations.


They were onto a good thing, and they screwed up. How it took so long to realise this I don't know.
#15 +techbeck on 06 Nov 2008 - 21:48
I have had my razor for 2 years...battery was perfect...ive had my rizor for a year...battery was perfect....never had an issue with any of the phone features as well.
#16 kaffra on 06 Nov 2008 - 22:08
motorola are actually going to sell off their phone division next year
#17 LTD on 06 Nov 2008 - 22:08
The answer is simple.

What's the competition doing that Motorola isn't?

http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/19025/

Moto phones aren't as sturdy as they used to be. But that's arguable.

The OS sucks.

They're nothing special.
#18 RDExpress on 06 Nov 2008 - 22:23
Owned a V200 years ago. Nice cheap phone for the time, just as flip phones were coming in properly. But it broke after a few months, screen stopped working. Terrible build quality, and the V3 didn't look much better.

Get your act together or GTFO.
#19 vraev on 06 Nov 2008 - 22:37
yup! my very first cell phone was the motorola rokr E1. Right then...after a week or so of usage I vowed to never ever again get a motorola design. I hate their aptly worded "automobile industry" style strategy. USB2.0 had been out for yrs but motorola purposely put only 1.0 in the first rokr to make ppl get the second one. It was the mostly useless 100$ I spent on anyting. After 3 yrs of usage with that piece of crap...I have now moved to the iphone which is like moving from a tricycle to a F-22 raptor. Lesson learnt! Never ever motorola.
#20 qdave on 06 Nov 2008 - 22:47
my mom had v220 for 3 years and still works. good bttery life too.


also the new motorolla aura is cool..only a wee bit too pricey.

Last edited by qdave on 06 Nov 2008 - 22:57
#21 gonchuki on 06 Nov 2008 - 23:14
The issue with Motorola IMO is that their crappiest phones were the most popular ones. I have a L7e/L71 since it was launched back in October/November 2006 and it has been a great phone so far.
At that time it was really hard to find a phone that would do MP3 + AAC + EDGE + H263 video + hot-swappable MicroSD + hot-pluggable in a PC so the phone instantly acts as a pendrive + bluetooth 2.0 + support of standard headphones via a small adapter (I'm happily running Sennheisers on my phone) + 20mb internal memory + 14 days battery on stand-by, and all this in a very slim 11mm phone.
Fast forward two years to the present, and there's still no replacement to take it's place... all you can get today is a bulky slider phone being both wider and thicker, and some don't even have all the features this phone has.

And let me emphasize on the hot-swappable MicroSD slot... what the heck came into the minds of Nokia designers that they put the MicroSD slot behind the battery in most of their phones? great move, skip implementing hot-swapping by forcing users to turn off and on their phones.
And before you ask, I'm a heavy video/audio user, so it's a lot simpler (and cheaper) to just use the phone as my main audio/video player and carry a few MicroSDs instead of shelling out a good $200 for an iPod Nano (more likely $300 down here in Uruguay).

Hands down one of the best phones ever made it's a shame it had so little success.
(1 reply) #22 2Cold Scorpio on 07 Nov 2008 - 00:07
I must have lucked out: my first Razr lasted nearly 3 years, one of which was out in the oil fields. Needless to say, it survived, without breaking at all, several 8+ ft. drops, including one from 14 ft. where it bounced off of several iron beams. In fact, the only reason I replaced it was because the battery was finally going bad.

My second Razr, which I still have and works perfectly, is a V3xx. Both have been solid phones; I don't get all the negative press. Maybe its not the phone, but rather the operator at fault?
#22.1 gonchuki on 07 Nov 2008 - 00:16
I very much think it's that, FWIW the usability of the software is really good compared to the average Nokia... what's wrong with these guys? 4 different places to have my audio files? 3 different places for my pictures? was it so hard to unify the whole thing in a single "sounds" and "pictures" item as Motorola does?
#23 naap51stang on 07 Nov 2008 - 02:38
The last moto phone I actually liked was the digi star-tac. Other than the fricking antenna breaking every other day, it was a good phone. I've still got an old Alltel digi Star-Tac which STILL HOLDS A CHARGE when I charge it up.
Moto screwed up and set on their butts after the Razr came out. They just keep milking the cow until it died.
They should have R&D'd some new products along with THE SOFTWARE.
#24 mocax on 07 Nov 2008 - 02:46
i found the razr2 V8 more user friendly than the nokias
i like the linux-ness of it and the customizability.

too bad motomagx had to suffer from their bad business strategy. was looking forward to the new SDKs
#25 Davo on 07 Nov 2008 - 22:40
Motorola phones are durable but they also are the ones most prone to random malfunctions in my experience. I rarely try and sell them because too many have come back with screens suddenly no longer working or keypads doing the same thing. However, their OS while disorganized and extremely plain beats the pants out of the ones used in Nokias. I don't care how colorful the UI is if I can't find the simplest of functions.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)