Motorola was once a juggernaut of the cell phone world. Nearly everyone you talk has had at least one Motorola cell phone at some point in their cellular life cycle. The Motorola Razor was a huge success, the phone sold well beyond 50 million units and this padded the Motorola board room with fine wine and cheese. When one has a successful product its common place to ride that success into the ground (think tickle me Elmo). Motorola's problem was that they not only rode that success into the ground but they rode it so far into the ground that they were blinded by their own success.Lets first look at the many variations of the Razr; this is where Motorola's downfall began. The variations included; V3. V3i, V3r, V3t, V3im, MS500, V3re, V3c, V3m, V3x, M702iG, V3xx, M702iS. Some of the variations are carrier specific models but regardless it shows how many different variations of the same phone Motorola released to the general public. Many of the models had slightly upgraded specs or an update to the operating system. While this practice is a common business model in the auto industry it does not work for the cell phone industry.
The build quality of the Razr was nothing short of terrible. A survey by Mobile, 78% of RAZR users would not buy another Motorola handset because of poor usability. This figure was even higher for first-time users. One company ranked it 11th out of 13 for ease-of-use, when compared to competitors' products the RAZR required extra steps and had poor usability, meaning that users had a 47% success rate for a given task. With such terrible user quality issues, it can be easily observed that the success of the Razr was due to it being a fashion accessory.
Motorola riding off the success of the Razr decided to ramp up production of other phones. They were modeling all their new offerings off the old success of the Razr. The Razr offered something new, incredible thinness for its time, but Motorola's other phones offered no such innovation. Taking a blind stab into Motorola's current handset lineup (excluding smart phones) you find nothing revolutionary and all are incredibly bland.
Motorola has vested little interest into a new OS; it has been essentially the same bland old OS. With the release of phones from Apple, HTC, and RIM all featuring slick new UI's, faster user integration and high build quality Motorola's offerings have fallen behind. The targeting of the low slung mobile has failed on massive accounts for Motorola. The essential idea that there is a strong demand for no feature low cost handsets has not prevailed. The profit margin for these phones resides on the idea of high volume and low margins to make up for the lower cost. When Motorola couldn't move the quantities needed jobs were slashed.
Motorola has been slashing jobs and is placing large bets on Google's new mobile OS Android. The OS does offer a huge potential but Motorola will not have a cell phone running the OS until 2009. The T-mobile G1 has stolen the spotlight for being the first phone with the OS. It garnered that spotlight because it was the first out the door but it can be described as an ugly duckling. HTC will pump out new handsets with Android and they have a long standing history of highly attractive looking phones with solid features. Motorola is banking on Android but does not have the same reputation for quality and design, its like putting brand new hardwood floors in your house but forgetting to fix the broken windows. People will see your broken windows and will never come in to look at your new hardwood floors. Android is representative of the hardwood floors as Google will help to create the open sourced OS but will not fix the broken windows, the phone design, of Motorola.
Motorola has a long way to go to gain consumer confidence. They fundamentally have the wrong business model and unattractive phone designs. If they want to get back on the game they need to increase quality, phone design and implement Android with feature competitive phones into the market. Do this and times will turn but until their phones can stand the test of two years (standard phone contract) without replacement, jobs will continue to be lost.
















Really they just haven't got anything to compete with the Sony Ericsson Cybershot phones. I'm very happy with my K850i.
Their software does suck and really needs to be updated. Things like only being able to hold 30 texts... i mean seriously?????? My samsung can hold 250 before its full
Last edited by techbeck on 06 Nov 2008 - 19:36
Their software does suck and really needs to be updated. Things like only being able to hold 30 texts... i mean seriously?????? My samsung can hold 250 before its full
You must not have had a Motorola phone for a while. For the past few years, they updated their software to hold a heck of a lot more than 30 texts.
Their software does suck and really needs to be updated. Things like only being able to hold 30 texts... i mean seriously?????? My samsung can hold 250 before its full
You must not have had a Motorola phone for a while. For the past few years, they updated their software to hold a heck of a lot more than 30 texts.
my L7e can hold around 600
-Spenser
As a result of the failings the RAZR had, and the way that the RAZRs success brought about an entire range of phones based on these failings, Motorola has all but disappeared off the face of the Mobile handset scene, and it's paying for this.
Business only works if you're good at it, and Motorola aren't good at business anymore.
I had the Razor, the Rizor, the V3, and several other motorola phones. Never had any problem with them. I like that their phones have a long battery life/talk time and they never once broke on me and I dropped my phones a lot. To me this is more important that having a touch screen or being able to get on the internet. I need to know that my phone will work when I need it to and Motorola has been really good to me.
I dont like the Google phone, the iPhone, or Blackberrys. All I ever need/want to do with a phone is make a call. I have no need to get on the internet, check my email, or run the space shuttle from a phone. I have a BB curve, but it is my work issued cell phone.
While it is good to have newer innovative stuff in products, not everyone needs or wants them.
were blinded by their own successended up right in the center of the earth.Fixed.
I would recommend this cellphone to anybody looking for a phone, although most people my age these days do not want a phone, they want a smart phone. It isn't a very flashy phone.. it just talks and texts and takes pictures.. But that is all I need.
BTW.. Ive had it for about 14 months so far.. It shows no sign of needing to be replaced yet..
Last edited by Dale on 06 Nov 2008 - 21:42
I bought a Moto E1000 in 2004 - it had GPS in it... YES, GPS
Stereo speakers too, QVGA resolution - all things unheard of in mobiles until two years later.
And then the RAZR came out... and they just wanted to sell one phone, with the same variations.
They were onto a good thing, and they screwed up. How it took so long to realise this I don't know.
What's the competition doing that Motorola isn't?
http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/19025/
Moto phones aren't as sturdy as they used to be. But that's arguable.
The OS sucks.
They're nothing special.
Get your act together or GTFO.
also the new motorolla aura is cool..only a wee bit too pricey.
Last edited by qdave on 06 Nov 2008 - 22:57
At that time it was really hard to find a phone that would do MP3 + AAC + EDGE + H263 video + hot-swappable MicroSD + hot-pluggable in a PC so the phone instantly acts as a pendrive + bluetooth 2.0 + support of standard headphones via a small adapter (I'm happily running Sennheisers on my phone) + 20mb internal memory + 14 days battery on stand-by, and all this in a very slim 11mm phone.
Fast forward two years to the present, and there's still no replacement to take it's place... all you can get today is a bulky slider phone being both wider and thicker, and some don't even have all the features this phone has.
And let me emphasize on the hot-swappable MicroSD slot... what the heck came into the minds of Nokia designers that they put the MicroSD slot behind the battery in most of their phones? great move, skip implementing hot-swapping by forcing users to turn off and on their phones.
And before you ask, I'm a heavy video/audio user, so it's a lot simpler (and cheaper) to just use the phone as my main audio/video player and carry a few MicroSDs instead of shelling out a good $200 for an iPod Nano (more likely $300 down here in Uruguay).
Hands down one of the best phones ever made
My second Razr, which I still have and works perfectly, is a V3xx. Both have been solid phones; I don't get all the negative press. Maybe its not the phone, but rather the operator at fault?
Moto screwed up and set on their butts after the Razr came out. They just keep milking the cow until it died.
They should have R&D'd some new products along with THE SOFTWARE.
i like the linux-ness of it and the customizability.
too bad motomagx had to suffer from their bad business strategy. was looking forward to the new SDKs
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.